The f-wald test, Advanced Statistics

Assignment Help:

Primary Model

Below is a regression analysis without 17 outliers that have been removed

Regression Analysis: wfood versus totexp, income, age, nk

The regression equation is

wfood = 0.378 - 0.00129 totexp - 0.000054 income + 0.00170 age + 0.0317 nk

Predictor              Coef       SE Coef           T          P         VIF

Constant         0.37816     0.01356         27.89  0.000

totexp         -0.00128554  0.00006284  -20.46  0.000    1.324

income        -0.00005410  0.00004950   -1.09   0.275    1.341

age              0.0016993    0.0003058      5.56   0.000    1.065

nk                0.031717      0.004676        6.78   0.000    1.007

S = 0.0880161   R-Sq = 28.0%   R-Sq(adj) = 27.8%

Analysis of Variance

Source               DF       SS          MS         F           P

Regression         4      4.5159    1.1290  145.73  0.000

Residual Error   1497  11.5970   0.0077

  Lack of Fit       1328   10.1731  0.0077    0.91  0.806

  Pure Error        169    1.4239    0.0084

Total                  1501  16.1129

 

Secondary Model

Below is a regression analysis without 17 outliers that have been removed and dropping the income variable   

Regression Analysis: wfood versus totexp, age, nk

The regression equation is

wfood = 0.376 - 0.00132 totexp + 0.00165 age + 0.0317 nk

Predictor         Coef     SE Coef       T      P    VIF

Constant       0.37593     0.01341   28.04  0.000

totexp     -0.00131710  0.00005581  -23.60  0.000  1.045

age          0.0016462   0.0003019    5.45  0.000  1.038

nk            0.031672    0.004676    6.77  0.000  1.007

S = 0.0880218   R-Sq = 28.0%   R-Sq(adj) = 27.8%

Analysis of Variance

Source               DF       SS          MS          F           P

Regression         3       4.5067   1.5022   193.89  0.000

Residual Error   1498  11.6063  0.0077

  Lack of Fit       644    4.9570    0.0077    0.99     0.560

  Pure Error      854     6.6493    0.0078

Total               1501    16.1129

The Null Hypothesis - H0: No difference between the primary and secondary model

1465_The F-Wald Test.png

Since the F value is 1.2005 < 3.8477 there is sufficient evidence to suggest that we accept H0 implying that there is no difference between the primary and secondary model and income can be removed.


Related Discussions:- The f-wald test

Environmental statistics, The procedures used for determining how the quali...

The procedures used for determining how the quality of life is affected by the environment, in particular by factors such as air and solid wastes, water pollution, hazardous substa

Deviance, The measure of the degree to which the particular model differs f...

The measure of the degree to which the particular model differs from the saturated model for the data set. Explicitly in terms of the likelihoods of the two models can be defined a

Null hypothesis model, The Null Hypothesis - H0: Model does not fit the dat...

The Null Hypothesis - H0: Model does not fit the data i.e. all slopes are equal to zero β 1 =β 2 =...=β k =  0 The Alternative Hypothesis - H1:  Model does fit the data i.e. at

Gaussian markov random field, It is the multivariate normal random vector w...

It is the multivariate normal random vector which satisfies certain conditional independence suppositions. This can be viewed as a model framework which contains a wide range of st

Scatter plots, The scatter plot of SRES1 versus totexp demonstrates that th...

The scatter plot of SRES1 versus totexp demonstrates that there is non-linear relationship that exists as most of the points are below and above zero. The scatter plot show that th

Please answer this question, How large would the sample need to be if we ar...

How large would the sample need to be if we are to pick a 95% confidence level sample: (i) From a population of 70; (ii) From a population of 450; (iii) From a population of 1000;

Describe prior distribution, Prior distributions : The probability distribu...

Prior distributions : The probability distributions which summarize the information about a random variable or parameter known or supposed at a given time instant, prior to attaini

Homework help, Q1: The growth in bad debt expense for Aptara Pvt. Ltd. Comp...

Q1: The growth in bad debt expense for Aptara Pvt. Ltd. Company over the last 20 years is as follows. 1997 0.11 1998 0.09 1999 0.08 2000 0.08 2001 0.1 2002 0.11 2003 0.12 2004 0.1

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd