Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The Concept of Efficiency is stated below:
To illustrate this concept of the efficiency, it is used to expand the understanding of what is meant by the Pareto-efficient allocation of economic resources. This is the situation in which it is not probable to move to other allocation which would make some people improved off and nobody worse off. In this context of the production possibilities frontier, then, points on the frontier are all Pareto-efficient, as it is not possible to move to the one more point (which means produce more of one good) without incurring some opportunity price (which means sacrificing the production of some other good).
Economists argue that the free-market perfect competitively for economy where P=MC automatically delivers most favourable allocation in the economy (Pareto-efficiency), so every government intervention (such as tax) which interferes with that the allocation generates efficiency losses. The efficiency (or the welfare) loss of the tax can be illustrated by an easy demand supply diagram. It can be seen that the loss in consumer and the producer surplus is much more than the revenue gain to government.
Does the above argument state that a tax can never be justified on the grounds of efficiency?
The answer to the question asked to us is No. There are major two cases in which imposing the tax might actually be better than not imposing it.
i. When there are market failures and the tax is imposed to bring the marginal social cost equal to the marginal social benefit.
ii. When there are existing distortions in economy and taxes are imposed to the spread distortion over various commodities rather than placing burden on just one commodity. An additional way to say the same thing is that: it is better to impose a little tax on a number of commodities to increase a certain amount of the government revenue, in spite impose one large tax on one or two commodities specifically.
what is the law of diminishing marginal product? explanation with the help of proper schedule and diagram.
bains limit price
prove that the utility approach and the indifference curve yield the same consumer equilibrium.
Comparison with Our Needs: We can further test our performance by juxtaposing it with our requirements. Admittedly, it is very difficult to determine 'needed' rate of growth w
using the aggregate demand and supply model (x axis is national output and y axis is price level) if an economy is in a state of disequilibrium where supply is excess of demand u
Should the bank not have anyone to lend the demand deposit to (like that will ever happen) would the size of the money multiplier decrease? If so, why?
the general characterictics of economic models,its limitations and verification
solution for -calculate price elasticity of demand for demand function Q= 10 - 2p for decrease in price from Rs. 3 to Rs.2
1. Assume that the market for wheat is perfectly competitive. Suppose the demand curve for wheat is given by: QD = 200 – 2P where QD is the quantity demanded, in bushels, and P i
If the short run method to produce Q quantity is with full time workers L=0.025*Q, COST OF WORKER IN THE SHORT RUN IS w=20226.154, how do you derive the value of Q
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd