Full equilibrium strategy example, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

 (a) A player wins if she takes the total to 100 and additions of any value from 1 through 10 are allowed. Thus, if you take the sum to 89, you are guaran- teed to win; your opponent must take the sum to at least 90 but can take it no higher than 99. In either case you can get to 100 on the next move. Using rollback, you can show that you can win if you can get the sum to 78 or to 67 . . . or to 12 or to 1. Thus, being the first mover and using a strategy that entails choosing 1 on the first move and then saying 11 minus whatever your opponent says allows you to win; you take the sum successively to 12, 23, . . ., 78, 89, and 100.

Technically, the full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, start with 1;

(ii) if the current total is not (100 – 11n) for some n, then choose the number that will bring the total to this form; or

(iii) if the current total is of the form (100 – 11n), then choose any number (all choices are equally bad).


(b) In this version, you lose if you force the total to equal or exceed 100, so you can win if you take the total to 99. Using the same type of analysis as  above, you see that you can win if you can get the sum to 88, 77, . . ., 22, or 11. This time you want to be the second mover. Your strategy should be to say 11 minus whatever your opponent says; this strategy takes you successively to 11, 22, . . ., 77,88, 99, and a win.

The full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, choose any number (all choices are equally bad);

(ii) if the current total is a multiple of 11, choose any number (all choices are equally bad); or

(iii) if the current total is not a multiple of 11, choose the number that will make the total a multiple of 11 (this is equivalent to choosing 11 minus the number just chosen by your opponent).


Related Discussions:- Full equilibrium strategy example

Game, The interaction among rational, mutually aware players, where the cho...

The interaction among rational, mutually aware players, where the choices of some players impacts the payoffs of others. A game is described by its players, every player's methods,

Procurement auction, A market mechanism during which an object, service, or...

A market mechanism during which an object, service, or set of objects is being purchased, instead of sold, to the auctioneer. The auction provides a selected set of rules which wil

non-credible threat , A non-credible threat may be a threat created by a p...

A non-credible threat may be a threat created by a player in a very Sequential Game which might not be within the best interest for the player to hold out. The hope is that the thr

Nature player , A participant in a very game who selects from among her met...

A participant in a very game who selects from among her methods randomly, primarily based on some predetermined chance distribution, instead of strategically, primarily based on pa

Game playing in class-equilibrium payoffs example, (a) Equilibrium payoffs ...

(a) Equilibrium payoffs are (1, 0). Player A’s equilibrium strategy is S; B’s equilibrium strategy is “t if N.”   For (a): Player A has two strategies: (1) N or (2) S. P

Determine the perfect sub game nash equilibrium, Consider the situation in ...

Consider the situation in which Player M is an INCUMBENT monopolist in an industry, which makes a profit of $10m if left to enjoy its privileged position undisturbed. Player P is a

Non-cooperative game , A non-cooperative game is one during which players a...

A non-cooperative game is one during which players are unable to form enforceable contracts outside of these specifically modeled within the game. Hence, it's not outlined as games

Auctions, what will be the best strategy for a bidder in an auction compris...

what will be the best strategy for a bidder in an auction comprised of four bidders?

Game playing in class-equilibrium payoffs are (4, Equilibrium payoffs are (...

Equilibrium payoffs are (4, 5). Player A’s equilibrium strategy is “S then S if n and then N if n again.” Player B’s equilibrium strategy is “n if S and then n if S again and then

Solve for the bayesian nash equilibrium, Consider the Cournot duopoly model...

Consider the Cournot duopoly model in which two rms, 1 and 2, simultaneously choose the quantities they will sell in the market, q 1 and q 2 . The price each receives for each uni

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd