Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The Concept of Efficiency is stated below:
To illustrate this concept of the efficiency, it is used to expand the understanding of what is meant by the Pareto-efficient allocation of economic resources. This is the situation in which it is not probable to move to other allocation which would make some people improved off and nobody worse off. In this context of the production possibilities frontier, then, points on the frontier are all Pareto-efficient, as it is not possible to move to the one more point (which means produce more of one good) without incurring some opportunity price (which means sacrificing the production of some other good).
Economists argue that the free-market perfect competitively for economy where P=MC automatically delivers most favourable allocation in the economy (Pareto-efficiency), so every government intervention (such as tax) which interferes with that the allocation generates efficiency losses. The efficiency (or the welfare) loss of the tax can be illustrated by an easy demand supply diagram. It can be seen that the loss in consumer and the producer surplus is much more than the revenue gain to government.
Does the above argument state that a tax can never be justified on the grounds of efficiency?
The answer to the question asked to us is No. There are major two cases in which imposing the tax might actually be better than not imposing it.
i. When there are market failures and the tax is imposed to bring the marginal social cost equal to the marginal social benefit.
ii. When there are existing distortions in economy and taxes are imposed to the spread distortion over various commodities rather than placing burden on just one commodity. An additional way to say the same thing is that: it is better to impose a little tax on a number of commodities to increase a certain amount of the government revenue, in spite impose one large tax on one or two commodities specifically.
Q. Explain Nominal GDP? Nominal GDP: Nominal gross domestic product measures total value of all the services and goods produced and traded for money in the formal economy, eval
functions of taxes
Environmental economics goes back to the 19th century. Economists who research the planet are mainly worried with the idea of externalities, rare organic sources, and with the pro
How does planning serve as a solution to economic problems?
Cost Sharing in Higher Education - Graduate Tax Another commonly suggested measure is to tax the employers employing educated manpower. The case for this method is made on the
1- Suppose the economy is currently in recession, and the exchange rate if fixed using the IS-LM model. a) explain and illustrate the economy adjustment ( in the medium run)
Demand for Risky Assets * Assets - Something which provides a flow of money or services to its owner. - The flow of money or services can be explicit or implicit . *
Effects of weight loss A healthy body is required not only for the sake of health, but also for maintaining the standard frame of a body. A person experiencing the problem of weigh
unemployment is voluntary, discuss in view of the classical economists and the keynesian
difference between absolute advantage & comparative advantage theory
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd