User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Registration of resolutions, Registration of Resolutions: By S.143(1) ...

Registration of Resolutions: By S.143(1) a printed copy of the following resolutions shall, within 30 days after the passing thereof, be delivered to the registrar for registr

Trade and commerce, what is the importance of law enforcement and the legal...

what is the importance of law enforcement and the legal profession as service industries?

Dormant Commerce Clause, In 2001, Puerto Rico enacted a law that requires s...

In 2001, Puerto Rico enacted a law that requires specific labels on cement sold in Puerto Rico and imposes fines for any violations of these requirements. The law prohibits the sal

Benefits associated with ethical behavior, Question 1: (a) According to...

Question 1: (a) According to Archie Carroll what are the four interrelated aspects of corporate social responsibility? Use examples from the Mauritian context to illustrate you

Ways which affect the behaviour of the policy maker, Ways which affect the ...

Ways which affect the behaviour of the policy maker There may be at least three ways this uncertainty may affect the behaviour of the policy maker. a) He may chose mainly th

Who are the stakeholders, Jordan is the director a big engineering Company....

Jordan is the director a big engineering Company. Tyson is the Chief Engineer of the company. He is working on the company's new project, namely the construction of a new building

Alien tort claims act, Alien Tort Claims Act Problem: You work ...

Alien Tort Claims Act Problem: You work at a New York law firm and have been invited by the partner you work for to attend a meeting with Mrs. Esther Kiobel and a dozen

Proxies - meetings and resolutions, PROXIES - meetings and resolutions: ...

PROXIES - meetings and resolutions: By S.136(1), any member of a company entitled to attend and vote at a meeting of the company shall be entitled to appoint one more person (

Fitness for purpose - sales of goods, Fitness for Purpose - Sales of Goods ...

Fitness for Purpose - Sales of Goods However that goods such are bought for a particular purpose that are reasonably fit about that purpose:(S.16 (a))like Whether this conditi

Illustrate the case of environmental taxes, Illustrate the case of environm...

Illustrate the case of environmental taxes Consider the case of environmental taxes. There is clear evidence that International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) suffers from an

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd