Test of measurement errors Assignment Help

Assignment Help: >> Errors in variables - Test of measurement errors

Test of measurement errors:

Suppose we are estimating the two-variable regression model

1997_Test of measurement errors.png

There is a possibility that x might be measured with error.

If 898_Test of measurement errors1.pngthen the actual least squares regression would be  

 

1435_Test of measurement errors2.png

 

Where  197_Test of measurement errors3.png

If x is measured with error, we have seen  that consisent estimator  of x* can be obtained by using an instrument  z which is correlated with x*  but uncorrelated with E and v Suppose  the relationship between z and x*  is given by

1879_Test of measurement errors4.png

When (9.18) is estimated using least squares, we obtain

1901_Test of measurement errors5.png

where G,  are the regressioll  residuals. Substituting  the value of eq. (9.19) into eq (9.  i  7) we have

2149_Test of measurement errors6.png

Whether or  not there is meftsmsnt  error, the coefficient of ite  will be consistently estimated by ordinary  lawt squares,  since

2318_Test of measurement errors7.png

In fact,  the least-squares  estimator  of  the coefficient  of x* in eq.  (9.20)  is  identically equal  to the instrumental-variables  estimator, which is given by

2172_Test of measurement errors8.png

To  look at the coefficient of the variable 2206_Test of measurement errors11.png,  note that

1560_Test of measurement errors9.png

When there is no meburernent error, σv2 = 0, so that OLS applied to eq. (9.20) will generate a consistent estimator of the coefficient  of  .  However, when there is measurement error,  the coefficient 2206_Test of measurement errors11.png will be estimated inconsistently.  ' This suggests  a  relatively  easy measurement error test. Let δ represent  the coefficient of the variable I?,  in eq. (9.20).

425_Test of measurement errors10.png

With no measurement error, δ= β, so  that the coefficient of 2206_Test of measurement errors11.png,  should equal zero. However, with measurement error, δ ≠ β, and the coefficient will (in general) be different from zero. We can  test for measurement error by doing a simde  two-stage procedure. First, we regress x*  on z to obtain the residuals 2206_Test of measurement errors11.png. Then, we regress y on x* and2206_Test of measurement errors11.png,  and perform a  t test on the coefficient of the  ii,  variable. If we are concerned with measurement  error  in more  than one variable of a multiple  regression model, &I  equivalent F  test could be applied.

The test just described is a special case of a more general test for specification error proposed by Hausman. The Hausman specification test relies on the fact  that under the null hypothesis the ordinary least-squares estimator of the parameters of the original eq. (9.17) is  consistent and (for large samples) eRcient, but is  inconsistent if  the alternative hypothesis is  true.

However,  the instrumental-variables estimator [the least-squares estimator of eq. (9.20)]  is consistent whether or not  the null hypothesis is true, although  it is  inefficient if  the null hypothesis is not valid. The Hausman specification test is as  follows: If there are two estimators β1, and β2 that converge to the true value p under the null but converge to different values under the alternative, the null hypothesis can be verified by  testing whether the probability limit of the difference of the two estimators is zero.

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd