Pumping lemma, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

For every regular language there is a constant n depending only on L such that, for all strings x ∈ L if |x| ≥ n then there are strings u, v and w such that

1. x = uvw,

2. |uv| ≤ n,

3. |v| ≥ 1,

4. for all i ≥ 0, uviw ∈ L.

What this says is that if there is any string in L "long enough" then there is some family of strings of related form that are all in L, that is, that there is some way of breaking the string into segments uvw for which uvi w is in L for all i. It does not say that every family of strings of related form is in L, that uvi w will be in L for every way of breaking the string into three segments uvw.


Related Discussions:- Pumping lemma

Problem solving and programming concepts, The Last Stop Boutique is having ...

The Last Stop Boutique is having a five-day sale. Each day, starting on Monday, the price will drop 10% of the previous day’s price. For example, if the original price of a product

REGULAR GRAMMAR, Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Express...

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression: a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

Pumping lemma, For every regular language there is a constant n depending o...

For every regular language there is a constant n depending only on L such that, for all strings x ∈ L if |x| ≥ n then there are strings u, v and w such that 1. x = uvw, 2. |u

Toc, how to understand DFA ?

how to understand DFA ?

Pushdown automator, draw pda for l={an,bm,an/m,n>=0} n is in superscript

draw pda for l={an,bm,an/m,n>=0} n is in superscript

Closure properties to prove regularity, The fact that regular languages are...

The fact that regular languages are closed under Boolean operations simpli?es the process of establishing regularity of languages; in essence we can augment the regular operations

Automata, how to prove he extended transition function is derived from part...

how to prove he extended transition function is derived from part 2 and 3

Ogdens lemma, proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand ...

proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand the meaning of distinguished position .

Example of finite state automaton, The initial ID of the automaton given in...

The initial ID of the automaton given in Figure 3, running on input ‘aabbba' is (A, aabbba) The ID after the ?rst three transitions of the computation is (F, bba) The p

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd