User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Partnership agreement - voidable contracts, Partnership Agreement - Voidabl...

Partnership Agreement - Voidable Contracts Conversely an infant is bound at common law through a partnership agreement although he is free to repudiate it at all time during i

Stare decisis and its application by us courts, Stare Decisis and Its Appli...

Stare Decisis and Its Application by US Courts However there is so far no case decided through the US Court of Appeal regarding the application of "stare Decisis" through US C

Pooling of assets and liabilities, Q. Pooling of assets and liabilities? ...

Q. Pooling of assets and liabilities? In 2004 the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee proposed that assets and liabilities of companies be aggregated and creditors paid

When is an employer vicariously liable, When is an employer vicariously lia...

When is an employer vicariously liable? An employer is vicariously liable when: a. When Employer authorised. b. When unauthorised procedure utilized when executing an aut

Define a conflict of interest, Question  How does the RTL Code define ...

Question  How does the RTL Code define a 'conflict of interest'?  Give one example of how the RTL Code suggests a conflict of interest may arise.

Powers, Powers: The ultra vires doctrine limits a company's powers to ...

Powers: The ultra vires doctrine limits a company's powers to the attainment of the company's objects under its  memorandum of association. Partnerships are not  affected by t

Parol evidence rule, 1. How do mandatory terms limit freedom of contract? ...

1. How do mandatory terms limit freedom of contract? 2. How do contract interpretation issues arise? 3. What is the difference between subjective and objective intent?   4

Register of directors shareholdings, Register of Directors' Shareholdings: ...

Register of Directors' Shareholdings: Section 196(1) requires every company to keep a register showing the number, description and amount of any shares or debentures which are

Legislative or parliamentary control, LEGISLATIVE OR PARLIAMENTARY CONTROL:...

LEGISLATIVE OR PARLIAMENTARY CONTROL: (i)         Parliamentary approval and (ii)        Ministerial approval and (iii)       Publication into the England Gazette and

Purchase of own shares - merger accounting, Purchase Of Own Shares: An...

Purchase Of Own Shares: Another possible way in which a company's paid-up capital may leave the company other than in the ordinary course of the company's business would be if

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd