Cell-by-cell inspection:
There is an alternative to all of the solution methods considered so far in this unit. 'Chis alternative is known as the cell-by-cell inspection. This method can be applied to find the Nash equilibrium (equilibria) of any zero or non-zero sum game. This method is not sophisticated but some one can be sure of finding all the Nash equilibria of a game following this method, which other methods might overlook.
The easiest way to verify that a player is using her best response is just to check, at a particular outcome, whether she would want to change her choice of strategy. If she would, then the strategy she is using cannot be her best response to the strategy (ies) chosen by her rival(s). If she would not want to change, and if no other player would want to change either, then we must be sure that the outcome we are considering must be a Nash equilibri.um. Consider the following hypothetical game table:
Let us begin with the cell in the upper left hand corner of the table (High, High). We need to check whether this outcome constitutes Nash equilibrium or not. To do this, we simply assume that Player 2 is playing her equilibrium strategy (High). Then we investigate whether there is any incentive for player to deviate from High and look at the shaded column. Given that
Player 2 is playing High as her equilibrium strategy, there is an incentive for player 2 to adopt "Medium" instead of "High" which fetches her 10 units of extra payoff (70 - 60). Therefore, we can conclude that (High, High) does not constitute Nash equilibrium. Next we consider the strategy (Medium, High).
In this case, given player 2 is playing "High"; player 1 is optimally playing "Medium". But given the fact that player is playing "Medium", Player 2 is not playing her best. She would have done better had she been playing "Medium" too. This would have fetched her 14 (50 - 36) units of extra payoff. Therefore, (Medium, high) cannot be a Nash equilibrium.
Thus, in solving a game following the method of cell-by-cell inspection, we need to check every possible combination of strategies, whether or not they serve as a Nash equilibrium. Generally, we keep strategy of one player fixed and check whether the other is playing her best. If she does so, then we fix her strategy and check whether the other is playing her best. If both these conditions are satisfied, then we say that there is no incentive for the players to deviate fiom that strategy, and they constitute Nash equilibrium.