Full equilibrium strategy example, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

 (a) A player wins if she takes the total to 100 and additions of any value from 1 through 10 are allowed. Thus, if you take the sum to 89, you are guaran- teed to win; your opponent must take the sum to at least 90 but can take it no higher than 99. In either case you can get to 100 on the next move. Using rollback, you can show that you can win if you can get the sum to 78 or to 67 . . . or to 12 or to 1. Thus, being the first mover and using a strategy that entails choosing 1 on the first move and then saying 11 minus whatever your opponent says allows you to win; you take the sum successively to 12, 23, . . ., 78, 89, and 100.

Technically, the full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, start with 1;

(ii) if the current total is not (100 – 11n) for some n, then choose the number that will bring the total to this form; or

(iii) if the current total is of the form (100 – 11n), then choose any number (all choices are equally bad).


(b) In this version, you lose if you force the total to equal or exceed 100, so you can win if you take the total to 99. Using the same type of analysis as  above, you see that you can win if you can get the sum to 88, 77, . . ., 22, or 11. This time you want to be the second mover. Your strategy should be to say 11 minus whatever your opponent says; this strategy takes you successively to 11, 22, . . ., 77,88, 99, and a win.

The full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, choose any number (all choices are equally bad);

(ii) if the current total is a multiple of 11, choose any number (all choices are equally bad); or

(iii) if the current total is not a multiple of 11, choose the number that will make the total a multiple of 11 (this is equivalent to choosing 11 minus the number just chosen by your opponent).


Related Discussions:- Full equilibrium strategy example

Equilibrium payoffs, Equilibrium payoffs a) The reward system changes...

Equilibrium payoffs a) The reward system changes payoffs for Player A, but does not change the equilibrium strategies in the game. Player A still takes the money at the fir

Bayesian game and find its bayesian equilibria, Two people are involved in ...

Two people are involved in a dispute. Person 1 does not know whether person 2 is strong or weak; she assigns probability to person 2 being strong. Person 2 is fully informed. Each

Fixed worth auction, Not technically an auction, however a posted-price pro...

Not technically an auction, however a posted-price procedure during which the auctioneer sets a worth and sells to the primary bidder willing to pay it. The auction ends as soon as

Finding Equilibrium in Game Theory, This is Case of Competitive Games. ...

This is Case of Competitive Games. Player 2 L R Player 1 L (60,40) (70,30) R (65,35) (60,40) Are either have dominant st

Multiple nash equilibria, The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooper...

The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooperative simultaneous move game between 2 players. The payoffs are in the order (Player 1; Player 2): What is/are the Nash Equil

Pareto coordination game, Scenario Two corporations should simultaneousl...

Scenario Two corporations should simultaneously elect a technology to use for his or her compatible merchandise. If the corporations adopt totally different standards, few sales

Case study in game theory - color coordination, Game 1 Color Coordination (...

Game 1 Color Coordination (with Delay) This game should be played twice, once without the delay tactic and once with it, to show the difference between out- comes in the s

English auction, A type of sequential second worth auction during which an ...

A type of sequential second worth auction during which an auctioneer directs participants to beat the present, standing bid. New bids should increase the present bid by a predefine

Game, The interaction among rational, mutually aware players, where the cho...

The interaction among rational, mutually aware players, where the choices of some players impacts the payoffs of others. A game is described by its players, every player's methods,

Bayes rule, Treating probability as a logic, Thomas Bayes defined the follo...

Treating probability as a logic, Thomas Bayes defined the following: Pr(X|Y)=Pr(Y|X)Pr(X)/Pr(Y) For example, probability that the weather was bad given that our friends playe

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd