Myhill-nerode, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes.

Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recognizable language has ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes) observe that L ∈ Recog iff L = L(A) for some DFA A and that if δ(q0,w) = δ(q0, u) (i.e., if the path from the start state labeled w and that labeled u end up at the same state) then w ≡L u. This is a consequence of the fact that the state ˆ δ(q0,w) encodes all the information the automaton remembers about the string w. If v extends w to wv ∈ L(A) then v is the label of a path to an accepting state from δ(q0,w). Since this is the same state as δ(q0, u) the same path witnesses that uv ∈ L. Similarly, if the path leads one to a non-accepting state then it must necessarily lead the other to the same state. The automaton has no way of distinguishing two strings that lead to the same state and, consequently, the language it recognizes cannot distinguish them. Since A is deterministic, every string in Σ* labels a path leading to some state, hence the equivalence classes corresponding to the states partition Σ*. Since the automaton has ?nitely many states, it distinguishes ?nitely many equivalence classes.


Related Discussions:- Myhill-nerode

Equivalence of nfas and dfas, In general non-determinism, by introducing a ...

In general non-determinism, by introducing a degree of parallelism, may increase the accepting power of a model of computation. But if we subject NFAs to the same sort of analysis

Local myhill graphs, Myhill graphs also generalize to the SLk case. The k-f...

Myhill graphs also generalize to the SLk case. The k-factors, however, cannot simply denote edges. Rather the string σ 1 σ 2 ....... σ k-1 σ k asserts, in essence, that if we hav

Class of local languages is not closed under union, Both L 1 and L 2 are ...

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

Overview of dfa, Explain Theory of Computation ,Overview of DFA,NFA, CFG, P...

Explain Theory of Computation ,Overview of DFA,NFA, CFG, PDA, Turing Machine, Regular Language, Context Free Language, Pumping Lemma, Context Sensitive Language, Chomsky Normal For

Exhaustive search, A problem is said to be unsolvable if no algorithm can s...

A problem is said to be unsolvable if no algorithm can solve it. The problem is said to be undecidable if it is a decision problem and no algorithm can decide it. It should be note

Decision problems, In Exercise 9 you showed that the recognition problem an...

In Exercise 9 you showed that the recognition problem and universal recognition problem for SL2 are decidable. We can use the structure of Myhill graphs to show that other problems

DFA, designing DFA

designing DFA

what is a turing machine, A Turing machine is a theoretical computing mach...

A Turing machine is a theoretical computing machine made-up by Alan Turing (1937) to serve as an idealized model for mathematical calculation. A Turing machine having of a line of

Equivalence problem, The Equivalence Problem is the question of whether two...

The Equivalence Problem is the question of whether two languages are equal (in the sense of being the same set of strings). An instance is a pair of ?nite speci?cations of regular

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd