Operations on strictly local languages, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

The class of Strictly Local Languages (in general) is closed under

• intersection but is not closed under

• union

• complement

• concatenation

• Kleene- and positive closure

Proof: For intersection, we can adapt the construction and proof for the SL2 case again to get closure under intersection for SLk. This is still not quite enough for SL in general, since one of the languages may be in SLi and the other in SLj for some i = j. Here we can use the hierarchy theorem to show that, supposing i < j, the SLi language is also in SLj . Then the adapted construction will establish that their intersection is in SL .

For non-closure under union (and consequently under complement) we can use the same counterexample as we did in the SL2 case:

1844_Operations on Strictly Local Languages.png

To see that this is not in SLk for any k we can use the pair

1771_Operations on Strictly Local Languages1.png

which will yield abk-1 a under k-local suffix substitution closure.

2435_Operations on Strictly Local Languages2.png

For non-closure under concatenation we can use the counterexample

The two languages being concatenated are in SL2, hence in SLk for all k ≥ 2 but their concatenation is not in SLk for any k, as we showed in the example above.


Related Discussions:- Operations on strictly local languages

Path function of a nfa, The path function δ : Q × Σ*→ P(Q) is the extension...

The path function δ : Q × Σ*→ P(Q) is the extension of δ to strings: Again, this just says that to ?nd the set of states reachable by a path labeled w from a state q in an

Mapping reducibility, Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know...

Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?

Gephi, construct a social network from the real-world data, perform some si...

construct a social network from the real-world data, perform some simple network analyses using Gephi, and interpret the results.

Class of local languages is not closed under union, Both L 1 and L 2 are ...

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

Myhill-nerode theorem, The Myhill-Nerode Theorem provided us with an algori...

The Myhill-Nerode Theorem provided us with an algorithm for minimizing DFAs. Moreover, the DFA the algorithm produces is unique up to isomorphism: every minimal DFA that recognizes

Possibility of recognizing the palindrome language, Computer has a single F...

Computer has a single FIFO queue of ?xed precision unsigned integers with the length of the queue unbounded. You can use access methods similar to those in the third model. In this

Turing machine, Design a turing machine to compute x + y (x,y > 0) with x a...

Design a turing machine to compute x + y (x,y > 0) with x an y in unary, seperated by a # (descrition and genereal idea is needed ... no need for all TM moves)

Automaton for finite languages, We can then specify any language in the cla...

We can then specify any language in the class of languages by specifying a particular automaton in the class of automata. We do that by specifying values for the parameters of the

Equivalence of nfas and dfas, In general non-determinism, by introducing a ...

In general non-determinism, by introducing a degree of parallelism, may increase the accepting power of a model of computation. But if we subject NFAs to the same sort of analysis

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd