case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Explain the first kind of treaty, Explain the first kind of treaty Und...

Explain the first kind of treaty Under international law, treaties primarily serve three separate purposes, though any one treaty may perform more than one function. The first

Contracts illegal at the common law, Contracts illegal at the common law ...

Contracts illegal at the common law However a contract which is prohibited through the common law is frequently described as being as "contrary to public policy" as i.e. the c

Fraudulent concealment of a book, Fraudulent concealment of a book: He...

Fraudulent concealment of a book: Hence it is nothing to him where dividends are properly or improperly declared, and provided he discharges his own duty to the shareholders.

Effectiveness of challenge and appeal mechanisms, Question 1: Taking th...

Question 1: Taking the case of Mauritius, in the machinery of government, the Procurement Policy Officer is the central organ of the Government that regulates the procurement

Describe the law making process, Question 1: Discuss what types of norm...

Question 1: Discuss what types of norms can be used to help judges in their interpretation of statutes. Question 2: Discuss the concepts of originalism and dynamism in

C.i.f. contacts - import and export trade, C.I.F. Contacts - Import and Exp...

C.I.F. Contacts - Import and Export Trade Therefore a c.i.f. like cost, insurance else freight whether contract is a contract for the sale of goods for be performed through the

When was international criminal court for rwanda established, When was Inte...

When was International Criminal Court for Rwanda established Moreover, in early 1990s the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY) was established under UNSC Resol

Traditional case brief, The  defendants, while sympathetic, may believe tha...

The  defendants, while sympathetic, may believe that the ultimate responsibility of a child's safety and welfare belongs to the parent themselves. To the extent that the parents we

Executed consideration - types of consideration, Executed Consideration - T...

Executed Consideration - Types of Consideration Actually Executed consideration is constituted through something done by the plaintiff because to a promise made with the defen

Qualified acceptance, Qualified Acceptance It might be as the drawee is ...

Qualified Acceptance It might be as the drawee is prepared for accept the bill since only subject to some adjustment. Any type of acceptance which varies the effect of such a bi

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd