Class of recognizable languages, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Proof (sketch): Suppose L1 and L2 are recognizable. Then there are DFAs A1 = (Q,Σ, T1, q0, F1) and A2 = (P,Σ, T2, p0, F2) such that L1 = L(A1) and L2 = L(A2). We construct A′ such that L(A′ ) = L1 ∩ L2. The idea is to have A′ run A1 and A2 in parallel-keeping track of the state of both machines. It will accept a string, then, iff both machines reach an accepting state on that string.

Let A′ = (Q × P,Σ, T′ , (q0, p0), F1 × F2), where

T′ def= [{((q, pi, (q′, p′), σ) | (q, q′, σi)∈ T1 and (p, p′, σ ∈ T2}.

2294_Class of recognizable languages.png

Then

(You should prove this; it is an easy induction on the structure of w.) It follows then that

751_Class of recognizable languages1.png


Related Discussions:- Class of recognizable languages

Answer, And what this money. Invovle who it involves and the fact of,how we...

And what this money. Invovle who it involves and the fact of,how we got itself identified candidate and not withstanding time date location. That shouts me media And answers who''v

Operator p, implementation of operator precedence grammer

implementation of operator precedence grammer

Equivalence of nfas and dfas, In general non-determinism, by introducing a ...

In general non-determinism, by introducing a degree of parallelism, may increase the accepting power of a model of computation. But if we subject NFAs to the same sort of analysis

Equivalence of nfas, It is not hard to see that ε-transitions do not add to...

It is not hard to see that ε-transitions do not add to the accepting power of the model. The underlying idea is that whenever an ID (q, σ  v) directly computes another (p, v) via

Two-tape turing machine, Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG ...

Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG . Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the second

Formal language theory, This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Fo...

This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Formal Language Theory. It's maybe not too surprising to us, as we have already seen a similar equivalence between LTO and SF. But

Gephi, construct a social network from the real-world data, perform some si...

construct a social network from the real-world data, perform some simple network analyses using Gephi, and interpret the results.

Construct a recognizer, Let L1 and L2 be CGF. We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG t...

Let L1 and L2 be CGF. We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG too. Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the sec

Venkatesh, What is the arbwnememmsmdbdbfbfjmfksmjejfnfnfnnrndmnfjfjfnrnkrkf...

What is the arbwnememmsmdbdbfbfjmfksmjejfnfnfnnrndmnfjfjfnrnkrkfjfnfmkrjrbfbbfjfnfjruhrvrjkgktithhrbenfkiffnbr ki rnrjjdjrnrk bd n FBC..jcb?????????????????????????????????????????

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd