Convert chomsky normal form into binary form, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Suppose G = (N, Σ, P, S) is a reduced grammar (we can certainly reduce G if we haven't already). Our algorithm is as follows:

1. Define maxrhs(G) to be the maximum length of the right hand side of  any  production.

2. While maxrhs 3 we convert G to an equivalent reduced grammar G' with smaller maxrhs.

3. a) Choose a production A → α where is of maximal length in G.

b) Rewrite α as α1α2 where |α1| = |α1|/2 (largest integer ≤ |α1|/2) and  |α2| = |α2|/2 (smallest integer ≥ |α2|/2)

c) Replace A -> α in P by A  -> α1B and B -> α2

If we repeat step 3 for all productions of maximal length we create a grammar G' all of whose productions are of smaller length than maxrhs.

We can then apply the algorithm to G' and continue until we reach a grammar that has maxrhs ≤ 2.


Related Discussions:- Convert chomsky normal form into binary form

Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Claim Under the assum...

Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about

Finiteness of languages is decidable, To see this, note that if there are a...

To see this, note that if there are any cycles in the Myhill graph of A then L(A) will be infinite, since any such cycle can be repeated arbitrarily many times. Conversely, if the

Project, can you plz help with some project ideas relatede to DFA or NFA or...

can you plz help with some project ideas relatede to DFA or NFA or anything

Nfas with e-transitions, We now add an additional degree of non-determinism...

We now add an additional degree of non-determinism and allow transitions that can be taken independent of the input-ε-transitions. Here whenever the automaton is in state 1

Myhill-nerode, Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff...

Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes. Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recogn

Turing, turing machine for prime numbers

turing machine for prime numbers

Boolean operations - class of recognizable languages, Theorem The class of ...

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations. The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a give

Closure properties of recognizable languages, We got the class LT by taking...

We got the class LT by taking the class SL and closing it under Boolean operations. We have observed that LT ⊆ Recog, so certainly any Boolean combination of LT languages will also

Non-regular languages, Suppose A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a DFA and that Q = ...

Suppose A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a DFA and that Q = {q 0 , q 1 , . . . , q n-1 } includes n states. Thinking of the automaton in terms of its transition graph, a string x is recogn

Class of local languages is not closed under union, Both L 1 and L 2 are ...

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd