Emptiness problem, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

The Emptiness Problem is the problem of deciding if a given regular language is empty (= ∅).

Theorem 4 (Emptiness) The Emptiness Problem for Regular Languages is decidable.

Proof: We'll sketch three different algorithms for deciding the Emptiness Problem, given some DFA A = (Q,Σ, T, q0, F).

(Emptiness 1) A string w is in L(A) iff it labels a path through the transition graph of A from q0 to an accepting state. Thus, the language will be non-empty iff there is some such path. So the question of Emptiness reduces to the question of connectivity: the language recognized by A is empty iff there is no accepting state in the connected component of its transition graph that is rooted at q0. The problem of determining connected components of directed graphs is algorithmically solvable,by Depth-First Search, for instance (and solvable in time linear in the number of nodes). So, given A, we just do a depth-?rst search of the transition graph rooted at the start state keeping track of whether we encounter any accepting state. We return "True" iff we ?nd none.


Related Discussions:- Emptiness problem

Mapping reducibility, Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know...

Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?

Numerical integration, what problems are tackled under numerical integratio...

what problems are tackled under numerical integration

Mealy machine, Construct a Mealy machine that can output EVEN or ODD Accord...

Construct a Mealy machine that can output EVEN or ODD According to the total no. of 1''s encountered is even or odd.

Designing finite automata, a finite automata accepting strings over {a,b} e...

a finite automata accepting strings over {a,b} ending in abbbba

Strictly local generation automaton, Another way of interpreting a strictly...

Another way of interpreting a strictly local automaton is as a generator: a mechanism for building strings which is restricted to building all and only the automaton as an inexh

Give a strictly 2-local automaton, Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give ...

Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give a strictly 2-local automaton that recognizes L 3 . Use the construction of the proof to extend the automaton to one that recognizes L 3 . Gi

Vogel Approximation Method(VAM, how to write program Minimum Cost Calculat...

how to write program Minimum Cost Calculation - Vogel Approximation Method(VAM

Class of recognizable languages, Proof (sketch): Suppose L 1 and L 2 are ...

Proof (sketch): Suppose L 1 and L 2 are recognizable. Then there are DFAs A 1 = (Q,Σ, T 1 , q 0 , F 1 ) and A 2 = (P,Σ, T 2 , p 0 , F 2 ) such that L 1 = L(A 1 ) and L 2 = L(

Ogdens lemma, proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand ...

proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand the meaning of distinguished position .

Sketch an algorithm for recognizing language, Suppose A = (Σ, T) is an SL 2...

Suppose A = (Σ, T) is an SL 2 automaton. Sketch an algorithm for recognizing L(A) by, in essence, implementing the automaton. Your algorithm should work with the particular automa

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd