Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about how to do this. For this claim the assumption that the solution of each instance is unique is not necessary; but both of the others are. If you had a program that checks whether a proposed solution to an instance of a problem is correct and another that systematically generates every instance of the problem along with every possible solution, how could you use them (as subroutines) to build a program that, when given an instance, was guaranteed to ?nd a correct solution to that problem under the assumption that such a solution always exists?

1255_Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm.png


Related Discussions:- Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm

Defining strictly local automata, One of the first issues to resolve, when ...

One of the first issues to resolve, when exploring any mechanism for defining languages is the question of how to go about constructing instances of the mechanism which define part

Finiteness problem for regular languages, The fact that the Recognition Pro...

The fact that the Recognition Problem is decidable gives us another algorithm for deciding Emptiness. The pumping lemma tells us that if every string x ∈ L(A) which has length grea

#titl, matlab v matlab

matlab v matlab

Closure properties to prove regularity, The fact that regular languages are...

The fact that regular languages are closed under Boolean operations simpli?es the process of establishing regularity of languages; in essence we can augment the regular operations

Turing, turing machine for prime numbers

turing machine for prime numbers

Regular languages, LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolea...

LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolean operations which turned out to be identical to SF, the closure of the ?nite languages under union, concatenation and compl

Complement - operations on languages, The fact that SL 2 is closed under i...

The fact that SL 2 is closed under intersection but not under union implies that it is not closed under complement since, by DeMorgan's Theorem L 1 ∩ L 2 = We know that

Closure properties of recognizable languages, We got the class LT by taking...

We got the class LT by taking the class SL and closing it under Boolean operations. We have observed that LT ⊆ Recog, so certainly any Boolean combination of LT languages will also

Automata, As we are primarily concerned with questions of what is and what ...

As we are primarily concerned with questions of what is and what is not computable relative to some particular model of computation, we will usually base our explorations of langua

Kleene closure, One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would...

One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would imply non closure under both Kleene- and positive closure, since the concatenation of a language with itself is included

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd