case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Class meetings - meetings and resolutions, Class Meetings: "Class meet...

Class Meetings: "Class meetings" are not provided for by the Act.  however, a class meeting may be held pursuant to the provisions of the company articles of association, if a

What are the ways by which states create international law, Different ways ...

Different ways through which States create International law There are different ways through which States create International law. International conventions mentioned under a

Sales of goods, when can implied condition can be treated as warrantee?

when can implied condition can be treated as warrantee?

Law institutions and delegation of authority, Law institutions and delegati...

Law institutions and delegation of authority How time-consistency plays a significant role in policy process. The problems induced by the heterogeneity leading to the problem o

Compensation for loss of office - company management, Compensation for Loss...

Compensation for Loss of Office: (a) Section 192 makes it unlawful for a company to make a director any payment by way of compensation for loss of office, or  may as considera

Communication law, As a soon-to-be media practitioner, you will encounter m...

As a soon-to-be media practitioner, you will encounter many legal issues in the media industry. In this assignment, you are required to examine one main legal issue that media prac

Statutory task force on phoenix activity, Q. Statutory task force on phoeni...

Q. Statutory task force on phoenix activity? A long term option could be the establishment of a statutory task force on phoenix activity. This could be supported by all the rel

Mode of alteration, Mode of Alteration:  The alteration of capital may...

Mode of Alteration:  The alteration of capital may be made by - 1) Increasing the company's share capital by new shares of such amount as the resolution prescribes; or 2

When is an employer vicariously liable, When is an employer vicariously lia...

When is an employer vicariously liable? An employer is vicariously liable when: a. When Employer authorised. b. When unauthorised procedure utilized when executing an aut

Termination of arbitral proceeding, Termination of Arbitral Proceeding ...

Termination of Arbitral Proceeding Although the Arbitral proceedings may be terminated in any of the giving ways as; Through the final award of the arbitrator Whether

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd