Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Q. Legislative options for addressing phoenix activity?
There are a range of legislative options for addressing phoenix activity and the following legislative options were explored with stakeholders.
Garnishee Orders
The ATO has the power to issue garnishee orders which allow recovery of debts from a person's bank account, wage or from people who owe the debtor money. Legislative change could be introduced so that the FWO could garnish unpaid entitlements from bank accounts, wages and debtors. Stakeholders emphasised that this would be a significant expansion of the FWOs role.
Dual appointment of FWO Inspectors
An additional legislative option would be for FWO Inspectors to be appointed under the Tax Act and the Corporations Act giving them greater powers in their investigations. Stakeholders had significant reservations about the practicalities, viability and effectiveness of such an option.
Joint employment provisions
One option that was raised in consultation with stakeholders was the introduction of joint employment provisions, whereby both the employing entity and the entity that receives the labour are liable for employee expenses. Though some stakeholders were broadly supportive of such measures, others highlighted that this option would have significant implications for corporations law and sub-contract arrangements in Australia.
Managing Director: In Ellis v Bailey and Company (East Africa) Limited (76) it was stated that "without specific authority in the articles directors may not appoint one of the
Part of the client's contract clearly states that negative publicity will not be tolerated on any actions connected to the temp agency. You know that this situation can harm both c
online Law test, Due tomorrow December 14th, 20 multiple choice questions and 4 essay questions. Topics, Obscenity, child porn; broadcasting indecency, citizens united, ipr & cop
Personal rights invaded: A shareholder may sue to protect from invasion their own individual rights as members. This is illustrated by Pender v Lushington
i.Over the years a number of systems have been developed which record coded information across a range of factors about disabilities in ethnic communities. A new coding convention
Explain the elements of governmental authority The theme of these draft laws is mentioned in Article 1, which says that every internationally wrongful act of a State entails th
Explain the sovereign of state immunity Immunity relates to the sovereign of state immunity and act of state doctrine. This is the most complicated immunity available and relat
It has been estimated that about 6,000 phoenix companies operate in Australia, costing government and the community hundreds of millions of dollars per year and impacting on indi
Statutory safeguard - Non-accepting shareholders: The non-accepting shareholders have a further statutory safeguard. Company A is not obliged to serve notice of intention to
Define the Strategic Voting and Policy Process Now we take up an important issue with respect to policy process. In standard models, where a single vote is taken directly as re
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd