case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Accuracy of the managers certificate, Accuracy of the managers certificate:...

Accuracy of the managers certificate: Was it the duty of the auditors to test the accuracy of the manager's certificate by a comparison of the figures in the books, and were t

Reduction of capital, Reduction of Capital:   4.1 The general rule ...

Reduction of Capital:   4.1 The general rule is that it is illegal for a company to reduce its capital. This is so because such a reduction would be tantamount to reducing

Explain unhcr, Explain UNHCR UNHCR provides protection and assistance n...

Explain UNHCR UNHCR provides protection and assistance not only to refugees, but also to other categories of displaced or needy people. These include asylum seekers, refugees w

Proposal and invitation, Analyze the differences between a proposal and an ...

Analyze the differences between a proposal and an invitation to treat and discuss the rules to determine the point of time on which an agreement is reached. Using the latest Malays

Commencement of business, Commencement of Business: Section III (1) pr...

Commencement of Business: Section III (1) provides that a public company which has issued a prospectus cannot commence business or exercise any borrowing powers unless:-

Alternative dispute resolution, "The liability of third party neutrals has ...

"The liability of third party neutrals has been a topic of concern ever since the formalisation of dispute resolution in Australia.  Although there are no known cases in Australia

Jurisdiction over your company, a) Determine which forum(s) Purchaser could...

a) Determine which forum(s) Purchaser could file her lawsuit in.   Personal Jurisdiction, b)  If Purchaser were to file in CA, could she formed specific jurisdiction over you

Explain the main elements of a contract administration plan, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 (a) Briefly explain 4 functions involved in ensuring compliance with contract requirements (b) Explain how changes regarding variations and price adjustments are

Probabilistic operations research assignment help, Need help in a journal p...

Need help in a journal paper review. The following are the criteria: - Choose a journal paper in the general area of probabilistic operations research - recently published

What must the claimant show to succeed, What must the claimant show to succ...

What must the claimant show to succeed? The claimant should show the given issues, for a case to succeed: a. There was a duty of care. b. There was breach of such duty.

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd