Case study in game theory - color coordination, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

Game 1 Color Coordination (with Delay)

594_Color coordination.png

This game should be played twice, once without the delay tactic and once with it, to show the difference between out- comes in the simultaneous and sequential versions. As usual, the game can be played by pairs of students, although it can also be played by all students simultaneously with the left- hand side of the room's playing against the right-hand side. Tell the students not to write down anything (except their names) until they hear all of the instructions. As with the tacit coordination game, you might want to provide some inducement for coordination here; chocolate usually works well.

Ask the students to choose partners from the other side of the room or have them imagine that each is playing with one person who is sitting on the other side of the room. Each student will eventually be asked to write either pink or purple. If both students in the real or imaginary pair write pink, the person on the right-hand side of the room gets 50 points and the person on the left-hand side of the room gets 40 points. ("Right-hand" and "left-hand" are defined from the students' point of view.) If both write purple, the person on the left- hand side of the room gets 50 points and the person on the right-hand side of the room gets 40 points. If the answers don't match, neither player gets anything.

To play without the delay tactic, simply ask the students to choose a color and write the choice. Then play again, im- mediately, but explain that you will flip a coin first. If it comes up heads, those on the right-hand side of the room get to write their answers first; otherwise those on the left-hand side of the room write first.

Once you have collected answers from the students, you can discuss the implications of the game. Clearly, it is much more difficult to coordinate without the benefit of the delay tactic and there are two equilibria in pure strategies in the simultaneous-move game. The delay tactic makes the game sequential and creates a first-mover advantage; outcomes from this version often come much closer to complete co- ordination. As usual, you can ask students to try to come up with real-world situations that replicate some of the conditions of the game, or you can provide some examples.


Related Discussions:- Case study in game theory - color coordination

Hicks, Winner of the Nobel Prize in 1972, Hicks is acknowledged mutually of...

Winner of the Nobel Prize in 1972, Hicks is acknowledged mutually of the leading economists normally equilibrium theory. he's credited with the introduction of the notion of elasti

Status of identification, In econometric theory two possibie situations of ...

In econometric theory two possibie situations of identifiability can arise: Equation under,consideration is identified or not identified: 1) Equation is under-identified-

Dominated strategy , A strategy is dominated if, no matter what the other p...

A strategy is dominated if, no matter what the other players do, the strategy earns a player a smaller payoff than another strategy. Hence, a method is dominated if it's invariably

What terms are included in the monopolistic competition, What terms are inc...

What terms are included in the monopolistic competition? Product Differentiation: 1. The meaning of monopolistic competition and product differentiation 2. Why monopolist

Games with sequential moves-president liv problem , The most basic version ...

The most basic version of a LIV allows the executive office holder (Governor or President) to accept part of a bill passed by the legislature (so that part becomes law) and to veto

Draw the strategic form game - nash equilibrium, 1. Consider a two-player g...

1. Consider a two-player game where player A chooses "Up," or "Down" and player B chooses "Left," "Center," or "Right". Their payoffs are as follows: When player A chooses "Up" and

Game playing in class-equilibrium payoffs example, (a) Equilibrium payoffs ...

(a) Equilibrium payoffs are (1, 0). Player A’s equilibrium strategy is S; B’s equilibrium strategy is “t if N.”   For (a): Player A has two strategies: (1) N or (2) S. P

Japanese auction, A type of sequential second worth auction, just like an E...

A type of sequential second worth auction, just like an English auction during which an auctioneer frequently raises the present worth. Participants should signal at each worth lev

Find all nash equilibria of game- game theory, Game Theory: (prisoner'...

Game Theory: (prisoner's dilemma) Consider the following 2 x 2 pricing game, where rms choose whether to price High or Low simultaneously. Find the equilibrium in dominant s

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd