Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The Concept of Efficiency is stated below:
To illustrate this concept of the efficiency, it is used to expand the understanding of what is meant by the Pareto-efficient allocation of economic resources. This is the situation in which it is not probable to move to other allocation which would make some people improved off and nobody worse off. In this context of the production possibilities frontier, then, points on the frontier are all Pareto-efficient, as it is not possible to move to the one more point (which means produce more of one good) without incurring some opportunity price (which means sacrificing the production of some other good).
Economists argue that the free-market perfect competitively for economy where P=MC automatically delivers most favourable allocation in the economy (Pareto-efficiency), so every government intervention (such as tax) which interferes with that the allocation generates efficiency losses. The efficiency (or the welfare) loss of the tax can be illustrated by an easy demand supply diagram. It can be seen that the loss in consumer and the producer surplus is much more than the revenue gain to government.
Does the above argument state that a tax can never be justified on the grounds of efficiency?
The answer to the question asked to us is No. There are major two cases in which imposing the tax might actually be better than not imposing it.
i. When there are market failures and the tax is imposed to bring the marginal social cost equal to the marginal social benefit.
ii. When there are existing distortions in economy and taxes are imposed to the spread distortion over various commodities rather than placing burden on just one commodity. An additional way to say the same thing is that: it is better to impose a little tax on a number of commodities to increase a certain amount of the government revenue, in spite impose one large tax on one or two commodities specifically.
Consider a consumer with the following Cobb-Douglass utility function: U (x, y) = x α y 1-α a) Find the Marshallian Demand for both goods. b) Find the Price Elasticit
A control in economics means a steady profit rate that is enhancing. Thus, after one year you could have £1mill profit then the next year £3mill profit etc.
determinate equilibrium price and quantity. if Qd=7-1/2p AND Qs=1/4P-1/2
Identify the four essential economic activities. The four main economic activities are: a) resource maintenance, b) production, c) distribution, and d) consumpti
Demand Function is Homogeneous of Degree Zero: Mathematical Presentation we will show that demand function is homogeneous of degree zero in prices and money income. In o
meaning and characteristics of plural sense and singlural
How has the Harberler''s theory of opportunity cost an improvment over the classical theory of trade?
Features of bureaucracy: Impersonal Order: The authority is inherent in the post and not the individual who performs the official role. An official is supposed to have a det
Ask qExplain why each of the following factors may influence the own price elasticity of demand for a commodity. (i) Consumer preferences, that is, whether consumers regard the com
Joe Brown’s dairy operates in a perfectly competitive marketplace. Joe’s machinery costs $500 per day and is the only fixed input. His variable costs are comprised of the wages pai
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd