Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Fraud or improper conduct:
English courts have intervened on numerous occasions and lifted the veil of incorporation in order to circumvent a fraudulent or improper design by a bunch of scheming promoters or shareholders. This is illustrated by the decisions in Jones and Another v Lipman and Another (13) and Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne (14). The court's order in the latter case is usually cited as an instance of lifting the veil but it should be noted that the defendant (Horne) was not a member of the company and, in principle, no veil existed between him and the company which would have been lifted by the court. It is rather an instance of the court regarding the company as Mr Horne in another form ("alter ego").
Enemy Character
A company may be regarded as an enemy if, inter alia, all or substantially all of its shares are held by alien enemies. This is illustrated by Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre & Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd (15). Since there appears to be no Kenya case on the point, the principles summarised by Lord Parker may be useful guidance to a Kenyan who might have to determine, in a given case, whether a particular company is to be regarded as a friend or enemy of Kenya.
Explain the Laws and rules of atlantic case There are several laws and rules which were applicable to this situation: Paris Convention on Aerial Navigation of 1919 H
Challenging an Arbitral Award Conversely a party dissatisfied through an arbitral award any challenge that it in the High Court and the High Court might set it aside whether i
In 2001, Puerto Rico enacted a law that requires specific labels on cement sold in Puerto Rico and imposes fines for any violations of these requirements. The law prohibits the sal
Judicial elucidation of Acts: In fact the other points to be noted in relation to judicial elucidation of Acts are as follows: like; (a) There is no clause of an Act is t
Jordan is the director a big engineering Company. Tyson is the Chief Engineer of the company. He is working on the company's new project, namely the construction of a new building
Advocates Whether in sec 3(1) of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act cap 2 and sec 2 of the Advocates Act (1989) an advocate is a person that whose name has been dul
Officials defended China's efforts to stop rampant copying of movies and other goods, saying Thursday that 4,322 people had been convicted of product piracy last year and promising
State the two alternatives of Policy Clustering That combines an element from each of these first two alternatives. One might think of it as a set of processes characterized by
Question 1: (a) In which instances would the legal burden shift on the defence? (b) Briefly describe the purpose of Cross Examination? (c) What are the characteristics of C
RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE: What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harb
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd