Maximization problem, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

Two individuals (i ∈ {1, 2}) work independently on a joint project. They each independently decide how much e ort ei they put. E ort choice has to be any real number between 0 and 1 (ei ∈ [0, 1] not just 0 or 1). The cost of putting an amount of e ffort ei is n e2i/2, where n is a parameter greater or equal than 2. If individual i puts e ffort ei, then he succeeds with probability ei and fails with probability 1 - ei. The probability of success of the two agents are independent; this means that both succeed with probability e1x e2, 1 succeeds and 2 fails with probability e1 x(1 - e2), 1 fails and 2 succeeds with probability (1 - e1)e2, and both fail with probability (1 - e1)  (1 - e2).

If at least one of the individuals succeeds then, independently of who did succeed, both individuals get a payo of 1. If none of them succeeds, both individuals get 0. Therefore, each individual is a ected by the action of the other. However, individuals choose the level of e ort that maximizes their own expected utility (bene t minus cost of e ort).

(a) Write down the expected utility of individuals 1 and 2 (note that the utility of 1 depends on the e orts of 1 and 2 and the utility of 2 depends on the e orts of 1 and 2). [Hint. The expected bene t of 1 is the probability that 1 and/or 2 succeed times the payo if 1 and/or 2 succeed plus the probability that both 1 and 2 fail times the payo if both 1 and 2 fail.]

(b) Find the Nash equilibrium of this game, that is, the optimal level of e ort. Find the expected utility of each individual in equilibrium (use the rst-order condition and make sure that the second-order condition is satis ed). Suppose that a benevolent dictator can choose the  level of e ort that both individuals must exert. He chooses the e ort levels that maximize the sum of the expected utilities of both agents (these e orts are also called socially optimal levels).

(c) Write down the maximization problem of the benevolent dictator.

(d) Find the e ort levels that the dictator imposes on each individual (use the rst-order condition and assume that the second-order condition is satis ed). Find the expected utility of each individual.

(e) Compare the e ort level and nal utility of each individual in the cases of Nash Equilibrium (sel sh individual maximization) and benevolent dictatorship.

 


Related Discussions:- Maximization problem

Bayesian game and find its bayesian equilibria, Two people are involved in ...

Two people are involved in a dispute. Person 1 does not know whether person 2 is strong or weak; she assigns probability to person 2 being strong. Person 2 is fully informed. Each

Game theory equilibrium exercise, Exercise 1 a) Pure strategy nash equi...

Exercise 1 a) Pure strategy nash equilibrium in this case is Not Buy, bad ( 0,0) as no one wants to deviate from this strategy. b) The player chooses buy in the first perio

Game 3 bargaining, GAME 3 Bargaining Two players A and B are chosen. P...

GAME 3 Bargaining Two players A and B are chosen. Player A offers a split of a dollar (whole dimes only). If B agrees, both get paid the agreed coins and the game is over. If

Matching pennies, Matching Pennies Scenario To determine who is needed t...

Matching Pennies Scenario To determine who is needed to try to to the nightly chores, 2 youngsters initial choose who are represented by "same" and who are represented by "diffe

Application to strategic management, Game Theory has evolved since its orig...

Game Theory has evolved since its origins as an idea exercise for educational mathematicians. Taught in prime business faculties, economics departments, and even military academies

Find the pure-strategy nash equilibrium, Find the pure-strategy Nash equili...

Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium Alice is on vacation in Wonderland and considers trying a special mushroom sold by the caterpillar. She cannot tell upfront if the mush

Identify the pure strategy equilibria, Consider the following three games (...

Consider the following three games (Chicken, Matching Pennies, Stag Hunt): Chicken Player 2 Player 1 D V D -100;-100 10;-10 V -10; 10 -1;-1 Matching Pennies Pla

NAsh equilibrium, Consider a game in which player 1 chooses rows, player 2 ...

Consider a game in which player 1 chooses rows, player 2 chooses columns and player 3 chooses matrices. Only Player 3''s payoffs are given below. Show that D is not a best response

Extensive games with sumultaneous moves, consider the three player game in ...

consider the three player game in question 2 in assignment 1. Assume now that player 3 moves first. Players 1 and 2

Pareto economical , Named when Vilfredo Pareto, Pareto potency (or Pareto o...

Named when Vilfredo Pareto, Pareto potency (or Pareto optimality) may be alive of potency. An outcome of a game is Pareto economical if there's no different outcome that produces e

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd