User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

What are the fact finding ethics, The phrase called information overload ma...

The phrase called information overload may be a bit of a problem because it used so often, but the fact remain that managers & support staff are merged in information of all kinds.

Labour laws, Question : Mr Brown was employed by Sun Company Ltd as man...

Question : Mr Brown was employed by Sun Company Ltd as manager of Star Hotel on a 3 year contract starting 1 st July 1990. It was agreed that either side may put an end to the

Duty of an auditor, Duty of an auditor: The duty of an auditor general...

Duty of an auditor: The duty of an auditor generally was very carefully considered by this court in RE: LONDON AND GENERAL BANK (1895) and I cannot usefully add anything to wh

Concepts of negligence and remoteness of damage in tort law, Question 1: ...

Question 1: Explain the main elements that constitute a valid contract. Question 2: Describe the concepts of negligence and remoteness of damage in tort law. Questi

Chartered companies, Chartered Companies: A chartered company is forme...

Chartered Companies: A chartered company is formed when the Queen or King of England issues a charter, or "letters patent", to a group of people who intend to carry on a busin

Relationship between banker and customer, Relationship between Banker and C...

Relationship between Banker and Customer Therefore the relationship between a banker and the customer is a debtor-creditor association that was articulated In the chief case o

Effectiveness of challenge and appeal mechanisms, Question 1: Taking th...

Question 1: Taking the case of Mauritius, in the machinery of government, the Procurement Policy Officer is the central organ of the Government that regulates the procurement

Health and safety of employees at the workplace, Question 1: In order t...

Question 1: In order to ensure health and safety of employees at the workplace, the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005 imposes duties on employers only. Discuss. Quest

Exceptions of merger accounting, Exceptions of Merger accounting: S.56...

Exceptions of Merger accounting: S.56 (1) permits a company to give financial assistance for a purchase of, or subscription for, its shares in the following circumstances:

Delays and inadequate remedies - equity, Delays: However certain stand...

Delays: However certain standard defences knows as "essoins" caused considerable delay earlier than a case could be heard.  Now for a certain condition like the hearing of a c

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd