Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The case company combines SKUs into product groups and product groups into assortment groups. The methods based on advance demand information (Methods 1-3) can therefore be on a product group level, on an assortment level, or for all assortment groups together. We tested all three ways for all three methods, and for each method it turned out that forecasting on a product group level provided the best results (and for all SKUs together the worst). Therefore, we will only report the results on a product group level.
We remark that the ongoing policy of the company was actually to produce forecasts based on advance demand information, but on an assortment group level. Their method used a combination of the rules for dividing group demand (i.e. for calculating fn; n 2N)of Methods 1 and 2. It applied a different way of estimating group demand M. Instead of using (1), a planning committee consisting of mainly purchasers had to reach a consensus, also taking budget restrictions into account. Since the resulting forecasts have not been recorded, they cannot be compared to those of other methods in our empirical investigation. We do remark that letting budget restrictions play a role in forecasting obviously carries the risk of underestimations to stay within budget or over-estimations to avoid losing part of the budget (in future years).
Since having a top, mid and flop class is intuitively most appealing, only results for three categories are presented. We also tested the top-flop method with varying class sizes. However, again, this did not (signi?cantly) improve the performance. Therefore, we report results for equal-sized classes only. We note that contrary to ABC inventory classi?cation, where class A SKUs typically get special attention and their number therefore needs to be limited, class sizes do not affect the complexity of applying the top-flop method.
20 questions
A owns all of the X stock with a basis of $200. A's three sons own all of the Y stock equally. X and Y each have E&P of $100, respectively. A sells one half of the X stock to Y
A promissory note is an instrument in writing (not being a blank or a currency note) containing an unconditional undertaking, signed by the maker, to pay a certain sum of money onl
A factoring company has offered a one-year agreement with Glub Ltd to both manage its debtors and advanced 80 per cent of the value of all its invoices immediately a sale is invoi
I need the El Cap climbing company corporate finance graded project
Question: (a) Discuss the concept of financial gearing and its implications for share price maximisation. (b) A firm has both, a current and a target debt-equity ratio of 0.
You are a new member of the accounting team and have been asked to examine the accounts of Bellatrix and calculate appropriate ratios in order to evaluate the company's performance
On December 31, 2009, the Real Weapons Factory reported total stockholders' equity of $447,200. On that date, total contributed capital was $360,000. During 2009, the firm had tota
CF&G will account nearly 40% of the marks for your Project. In order to do well in this part of the assignment you will have: • Shown the ability to apply SVA analysis comprehen
differentiate between pricing efficiency and allocative efficiency
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd