case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Interpret compliance requirements, For this unit you will be given a hypoth...

For this unit you will be given a hypothetical business situation, which is to be developed in line with statutory and voluntary compliance requirements to enable the business to o

Invitation to treat - law of contract, Invitation to Treat - Law of Contrac...

Invitation to Treat - Law of Contract Well this is a mere invitation through a party to another or others to make offers.  Another time the offeror become offeree and invitee

State the term delegated legislation, State the term delegated legislation....

State the term delegated legislation. Delegated legislation: Parliament sometimes provides the capability to legislate to other bodies as like regional parliaments and go

Proposal and invitation, Analyze the differences between a proposal and an ...

Analyze the differences between a proposal and an invitation to treat and discuss the rules to determine the point of time on which an agreement is reached. Using the latest Malays

State article 29 of international law, State Article 29 of international la...

State Article 29 of international law Article 29 states that a member of a diplomatic mission enjoys immunity from arrest or prosecution.

Explain the controversial mode of acquisition - accession, Explain the cont...

Explain the controversial mode of acquisition - accession The ontroversial mode of acquisition is accession . It involves the peaceful transfer of territory from one sovereig

Explain the term chain of custody, QUESTION Chain of custody in eviden...

QUESTION Chain of custody in evidence collection is a very important document when it comes to presenting a computer forensic case in the court of law i. Explain the term c

The occupational, QUESTION The Occupational, Safety and Health Act 2005...

QUESTION The Occupational, Safety and Health Act 2005 states that Every employer shall, so far as is reasonably practicable, ensure the safety, health and welfare at work of

Taxtation law, Question 6 Indicate any amounts from these transactions tha...

Question 6 Indicate any amounts from these transactions that is assessable income for the 2016/17 tax year. (a) Frida is a resident taxpayer employed by Sharpe Office Supplies. Sh

Account for the importance of policy evaluation, QUESTION 1 Explain cle...

QUESTION 1 Explain clearly how Public Policy making constitutes a major function of Government QUESTION 2 Account for the role of Public opinion in the identification o

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd