User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Assignment , What is Utilitarianism?

What is Utilitarianism?

Partnerships, Partnerships:                A partnership is defined by...

Partnerships:                A partnership is defined by s.3(1) of the Partnership Act   as "the relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with

What was the state responsibility, Normal 0 false false fal...

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Determine in detail about the money market, Determine in detail about the m...

Determine in detail about the money market Prior to the change in monetary policy both countries are assumed to be in equilibrium at point A in both of these diagrams. Only at

Variation of class rights, Variation of class rights: It is only neces...

Variation of class rights: It is only necessary to follow the variation of class rights procedure (and a dissenting minority can only apply to the court for cancellation)  if

Graphically illustrate a drp system, Question 1: Describe the types of ...

Question 1: Describe the types of pallets that exist, and suggest the one that is more suitable to an organization that has a high variety of low-value items, which high stock

What must the claimant show to succeed, What must the claimant show to succ...

What must the claimant show to succeed? The claimant should show the given issues, for a case to succeed: a. There was a duty of care. b. There was breach of such duty.

Liability by estoppel, Liability by Estoppel Anyone who presents himse...

Liability by Estoppel Anyone who presents himself or permits himself for be represented, further by words, conduct or writing as the partner about another person like  persons

Rights of guarantor against creditor, Rights of Guarantor Against Creditor ...

Rights of Guarantor Against Creditor Consequently the rights of the guarantor are: like (a) Further at any time after that the guaranteed debt such has become due and such prev

Re london and general bank, RE LONDON AND GENERAL BANK:           An a...

RE LONDON AND GENERAL BANK:           An auditor represented a confidential report to the directors calling their attention to the insufficiency of the securities in which the

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd