Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
TRADE LIBERALISATION UNDER WTO:
In the Uruguay Round negotiations, India agreed to reduce tariff on a large number of commodities and remove quantitative restrictions (QRs) on all, except for about 600 commodities. For industrial products, India's commitment was to bring down the average tariff rate from 71 per cent in the pre-Uruguay Round period to 32 per cent in the post-Uruguay Round era. While the 1991 reforms removed QRs on most manufactured intermediate and capital goods, there was little change in the import policy for textiles and clothing. The imports of these products remained practically banned. Thesituation began to change substantially in December 1994 when in separatetreaties with the EU and the USA, India agreed to a comprehensive liberalisationof import policies for textiles. This liberalisation in imports of textiles wasagreed to in part as quid pro quo for the ATC (Agreement on Textiles and Clothing) to phase out the MFA quotas, and in part in exchange for increasedMFA quotas in the US and EU markets. The reform process started in 1995with the removal of QRs on imports of wool tops, synthetic fibers, textile yarnand some selected industrial fabrics. It was also agreed that these productswould be free from import licensing altogether at specified future dates (1 998,2000 or 2002), and tariff rates would be reduced to levels between 20 and 40percent by 2000.
Turning now to other international agreements, India had used the balance of payments provision given in GATT (Article VIII (B)) to justify her routine use of QRs. Soon after the Uruguay Round agreements became effective India's unconstrained use of the balance of payments provision was challenged by the US, EU and other developed countries. It became difficult for India to justify QRs on grounds of balance of payments since there was a strong current account, substantial capital inflow and large foreign exchange reserves. -In 1999-00,2134 items were subject to QRs, of which 1589 items had QRs on imports, being maintained under the balance of payments provision.
Your firm usually uses about 200-300 tons of steel per year. Last year, you purchased 100 tons of steel than needed (at a price of $200 per ton) In the meantime, the price of steel
The annual fixed cost for a light fixture manufacturing company are $38,000, and the variable costs are $40 per unit. If the selling price per unit is p = 485 - 1.395X, what is the
The following is the information from the national income accounts for a hypothetical country: GDP
estimate paper by stock and watson in a bayesian manner
Suppose that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) administers the price floor for cheese, set at $0.17 per pound of cheese. (The price floor is officially set at $16.10 per hu
unemployment among undergraduates : a battle for job
difference between mercantilism and absolute advantage
Consider the following simple economy which consists of two industries, guns (1) and butter (2) and is characterized by the following input-output matrix. Suppose also that
How would the following influence the growth rates of theM1 and M2 money supply figures over time? a. an increase in the quantity of U.S. currency held overseas b. a shift of f
Component of balance payment: BOP is a statement that summarises all the economic transactions between residents (individuals, companies and other organisations) of the home
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd