Full equilibrium strategy example, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

 (a) A player wins if she takes the total to 100 and additions of any value from 1 through 10 are allowed. Thus, if you take the sum to 89, you are guaran- teed to win; your opponent must take the sum to at least 90 but can take it no higher than 99. In either case you can get to 100 on the next move. Using rollback, you can show that you can win if you can get the sum to 78 or to 67 . . . or to 12 or to 1. Thus, being the first mover and using a strategy that entails choosing 1 on the first move and then saying 11 minus whatever your opponent says allows you to win; you take the sum successively to 12, 23, . . ., 78, 89, and 100.

Technically, the full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, start with 1;

(ii) if the current total is not (100 – 11n) for some n, then choose the number that will bring the total to this form; or

(iii) if the current total is of the form (100 – 11n), then choose any number (all choices are equally bad).


(b) In this version, you lose if you force the total to equal or exceed 100, so you can win if you take the total to 99. Using the same type of analysis as  above, you see that you can win if you can get the sum to 88, 77, . . ., 22, or 11. This time you want to be the second mover. Your strategy should be to say 11 minus whatever your opponent says; this strategy takes you successively to 11, 22, . . ., 77,88, 99, and a win.

The full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, choose any number (all choices are equally bad);

(ii) if the current total is a multiple of 11, choose any number (all choices are equally bad); or

(iii) if the current total is not a multiple of 11, choose the number that will make the total a multiple of 11 (this is equivalent to choosing 11 minus the number just chosen by your opponent).


Related Discussions:- Full equilibrium strategy example

Identifying restrictions, In many cases we are interested in only one (or a...

In many cases we are interested in only one (or a few) of the equations of the model and attempts to measure its parameters statistically without a complete knowledge of the entire

What terms are included in the monopolistic competition, What terms are inc...

What terms are included in the monopolistic competition? Product Differentiation: 1. The meaning of monopolistic competition and product differentiation 2. Why monopolist

Combination of sequential and simultanous game, To give Mom a day of rest,...

To give Mom a day of rest, Dad Plans to take his two children, Bart and Cassie, on an outing on Sunday.Bart prefers to go to the amusement park (A), Whereas Cassie prefers to go to

Game playing in class, GAME PLAYING IN CLASS There are several games t...

GAME PLAYING IN CLASS There are several games that are appropriate for use on the first or second day of class. These games are simple but can be used to convey important poin

Status of identification, In econometric theory two possibie situations of ...

In econometric theory two possibie situations of identifiability can arise: Equation under,consideration is identified or not identified: 1) Equation is under-identified-

Dynamic game, Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE...

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE

Write a bouncing ball video game, Write a bouncing ball video game. The gam...

Write a bouncing ball video game. The game is similar to the one described and depicted in The balls bounce within the screen where the two horizontal walls are fixed. The two v

Equilibrium, An equilibrium, (or Nash equilibrium, named when John Nash) ma...

An equilibrium, (or Nash equilibrium, named when John Nash) may be a set of methods, one for every player, such that no player has incentive to unilaterally amendment her action. P

Hawk-dove game , Scenario The hawk-dove game is additionally commonly ca...

Scenario The hawk-dove game is additionally commonly called the sport of chicken. 2 hooligans with one thing to prove drive at one another on a slender road. The primary to swer

NAsh equilibrium, Consider a game in which player 1 chooses rows, player 2 ...

Consider a game in which player 1 chooses rows, player 2 chooses columns and player 3 chooses matrices. Only Player 3''s payoffs are given below. Show that D is not a best response

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd