Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
TRADE LIBERALISATION UNDER WTO:
In the Uruguay Round negotiations, India agreed to reduce tariff on a large number of commodities and remove quantitative restrictions (QRs) on all, except for about 600 commodities. For industrial products, India's commitment was to bring down the average tariff rate from 71 per cent in the pre-Uruguay Round period to 32 per cent in the post-Uruguay Round era. While the 1991 reforms removed QRs on most manufactured intermediate and capital goods, there was little change in the import policy for textiles and clothing. The imports of these products remained practically banned. Thesituation began to change substantially in December 1994 when in separatetreaties with the EU and the USA, India agreed to a comprehensive liberalisationof import policies for textiles. This liberalisation in imports of textiles wasagreed to in part as quid pro quo for the ATC (Agreement on Textiles and Clothing) to phase out the MFA quotas, and in part in exchange for increasedMFA quotas in the US and EU markets. The reform process started in 1995with the removal of QRs on imports of wool tops, synthetic fibers, textile yarnand some selected industrial fabrics. It was also agreed that these productswould be free from import licensing altogether at specified future dates (1 998,2000 or 2002), and tariff rates would be reduced to levels between 20 and 40percent by 2000.
Turning now to other international agreements, India had used the balance of payments provision given in GATT (Article VIII (B)) to justify her routine use of QRs. Soon after the Uruguay Round agreements became effective India's unconstrained use of the balance of payments provision was challenged by the US, EU and other developed countries. It became difficult for India to justify QRs on grounds of balance of payments since there was a strong current account, substantial capital inflow and large foreign exchange reserves. -In 1999-00,2134 items were subject to QRs, of which 1589 items had QRs on imports, being maintained under the balance of payments provision.
#question. BANK Z (@ 10% RR) ASSETS LIABILITIES RR: K200,000 Deposits : K2,000,000 ER : K1,800,000 You are given the above Balance sheet for Bank Z as
What is the difference between the short-run framework and the long-run framework? Discuss how each relates to supply and demand.
explain the phillips curve the relationship of inflation and unemployment
farmer grows a bushel of wheat & sells it to a miller for Rs. 1.00. The miller turns the wheat into flour & then sells the flour to a baker for RS. 3.00. The baker uses the flour
FDI Inflows - An Appraisal: A comparison of the magnitude of FDI inflows received by India would appear too small, especially when compared to the inflows received by other co
A nursing home contracts with an HMO for skilled nursing care at $2.00 PMPM. If costs are expected to average $120 per day, what is the maximum utilization of days per 1,000 member
money multiplier
what reasons limit the bargaining power of trade union in developing countries
Compare the three investments below in terms of their riskiness. What is the best way to evaluate the riskiness of an investment given the information you have on them? Project Exp
what are the limitation of economies scales
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd