Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Menu Costs
Why do firms not change their prices very frequently? Obviously, the costs of changing prices at frequent intervals and in small amounts must be more than the benefits obtained from such a change. Firms prefer to wait before they make price changes in relatively large amounts and in the mean time absorb the losses that they would suffer by not changing prices. This of course presumes that the firms have some monopolistic price setting power and the losses referred to above include lower profits than would have been possible if prices had been raised, and not necessarily actual out-of-pocket losses.
It is easy to understand this behaviour of monopolistically competitive firms through the example of restaurants competing with each other. The term 'menu costs' immediately becomes meaningful as the costs that would be incurred in changing the menu cards every time there is a change in the prices of items on the menu. These printing costs are surely negligible, but the more important costs are in terms of the loss of customers that a firm would face if it subjects its clientele to the 'irritability' of continuous, small changes in prices. The concept of menu costs in a modem economy is indeed broad. It is also widely applicable, given the proliferation of automatic dispensers (e.g., coffee machines) and pay telephones that operate on coins.
It is easy to imagine the cost that would be incurred by the suppliers if these ubiquitous machines were to be adjusted every time a price change is effected. The firms would rather not change their prices. It is this idea of weighing the costs of changing prices against the benefits obtained from changing prices that is formalised in the Mankiw model that we consider below.
Q. Central characteristics of Simon satisfying behaviour model? The pattern of policy commitments which result from the bargaining process can be seen to be a specification of
a) The following would most likely shift a production possibilities curve to the right? b) Money should not be considered an economic resource ? c) Which of the following is
Q. Explain about isocost line? In economics, an isocost line signifies all combinations of inputs that cost the same total amount. Though, similar to the budget constraint in c
all theory
Functions of the Budget The budget fulfils three main functions: To raise revenue to meet government expenditure The government of a country provides certain se
A baseball team is trying to predict ticket sales for the upcoming season. They are also considering increasing prices. The market has a population of 2 million persons. The team s
Neo Classical vs Keynesian School We know that Keynesian economics was propounded as a revolution against the then prevailing orthodoxy of the classical school. In time,
Demand for money The demand for money is a more difficult concept than the demand for goods and services. It refers to the desire to hold one's assets as money rather tha
Question: a. What are the basic attributes in designing a good tax system? b. Explain briefly how tax systems affect economic efficiency. c. The trade unionists advocat
Problem: (a) Explain with the help of a diagram, the effect on a consumer's equilibrium, of an increase in the price of commodity X while the consumer's money income and price
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd