Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Fraud or improper conduct:
English courts have intervened on numerous occasions and lifted the veil of incorporation in order to circumvent a fraudulent or improper design by a bunch of scheming promoters or shareholders. This is illustrated by the decisions in Jones and Another v Lipman and Another (13) and Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne (14). The court's order in the latter case is usually cited as an instance of lifting the veil but it should be noted that the defendant (Horne) was not a member of the company and, in principle, no veil existed between him and the company which would have been lifted by the court. It is rather an instance of the court regarding the company as Mr Horne in another form ("alter ego").
Enemy Character
A company may be regarded as an enemy if, inter alia, all or substantially all of its shares are held by alien enemies. This is illustrated by Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre & Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd (15). Since there appears to be no Kenya case on the point, the principles summarised by Lord Parker may be useful guidance to a Kenyan who might have to determine, in a given case, whether a particular company is to be regarded as a friend or enemy of Kenya.
how do i answer a problem question in law base on the law of contract for final assesment
Wishes of members of parliament -Disadvantages law: However acts of Parliament do not reflect the wishes of the people as voters although the wishes of the individuals that wh
I will provide a cases from the media that have ethical implications. Please prepare a ppt presentation that: a) describes the issue/story (Clearly identify which case you ar
International Competition Law - Select a specific industry or corporation and analyse the factors that determine a competitive or anticompetitive outcome; - Factors such a
Question 1: (a) Elaborate on the sources of Law in Mauritius. (b) Explain what you understand by the following legal terms: (i) Obiter Dictum
Question 1: (a) Describe about a Trade Union. (b) Show the objectives of the Trade Union in the Republic of Mauritius. Justify your answer. (c) If you were nominated as
State law of refugees Under international law, refugees are individuals who are outside their country of nationality or habitual residence; who have well-founded fear of discri
Describe the principal-agent framework In standard principal-agent framework an agent may be directed to maximize an objective function which may or may not be different from
QUESTION 1 Describe the Public Procurement Legal Framework of Mauritius QUESTION 2 Explain the following, within the meaning of the Competition Act: a. collusive agreem
Question : In July 2007 Amin sent a brochure of a hotel he was running and managing to Sam, a travel agent and included the following statement: "The hotel provides a range of
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd