Full equilibrium strategy example, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

 (a) A player wins if she takes the total to 100 and additions of any value from 1 through 10 are allowed. Thus, if you take the sum to 89, you are guaran- teed to win; your opponent must take the sum to at least 90 but can take it no higher than 99. In either case you can get to 100 on the next move. Using rollback, you can show that you can win if you can get the sum to 78 or to 67 . . . or to 12 or to 1. Thus, being the first mover and using a strategy that entails choosing 1 on the first move and then saying 11 minus whatever your opponent says allows you to win; you take the sum successively to 12, 23, . . ., 78, 89, and 100.

Technically, the full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, start with 1;

(ii) if the current total is not (100 – 11n) for some n, then choose the number that will bring the total to this form; or

(iii) if the current total is of the form (100 – 11n), then choose any number (all choices are equally bad).


(b) In this version, you lose if you force the total to equal or exceed 100, so you can win if you take the total to 99. Using the same type of analysis as  above, you see that you can win if you can get the sum to 88, 77, . . ., 22, or 11. This time you want to be the second mover. Your strategy should be to say 11 minus whatever your opponent says; this strategy takes you successively to 11, 22, . . ., 77,88, 99, and a win.

The full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, choose any number (all choices are equally bad);

(ii) if the current total is a multiple of 11, choose any number (all choices are equally bad); or

(iii) if the current total is not a multiple of 11, choose the number that will make the total a multiple of 11 (this is equivalent to choosing 11 minus the number just chosen by your opponent).


Related Discussions:- Full equilibrium strategy example

Determine the perfect sub game nash equilibrium, Consider the situation in ...

Consider the situation in which Player M is an INCUMBENT monopolist in an industry, which makes a profit of $10m if left to enjoy its privileged position undisturbed. Player P is a

Game playing in class-equilibrium payoffs are (2, Equilibrium payoffs are ...

Equilibrium payoffs are (2, 3, 2). Player A’s equilib- rium strategy is “N and then N if b follows N or N if d follows N” or “Always N.” Player B’s equilibrium strategy is “b if N

Heuristic, A heuristic is an aid to learning, casually brought up as a rule...

A heuristic is an aid to learning, casually brought up as a rule of thumb. Formally, a heuristic may be a mechanism capable of altering its internal model of the surroundings in re

Determine the pure strategy nash equilibria, a) Define the term Nash equili...

a) Define the term Nash equilibrium b) You are given the following pay-off matrix:   Strategies for player 1   Strategies for player 2

Stag hunt , Scenario The French thinker, Jean Jacques Rousseau, presente...

Scenario The French thinker, Jean Jacques Rousseau, presented the subsequent state of affairs. 2 hunters will either jointly hunt a stag (an adult deer and rather massive meal)

DYnamic, saaaaaaasfffffffffffffffffffaaaczzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...

saaaaaaasfffffffffffffffffffaaaczzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Bayesian game and find its bayesian equilibria, Two people are involved in ...

Two people are involved in a dispute. Person 1 does not know whether person 2 is strong or weak; she assigns probability to person 2 being strong. Person 2 is fully informed. Each

equilibrium refinement, An equilibrium refinement provides how of choosing...

An equilibrium refinement provides how of choosing one or many equilibria from among several in a very game. several games might contain many Nash equilibria, and therefore supply

Find the nash equilibria of game - bimatrix of strategies, Players 1 and 2 ...

Players 1 and 2 are bargaining over how to split one dollar. Both players simultaneously name shares they would like to keep s 1 and s 2 . Furthermore, players' choices have to be

Dominant strategy equilibrium, The following is a payoff matrix for a non-c...

The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooperative simultaneous move game between 2 players. The payoffs are in the order (Player 1; Player 2): What is the Dominant Strat

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd