Full equilibrium strategy example, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

 (a) A player wins if she takes the total to 100 and additions of any value from 1 through 10 are allowed. Thus, if you take the sum to 89, you are guaran- teed to win; your opponent must take the sum to at least 90 but can take it no higher than 99. In either case you can get to 100 on the next move. Using rollback, you can show that you can win if you can get the sum to 78 or to 67 . . . or to 12 or to 1. Thus, being the first mover and using a strategy that entails choosing 1 on the first move and then saying 11 minus whatever your opponent says allows you to win; you take the sum successively to 12, 23, . . ., 78, 89, and 100.

Technically, the full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, start with 1;

(ii) if the current total is not (100 – 11n) for some n, then choose the number that will bring the total to this form; or

(iii) if the current total is of the form (100 – 11n), then choose any number (all choices are equally bad).


(b) In this version, you lose if you force the total to equal or exceed 100, so you can win if you take the total to 99. Using the same type of analysis as  above, you see that you can win if you can get the sum to 88, 77, . . ., 22, or 11. This time you want to be the second mover. Your strategy should be to say 11 minus whatever your opponent says; this strategy takes you successively to 11, 22, . . ., 77,88, 99, and a win.

The full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, choose any number (all choices are equally bad);

(ii) if the current total is a multiple of 11, choose any number (all choices are equally bad); or

(iii) if the current total is not a multiple of 11, choose the number that will make the total a multiple of 11 (this is equivalent to choosing 11 minus the number just chosen by your opponent).


Related Discussions:- Full equilibrium strategy example

Fighting for survival, Two animals are fighting over a prey. The prey is wo...

Two animals are fighting over a prey. The prey is worth v to each animal. The cost of fighting is c1 for the first animal (player 1) and c2 for the second animal (player 2). If the

Two player problem of points set up - game theory, a) Show that A c...

a) Show that A counting proof could be fun(?). But any old proof will do. (Note that the coefficients (1,2,1) in the above are just the elements of the second row of Pas

Rollback , Rollback (often referred to as backward induction) is an iterati...

Rollback (often referred to as backward induction) is an iterative method for solving finite in depth kind or sequential games. First, one determines the optimal strategy of the pl

equilibrium refinement, An equilibrium refinement provides how of choosing...

An equilibrium refinement provides how of choosing one or many equilibria from among several in a very game. several games might contain many Nash equilibria, and therefore supply

Beard strategy, #questi1 A, Explain how a person can be free to choose but...

#questi1 A, Explain how a person can be free to choose but his or her choices are casually determined by past event 2 B , Draw the casual tree for newcomb''s problem when Eve ca

Find all nash equilibria of game- game theory, Game Theory: (prisoner'...

Game Theory: (prisoner's dilemma) Consider the following 2 x 2 pricing game, where rms choose whether to price High or Low simultaneously. Find the equilibrium in dominant s

Straight auction, A common term for an English auction, a sort of sequentia...

A common term for an English auction, a sort of sequential auction during which an auctioneer directs participants to beat the present, standing bid. New bids should increase the p

Perfect data, A sequential game is {one of|one among|one in all|one amongst...

A sequential game is {one of|one among|one in all|one amongst|one in each of} excellent data if just one player moves at a time and if every player is aware of each action of the p

Determine the pure strategy nash equilibria, a) Define the term Nash equili...

a) Define the term Nash equilibrium b) You are given the following pay-off matrix:   Strategies for player 1   Strategies for player 2

Kakutani, Twentieth century mathematician who expanded on earlier fastened ...

Twentieth century mathematician who expanded on earlier fastened purpose theorems. a hard and fast purpose theorem defines the conditions on a perform, f(x), beneath that there exi

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd