Class of recognizable languages, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Proof (sketch): Suppose L1 and L2 are recognizable. Then there are DFAs A1 = (Q,Σ, T1, q0, F1) and A2 = (P,Σ, T2, p0, F2) such that L1 = L(A1) and L2 = L(A2). We construct A′ such that L(A′ ) = L1 ∩ L2. The idea is to have A′ run A1 and A2 in parallel-keeping track of the state of both machines. It will accept a string, then, iff both machines reach an accepting state on that string.

Let A′ = (Q × P,Σ, T′ , (q0, p0), F1 × F2), where

T′ def= [{((q, pi, (q′, p′), σ) | (q, q′, σi)∈ T1 and (p, p′, σ ∈ T2}.

2294_Class of recognizable languages.png

Then

(You should prove this; it is an easy induction on the structure of w.) It follows then that

751_Class of recognizable languages1.png


Related Discussions:- Class of recognizable languages

Ogdens lemma, proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand ...

proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand the meaning of distinguished position .

Can you help me in automata questions, i have some questions in automata, c...

i have some questions in automata, can you please help me in solving in these questions?

Grammer, write grammer to produce all mathematical expressions in c.

write grammer to produce all mathematical expressions in c.

Computation of an automaton, The computation of an SL 2 automaton A = ( Σ,...

The computation of an SL 2 automaton A = ( Σ, T) on a string w is the maximal sequence of IDs in which each sequential pair of IDs is related by |- A and which starts with the in

Transition graphs, We represented SLk automata as Myhill graphs, directed g...

We represented SLk automata as Myhill graphs, directed graphs in which the nodes were labeled with (k-1)-factors of alphabet symbols (along with a node labeled ‘?' and one labeled

Strictly k-local automata, Strictly 2-local automata are based on lookup ta...

Strictly 2-local automata are based on lookup tables that are sets of 2-factors, the pairs of adjacent symbols which are permitted to occur in a word. To generalize, we extend the

Two-tape turing machine, Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG ...

Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG . Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the second

Operations on strictly local languages, The class of Strictly Local Languag...

The class of Strictly Local Languages (in general) is closed under • intersection but is not closed under • union • complement • concatenation • Kleene- and positive

Mapping reducibility, Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know...

Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd