User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Increasing the risk rating of building and construction, Q. Increasing the ...

Q. Increasing the risk rating of building and construction? Stakeholders indicated that there is a significant risk of phoenix activity in the building and construction industr

Negotiation and joint consultation committee, Problem: (a) Show the dif...

Problem: (a) Show the difference between negotiation and Joint consultation Committee. (b) What is the difference between a procedural and a substantive agreement? (c) De

Explain the law of treaties, LAW OF TREATIES Treaties are an important ...

LAW OF TREATIES Treaties are an important and major source of international law. It is a convenient way by which the States deliberately  enter into agreements with other State

Describe the public procurement legal framework of mauritius, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 Describe the Public Procurement Legal Framework of Mauritius QUESTION 2 Explain the following, within the meaning of the Competition Act: a. collusive agreem

Contract of employment has been terminated, QUESTION (a) Tom is 15 ½ an...

QUESTION (a) Tom is 15 ½ and he has not eaten for three days because his parents did not have any money to buy food when he approached Mr. Taylor for a job in his factory and t

Determine the term - games nations play, Games nations play Game analog...

Games nations play Game analogy can be used to get the idea because the principal players, states reject any higher authority. Each state, take any player in a competitive game

What are the prohibited acts related to this right?, QUESTION 1 Pringle...

QUESTION 1 Pringles Company Ltd is an enterprise that is not regulated by the EPZ Act. It employs 50 workers who have been employed for more than 10 years. Presently, Pringles

#title.CONTRACT., WHAT ARE MITIGATING FACTORS OF A CONTRACT

WHAT ARE MITIGATING FACTORS OF A CONTRACT

Ethics in finance, MSc Finance and Management 2012-13 Ethics in Finance E...

MSc Finance and Management 2012-13 Ethics in Finance Ethics in Finance, Assessment Answer ALL THREE questions. This should be your own unaided work (this is an ethics assessmen

The acts of non-state actor, The acts of non-state actor More important...

The acts of non-state actor More importantly, the concept of non-state actor needs be discussed by the concept of state responsibility, that is to say how and to what extent a

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd