case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Manage the currency risks using the futures contract, Question 1: (a) "...

Question 1: (a) "A tourist resort which does business in a single currency is not exposed to currency risk." Discuss (use example to support your answer). (b) Case: Hedging

How would you ensure that the code is effective, QUESTION 1 You are giv...

QUESTION 1 You are given the task to make a Code of Ethics for your organization (a) Describe a Code of Ethics (b) What are the different aspects/issues that you might in

The law making process of primary legislation in mauritius, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 Interpreting legislation is a very important function of the Court. However, Judges must only have recourse to the intention of parliament while interpreting legisla

What do you understand by contract administration, QUESTION (a) Define ...

QUESTION (a) Define the term 'contract' and explain the basic elements which constitute a valid and legally enforceable contract under the English Law (b) What do you unders

Conditions for relief - statutory provisions, CONDITIONS FOR RELIEF: I...

CONDITIONS FOR RELIEF: In H.R. Harmer Ltd (1959) Jenkins L.J. summarised the conditions which must be met before relief under the section can be granted by the court when he s

Partnerships, Partnerships:                A partnership is defined by...

Partnerships:                A partnership is defined by s.3(1) of the Partnership Act   as "the relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with

President''s assent, PRESIDENT'S ASSENT: Under section 46(2) of the ...

PRESIDENT'S ASSENT: Under section 46(2) of the Constitution a Bill passed through the National Assembly must be presented to the President for his assent. However the Presid

Repugnance to justice and morality, Repugnance to Justice and Morality ...

Repugnance to Justice and Morality However the customary law will be applied only whether it is not repugnant to justice and morality.Even though the Act needs the phrase "and

Illustrate the case of environmental taxes, Illustrate the case of environm...

Illustrate the case of environmental taxes Consider the case of environmental taxes. There is clear evidence that International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) suffers from an

Concepts of negligence and remoteness of damage in tort law, Question 1: ...

Question 1: Explain the main elements that constitute a valid contract. Question 2: Describe the concepts of negligence and remoteness of damage in tort law. Questi

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd