Take-over bid, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:

TAKE-OVER BID:

                  If Company A ("the transferee company") offers to acquire shares of Company B ("the transferor") and the scheme or contract to which the offer relates is accepted by holders of nine-tenths of the shares for which the offer is made Company A may then compulsorily acquire the remaining 10 per cent (or less) of the shares so as to achieve a complete 100 per cent acquisition of the shares: CA, s.210.

                It is standard procedure in making a take-over bit to state that if 90 per cent acceptance is attained compulsory acquisition under s.210 will follow.  Company A may resort to s.210 whether it offers its own shares or cash for shares of Company B.  The procedure is available if Company A already owns shares of Company B and offers to acquire those which it does not already own (but see para 22 below.)  The non-accepting minority may however apply to the court to prevent Company A from acquiring their shares.  The rules of procedure are explained below.

               The offer must be made by a company to acquire shares of another.  S.210 is not available to an individual who makes a take-over bid (but he can always form a company for the purpose: provided no fraud or imoproper conduct is involved: Re Bugle Press Ltd.

                 If Company A directly or through subsidiaries owns more than one-tenth of the shares of Company B then (in order to be able to use s.210) Company A must:

(a) offer the same terms for all the shares which it does not already own;

(b) obtain acceptances from holders who are three-quarters in number as well as holders of 90 per cent of the shares.

                 The wording of s.210 is ambiguous but it is generally taken that Company A must offer to acquire all of the shares of Company B which it does not already own if it is then to use s.210 to acquire the remaining shares in Company B (or all the shares of the class) for which the offer is made.


Related Discussions:- Take-over bid

Business law, Jerry contracted with Sally to purchase Sally’s Restaurant fo...

Jerry contracted with Sally to purchase Sally’s Restaurant for $50,000ion #Minimum 100 words accepted#

Legal protection of minorities, LEGAL PROTECTION OF MINORITIES: Accord...

LEGAL PROTECTION OF MINORITIES: According to decisions of English courts, companies are democratic organisations whose affairs are to be managed by the directors according to

Find out the ethical issues of the organization, Select a manufacturing org...

Select a manufacturing organization and find out the ethical issues of the organization in the following areas: Production: Marketing & sales: Human Resources & employee relatio

Define a conflict of interest, Question  How does the RTL Code define ...

Question  How does the RTL Code define a 'conflict of interest'?  Give one example of how the RTL Code suggests a conflict of interest may arise.

Realization of auditors, Realization of Auditors: it is a mere truism ...

Realization of Auditors: it is a mere truism to say that the value of loans and securities depends on their realization.  We were told that a statement to that effect, is so u

Define the term - inaction and crises, Define the term - Inaction and crise...

Define the term - Inaction and crises We know that the standard social planner does not show and delay or have tendency of inaction and adopts a policy as soon as it is proved

Case law - statutory provisions, CASE LAW:    The aforesaid statutory ...

CASE LAW:    The aforesaid statutory provisions for the protection of minorities have been supplemented by judicial intervention in a variety of cases which are generally expl

State article 3 of air and outer space law, State Article 3 of air and oute...

State Article 3 of air and outer space law Article 3 refers to the fact that the Convention would be applicable to the civil aircraft only and not to the state aircraft. Also,

Reduction of capital, Reduction of Capital:   4.1 The general rule ...

Reduction of Capital:   4.1 The general rule is that it is illegal for a company to reduce its capital. This is so because such a reduction would be tantamount to reducing

"detriment" as consideration, "Detriment" as consideration  An example...

"Detriment" as consideration  An example of a 'detriment' that will legally suffice like the consideration for a promise is provided with the case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd