Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The marketing manager of Handy Foods Ltd. is concerned with the sales appeal of one of the company's present label for one of its products. Market research indicates that supermarket consumers ?nd little appeal in the drab, somewhat cluttered appearance of the label. The company hired a design artist who produced some prototype labels, one of which was chosen consistently as best by the marketing executives. Nevertheless, the marketing executive is still in some doubt as to whether the new label would appreciably bene?t sales. He decides to make further enquiries about the consequences of a decision to switch to a new label. The decision to change to a new label is denoted by D1 and to keep the old by D2.
First he considers the costs associated with converting his company's machinery, inventory, point of purchase displays, etc., to the new label, and estimates that an out-of-pocket, once and for all cost of £250,000 would be involved. If the new label were really superior to the old, the marketing executive estimates that the present value of all net cash ?ows over and above this cost related to increased sales generated over the next three years by the more attractive label will be £400,000. Based on his prior experience and the discussion held with his colleagues, he is only willing to assign a 0.5 probability to the outcome 'new label superior to old', denoted B1. Let B2 denote the event that 'new label is not superior to the old'. Rather than make his decision on these data alone, however, he could delay it and obtain further market research information. The survey is such that it is 'perfect' at a cost of £150,000. The information from the market research survey is shown as either positive (R) or negative ( R) in favour of the new label. Draw a decision tree and decide whether it is worth carrying out market research.
Wilcoxon's ranksum test is the distribution free method or technique used as an alternative to the Student's t-test for assessing whether two populations have the same location. G
the problem that demonstrates inference from two dependent samples uses hypothetical data from TB vaccinations and the number of new cases before and after vaccinations for cases o
Incidental parameter problem is a problem which sometimes occurs when the number of parameters increases in the tandem with the number of observations. For instance, models for pa
Lexis diagram is the diagram for displaying the simultaneous effects of the two time scales (generally age and calendar time) on a rate. For instance, mortality rates from cancer
Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement : The protocol for reporting the results of the clinical trials. The core contribution of the statement comprises of
PRINCIPLES OF MODELLING IN OR.
Formal graphical representation of the "causal diagrams" or the "path diagrams" where the relationships are directed but acyclic (that is no feedback relations allowed). Plays an
Asymmetric proximity matrices : Proximity matrices in which the non-diagonal elements, in the ith row and jth column and the jth row and ith column, are not essentially equal. Exam
Mortality odds ratio is the ratio equivalent to the odds ratio used in case-control studies where the equivalent of the cases are deaths from the cause of interest and the equival
The Null Hypothesis - H0: There is no heteroscedasticity i.e. β 1 = 0 The Alternative Hypothesis - H1: There is heteroscedasticity i.e. β 1 0 Reject H0 if nR2 > MTB >
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd