Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The Concept of Efficiency is stated below:
To illustrate this concept of the efficiency, it is used to expand the understanding of what is meant by the Pareto-efficient allocation of economic resources. This is the situation in which it is not probable to move to other allocation which would make some people improved off and nobody worse off. In this context of the production possibilities frontier, then, points on the frontier are all Pareto-efficient, as it is not possible to move to the one more point (which means produce more of one good) without incurring some opportunity price (which means sacrificing the production of some other good).
Economists argue that the free-market perfect competitively for economy where P=MC automatically delivers most favourable allocation in the economy (Pareto-efficiency), so every government intervention (such as tax) which interferes with that the allocation generates efficiency losses. The efficiency (or the welfare) loss of the tax can be illustrated by an easy demand supply diagram. It can be seen that the loss in consumer and the producer surplus is much more than the revenue gain to government.
Does the above argument state that a tax can never be justified on the grounds of efficiency?
The answer to the question asked to us is No. There are major two cases in which imposing the tax might actually be better than not imposing it.
i. When there are market failures and the tax is imposed to bring the marginal social cost equal to the marginal social benefit.
ii. When there are existing distortions in economy and taxes are imposed to the spread distortion over various commodities rather than placing burden on just one commodity. An additional way to say the same thing is that: it is better to impose a little tax on a number of commodities to increase a certain amount of the government revenue, in spite impose one large tax on one or two commodities specifically.
Use a graphical illustration to describe briefly what the influence of each of the following would be on the market supply of labor:(a) an increase in immigration (b) more women en
Duopolist P=20-0.1Q where Q=QA+QB CA=QA CB=0.1QB2
Adding the economic activities of government to the circular flow model shows that: 1. Government spending creates inflation 2. Government purchases of goods and services,
What are the income and cross elasticities of demand? Why might they be useful? Explain.
The cross elasticity of demand calculates the responsiveness of the quantity demanded of one product to alters in the price of another product. For example, the quantity demanded
derivation of demand curve
how does the concept of possibility production curve aplicable in real life?
1. What is a resource market? 2. Describe resource demand and resource supply. 3. Define derived demand. 4. Describe the resource market demand and supply curve. 5. Define a te
(a) Increase in technology and productivity take effect in the red bull market use and label a graph to explain the result of this change on each of the following (i) Market Pri
Allocative efficiency criteria are satisfied by the competitive model. Because P = MC, in each market in the economy there is no over- or under- allocation of resources in this ec
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd