case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Applied laws - judicial elucidation of acts, APPLIED LAWS: However sec...

APPLIED LAWS: However section 2 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act specified like an "applied law" as:; (a)   here an Act of the legislature of another countr

What is the relation between business the law and ethics, Question 1: T...

Question 1: To what extent do you agree with the assertion that Governments are failing and that corporate power is on the rise? Question 2: (a) Critically determine th

Marketing law assignment, On 10 March 2011 the ACCC accepted an undertaking...

On 10 March 2011 the ACCC accepted an undertaking under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010(Cth) from Patterson Cheney Pty Ltd in relation to alleged misrepresentations made by t

Transfer or passing of property - sales of goods, Transfer or Passing of Pr...

Transfer or Passing of Property - Sales of Goods Perhaps assuming like the seller has a right to sell the goods, so it like necessary to determine the precise moment the trans

Duties or obligations of hirer, Duties or Obligations of Hirer However...

Duties or Obligations of Hirer However these are not provided in the Act although are usually found in such the agreement itself Like: a) Take delivery: whether upon ente

Role and Functions of Law, Discuss the roles of law and courts in today''s ...

Discuss the roles of law and courts in today''s business environment. •Compare and contrast the federal court structure with your Florida''s court structure. •Discuss the concept

C.i.f. contacts - import and export trade, C.I.F. Contacts - Import and Exp...

C.I.F. Contacts - Import and Export Trade Therefore a c.i.f. like cost, insurance else freight whether contract is a contract for the sale of goods for be performed through the

Doctrine of stare decisis, Doctrine of Stare Decisis However the doctr...

Doctrine of Stare Decisis However the doctrine of "stare Decisis" or "judicial precedent" is a legal rule which utilized a judge to refer to the earlier cases decided through

Business Law and Ethics, A Black Firefighter alleges that each time he is t...

A Black Firefighter alleges that each time he is transferred from one fire station to another, he must take his bed with him, on orders of the fire chief. The chief defends on the

Estoppel - law of agency and partnership, Estoppel - Law of Agency and Part...

Estoppel - Law of Agency and Partnership Further the basis of estoppel was explained through the court like Spiro v. Lintern  in giving such; "Where a man is below a duty -

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd