Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Lag Length criteria
VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria
Endogenous variables: OIL EXCH R RPI LUNEMP GDP
Exogenous variables: C
Date: 04/10/12 Time: 09:40
Sample: 1980Q1 2011Q4
Included observations: 90
Lag
LogL
LR
FPE
AIC
SC
HQ
0
-1297.398
NA
152838.1
28.96439
29.13105
29.03160
1
-629.2589
1232.345
0.121419
14.91686
16.08344
15.38730
2
-546.9702
140.8050
0.043857
13.88823
16.05473*
14.76189*
3
-502.2073
70.62590
0.037065
13.69350
16.85992
14.97039
4
-469.5335
47.19560
0.042007
13.76741
17.93376
15.44753
5
-424.0268
59.66430
0.037071
13.55615
18.72242
15.63950
6
-377.6019
54.67826
0.033616
13.32449
19.49068
15.81106
7
-312.0832
68.43057
0.021261
12.66852
19.83464
15.55832
8
-247.3143
59.01173*
0.014906*
12.02921*
20.19525
15.32223
* indicates lag order selected by the criterion
LR: sequential modified LR test statistic (each test at 5% level)
FPE: Final prediction error
AIC: Akaike information criterion
SC: Schwarz information criterion
HQ: Hannan-Quinn information criterion
Fig - Table of Lag Order Selection Criteria from Eviews
From Fig it can be seen that the AIC statistic minimises at a lag length of 8. Therefore, according to Akaike, this should be the lag length which is used in the VAR model. However it can also be seen that the SC and HQC both minimise at the lag length 2. As the lag length 2 satisfies more than one criterion, and therefore the majority of criteria assessed in this paper, this length will be chosen.This length should produce the best goodness of fit for the VAR model.
You are an assistant to a senator who chairs an ad hoc committee on reforming taxes on telecommunication services. Based on your research, AT&T has spent over $15 million on relate
Suppose a company is considering two independent projects, Project A and Project B. The cash outlay for Project A is $14,000. The cash outlay for Project B is $20,000. The company
Flossy has a quasi-linear utility function, 16q1^0.5 + q2. The price of good 1 is fixed at one. Thus, Flossy's budget constraint is q1 + p2q2 =Y, where Y denotes income. 6.1 Compu
explain the neo-classical theory of trade and show the difference between this and the classical approach, as wellas the similarities
TRADE policy: We are now in a position to sum up our analysis of India's trade policy. First, India's trade policy has always been very intricately related to India's basic de
# ?????? ..
using the fisher equation what can you infer about expected inflation in canada and in the united states?
Compare the three investments below in terms of their riskiness. What is the best way to evaluate the riskiness of an investment given the information you have on them? Project Exp
Derive saving- investment recognize in the context of an open economy. From national income accounting shows that an enhance in taxes (whereas transfer unchanged) must imply a
What is the difference between heckscher_olin theory and comparative theory
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd