User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Define your point of view about international legal relation, Define your p...

Define your point of view about international legal relation. International legal relations: International law covers the matters which may occur between countries not li

Business law for commercial transactions, (These are short answer assignmen...

(These are short answer assignments; just a few paragraphs for each part is all that is required) Assignment 1: Discussion Questions In this assignment, you will research and appl

Evaluate nature of phoenix activity, Q. Evaluate nature of phoenix activity...

Q. Evaluate nature of phoenix activity? The literature on phoenix activity and the stakeholders consulted in this project emphasised that phoenix activity has evolved significa

Reaction of other countries - policy coordination, Reaction of Other Countr...

Reaction of Other Countries - Policy coordination  A final problem associated with the policy coordination is that countries not involved in the policy agreement may react in s

Explain non proliferation treaty, Explain Non Proliferation Treaty The ...

Explain Non Proliferation Treaty The treaty which regulates and limits the use of nuclear weapons is known as Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT), signed in 1968. The NPT lays down

Distinguish between the concepts of originalism and dynamism, Question 1: ...

Question 1: Discuss the main problems faced by judges when interpreting a piece of legislation. Question 2: A necessary evil': Would you agree with this definition of d

Separate meetings of each group - mergers and winding up, Separate meetings...

Separate meetings of each group - mergers and winding up: The first ground of objection was valid, ie. if within a single class of shareholders there are groups whose inte

Personal jurisdiction, A) As members of the WTO, recognize three (3) shared...

A) As members of the WTO, recognize three (3) shared interests Japan, the EU, the USA and China all share.   B) A court only requires to have personal jurisdiction over a par

condition precedent, What is a condition precedent? Provide me with an exa...

What is a condition precedent? Provide me with an example.

Successfully sue michael in negligence, It was late at night and very wet a...

It was late at night and very wet and, rather than wait for a taxi to take her home, Anna was only to happy to accept a lift from Michael. He smelt strongly of alcohol and had trou

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd