User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Holder in due course - transferor''s title, Holder in Due Course - Transfer...

Holder in Due Course - Transferor's Title Section number 29 of the Act defines like "a holder in unpaid course" such like "a holder who that has taken a bill, so then complete a

Define power, 1. How does the Melian dialogue represent key concepts such a...

1. How does the Melian dialogue represent key concepts such as self-interest, the balance of power, alliance, capabilities, empires and justice? Athenian leaders arrive on the is

Global competitiveness of firms, Question 1 Briefly explain: (i) Des...

Question 1 Briefly explain: (i) Describe Business ethics. (ii) Illustrate caveat emptor. (iii) Define corporate governance. (iv) What is whistle blowing? (v) D

Impact on businesses of phoenix activity, Q. Impact on businesses of phoeni...

Q. Impact on businesses of phoenix activity? In 1996 the Australian Securities Commission (ASC), published a report on phoenix activity titled Phoenix Activities and Insolvent

What are the direct costs, 1. a.  Read this summary of a journal article ab...

1. a.  Read this summary of a journal article about education and the recent uprisings in the Middle b.    Model the decision whether to participate in a rally like our two peri

Types of licence needed tourist enterprise, QUESTION (a) Mr Raj owns a...

QUESTION (a) Mr Raj owns a plot of land and wishes to invest in the tourism industry and seeks your advice as to whether he needs to apply for a tourist enterprise licence and

Determine the cash flows of the swap, Question : (a) Show how a party c...

Question : (a) Show how a party can terminate a forward transaction prior to maturity? (b) Suppose a forward Rate Agreement that: Expires in 30 days Is based on a n

Welfare of the community act 1962 , Helen Brown's husband Mark was recently...

Helen Brown's husband Mark was recently charged with an offence under the Welfare of the Community Act 1962 (Qld).  It is likely that Helen will be called as a witness against hi

Legislation and legislative functions, Question : This is an extract of...

Question : This is an extract of the Mauritian Patents, Industrial Design and Trademarks Act 2002. 12. Patentable inventions (1) An invention shall be patentable under

Theobald , Theobald: Conversely there such I take to be the duty of th...

Theobald: Conversely there such I take to be the duty of the auditor; then he must be honest.... i.e. like he must not certify that what he does not believe to be true, reason

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd