User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Rights of guarantor against the debtor, Rights of Guarantor Against the Deb...

Rights of Guarantor Against the Debtor Therefore the guarantor's rights alongside the debtor are: like; (a) Before the payment has been made, whereas to compel the debtor t

Profit and loss account, Profit and Loss Account: with s.148(1) the di...

Profit and Loss Account: with s.148(1) the directors of every company shall, at some date not soon than eighteen months later than the incorporation of the company and subsequ

Take-over bid, TAKE-OVER BID:                   If Company A ("the t...

TAKE-OVER BID:                   If Company A ("the transferee company") offers to acquire shares of Company B ("the transferor") and the scheme or contract to which the off

Determine the kinds of advocacy tactics, Determine the kinds of advocacy ta...

Determine the kinds of advocacy tactics The kinds of advocacy tactics employed by policy entrepreneurs in setting agendas and generating support for their proposals may often

Government, an impartial jury must

an impartial jury must

Fraud on the minority, Fraud on the minority: The exception of "fraud ...

Fraud on the minority: The exception of "fraud on the minority" depends, whereas the company is defrauded, on "wrongdoer control," i.e. the individual shareholder must show th

Business environment, 1.(a) identify and give out the explanation of differ...

1.(a) identify and give out the explanation of different categories of legal system. (b) How is legal system in bznz enforce

Managing director - company management, Managing Director: In Ellis v ...

Managing Director: In Ellis v Bailey and Company (East Africa) Limited (76) it was stated that "without specific authority in the articles directors may not appoint one of the

Prospectus issue and statutory provisions, Prospectus Issue And Statutory P...

Prospectus Issue And Statutory Provisions: A company's shares are legally regarded as goods. Consequently, the common law rule known as "caveat emptor" applied to their sale.

State the two alternatives of policy clustering, State the two alternatives...

State the two alternatives of Policy Clustering That combines an element from each of these first two alternatives. One might think of it as a set of processes characterized by

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd