Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Fraud or improper conduct:
English courts have intervened on numerous occasions and lifted the veil of incorporation in order to circumvent a fraudulent or improper design by a bunch of scheming promoters or shareholders. This is illustrated by the decisions in Jones and Another v Lipman and Another (13) and Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne (14). The court's order in the latter case is usually cited as an instance of lifting the veil but it should be noted that the defendant (Horne) was not a member of the company and, in principle, no veil existed between him and the company which would have been lifted by the court. It is rather an instance of the court regarding the company as Mr Horne in another form ("alter ego").
Enemy Character
A company may be regarded as an enemy if, inter alia, all or substantially all of its shares are held by alien enemies. This is illustrated by Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre & Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd (15). Since there appears to be no Kenya case on the point, the principles summarised by Lord Parker may be useful guidance to a Kenyan who might have to determine, in a given case, whether a particular company is to be regarded as a friend or enemy of Kenya.
Formation of Contract - Law of Contract However a legally binding agreement prepared between two or persons or more parties. Whereas it has also been explained as a promise o
RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE: What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harb
What is Utilitarianism?
The UNCLOS 1982 The UNCLOS 1982 does not stop at gauging the limits of the territory of coastal states. Other features of the Convention include the right of transit of landloc
(a) Section 63 of the Employment Relations Act provides as follows: "The parties to a labour dispute may jointly refer such dispute for voluntary arbitration to the Tribunal or
Question 1: In order to ensure health and safety of employees at the workplace, the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005 imposes duties on employers only. Discuss. Quest
Impose a duty on directors: A company is, however, free to impose a duty on its directors to attend board meetings within a certain period of time and to prescribe the consequ
Unsecured trade creditors: It refers to a "class" of members or of creditors. Obviously if two or more companies are involved or if one company has two classes of shares, eg.
Disadvantages of Stare Decisis - Rigidity However the case law method of administration of justice has been criticized on the grounds which it leads to rigidity because the di
The below is a scenario in which I have to make an IRAC for (not sure if you know what that is) but read the scenario and see if "Faye" is able to leave legally without ramificat
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd