Take-over bid, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:

TAKE-OVER BID:

                  If Company A ("the transferee company") offers to acquire shares of Company B ("the transferor") and the scheme or contract to which the offer relates is accepted by holders of nine-tenths of the shares for which the offer is made Company A may then compulsorily acquire the remaining 10 per cent (or less) of the shares so as to achieve a complete 100 per cent acquisition of the shares: CA, s.210.

                It is standard procedure in making a take-over bit to state that if 90 per cent acceptance is attained compulsory acquisition under s.210 will follow.  Company A may resort to s.210 whether it offers its own shares or cash for shares of Company B.  The procedure is available if Company A already owns shares of Company B and offers to acquire those which it does not already own (but see para 22 below.)  The non-accepting minority may however apply to the court to prevent Company A from acquiring their shares.  The rules of procedure are explained below.

               The offer must be made by a company to acquire shares of another.  S.210 is not available to an individual who makes a take-over bid (but he can always form a company for the purpose: provided no fraud or imoproper conduct is involved: Re Bugle Press Ltd.

                 If Company A directly or through subsidiaries owns more than one-tenth of the shares of Company B then (in order to be able to use s.210) Company A must:

(a) offer the same terms for all the shares which it does not already own;

(b) obtain acceptances from holders who are three-quarters in number as well as holders of 90 per cent of the shares.

                 The wording of s.210 is ambiguous but it is generally taken that Company A must offer to acquire all of the shares of Company B which it does not already own if it is then to use s.210 to acquire the remaining shares in Company B (or all the shares of the class) for which the offer is made.


Related Discussions:- Take-over bid

Rules for partnership - partnership law, Rules for Partnership - Partnershi...

Rules for Partnership - Partnership Law Joint tenancy, as such tenancy in common then joint property or common property and may part ownership does not of itself produce a

Different time zones in which the issue of jammu & kasmir, Following are di...

Following are different time zones in which the issue of Jammu & Kashmir could be divided: 1. 1947: when the dispute came up 2. 1948-1957: when the matter goes to UN, the su

Define the name of tort, 1. Joe is walking down the street and Sue com...

1. Joe is walking down the street and Sue comes up behind Joe, aims a gun at him, but stops just before shooting. Joe did not know Sue was coming up behind him.

Void contracts, Void Contracts - Law of Contract However these are con...

Void Contracts - Law of Contract However these are contracts which the law treats as non-existent.  Thus as a general rule illegal contract is only void although not certain r

Pre-incorporation contracts, Pre-incorporation Contracts:             ...

Pre-incorporation Contracts:                             A pre-incorporated contract is an agreement which is entered into, usually by a promoter or promoters, on behalf of a

Wbp, what is wbp? and its danger and benefits ? components of wbp?

what is wbp? and its danger and benefits ? components of wbp?

Who is liable to income tax?, QUESTION 1 Discuss the legal relationship...

QUESTION 1 Discuss the legal relationship between a bank and its customer with reference to the responsibilities of the parties towards each other QUESTION 2 (a) Examin

Sales of goods, when can implied condition can be treated as warrantee?

when can implied condition can be treated as warrantee?

What is the principal-agent paradigm, What is the principal-agent paradigm ...

What is the principal-agent paradigm Controversies on the decisions of many state governors and other ministers can be cited as examples. Such behaviour reflects their willing

Health and safety of employees at the workplace, Question 1: In order t...

Question 1: In order to ensure health and safety of employees at the workplace, the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005 imposes duties on employers only. Discuss. Quest

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd