case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

State article 30 of international law, State Article 30 of international la...

State Article 30 of international law Article 30 further states that his or her private residence and papers, correspondence and property are all inviolable.

State article 15 of air and outer space law, State Article 15 of air and ou...

State Article 15 of air and outer space law Article  15  states  that  any  charges  that  may  be  imposed  or  permitted  to  be  imposed  by  a contracting State for the use

Identify the issues which have created negative impact, Mr. Andrew is the C...

Mr. Andrew is the Chairman of Board of Directors of Stylish Garments plc. He believes that the success of the business depends mainly on a committed, loyal work force. Therefore th

Sense of urgency-entrepreneurship development, Sense of Urgenc: Entreprene...

Sense of Urgenc: Entrepreneurs have a never-ending sense of urgency to develop their ideas. Inactivity makes them impatient, tense, and uneasy. They thrive on activity and are tir

Functions of law, Functions of Law: we discuss like, how can be utiliz...

Functions of Law: we discuss like, how can be utilized Functions of Law:;- are (i)         For Rules of law facilitate administration of justice.  It is an instrument used

What is meant by the supremacy of parliament, Question: (a) Define dem...

Question: (a) Define democracy. How far is the famous saying of former president of USA, Abraham Lincoln valid today? (b) Argue the case for and against the introduction

Executions take place using a lethal injection, Most executions take place ...

Most executions take place using a lethal injection.  The company that manufactures the drug that is most used has now announced that it is choosing to no longer produce that drug.

Analyse ethical and legal issues , Fran is a 68 year old female patient wit...

Fran is a 68 year old female patient with a history of diabetes.  Fran separated from her husband, Derek, 3 years ago (although they are not divorced) and over the past few years t

Legal rights - winding up, Legal rights - Winding up: In substance the...

Legal rights - Winding up: In substance these two people are really partners" and by analogy with the law of partnership (which permits dissolution if the partners are really

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd