Full equilibrium strategy example, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

 (a) A player wins if she takes the total to 100 and additions of any value from 1 through 10 are allowed. Thus, if you take the sum to 89, you are guaran- teed to win; your opponent must take the sum to at least 90 but can take it no higher than 99. In either case you can get to 100 on the next move. Using rollback, you can show that you can win if you can get the sum to 78 or to 67 . . . or to 12 or to 1. Thus, being the first mover and using a strategy that entails choosing 1 on the first move and then saying 11 minus whatever your opponent says allows you to win; you take the sum successively to 12, 23, . . ., 78, 89, and 100.

Technically, the full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, start with 1;

(ii) if the current total is not (100 – 11n) for some n, then choose the number that will bring the total to this form; or

(iii) if the current total is of the form (100 – 11n), then choose any number (all choices are equally bad).


(b) In this version, you lose if you force the total to equal or exceed 100, so you can win if you take the total to 99. Using the same type of analysis as  above, you see that you can win if you can get the sum to 88, 77, . . ., 22, or 11. This time you want to be the second mover. Your strategy should be to say 11 minus whatever your opponent says; this strategy takes you successively to 11, 22, . . ., 77,88, 99, and a win.

The full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, choose any number (all choices are equally bad);

(ii) if the current total is a multiple of 11, choose any number (all choices are equally bad); or

(iii) if the current total is not a multiple of 11, choose the number that will make the total a multiple of 11 (this is equivalent to choosing 11 minus the number just chosen by your opponent).


Related Discussions:- Full equilibrium strategy example

Backward induction, Backward induction is an iterative procedure for resolv...

Backward induction is an iterative procedure for resolving finite general form or sequential games. First, one decides the finest policy of the player who makes the last move of th

Edgeworth, Living from 1845 to 1926, Edgeworth's contributions to Economics...

Living from 1845 to 1926, Edgeworth's contributions to Economics still influence trendy game theorists. His Mathematical Psychics printed in 1881, demonstrated the notion of compet

Case study in game theory - color coordination, Game 1 Color Coordination (...

Game 1 Color Coordination (with Delay) This game should be played twice, once without the delay tactic and once with it, to show the difference between out- comes in the s

Game 3 bargaining, GAME 3 Bargaining Two players A and B are chosen. P...

GAME 3 Bargaining Two players A and B are chosen. Player A offers a split of a dollar (whole dimes only). If B agrees, both get paid the agreed coins and the game is over. If

Sequential game, A sequential game is one during which players build choice...

A sequential game is one during which players build choices (or choose a strategy) following an exact predefined order, and during which a minimum of some players will observe the

Principal agent, A class of games of imperfect data during which one player...

A class of games of imperfect data during which one player (the principal) tries to supply incentives to the opposite (the agent) to encourage the agent to act within the principal

sub game excellent nash equilibrium , A sub game excellent Nash equilibriu...

A sub game excellent Nash equilibrium is an equilibrium such that players' methods represent a Nash equilibrium in each sub game of the initial game. it should be found by backward

Player , Any participant in a very game who (i)  contains a nontrivial s...

Any participant in a very game who (i)  contains a nontrivial set of methods (more than one) and (ii) Selects among the methods primarily based on payoffs. If a player is non

State the profit maximization problem of firm, 1. Consider two firms produc...

1. Consider two firms producing an identical product in a market where the demand is described by p = 1; 200 2Y. The corresponding cost functions are c 1 (y 1 ) = y 2 1 and c 2

Zero restriction, A priori knowledge usually enables us to decide that some...

A priori knowledge usually enables us to decide that some coefficients must be zero in the particular equation, while they assume non-zero values in other equations of the system.

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd