Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The class of Strictly Local Languages (in general) is closed under
• intersection but is not closed under
• union
• complement
• concatenation
• Kleene- and positive closure
Proof: For intersection, we can adapt the construction and proof for the SL2 case again to get closure under intersection for SLk. This is still not quite enough for SL in general, since one of the languages may be in SLi and the other in SLj for some i = j. Here we can use the hierarchy theorem to show that, supposing i < j, the SLi language is also in SLj . Then the adapted construction will establish that their intersection is in SL .
For non-closure under union (and consequently under complement) we can use the same counterexample as we did in the SL2 case:
To see that this is not in SLk for any k we can use the pair
which will yield abk-1 a under k-local suffix substitution closure.
For non-closure under concatenation we can use the counterexample
The two languages being concatenated are in SL2, hence in SLk for all k ≥ 2 but their concatenation is not in SLk for any k, as we showed in the example above.
Give DFA''s accepting the following languages over the alphabet {0,1}: i. The set of all strings beginning with a 1 that, when interpreted as a binary integer, is a multiple of 5.
The computation of an SL 2 automaton A = ( Σ, T) on a string w is the maximal sequence of IDs in which each sequential pair of IDs is related by |- A and which starts with the in
Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?
jhfsaadsa
Computer has a single LIFO stack containing ?xed precision unsigned integers (so each integer is subject to over?ow problems) but which has unbounded depth (so the stack itself nev
The Emptiness Problem is the problem of deciding if a given regular language is empty (= ∅). Theorem 4 (Emptiness) The Emptiness Problem for Regular Languages is decidable. P
Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression: a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.
Strictly 2-local automata are based on lookup tables that are sets of 2-factors, the pairs of adjacent symbols which are permitted to occur in a word. To generalize, we extend the
As de?ned the powerset construction builds a DFA with many states that can never be reached from Q′ 0 . Since they cannot be reached from Q′ 0 there is no path from Q′ 0 to a sta
program in C++ of Arden''s Theorem
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd