Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
1. Your firm is considering an investment in a wind farm. Assume that the farm will cost $1 million per MW of installed capacity. The plan under consideration would deploy 10 GE 1.5 MW. You are to assess the after-tax profitability of this plan. The wind farm will be placed in a Class 6 wind area, generating an estimated average of 8760 MWh per turbine per year. The price of energy produced is $0.067 per kwh and a production tax credit provide an additional $0.022 per kwh for the first 10 years. You can obtain a very low interest loan for your investment, with an effective interest rate of 2.5% that you will pay off over 30 years. Assume that transmission lines will be provided by a local utility at no cost. Operating expenditures are $10,000 per year, mostly for insurance and occasional maintenance. Your corporate tax rate is 30%. Discount real profits or losses at a rate of 10%. For the three options below, generate an annual nominal cash flow, annual before tax profits, annual after-tax profits, and net present value after tax of the windfarm for the first 20 years (using traditional NPV calculations-do not worry about WACC), assuming zero salvage value and that you have no other deductions or credits for taxation except interest and: 1. The wind turbines can be straight-line depreciated over 15 years. 2. The wind turbines can be MACRS depreciated at 300% declining balance over 6 years, switching to straight-line depreciation on the adjusted basis (as in 4) if ever that provides a greater deduction. 3. The wind turbines can be depreciated 100% in the first year. Is the wind farm profitable in NPV terms under any of these scenarios after 20 years? Which depreciation method is preferable? Why?
Oregon Productivity Matrix - Performance Measures The Oregon productivity matrix (OPM) was developed in Oregon State University in 1986 and measures accomplishments against go
Consider the WBS shown below: 1.00.00 1.1.0 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.2.0 1.2.1 1.2.2 If the total program costs $100,000 and 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 are each $20 K, then the cost of 1.1.0 is:
Because of the aggressive actions of his brokerage firm, a stockbroker feels pressure to recommend to a client a stock he does not consider a good investment. Please develop a deci
Professor Davis teaches a course in supply chain management at North Texas State University. She is scheduled to give her class of 32 students a final exam on the last day of exam
value chain analysis
Approaches to Determining Operations Strategy This describes aspects of operations systems and performance measurement, including trade-offs between performance criteria. We
Locational Break - even analysis In comparing several potential location on an economic basis,( i., e, tangible factor) the only revenues and costs that need to be con
Your company wants to increase revenues from its existing customers. How can data mining be used to accomplish his objective?
Ask que Prepare Paul Jordan’s report to John Smithers using regression analysis. Provide a summary of the cell phone industry outlook as part of Paul’s response. stion #Minimum 100
Demand for a surgical procedure at St. Elsewhere Hospital has increased steadily over the past few years: Year 1 2 3 4 5 Heart Transplants 45 50 52 56 61 Use the
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd