Maximization problem, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

Two individuals (i ∈ {1, 2}) work independently on a joint project. They each independently decide how much e ort ei they put. E ort choice has to be any real number between 0 and 1 (ei ∈ [0, 1] not just 0 or 1). The cost of putting an amount of e ffort ei is n e2i/2, where n is a parameter greater or equal than 2. If individual i puts e ffort ei, then he succeeds with probability ei and fails with probability 1 - ei. The probability of success of the two agents are independent; this means that both succeed with probability e1x e2, 1 succeeds and 2 fails with probability e1 x(1 - e2), 1 fails and 2 succeeds with probability (1 - e1)e2, and both fail with probability (1 - e1)  (1 - e2).

If at least one of the individuals succeeds then, independently of who did succeed, both individuals get a payo of 1. If none of them succeeds, both individuals get 0. Therefore, each individual is a ected by the action of the other. However, individuals choose the level of e ort that maximizes their own expected utility (bene t minus cost of e ort).

(a) Write down the expected utility of individuals 1 and 2 (note that the utility of 1 depends on the e orts of 1 and 2 and the utility of 2 depends on the e orts of 1 and 2). [Hint. The expected bene t of 1 is the probability that 1 and/or 2 succeed times the payo if 1 and/or 2 succeed plus the probability that both 1 and 2 fail times the payo if both 1 and 2 fail.]

(b) Find the Nash equilibrium of this game, that is, the optimal level of e ort. Find the expected utility of each individual in equilibrium (use the rst-order condition and make sure that the second-order condition is satis ed). Suppose that a benevolent dictator can choose the  level of e ort that both individuals must exert. He chooses the e ort levels that maximize the sum of the expected utilities of both agents (these e orts are also called socially optimal levels).

(c) Write down the maximization problem of the benevolent dictator.

(d) Find the e ort levels that the dictator imposes on each individual (use the rst-order condition and assume that the second-order condition is satis ed). Find the expected utility of each individual.

(e) Compare the e ort level and nal utility of each individual in the cases of Nash Equilibrium (sel sh individual maximization) and benevolent dictatorship.

 


Related Discussions:- Maximization problem

Pareto dominated, An outcome of a game is Pareto dominated if another outco...

An outcome of a game is Pareto dominated if another outcome would build a minimum of one player at an advantage while not hurting the other player. That is, another outcome is weak

Schedule bid , A bid that indicates totally different costs for various qua...

A bid that indicates totally different costs for various quantitites of the item offered for sale. A series of price-quantity mixtures is tendered to the auctioneer.

Player , Any participant in a very game who (i)  contains a nontrivial s...

Any participant in a very game who (i)  contains a nontrivial set of methods (more than one) and (ii) Selects among the methods primarily based on payoffs. If a player is non

Hicks, Winner of the Nobel Prize in 1972, Hicks is acknowledged mutually of...

Winner of the Nobel Prize in 1972, Hicks is acknowledged mutually of the leading economists normally equilibrium theory. he's credited with the introduction of the notion of elasti

Game playing in class:adding numbers—win at 100, GAME PLAYING IN CLASS GAME...

GAME PLAYING IN CLASS GAME 1 Adding Numbers—Win at 100 This game is described in Exercise 3.7a. In this version, two players take turns choosing a number between 1 and 10 (inclus

Find all ne of the game, 1. Find all NE of the following 2×2 game. Determin...

1. Find all NE of the following 2×2 game. Determine which of the NE are trembling-hand perfect. 2. Consider the following two-person game where player 1 has three strategie

Kakutani, Twentieth century mathematician who expanded on earlier fastened ...

Twentieth century mathematician who expanded on earlier fastened purpose theorems. a hard and fast purpose theorem defines the conditions on a perform, f(x), beneath that there exi

Combining simultaneous and sequential moves, Combining Simultaneous and...

Combining Simultaneous and  Sequential Moves The material in this chapter covers a variety of issues that require some knowledge of the analysis of both sequential- move

Bidding ring, A set of colluding bidders. Ring participants agree to rig bi...

A set of colluding bidders. Ring participants agree to rig bids by agreeing not to bid against each other, either by avoiding the auction or by placing phony (phantom) bids.

Formal rules for identification, Identification may be established either ...

Identification may be established either by the examination of the specification of the structural model, or by the examination of the reduced form of the model. Traditionally

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd