Dynamics and Evolutionary Games:
The theory of games is based on the assumptions of rationality and equilibrium has proved to be very usehl, but it would be a mistake to rely on it totally. When games are played by novices who do not have the necessary experience to perform the calculations to their best strategies, explicitly or implicitly, their choices and therefore the outcome of the game, can differ significantly from the predictions of analysis based on the concept of equilibrium.
However, we should not abandon all notion of good choice, we should allow for a dynamic process in which strategies that prove to be better in the previous plays of the game are more likely to be chosen in the later plays. The evolutionary approach to games does just this. It is derived from the idea of evolution in Biology. Any individual animal's genes strongly influence its behaviour. Some behaviour succeeds better in the prevailing environment, in the sense that animals exhibiting those behaviors are more likely to reproduce successfully and pass their genes to their progeny. An evolutionary stable state, relative to a given environment, is the ultimate outcome of this process over several generations.
The analogy in games would be to suppose that strategies are not chosen by conscious, rational maximisers, but instead that each player comes to the game with a particular strategy "hardwired" or "programmed" in. The players then confront other players who may be programmed to play the same or different strategies. The strategies that are fair better get higher payoffs and multiply faster while the other decline. In the context of strategic games in business and society, the mechanism is much more likely to be social or cultural - observation and initiation, teaching and learning, greater availability of capital for the more successful ventures and so on.
The object of study is the dynamics of this process. Interestingly in many games, the evolutionary stable limit is the same as the equilibrium that would result if the players were conscious, rational calculators. Therefore, the evolutionary approach gives us the backdoor justification for equilibrium analysis.