case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Rules for purchase of own shares, Rules for Purchase of own shares: So...

Rules for Purchase of own shares: So now next despite the rule in Trevor V Whitworth a company may purchase or acquire its own shares in the following cases: a) Where it ac

Function and powers of chairman, Function and Powers of Chairman: In t...

Function and Powers of Chairman: In the case of National Dwellings Society v Sykes Chitty, J. stated: "It is the duty of the chairman, and his function, to preserve order,

State in brief about the term - nash equilibrium, State in brief about the ...

State in brief about the term - Nash equilibrium For the foreign country its reaction function cuts its indifference curves where they are vertical. Both these reaction functio

Determine the name and elements of the tort, Sue owns a car that has 150,00...

Sue owns a car that has 150,000 miles on it, but otherwise looks to be in very good condition. She advertises to sell the car and Ken asks her how many miles are on the c

What is the neighbour rule, What is the neighbour rule? Duty of care:...

What is the neighbour rule? Duty of care: There is a duty of care by anyone to other where this can be reasonably foreseen which one’s action may injure another (negligen

Difference between plain meaning and the liberal approaches, What is the d...

What is the difference between the plain meaning and the liberal approaches to the interpretation of contracts? Provide me with an example of each to show me you understand the dif

Give five differences between law and ethics, QUESTION (a) In scientifi...

QUESTION (a) In scientific ethics, list four fundamental principles of scientific research? (b) Give five differences between law and ethics (c) When does a ‘Conflict of

Media Law, online Law test, Due tomorrow December 14th, 20 multiple choice...

online Law test, Due tomorrow December 14th, 20 multiple choice questions and 4 essay questions. Topics, Obscenity, child porn; broadcasting indecency, citizens united, ipr & cop

State the policies of convergence, State the policies of convergence Ex...

State the policies of convergence Explained here in the simplest case with assumption that there is full representation of voters; information is symmetric and single peaked pr

Implied conditions and warranties - sales and goods, Implied Conditions and...

Implied Conditions and Warranties - Sales and Goods Whether section 8 of the Act implies that the next terms in every hire purchase agreement like: a) Right to sell: whethe

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd