Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The Concept of Efficiency is stated below:
To illustrate this concept of the efficiency, it is used to expand the understanding of what is meant by the Pareto-efficient allocation of economic resources. This is the situation in which it is not probable to move to other allocation which would make some people improved off and nobody worse off. In this context of the production possibilities frontier, then, points on the frontier are all Pareto-efficient, as it is not possible to move to the one more point (which means produce more of one good) without incurring some opportunity price (which means sacrificing the production of some other good).
Economists argue that the free-market perfect competitively for economy where P=MC automatically delivers most favourable allocation in the economy (Pareto-efficiency), so every government intervention (such as tax) which interferes with that the allocation generates efficiency losses. The efficiency (or the welfare) loss of the tax can be illustrated by an easy demand supply diagram. It can be seen that the loss in consumer and the producer surplus is much more than the revenue gain to government.
Does the above argument state that a tax can never be justified on the grounds of efficiency?
The answer to the question asked to us is No. There are major two cases in which imposing the tax might actually be better than not imposing it.
i. When there are market failures and the tax is imposed to bring the marginal social cost equal to the marginal social benefit.
ii. When there are existing distortions in economy and taxes are imposed to the spread distortion over various commodities rather than placing burden on just one commodity. An additional way to say the same thing is that: it is better to impose a little tax on a number of commodities to increase a certain amount of the government revenue, in spite impose one large tax on one or two commodities specifically.
Demonstrate mathematically that the equilibrium condition MRS PB PA is the equivalent of the utility-maximizing rule MU AP A MU B PB .
Niche Operators: It is assessed by TRAI that despite the USO support, existing big service providers would not be interested to serve about 50 per cent of the villages. To add
prove that marginal utility of x=the price of commodity x.
Emergence and Persistence of Structural Imbalances: The period broadly corresponds to the period of the Sixth Plan and the Seventh Plan. The Sixth Plan was launched when the e
Using the key distinguishing features of any market structure describe the market structure for the South African mobile telecommunications industry
Economic instruments Financial rewards, incentives and penalties that operate automatically via market forces, to encourage beneficial behavior.
Graph the following example and answer the questions: The United States and Japan only produce two goods. They have the same fixed resources and they are equally efficient, and bo
suppose ismail were to eat five pizzas per week.what is the total value ismail would place on his five weekly pizzas?
Joe Brown’s dairy operates in a perfectly competitive marketplace. Joe’s machinery costs $500 per day and is the only fixed input. His variable costs are comprised of the wages pai
Problem 1: a. Briefly explain and distinguish between a centrally planned, laissez-faire and mixed economy. b. According to you, which type of economic system is most desira
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd