User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Set of circumstances of policy maker, Set of circumstances of policy maker ...

Set of circumstances of policy maker The distinction leads to think what to say then, to a policy, which is feasible in only one set of circumstances. Then the expectations on

Self-control in entrepreneurship development, Self-Control : Most entrepre...

Self-Control : Most entrepreneurs believe they can do the job better than anyone else and will strive for maximum responsibility and accountability. An entrepreneur needs to maint

Avoidance of floating charges, Avoidance of Floating Charges: Under s....

Avoidance of Floating Charges: Under s.314 liquidation automatically renders void any floating charge created within the period of 12 months before commencement of liquidation

Describe in detail about the term - policy makers, Describe in detail abou...

Describe in detail about the - policy makers Elections are used to choose the policy makers, it is not the only mechanism. Since the authority to make decisions may be vested i

Lord coleridge - judicial elucidation of acts, lord Coleridge - Judicial el...

lord Coleridge - Judicial elucidation of acts: However lord Coleridge stated in Rv PETERS  as like "I am quite aware which dictionaries are not to be taken as authoritative ex

Disclaimer of assets, DISCLAIMER OF ASSETS: The liquidator has a statu...

DISCLAIMER OF ASSETS: The liquidator has a statutory right of disclaimer of assets: s.135.  The rules are: (a)     he must obtain leave of the court; (b)     the right o

Express and implied terms of contract, Express and Implied terms of contrac...

Express and Implied terms of contract Express terms However the terms of a contract are said to like "express terms" whether the parties themselves adverted to them on

Proposal and invitation, Analyze the differences between a proposal and an ...

Analyze the differences between a proposal and an invitation to treat and discuss the rules to determine the point of time on which an agreement is reached. Using the latest Malays

Wbp, what is wbp? and its danger and benefits ? components of wbp?

what is wbp? and its danger and benefits ? components of wbp?

Continuing guarantees – negotiable instrument, Continuing Guarantees – Nego...

Continuing Guarantees – Negotiable Instrument A continuing guarantee is such type of a guarantee that extends to a series of transactions, so and such is not exhausted through

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd