User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Fraudulent preference - liquidator, Fraudulent preference - liquidator: ...

Fraudulent preference - liquidator: When a transaction is void as a fraudulent preference any charge created is void and any cash paid or property transferred by the company

Compensation for loss of office - company management, Compensation for Loss...

Compensation for Loss of Office: (a) Section 192 makes it unlawful for a company to make a director any payment by way of compensation for loss of office, or  may as considera

Provision of fiduciary duties - company management, Provision of Fiduciary ...

Provision of Fiduciary Duties - company management: This provision is supplemented by Article 84 of Table A which provides that-  i. The director shall not vote in respect

What do you mean by garnishee orders, Q. What do you mean by Garnishee Orde...

Q. What do you mean by Garnishee Orders? The ATO has the power to issue garnishee orders which allow recovery of debts from a person's bank account, wage or from people who owe

Delivery of good – sales of goods, Delivery of Good – Sales of Goods T...

Delivery of Good – Sales of Goods Therefore this is the voluntary transfer of possession from one person to other. Actually delivery usually takes any of the next forms, namel

Change the law and move to comparative negligence, 1. Maryland is one of a ...

1. Maryland is one of a few states in which contributory negligence is a complete defense, barring the plaintiff from any recovery. What is contributory negligence? How does it com

Scheme at meeting - reconstructions, Scheme at meeting - reconstructions: ...

Scheme at meeting - reconstructions: Following approval of the scheme at meeting(s) application is made to the court for an order to approve and implement the scheme.  At this

Non-judicial and judicial adr neutrals, "The liability of third party neutr...

"The liability of third party neutrals has been a topic of concern ever since the formalisation of dispute resolution in Australia.  Although there are no known cases in Australia

Misfeasance by the auditors, Misfeasance by the auditors: However it i...

Misfeasance by the auditors: However it is not sufficient to describe that the frauds must have been detected whether the entries in the books had been put mutually in a way w

Statute law, STATUTE LAW: There this is an Act of Parliament.  Whether...

STATUTE LAW: There this is an Act of Parliament.  Whether this is law made through parliament directly in exercise of legislative power conferred upon it through the constitut

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd