User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Election of chairman, ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN:           S.134(d) provide...

ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN:           S.134(d) provides that, unless the articles of a company contain a contrary provision, any member elected by the members present at a meeting m

Arbitration is overriding condition in business contracts, QUESTION 1 A...

QUESTION 1 Arbitration is an overriding condition in all business contracts. Without a clause for arbitration business relationship is bound to suffer. Critically examine this

Foreign Direct Investment: Legal and policy issues., 2 essays that due May ...

2 essays that due May 2.

Possible proceeding under the fair work act, As part of this project, exper...

As part of this project, expert input was provided by employment law specialists Herbert Geer. Herbert Geer raised the possibility that the FWO could recover amounts lost by indivi

Commercial law, Commercial Law Alice is an 80 year old, illiterate, an...

Commercial Law Alice is an 80 year old, illiterate, and suffering from Alzheimer’s disease (a disease affecting short-term memory). Will is a social worker employed by the loc

Judicial control - subsidiary legislation, Judicial Control: Conversel...

Judicial Control: Conversely the courts can declare any law made as subsidiary legislation to be invalid or unacceptable under the ultra vires doctrine. Thus the law may be de

Scheme of arrangement, Scheme of Arrangement: The following sequence o...

Scheme of Arrangement: The following sequence of action is necessary:  (a) application is made to the court (usually by the company itself) for an order that one or more me

What is expansionary bias, What is Expansionary Bias The domestic count...

What is Expansionary Bias The domestic country's bliss point (B) is now below the 45 degree line and the foreign country's bliss point (B 1 ) above the 45 degree line. With sep

Show key considerations in defining phoenix activity, Q. Show Key considera...

Q. Show Key considerations in defining phoenix activity? In determining an appropriate definition of phoenix activity, there are a range of considerations that must be accounte

Common law rule - meetings and resolutions, Common law rule - meetings and ...

Common law rule - meetings and resolutions: The common law rule applies irrespective of whether the failure to give notice of the meeting was deliberate or unintentional.  How

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd