Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle:
According to Professor Wedderburn, the so-called exceptions are essentially no exceptions at all. They appear to be circumstances in that such there is no chance of confirmation by the majority and to which the rule is, therefore, inapplicable.
However, the exceptions were summarised by Jenkins, L.J. in Edwards v Halliwell (100) as follows-
1. Ultra vires and illegality
"Where the act complained of is wholly ultra vires the company or association the rule has no application because there is no question of the transaction being confirmed by whichever majority," (per Jenkins, L.J.)
2. Special majorities
The rule in Foss v Harbottle does not prevent an individual member from suing if the matter in respect of which he was suing was one which could be done or sanctioned, not through a simple majority of the members of the company or association (i.e. an ordinary resolution), but only by some special majority (i.e. a special resolution) which has not been obtained.
Warranties - Terms used in Contract Conversely the following are the warranties implied by the Act like: (a) Quiet possession with (s.14 (b)). However this provision is int
CONDITIONS FOR RELIEF: In H.R. Harmer Ltd (1959) Jenkins L.J. summarised the conditions which must be met before relief under the section can be granted by the court when he s
Question 1: (i) Explain clearly the difference between Individual Bargaining and Collective Bargaining highlighting with examples the contexts in which each of them applies.
Repugnance to Justice and Morality However the customary law will be applied only whether it is not repugnant to justice and morality.Even though the Act needs the phrase "and
Stakeholders emphasised that a coordinated, whole of government approach is necessary to mitigate phoenix activity. Stakeholders also emphasised that options should recognise th
Question 1: Critically examine the ‘Exclusivity Principle' and support your answer with relevant case law. Question 2: Even before the decision of the Court in Anismini
Explain UNSC Resolution 1624 and when it is passed The most-recent such resolution is UNSC Resolution 1624 passed in the year 2005. It states: "1. Calls upon all States to
WHAT WAS THE IMMUNITY FROM JURISDICTION States are recognized as having authority over people, things and events within their own territory and therefore may exercise jurisdict
Advantages of Stare Decisis - Certainty and Predictability However the doctrine of stare Decisis includes an element of certainty and uniformity in the administration and mana
Article 33 - Pacific settlement of disputes Article 33 the meaning of Negotiation is the same as in domestic law. It is a preferred mode and third party intervention is not nee
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd