Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Fraud or improper conduct:
English courts have intervened on numerous occasions and lifted the veil of incorporation in order to circumvent a fraudulent or improper design by a bunch of scheming promoters or shareholders. This is illustrated by the decisions in Jones and Another v Lipman and Another (13) and Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne (14). The court's order in the latter case is usually cited as an instance of lifting the veil but it should be noted that the defendant (Horne) was not a member of the company and, in principle, no veil existed between him and the company which would have been lifted by the court. It is rather an instance of the court regarding the company as Mr Horne in another form ("alter ego").
Enemy Character
A company may be regarded as an enemy if, inter alia, all or substantially all of its shares are held by alien enemies. This is illustrated by Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre & Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd (15). Since there appears to be no Kenya case on the point, the principles summarised by Lord Parker may be useful guidance to a Kenyan who might have to determine, in a given case, whether a particular company is to be regarded as a friend or enemy of Kenya.
a) Two family businesses are competing in the same industry, and have been bitter rivals since their early days. The feud eventually extended into the personal lives of each famil
Laws relating to air and outer space as follows: Article 1 states that the contracting states should recognize that every state has complete and exclusive sovereignty over the
State Article 9 of air and outer space law Article 9 states that each contracting State may, for reasons of military necessity or public safety, restrict or prohibit uniformly
Good Faith - meetings and resolutions: The directors must act in good faith when calling a meeting,. Thus, in Cannon v Tasks, the directors called the annual general meeting
Doctrine of Stare Decisis However the doctrine of "stare Decisis" or "judicial precedent" is a legal rule which utilized a judge to refer to the earlier cases decided through
Case Law Relating To Dividends: The above provisions of Table A supplement the following common law rules: 1) Losses in previous years need not be provided for. Furthe
Directors liability: This was fraudulent preference and the bank must repay the sums received. The directors' liability under their guarantee to the bank then revived. A paym
Explain Universal jurisdiction of criminal jurisdiction It is concerned with the application of a State's criminal jurisdiction in respect of offences committed against the int
Qualifications of Advocates Conversely for qualify to admission as an advocate one must as; Be a US citizen or can say Possess a law degree from a recognized
Common law systems such as that in the United States rely on prior decisions as a principal source for determining cases as they arise. a) What are the five ways that precedents
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd