case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Realization of auditors, Realization of Auditors: it is a mere truism ...

Realization of Auditors: it is a mere truism to say that the value of loans and securities depends on their realization.  We were told that a statement to that effect, is so u

Perpetual succession, Perpetual Succession:                      Accor...

Perpetual Succession:                      According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary, "perpetual" means, inter alia, "applicable, valid, for ever or for indefinite time " wh

Summary of the international humanitarian laws, Summary of the internationa...

Summary of the international humanitarian laws The main objectives/summary of the international humanitarian laws can be divided into a few parts which are as follows: D

Prospectus issue and statutory provisions, Prospectus Issue And Statutory P...

Prospectus Issue And Statutory Provisions: A company's shares are legally regarded as goods. Consequently, the common law rule known as "caveat emptor" applied to their sale.

Intent to defraud the italian creditor, Intent to defraud the Italian credi...

Intent to defraud the Italian creditor: The company owed money to trade creditors and also had outstanding against it a large claim for breach of contract which it disputed (t

Utmost good faith, Utmost Good Faith Whether a partnership is such con...

Utmost Good Faith Whether a partnership is such contract of the chief good faith. Every one partner is entitled for utmost gaviness rom his co-partners. Therefore this equitab

Repugnance to justice and morality, Repugnance to Justice and Morality ...

Repugnance to Justice and Morality However the customary law will be applied only whether it is not repugnant to justice and morality.Even though the Act needs the phrase "and

Determine about the opportunistic policy cycle, Determine about the Opportu...

Determine about the Opportunistic policy cycle We now turn back once again to study the behaviour of the decision maker who, ultimately wants to return to the office in future.

Legal protection of minorities, LEGAL PROTECTION OF MINORITIES: Accord...

LEGAL PROTECTION OF MINORITIES: According to decisions of English courts, companies are democratic organisations whose affairs are to be managed by the directors according to

Decision making regarding treatment vs non-treatment, In relation to the ...

In relation to the scenario below, discuss relevant ethical and legal issues that relate to decision making regarding treatment vs non-treatment.   Please note , you are

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd