Class of recognizable languages, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Proof (sketch): Suppose L1 and L2 are recognizable. Then there are DFAs A1 = (Q,Σ, T1, q0, F1) and A2 = (P,Σ, T2, p0, F2) such that L1 = L(A1) and L2 = L(A2). We construct A′ such that L(A′ ) = L1 ∩ L2. The idea is to have A′ run A1 and A2 in parallel-keeping track of the state of both machines. It will accept a string, then, iff both machines reach an accepting state on that string.

Let A′ = (Q × P,Σ, T′ , (q0, p0), F1 × F2), where

T′ def= [{((q, pi, (q′, p′), σ) | (q, q′, σi)∈ T1 and (p, p′, σ ∈ T2}.

2294_Class of recognizable languages.png

Then

(You should prove this; it is an easy induction on the structure of w.) It follows then that

751_Class of recognizable languages1.png


Related Discussions:- Class of recognizable languages

Qbasic, Ask question #Minimum 100 words accepte

Ask question #Minimum 100 words accepte

Construct a regular expression, Given any NFA A, we will construct a regula...

Given any NFA A, we will construct a regular expression denoting L(A) by means of an expression graph, a generalization of NFA transition graphs in which the edges are labeled with

Universality problem, The Universality Problem is the dual of the emptiness...

The Universality Problem is the dual of the emptiness problem: is L(A) = Σ∗? It can be solved by minor variations of any one of the algorithms for Emptiness or (with a little le

Decision problems, In Exercise 9 you showed that the recognition problem an...

In Exercise 9 you showed that the recognition problem and universal recognition problem for SL2 are decidable. We can use the structure of Myhill graphs to show that other problems

Kleenes theorem, All that distinguishes the de?nition of the class of Regul...

All that distinguishes the de?nition of the class of Regular languages from that of the class of Star-Free languages is that the former is closed under Kleene closure while the lat

Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Claim Under the assum...

Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about

Regular languages, LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolea...

LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolean operations which turned out to be identical to SF, the closure of the ?nite languages under union, concatenation and compl

Designing finite automata, a finite automata accepting strings over {a,b} e...

a finite automata accepting strings over {a,b} ending in abbbba

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd