Two-tape turing machine, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG .

Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 .

Consider a 2-tape TM M:

"On input x:

1. copy x on the second tape

2. on the ?rst tape run M1 on x

M=

3. if M1 accepted then goto 4. else M rejects

4. on the second tape run M2 on x

5. if M2 accepted then M accepts else M rejects."

The machine M is a decider and it accepts a string x i? both M1 and M2 accept x.

Two-tape TM is as expressive as the single tape TM.

The process is as follows

"Given a CFG G and a string w , does G generate w ?

Language Formulation (Acceptance Problem for CFG) def

ACFG = {?G , w ? | G is a CFG, w a string and w ∈ L(G )}

The language ACFG is decidable.

 Construct a decider M for ACFG :M = " 1. On input x check if x = ?G , w ? where

G is an CFG and w is a string, if not then M rejects.

2. Convert G into Chomsky normal form.

3. List all derivations in G of length exactly 2|w | - 1,

if w = ? then check if there is the rule S → ?.

4. If w is ever generated then M accepts, else M rejects."


Related Discussions:- Two-tape turing machine

Class of local languages is not closed under union, Both L 1 and L 2 are ...

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

Regular languages, LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolea...

LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolean operations which turned out to be identical to SF, the closure of the ?nite languages under union, concatenation and compl

Defining strictly local automata, One of the first issues to resolve, when ...

One of the first issues to resolve, when exploring any mechanism for defining languages is the question of how to go about constructing instances of the mechanism which define part

Kleene closure, One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would...

One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would imply non closure under both Kleene- and positive closure, since the concatenation of a language with itself is included

Decision problems, In Exercise 9 you showed that the recognition problem an...

In Exercise 9 you showed that the recognition problem and universal recognition problem for SL2 are decidable. We can use the structure of Myhill graphs to show that other problems

Strictly local languages, We have now de?ned classes of k-local languages f...

We have now de?ned classes of k-local languages for all k ≥ 2. Together, these classes form the Strictly Local Languages in general. De?nition (Strictly Local Languages) A langu

Flow charts, https://www.google.com/search?q=The+fomula+n%3D%28x%3D0%29%2F%...

https://www.google.com/search?q=The+fomula+n%3D%28x%3D0%29%2F%281%3D2%29.The+value+x%3D0+and+is+used+to+stop+the+algerithin.The+calculation+is+reapeated+using+values+of+x%3D0+is+in

Kleene closure, So we have that every language that can be constructed from...

So we have that every language that can be constructed from SL languages using Boolean operations and concatenation (that is, every language in LTO) is recognizable but there are r

Alphabets - strings and representation, A finite, nonempty ordered set will...

A finite, nonempty ordered set will be called an alphabet if its elements are symbols, or characters. A finite sequence of symbols from a given alphabet will be called a string ove

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd