Equilibrium analysis, Macroeconomics

Assignment Help:

A vital question is whether the equilibrium we have identified in labor market (with a high unemployment rate) can remain in long run. Will there not be adjustments which will take us back to a point with no unemployment? Keynesian justification for why unemployment will persist is as below. 

Goods market is in equilibrium as firms will sell everything they produce and demand for finished goods is satisfied. Firms then have no reason to hire more labor (they will just increase L when YD increases). And as the goods market is in equilibrium so they have no reason to change prices. 

Anyhow we have involuntary unemployment in the diagram above which may create a downward pressure on wages. In the cross model, this won't happen for the below arguments: 

1. Nominal wages are sticky, principally downwards. We barely ever observe cuts in nominal wages. 

2. Nominal wage cuts wouldn't help. With lower wages, income would fall, decreasing aggregate demand even more hence making the situation worse. Lower nominal wages will allow firms to lower prices. Though if prices fall as much as nominal wages, real wages will no, and we had stayed in same paragraph. 

As with classical model, we study most of the check model characteristics in an exercise book. A couple of comments, however, may be of interest already here.

  • It is difficult to illustrate long periods of high unemployment in classic model with the model of labor used there.
  • During the Great Depression in early 1930s (the great depression), it became increasingly apparent that traditional model had flaws. Unemployment was very high for a long time and any adjustment to the balance of labor market wasn't.
  • In Keynesian model, can the economy to be in balance even with a high level of involuntary unemployment and model appeared to be a good explanation for depression.
  • I check the model, financial policy is a very significant role. By increasing G so, the government can increase GDP and hence reduce unemployment.
  • The classic dichotomy between nominal and real variables will disappear in all Keynesian models.

 


Related Discussions:- Equilibrium analysis

Money supply unanticipated increase, What impact will an unanticipated incr...

What impact will an unanticipated increase in the money supply have on the real interest rate, real output, and employment in the short run? How will expansionary monetary policy a

Explain why interest rates are pro-cyclical, Critically explain why interes...

Critically explain why interest rates are pro-cyclical, using the supply and demand for bonds framework.

Rent control agency of new york city, The rent control agency of New York C...

The rent control agency of New York City has found that market demand is QD=100-5P With quantity measured in tens of though sands of apartments and price, the monthly rental rate,

Explain the difference among saving and investment, Explain the difference ...

Explain the difference among saving and investment as explained by macroeconomists. Which of the following situations represent investment or saving? Explain: a) You u

International trade, what does international trade fails to its claims ?

what does international trade fails to its claims ?

Input combination if the price of capital decreased, In reference to the ab...

In reference to the above question, assume you know the combination of inputs that minimizes cost. What would happen to this input combination if the price of labor increased? What

Goods market and factors market, Goods Market and Factors Market: Good...

Goods Market and Factors Market: Goods  market  is  the  market  where  goods  are  bought  and  sold  for  the  purpose  of consumption Factors markets are the markets

Define nominal wages, Q. Define Nominal wages? The nominal wage is wage...

Q. Define Nominal wages? The nominal wage is wage per unit of time in the currency used in the country- what we usually just call wage. When we mention wage in macroeconomics w

Willing to hold money, Was money a better store of value in the United Stat...

Was money a better store of value in the United States in the 1950s than it was in the 1970s? Why or why not? In which period would you have been willing to hold money? Which one w

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd