User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Distinguish between primary and secondary stakeholder, Question 1: a. ...

Question 1: a. Social responsibility is the duty to do what is best for the good of society. Critically analyze the ethical obligations of a business are toward the society.

State in brief about the monetary effects, State in brief aboput the Moneta...

State in brief aboput the Monetary Effects Besides real income effects there will also be monetary effects if nations seek to intervene in foreign exchange markets which govern

Health and safety of employees at the workplace, Question 1: In order t...

Question 1: In order to ensure health and safety of employees at the workplace, the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005 imposes duties on employers only. Discuss. Quest

Explain articles of universal declaration of human rights, Explain Articles...

Explain Articles of Universal Declaration of Human Rights i. Preamble: 'Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equivalent and inalienable rights of all  membe

Types and classification of law, Types and Classification of Law: Rule...

Types and Classification of Law: Rules of law may be classified as like;: For Written For National and International For Public and Private For Substantive

Laws, #questiwhat are lawson..

#questiwhat are lawson..

Statutory provisions in applicable in the absence of a deed, Statutory Prov...

Statutory Provisions in Applicable in the absence of a deed However it has been stated that the rights and relations of partners for one another are governed through the conte

Misconduct in employment law, Question 1: " One of those general precep...

Question 1: " One of those general precepts of our law of contract is that covenants legally entered into cannot be revoked except by the mutual consent of the parties theret

What was the immunity from jurisdiction, WHAT WAS THE IMMUNITY FROM JURISD...

WHAT WAS THE IMMUNITY FROM JURISDICTION   States are recognized as having authority over people, things and events within their own territory and therefore may exercise jurisdict

Personal rights invaded - statutory provisions, Personal rights invaded: ...

Personal rights invaded:                    A shareholder may sue to protect from invasion their own individual rights as members.  This is illustrated by Pender v Lushington

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd