Evolution of international monetary system:
When a subject like the international monetary system is approached the first question which arises is in terms of a definition of it as opposed to the international financial system. The international financial system often includes the monetary and exchange rate arrangements in its coverage. The international financial system is defined as a set of global financial markets, global financial institutions, official lenders such as the IMF, and global regulatory arrangements.This set of institutions exists and has developed to facilitate cross border transactions in financial instruments. In the present Unit, developments in both monetary and financial matters would be taken up to elucidate any important dimension of the global financial and monetary systems'dynamics.
In economic theory, the interdependence of the international monetary system stems from the fact that balances of payment are connected together. If one country has a balance of payments surplus, the rest of the world has a balance of payments deficit and vice versa. If one country has a balance of trade surplus, the rest of the world has a balance of trade deficit. This has an influence on the exchange rate system. In a world of n countries with n currencies, there are n-1 independent exchange rates. No country can fix exchange rates. There would be too many fixed exchange rates. There is one degree of freedom, giving rise to what theorists called the redundancy problem. The role of that extra degree of freedom was to maintain a stable price level, or in the case of the gold standard, to maintain the price of gold.
With the rapid expansion of cross-border capital flows, the problem of what is widely known as the "impossible trinity" came to the fore. As you learnt above, it is impossible to achieve simultaneously the goals of a fixed exchange rate, an open capital account, and a monetary policy dedicated to domestic economic goals.
At this stage, the fixed exchange rate regime in various countries was dropped as a goal worth pursuing. Before 1971, in the fixed rates regime, the IMF could defend and manage the anchored dollar system of fixed exchange rates. The IMF lost its role as a guardian of the international monetary system since 1971 and especially after1973, the year the international monetary system moved towards flexible exchange rates. The Fund was then shifted from its role at the centre of the international monetary system to a new role of ad hoc macroeconomic consultant and debt monitor. With the breaking down of the gold exchange standard, which acted as a price-stabilisation mechanism through the interdependence of the currency system, there was inflationary pressure witnessed worldwide. Consequently, the Articles ofAgreement of the IMF were amended in 1978 with a focus how on price stabilisation as imbibed in the amended Article IV.
There have been severe criticisms of the role and functioning of the IMF as a global institution playing a developmental role. The credentials of the IMF have been questioned by raising several issues including if IMF-supported programs impose austerity on countries in financial crisis. Alternatively, we may ask whether IMF-supported programs will facilitate bankers and elites.
Similarly, one may ask whether programs supported by IMF constrain spending on priority sectors like education and health by "imposing" fiscal deficit limits.
On the other hand, is the IMF unaccountable?
These have given rise to various unique trends in the international monetary system. These trends are fragmented and there is no one-umbrella institution, which can be said to be providing an international monetary and financial architecture, presently. These trends are summarised below:
- domestic financial market deregulation and opening by countries since the early 1980s
- internationalisation of domestic financial markets and institutions
- companies and financial institutions approach international capital markets to raise needed funds
- investors seeking investment opportunities abroad countries allow foreign corporations and financial institutions to issue bonds and stocks denominated in different currencies (including their own) in their domestic financial markets and also allow foreign investors to buy their domestic securities
- emergence of other international financial centers located in Europe and
- Asia along with the US bond and stock markets (the traditional international capital markets)
- growth of offshore money and capital markets such as the markets for Eurobond etc.
- integrated stock markets
- rapid globalisation of banking, insurance, and other intermediatioil businesses
- large banks from the U.S, Europe, Japan etc. have global network of branches and subsidiaries
Thus, the international capital market is not a single market. Instead, it refers to a group of oflshore and onshore capital markets that are closely interconnected to one another and in which domestic and foreign residents buy and sell many different types of financial instruments. It is true of banking, insurance, and other intermediation businesses as well.