Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The Concept of Efficiency is stated below:
To illustrate this concept of the efficiency, it is used to expand the understanding of what is meant by the Pareto-efficient allocation of economic resources. This is the situation in which it is not probable to move to other allocation which would make some people improved off and nobody worse off. In this context of the production possibilities frontier, then, points on the frontier are all Pareto-efficient, as it is not possible to move to the one more point (which means produce more of one good) without incurring some opportunity price (which means sacrificing the production of some other good).
Economists argue that the free-market perfect competitively for economy where P=MC automatically delivers most favourable allocation in the economy (Pareto-efficiency), so every government intervention (such as tax) which interferes with that the allocation generates efficiency losses. The efficiency (or the welfare) loss of the tax can be illustrated by an easy demand supply diagram. It can be seen that the loss in consumer and the producer surplus is much more than the revenue gain to government.
Does the above argument state that a tax can never be justified on the grounds of efficiency?
The answer to the question asked to us is No. There are major two cases in which imposing the tax might actually be better than not imposing it.
i. When there are market failures and the tax is imposed to bring the marginal social cost equal to the marginal social benefit.
ii. When there are existing distortions in economy and taxes are imposed to the spread distortion over various commodities rather than placing burden on just one commodity. An additional way to say the same thing is that: it is better to impose a little tax on a number of commodities to increase a certain amount of the government revenue, in spite impose one large tax on one or two commodities specifically.
"If for a certain market, the concentration ratio CR4 (the combined market share of the 4 largest firms) is 1, its Herfindahl index is at least 0.25." Describe the given statement.
Question 1: a) Describe the different types of unemployment that exist. b) Critically examine how monetary policy will be used to deal with inflation. c) Critically deter
(1) The demand curve for oranges is given by the equation P = 5 – Q/200. The supply curve is given by P = Q/800. Q is measured in oranges per day and price is measured in dollars p
Once the organization has decided to move forward with the development of a new or modified system, it is time to determine what tasks are necessary to move the project from initia
An economics branch which keep concentrate on illumination the economic decisions people make in practice, particularly when these conflict with what conventional economic theory p
The law of supply is that producers will supply more the higher the price of the commodity. The supply curve is an upward sloping function showing a direct relationship among pric
compare marginal rate of technical substitution and marginal rate of substitution
using the marginal utility approach discuss how economic theory explains the optimum pattern of consumption for an individual consumer
Foreign investment: To attract foreign investment – Developing Plans are used as a means of attracting foreign investment or foreign aid.Foreign government and international o
is economics a positive science
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd