case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Types of precedents, Types of Precedents There a precedent may be as; ...

Types of Precedents There a precedent may be as; A binding precedent here judge must tag along whereas he approves of it or not. Hence it is excludes his judicial discr

Acceptance - negotiable instruments, Acceptance - Negotiable Instruments ...

Acceptance - Negotiable Instruments Meaning The word "acceptance" such used in relation to bills of exchange like has a special meaning also. Acceptance of a bill of ex

Principle of statutory provisions, Principle of statutory provisions: ...

Principle of statutory provisions: Most of the cases in which the principle has actually been applied appear to fall within one of the following two classes:- 1. Where the

Examine the features of the main sources of law in mauritius, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 Arbitration has proved itself to be a valuable scheme in alternative dispute resolution of conflicts. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Arbitration as a su

Fair work ombudsman options, Q. Fair Work Ombudsman options? The follow...

Q. Fair Work Ombudsman options? The following are a range of potential options for the FWO to mitigate phoenix activity. These options recognise that the FWO does not currently

Duties or obligations of hirer, Duties or Obligations of Hirer However...

Duties or Obligations of Hirer However these are not provided in the Act although are usually found in such the agreement itself Like: a) Take delivery: whether upon ente

Liability of auditors, Liability of auditors: It would cover any act o...

Liability of auditors: It would cover any act of negligence - any actionable wrong by an officer of a company which did not involve any misapplication of the assets of the com

Legislation and legislative functions, Question : This is an extract of...

Question : This is an extract of the Mauritian Patents, Industrial Design and Trademarks Act 2002. 12. Patentable inventions (1) An invention shall be patentable under

Remedies of the ultra vires lender, Remedies of the Ultra Vires Lender: ...

Remedies of the Ultra Vires Lender:                          In Sinclair v Brougham (26) the House of Lords explained that no action or suit lies at law or in equity to recove

Describe the principal-agent framework, Describe the principal-agent framew...

Describe the principal-agent framework In standard principal-agent framework an agent may be directed to maximize an objective function which may or may not be different from

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd