Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Operation Management

Assignment Help:

Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes

This type of chart is used when it is impractical or inconvenient to maintain a constant sample size. Instead of plotting the number of defectives in each sample, the proportion (p) or fraction of defectives is calculated and then plotted. Clearly, to ensure that meaningful plots are made, the sample sizes must be large enough to ensure that a number of defectives will typically be found. This may seem to imply that some level of non-conformance is being accepted, but this is not necessarily so. For example, consider the Go/Not-go gauging example shown in the figure on page 249. Whilst the design limits of size on the component diameter might be, say, 24.98 mm and 25.02 mm; for process control purposes the gaps in the gauge might be set at, say, 24.99 and 25.01 respectively. Remembering that, for attributes, only two states are possible (defective/non defective) the relevant probability distribution is the binomial distribution, the mean of which (¯p) can be estimated by inspecting a large number of items:

¯p = total number of defectives/ total number inspected

An estimate of the standard deviation of the binomial distribution (σp), for samples of size n is given by:

σp = √(¯p (1-¯p) / n)

For small values of n the profiles of the binomial distributions are distinctly skewed, but, for large values of n and, particularly, when the product p n is greater than about 5, the distributions are sufficiently symmetrical to be well-approximated by the normal distribution. In this latter situation the control chart limits can be determined in the same manner as for variables charts.

2206_Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes.png

It will be realised that the implied constant sample size (n) in these expressions presents some difficulty in a procedure when the sample size is allowed to vary. This can be surmounted by using an average value for n, and limiting variation in the size of subsequent samples to, say, ±20 per cent of this value: the results will still be sufficiently accurate for most process control purposes.


Related Discussions:- Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes

Define what would be the percentage increase in productivity, An operation ...

An operation produces 190 units per hour with a scrap rate of 10 percent. If we could eliminate the scrap completely, what would be the percentage increase in productivity per hour

Define organizational behaviours in certain situations, A number of persona...

A number of personality dimensions are identified (Big Five, attitudes, locus of control, etc.). What are the strengths and weaknesses of some of the personality dimensions in vari

Illustrate the quality control systems, Illustrate the quality control syst...

Illustrate the quality control systems? Quality Control verses Quality Assurance: Quality control systems comprise sampling, testing and inspection of raw materials, work-in

Explain the best way to handle the situation in the future, How is Microsof...

How is Microsoft and other software manufacturers combating the threat of open source software and other free tools that compete with its commercial products? Do you think that thi

Explain terms of developing a project plan, In terms of developing a projec...

In terms of developing a project plan, specifically recommend how this resource could expedite that process.

Location decisions, what are the factors to be considered when making locat...

what are the factors to be considered when making location decisions

I want a broke down step by step solution, I have looked at your solution a...

I have looked at your solution and I still do not understand how you get the numbers put in for flow time from the information given. I understand how to calculate everything after

Explain violate a federal law, Agents and employees of Apples Corporation a...

Agents and employees of Apples Corporation and Oranges Corporation are convicted of conspiring to violate a federal law that is punishable by a term of imprisonment and a fine. Can

Explain what lessons learned other companies, • What lessons learned other ...

• What lessons learned other companies (in vastly different industries) could take away from the innovative practices at Holden. Provide specific examples to support your response.

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd