User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Ethics in finance, MSc Finance and Management 2012-13 Ethics in Finance E...

MSc Finance and Management 2012-13 Ethics in Finance Ethics in Finance, Assessment Answer ALL THREE questions. This should be your own unaided work (this is an ethics assessmen

Explain who is a promoter according to law, Ahtesh is the promoter to a com...

Ahtesh is the promoter to a company not yet incorporated. As promoter he bought two excavators on behalf of the company as the latter would be building and running a hotel. While t

Find out the ethical issues of the organization, Select a manufacturing org...

Select a manufacturing organization and find out the ethical issues of the organization in the following areas: Production: Marketing & sales: Human Resources & employee relatio

Important resolutions which have great impact of terrorism, Two very import...

Two very important resolutions which had a great impact on description of terrorism UNSC has also declared incitement as an offence. The interpretation of terrorism formulated

Lost by company personnel, In a business context, there are thousands of le...

In a business context, there are thousands of legal claims that happen frequently in a company's course of operations. Frequently, the management team must come to together to veri

Contractual capacity of drunken persons, Contractual Capacity of Drunken Pe...

Contractual Capacity of Drunken Persons Whether a person purported to enter with a contract at a time at what time he was too drunk to understand then what he was doing and th

State article 9 of air and outer space law, State Article 9 of air and oute...

State Article 9 of air and outer space law Article 9 states that each contracting State may, for reasons of military necessity or public safety, restrict or prohibit uniformly

Committal stage - reading, Committal Stage: In this such order 103 off...

Committal Stage: In this such order 103 offers that a Bill having been read a second moment shall stand committed to a committee of the Whole House, unless the House commits t

Illustration of rules relating to consideration, Illustrtaion of Rules rela...

Illustrtaion of Rules relating to consideration Foakes v Beer (1884) Actually On the date 11th of August, 1875 Mrs Beer wrapped judgment next to Dr. Foakes for £2,077 1

Common law rules, Common law rules: The above common law rules have be...

Common law rules: The above common law rules have been modified by the following statutory provisions:  VOID ALLOTMENTS a) S.50 A renders an allotment void if it was mad

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd