Problems in using arc elasticity, Managerial Economics

Assignment Help:

The use of arc elasticity in economic analysis involves a good deal of chariness since it is capable of being misinterpreted. Arc elasticity coefficients vary between the same two finite points on a demand curve if direction of change in price is reversed. Arc elasticity for a decrease in price would be different from that for same increase in price between the same to points on a demand curve. For instance, the price elasticity between points J and K - moving from J to K - is equal to 1.11. This is the elasticity for decrease in price from 25$ to 10$. Though a reverse movement on the demand curve, which is from point K to J implies an increase in price from 10$ to 25$ that will give a different elasticity coefficient. In the case of movement from point K to J, P = 10, Δ P = 10 - 25 = - 15, Q = 50 and ΔQ = 50 - 30 = 20. Substituting these values in elasticity formula, we get

EP = (20/-15)(10/50) = 0.26

Measure of arc elasticity co-efficient in equation I for the reverse movement in price is obviously different from the one given in equation II. So, while measuring the arc elasticity, direction of price change must be carefully noted, otherwise it may yield misleading conclusions.

A method recommended to resolve this problem is to use average of lower and upper values of P and Q in fraction, P/Q, so that formula is

Ep = (δQ/δP). {(P1+P2)/2} / {(Q1+Q2)/2}

   = (Q1-Q2/P1-P2). {(P1+P2)/2} / {(Q1+Q2)/2}

Substituting the values from this illustration, we get

= (30-50/25-10). {(10+25)/2} / {(30+50)/2} = 0.58

This method has its own disadvantages as elasticity co-efficient calculated through this formula, refers to elasticity of demand at mid-point between points J and K (Fig. below). Elasticity co-efficient (0.58) isn't applicable for the whole range of price-quantity combinations at different points between J and K on the demand curve (Fig. below). It gives only mean of the elasticity between the two points. It is vital to note that elasticity between mid-point and the upper point J or lower point K will be different. So this method doesn't give one measure of elasticity.

672_Problems in Using Arc Elasticity.png

Figure: Measuring Arc Elasticity


Related Discussions:- Problems in using arc elasticity

Loss at the point of equilibrium, Q. Loss at the point of equilibrium? ...

Q. Loss at the point of equilibrium? Losses: At the point of equilibrium i.e. E where MR = MC, firm produces OM amount of the output. To produce this output, firm incurs an a

Equilibria than continuous pricing, Two firms are engaged in Bertrand compe...

Two firms are engaged in Bertrand competition. Both firms have a stable marginal cost of €7. Presently, every firm is allocated half the market. There are 10,000 people in the popu

Elasticity.., elasticity concepts occupies a central place in policy formul...

elasticity concepts occupies a central place in policy formulation explain in details

cost pricing and marginal cost pricing method, Discuss the full cost prici...

Discuss the full cost pricing and marginal cost pricing method. Explain how the two  methods differ from each other.

Long run equilibrium of a firm under perfect competition, In the long run, ...

In the long run, because of the assumption of free entry and exit of the firms, it's not possible for the firms to make super-normal profits nor it is possible for them to incur lo

Compensatory financing, Compensatory Financing Two other schemes for a...

Compensatory Financing Two other schemes for alleviating the effects of commodity trade instability have been operating for a number of years.  These are the IMF's Compensator

Define the managerial economics, Define the Managerial economics Manag...

Define the Managerial economics Managerial economics is thus a study of application of managerial skills in economics. It assists in determining, anticipating and resolving po

Arguments for uneven distribution of income and wealth, Arguments for Uneve...

Arguments for Uneven Distribution of Income and Wealth The basic economic argument to justify large income inequality was the assumption that high personal and corporate income

Describe managerial and behavioural theories, Q. Describe Managerial and be...

Q. Describe Managerial and behavioural theories? It was only in 1960s that neo-classical theory of firm was disputed by alternatives like behavioural and managerial theories. M

Financial globalization and economic growth, Question 1: Either ‘Tod...

Question 1: Either ‘Today the business organizations are quite different from the traditional classical firm with a wide range of objectives.' Discuss the above statement

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd