Various dimensions of the globalisation process:
There are various dimensions of the globalisation process and the adoption of a free trade policy that have not created a pro-poor economic climate. The structural adjustment programmes have overemphasised on the objectives of fiscal restraints that have resulted in a cut in spending on social sectors which, in turn, has adversely affected the poverty profiles, especially in the rural areas of the developing countries. Poverty levels have also been affected due to capital-intensive industrialisation necessitated by' the imperatives of raising competitiveness in a liberalised global economy via its effects on greater unemployment. This is particularly important in the wake of the fact that such situations are not backed by adequate social security schemes, reflecting poorly on the development strategy.
Due to asymmetric market access, under the WTO regime, between North and South in both industrial and agriculture sectors and continuation of heavy subsidies in the agriculture sector in the developed world, the export prospects of the South have been marred, with ramifications on the employment prospects of the rural poor. FDI as a tool of globalisation process has not been observed to be always growth-propelling and on the other hand, short-term capital flows have led to crisis situations with catastrophic effects on the social dimensions of development. The technology market has become more segmented, inaccessible and unaffordable it has been increasingly becoming inappropriate for different sectors of the Southern economies.
All these together have influenced the poverty levels adversely and contributed to increased inequalities between countries and within a country between different income strata. They have also affected the social sectors like health and education.
Towards the end, the ongoing pace and scope of negotiations at the WTO only suggest that free trade has largely been a policy strategy which the developed want the developing world to follow so that the former can get market access and economic space in the latter while at the same time the former keep pursuing the protectionist policies.