Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The expected monetary value method
The expected pay off as profit associated with a described combination of act and event is acquired by multiplying the pay off for that act and event combination by the probability of occurrence of the described event. The expected monetary value or EMV of an act is the sum of all expected conditional profits associated along with that act
Illustration
A manager has a choice among
i. A risky contract promising of shs 7 million along with probability 0.6 and shs 4 million along with probability 0.4 and
ii. A diversified portfolio consisting of two contracts along with independent outcomes each promising Shs 3.5 million along with probability 0.6 and shs 2 million along with probability 0.4
Could you arrive at the decision by using EMV method?
Solution
The conditional payoff table for the problem may be constructed as given below:
(Shillings in millions)
Event Ei
Probability (Ei)
Conditional pay offs decision
Expected pay off decision
(i)
Contract (ii)
Portfolio(iii)
Contract (i) x (ii)
Portfolio (i) x (iii)
Ei
0.6
7
3.5
4.2
2.1
E2
0.4
4
2
1.6
0.8
EMV
5.8
2.9
By using the EMV method the manager must go in for the risky contract that will yield him a higher expected monetary value of shs 5.8 million
What is Congruent Number?
Difference between absolute and relative in the definition Now, let's talk a little bit regarding the subtle difference among the absolute & relative in the definition above.
I figured out the volume and the width, but I have no idea how to use that information to get the height and the length!
degree of a diffrential equation
S-aSa;S-bSb;S-c construct an CFG
Variable stars are ones whose brightness varies periodically. One of the most visible is R Leonis; its brightness is modelled by the function where t is measured in days.
(1) Show that the conclusion of Egroff's theorem can fail if the measure of the domain E is not finite. (2) Extend the Lusin's Theorem to the case when the measure of the domain E
Verify Liouville''s formula for y^ prime prime prime -y^ prime prime - y'' + y = 0 in [0, 1]
Any point on parabola, (k 2 ,k) Perpendicular distance formula: D=(k-k 2 -1)/2 1/2 Differentiating and putting =0 1-2k=0 k=1/2 Therefore the point is (1/4, 1/2) D=3/(32 1/2
is that rational or irrational number
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd