Class of recognizable languages, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Proof (sketch): Suppose L1 and L2 are recognizable. Then there are DFAs A1 = (Q,Σ, T1, q0, F1) and A2 = (P,Σ, T2, p0, F2) such that L1 = L(A1) and L2 = L(A2). We construct A′ such that L(A′ ) = L1 ∩ L2. The idea is to have A′ run A1 and A2 in parallel-keeping track of the state of both machines. It will accept a string, then, iff both machines reach an accepting state on that string.

Let A′ = (Q × P,Σ, T′ , (q0, p0), F1 × F2), where

T′ def= [{((q, pi, (q′, p′), σ) | (q, q′, σi)∈ T1 and (p, p′, σ ∈ T2}.

2294_Class of recognizable languages.png

Then

(You should prove this; it is an easy induction on the structure of w.) It follows then that

751_Class of recognizable languages1.png


Related Discussions:- Class of recognizable languages

Finite automata, design an automata for strings having exactly four 1''s

design an automata for strings having exactly four 1''s

#dfa, Give DFA''s accepting the following languages over the alphabet {0,1}...

Give DFA''s accepting the following languages over the alphabet {0,1}: i. The set of all strings beginning with a 1 that, when interpreted as a binary integer, is a multiple of 5.

Third model of computation, Computer has a single LIFO stack containing ?xe...

Computer has a single LIFO stack containing ?xed precision unsigned integers (so each integer is subject to over?ow problems) but which has unbounded depth (so the stack itself nev

Kleene closure, One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would...

One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would imply non closure under both Kleene- and positive closure, since the concatenation of a language with itself is included

Computations of sl automata, We will specify a computation of one of these ...

We will specify a computation of one of these automata by specifying the pair of the symbols that are in the window and the remainder of the string to the right of the window at ea

Transition graphs, We represented SLk automata as Myhill graphs, directed g...

We represented SLk automata as Myhill graphs, directed graphs in which the nodes were labeled with (k-1)-factors of alphabet symbols (along with a node labeled ‘?' and one labeled

Construct a regular expression, Given any NFA A, we will construct a regula...

Given any NFA A, we will construct a regular expression denoting L(A) by means of an expression graph, a generalization of NFA transition graphs in which the edges are labeled with

Non - sl languages, Application of the general suffix substitution closure ...

Application of the general suffix substitution closure theorem is slightly more complicated than application of the specific k-local versions. In the specific versions, all we had

Non - sl languages, The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure prop...

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language. While the argument tha

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd