Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Extraordinary Universal Meetings:
S.132(1) provides for the convening of "extraordinary" general meeting but does not define it. Neither is the word "extraordinary" defined in any other section of the Act. However, Table A, Article 48 provides that all general meetings other than annual general meetings shall be called extraordinary general meetings.
Table A, Article 49 further provides that the directors may, whenever they think fit, convene an extraordinary general meeting. Furthermore through s.132(1), despite anything in the articles of a company, the directors are bound to convene an extraordinary general meeting of the company on the requisition of the holders of not less than one-tenth of the paid-up capital of the company carrying the right of voting at general meetings of the company, or, if the company has no share capital, of members representing not less than one-tenth of the total voting rights. S.132(2) provides that the requisition must state the objects of the meeting, and must be signed by the requisitionists and deposited at the registered office of the company. S.132(3) provides that if the directors do not within 21 days from the date of the deposit of the requisition proceed to convene a meeting, the requisitionists, or any of them representing more than one-half of the total voting rights of all of them, may themselves convene a meeting, so long as they do so within three months of the requisition.
S.132(5) entitles the requisitionists to recover any reasonable expenses incurred in convening the meeting from the company, and the company may in turn recover these from the fees or other remuneration of the defaulting directors.
QUESTION 1 Mr Tom, a businessman, has a commercial dispute with one of his clients. He has heard about Alternative Dispute Resolution and he believes that mediation, conciliati
Question 1 The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co. Ltd has to be watched very carefully. The Courts can and often do draw aside the veil. Discuss. Question 2
Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
Complaints made against the auditors: These are the most simple principles that such have to be applied to cases of this description. I protest, however, against the notion
Determine about the Opportunistic policy cycle We now turn back once again to study the behaviour of the decision maker who, ultimately wants to return to the office in future.
Administrative Function of Chief Justice Where, he is the principal administrative officer of the judiciary And where, he is the chairman of the Judicial Service Commi
Every person is having different set of knowledge and skill with them which is different from other individual, this difference in skill and knowledge factor among various individu
Schemes of fraud: Auditors must not be made liable for not tracking out ingenious and carefully laid schemes of fraud whenever there is nothing to arouse their suspicion, and
Avoidance of Floating Charges: Under s.314 liquidation automatically renders void any floating charge created within the period of 12 months before commencement of liquidation
EXCEPTIONS: A valid meeting may be constituted by the presence of one person in the following cases: (i) If the meeting is an annual general meeting which was called by, o
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd