case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Advantages of stare decisis - flexibility, Advantages of Stare Decisis - ...

Advantages of Stare Decisis - Flexibility Since of the freedom that final Court of Appeal always has to depart from a previous decision of its own whether the social condi

Misfeasance - winding up, Misfeasance: Under s.324, misfeasance procee...

Misfeasance: Under s.324, misfeasance proceedings may be instituted against a director, promoter, manager, liquidator or "officer" (including an auditor) of a company in liqui

Defining phoenix activity, Stakeholders felt the working definition was bro...

Stakeholders felt the working definition was broadly appropriate. It was also noted that the Treasury definition, used as the working definition, has been endorsed by the ATO. A nu

Private bill - categorization of law, Private Bill - categorization of law:...

Private Bill - categorization of law: In fact order 120 offers like whereas leave to proceed is granted the promoters shall:; as a. First is pay to the Clerk a fee of £10 f

What are the stages in policy process, What are the Stages in Policy Proces...

What are the Stages in Policy Process The traditional textbook approach to the study of public policy separates policy making into its component steps and analyzes each in turn.

Court, why is it important for a lawyer to address the victim

why is it important for a lawyer to address the victim

Government optimal long run policy - nash equilibrium, Government optimal l...

Government optimal long run policy - Nash equilibrium The government's optimal long run policy is associated with policy coordination at point C. However, as in the static mod

Independent research into a particular aspect of law, The purpose of the as...

The purpose of the assignment is to allow you to undertake independent research into a particular aspect of law, to reflect on and consider particular legal issues and to apply you

Supervisory jurisdiction and admiralty jurisdiction, Supervisory Jurisdicti...

Supervisory Jurisdiction and Admiralty Jurisdiction Supervisory Jurisdiction However the High Court has jurisdiction under S.65 (2) of the Constitution to supervise a n

Problem question in law, how do i answer a problem question in law about th...

how do i answer a problem question in law about the law of contract

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd