Formal language theory, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Formal Language Theory. It's maybe not too surprising to us, as we have already seen a similar equivalence between LTO and SF. But it equates two very di?erent ways of specifying languages-ways that have almost nothing in common. The fact that these actually de?ne the same class of languages suggests that it is a "natural" class of some sort and not just an arbitrary class re?ecting the idiosyncrasies of the mechanisms we used. In wake Kleene's Theorem, the term Regular is uniformly used to denote both the languages that can be denoted by a regular expression and those that are recognized by FSA.


Related Discussions:- Formal language theory

Give a strictly 2-local automaton, Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give ...

Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give a strictly 2-local automaton that recognizes L 3 . Use the construction of the proof to extend the automaton to one that recognizes L 3 . Gi

Chomsky normal form, s->0A0|1B1|BB A->C B->S|A C->S|null find useless symbo...

s->0A0|1B1|BB A->C B->S|A C->S|null find useless symbol?

Algorithm for the universal recognition problem, Sketch an algorithm for th...

Sketch an algorithm for the universal recognition problem for SL 2 . This takes an automaton and a string and returns TRUE if the string is accepted by the automaton, FALSE otherwi

Concatenation, We saw earlier that LT is not closed under concatenation. If...

We saw earlier that LT is not closed under concatenation. If we think in terms of the LT graphs, recognizing the concatenation of LT languages would seem to require knowing, while

Non-determinism - recognizable language, Our DFAs are required to have exac...

Our DFAs are required to have exactly one edge incident from each state for each input symbol so there is a unique next state for every current state and input symbol. Thus, the ne

Class of local languages is not closed under union, Both L 1 and L 2 are ...

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

Pushdown automator, draw pda for l={an,bm,an/m,n>=0} n is in superscript

draw pda for l={an,bm,an/m,n>=0} n is in superscript

Distinguish between mealy and moore machine, Distinguish between Mealy and ...

Distinguish between Mealy and Moore Machine? Construct a Mealy machine that can output EVEN or ODD According to the total no. of 1's encountered is even or odd.

Automata, automata of atm machine

automata of atm machine

Union, Intuitively, closure of SL 2 under intersection is reasonably easy ...

Intuitively, closure of SL 2 under intersection is reasonably easy to see, particularly if one considers the Myhill graphs of the automata. Any path through both graphs will be a

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd