Non-regular languages, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Suppose A = (Q,Σ, T, q0, F) is a DFA and that Q = {q0, q1, . . . , qn-1} includes n states. Thinking of the automaton in terms of its transition graph, a string x is recognized by the automaton iff there is a path through the graph from q0 to some qf ∈ F that is labeled x, i.e., if δ(q0, x) ∈ F. Suppose x ∈ L(A) and |x| = l. Then there is a path l edges long from q0 to qf . Since the path traverses l edges, it must visit l + 1 states.

756_Non-Regular Languages.png

Suppose, now, that l ≥ n. Then the path must visit at least n+1 states. But there are only n states in Q; thus, the path must visit at least one state at least twice. (This is an application of the pigeon hole principle: If one places k objects into n bins, where k > n, then at least one bin must contain at least two objects.)

1213_Non-Regular Languages1.png

Thus, whenever |x| ≥ n the path labeled w will have a cycle. We can break the path into three segments: x = uvw, where

• there is a path (perhaps empty) from q0 to p labeled u (i.e., δ(q0, u) = p),

• there is a (non-empty) path from p to p (a cycle) labeled v (i.e., δ(p, v) = p),

• there is a path (again, possibly empty) from p to qf labeled w (i.e., δ(p,w) = qf ).

But if there is a path from q0 to p labeled u and one from p to qf labeled w then there is a path from q0 to qf labeled uw in which we do not take the loop labeled v, which is to say uw ∈ L(A). Formally

δ(q0, uvvw) = δ(δ(q0, u), w) =  δ(p, w) = qf =  F

Similarly, we can take the v loop more than once:

δ(q0, uvvw) = δ(δ(δ(δ(q0, u), v), v),w)
= δ(δ(δ(p, v), v),w)

= δ(δ(p, v),w)

= δ(p,w) = qf ∈ F.

In fact, we can take it as many times as we like. Thus, uvi

w ∈ L(A) for all i.

This implies, then, that if the language recognized by a DFA with n states includes a string of length at least n then it contains in?nitely many closely related strings as well. We can strengthen this by noting (as a consequence of the pigeon hole principle again) that the length of the path from q0 to the ?rst time a state repeats (i.e., the second occurrence of p) must be no greater than n. Thus |uv| ≤ n.


Related Discussions:- Non-regular languages

Deterministic finite state automaton, De?nition Deterministic Finite State ...

De?nition Deterministic Finite State Automaton: For any state set Q and alphabet Σ, both ?nite, a ?nite state automaton (FSA) over Q and Σ is a ?ve-tuple (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F), w

Non - sl languages, The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure prop...

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language. While the argument tha

How to solve the checking problem, The objective of the remainder of this a...

The objective of the remainder of this assignment is to get you thinking about the problem of recognizing strings given various restrictions to your model of computation. We will w

Myhill-nerode theorem, The Myhill-Nerode Theorem provided us with an algori...

The Myhill-Nerode Theorem provided us with an algorithm for minimizing DFAs. Moreover, the DFA the algorithm produces is unique up to isomorphism: every minimal DFA that recognizes

Instantaneous description of an fsa, De?nition Instantaneous Description of...

De?nition Instantaneous Description of an FSA: An instantaneous description (ID) of a FSA A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a pair (q,w) ∈ Q×Σ* , where q the current state and w is the p

Decision Theroy, spam messages h= 98%, m= 90%, l= 80% non spam h=12%, m = 8...

spam messages h= 98%, m= 90%, l= 80% non spam h=12%, m = 8%, l= 5% The organization estimates that 75% of all messages it receives are spam messages. If the cost of not blocking a

Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Claim Under the assum...

Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about

Myhill-nerode theorem, This close relationship between the SL2 languages an...

This close relationship between the SL2 languages and the recognizable languages lets us use some of what we know about SL 2 to discover properties of the recognizable languages.

Strictly local generation automaton, Another way of interpreting a strictly...

Another way of interpreting a strictly local automaton is as a generator: a mechanism for building strings which is restricted to building all and only the automaton as an inexh

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd