Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The case company combines SKUs into product groups and product groups into assortment groups. The methods based on advance demand information (Methods 1-3) can therefore be on a product group level, on an assortment level, or for all assortment groups together. We tested all three ways for all three methods, and for each method it turned out that forecasting on a product group level provided the best results (and for all SKUs together the worst). Therefore, we will only report the results on a product group level.
We remark that the ongoing policy of the company was actually to produce forecasts based on advance demand information, but on an assortment group level. Their method used a combination of the rules for dividing group demand (i.e. for calculating fn; n 2N)of Methods 1 and 2. It applied a different way of estimating group demand M. Instead of using (1), a planning committee consisting of mainly purchasers had to reach a consensus, also taking budget restrictions into account. Since the resulting forecasts have not been recorded, they cannot be compared to those of other methods in our empirical investigation. We do remark that letting budget restrictions play a role in forecasting obviously carries the risk of underestimations to stay within budget or over-estimations to avoid losing part of the budget (in future years).
Since having a top, mid and flop class is intuitively most appealing, only results for three categories are presented. We also tested the top-flop method with varying class sizes. However, again, this did not (signi?cantly) improve the performance. Therefore, we report results for equal-sized classes only. We note that contrary to ABC inventory classi?cation, where class A SKUs typically get special attention and their number therefore needs to be limited, class sizes do not affect the complexity of applying the top-flop method.
Kristina started setting aside funds three years ago to save for a down payment on a house. She has saved $900 each quarter and earned an average rate of return of 4.8 percent. How
Question 1 : The history of federalism can be broken down into three (4 really but we'll just focus on 3) historical phases (Dual, Cooperative, and New). Discuss each phase and eva
Mergers & Acquisitions now is playing crucial role in modern corporate finance world. For any prospects, there is only one reason for a firm making an offer to M&A another firm,
Explain in detail, using the time value of money,if its better to receive a 685k tax deduction in 1 year vs 17,564.10 each year for 39 years.(inflation, opportunity cost, etc...) T
Problem: (a) The Mauritius Automated Clearing and Settlement System (MACSS) is the Mauritian Real-time Gross Settlement (RTGS) system. (i) Outline briefly the concept of R
Financial Modelling Read carefully the case notes overleaf. Factor models on explaining firm's returns in a credit risk context. Is the usual one-factor model good enough?
L has business assets worth $8 million and NOL carryovers of $1 million expiring in 14 years and of $2 million expiring in 15 years. 100% of L's stock is worth $10 million. The l
You are a ceo of a sotware firm that has limited access to debt equity markets. The average return on last year projects is 28 % . and cost of capital is 12%. would npv pr Irr be
limitation of time lag theory
Determine pay back period and net present value? A company is considering two projects with the subsequent cash flow streams: Year Project A
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd