case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Approaches to defining phoenix activity, Q. Approaches to defining phoenix ...

Q. Approaches to defining phoenix activity? There are a number of approaches to defining phoenix activity that could be used. These approaches are summarised below. It should b

Set of circumstances of policy maker, Set of circumstances of policy maker ...

Set of circumstances of policy maker The distinction leads to think what to say then, to a policy, which is feasible in only one set of circumstances. Then the expectations on

Explain unhcr, Explain UNHCR UNHCR provides protection and assistance n...

Explain UNHCR UNHCR provides protection and assistance not only to refugees, but also to other categories of displaced or needy people. These include asylum seekers, refugees w

When was international atomic energy agency established, Explain Internatio...

Explain International Atomic Energy Agency The  NPT  also  creates  rights and  obligations on  the  members of  NPT  to  comply  with  the provisions of the treaty and to ensu

Discuss legal relationship between a bank and its customer, Question 1: ...

Question 1: Discuss the legal relationship between a bank and its customer with reference to the responsibilities of the parties towards each other. Question 2: This qu

Legal rights - winding up, Legal rights - Winding up: In substance the...

Legal rights - Winding up: In substance these two people are really partners" and by analogy with the law of partnership (which permits dissolution if the partners are really

Explain salient features of the constitution of mauritius, QUESTION 1 T...

QUESTION 1 The proliferation of tribunals, enquiries and quasi-judicial bodies constitutes the risk of a new type of despotism in running public affairs. How do the courts ensu

Employment relations tribunal, QUESTION 1 Explain the composition and f...

QUESTION 1 Explain the composition and functions of the following institutions- (i) Employment Relations Tribunal (ii) Commission for Conciliation and Mediation QUEST

Communication law, As a soon-to-be media practitioner, you will encounter m...

As a soon-to-be media practitioner, you will encounter many legal issues in the media industry. In this assignment, you are required to examine one main legal issue that media prac

Reconstruction - take-over bid, Reconstruction Under S.280: The essent...

Reconstruction Under S.280: The essential features of this type of reconstruction have been described at 8.2.1(b).  It is subject to several disadvantages and is little used.

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd