Class of local languages is not closed under union, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Both L1 and L2 are SL2. (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.)

2360_Class of local languages is not closed under union.png

We claim that L1 ∪ L2 ∈ SL2. To see this, suppose, by way of contradiction, that it was SL2. Then it would satisfy Suffx Substitution Closure. But abb ∈ L1 ∪ L2, since it is in L1, and bba ∈ L1 ∪ L2, since it is in L2, and, by Suffx Substitution Closure, this implies that aba ∈ L1 ∪ L2, which is not the case. Hence, L1 ∪ L2 is not SL2.

It's important to not misunderstand the weight of this result. It does not show that every union of two SL2 languages is not SL2-after all, the union of any SL2 language with itself must, necessarily, be SL2. It is easy to come up with pairs of distinct SL2 languages which yield an SL2 union as well,

1737_Class of local languages is not closed under union1.png

What it does say is that one can't count on the union of SL2 languages being SL2. This is in contrast to the closure result for intersection, which lets us build up languages out of simpler SL2 languages using intersection with con?dence that the result will be SL2. Showing that our desired language is the union of some simple SL2 languages doesn't help us. The result may or may not be SL.


Related Discussions:- Class of local languages is not closed under union

Non-determinism - recognizable language, Our DFAs are required to have exac...

Our DFAs are required to have exactly one edge incident from each state for each input symbol so there is a unique next state for every current state and input symbol. Thus, the ne

Turing machine, design a turing machine that accepts the language which con...

design a turing machine that accepts the language which consists of even number of zero''s and even number of one''s?

Give a strictly 2-local automaton, Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give ...

Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give a strictly 2-local automaton that recognizes L 3 . Use the construction of the proof to extend the automaton to one that recognizes L 3 . Gi

Normal forms, how to convert a grammar into GNF

how to convert a grammar into GNF

Kleene closure, One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would...

One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would imply non closure under both Kleene- and positive closure, since the concatenation of a language with itself is included

Pendulum Swings, how many pendulum swings will it take to walk across the c...

how many pendulum swings will it take to walk across the classroom?

Theory of computation, Computations are deliberate for processing informati...

Computations are deliberate for processing information. Computability theory was discovered in the 1930s, and extended in the 1950s and 1960s. Its basic ideas have become part of

Suffix substitution , Exercise Show, using Suffix Substitution Closure, tha...

Exercise Show, using Suffix Substitution Closure, that L 3 . L 3 ∈ SL 2 . Explain how it can be the case that L 3 . L 3 ∈ SL 2 , while L 3 . L 3 ⊆ L + 3 and L + 3 ∈ SL

Xx, Ask queyystion #Minimum 100 words accepted#

Ask queyystion #Minimum 100 words accepted#

Mapping reducibility, Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know...

Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd