User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

General rules on statute-barred debts, General rules on statute-barred debt...

General rules on statute-barred debts: A statute-barred debt should be rejected since it is not legally enforceable.  But in a members' voluntary winding up the liquidator may

Explain the limitations to the economic rights, Question 1: (a) Expliqu...

Question 1: (a) Expliquez les conditions qui doivent être réunis pour la formation d'un contrat. (b) Expliquez les differentes modes selon lesquels un contrat peut prendre

Explain the right of self determination, Explain the right of self determin...

Explain the right of self determination The right of self determination amounts to an exception in the sense that when fighting for self determination, the state can render as

Companys capital, Companys capital: An order made by the court may- ...

Companys capital: An order made by the court may- (a) regulate the conduct of the company's affairs in future, as in Re: H.R. Harmer Ltd;- in which the father (Harmer) was

Derivative action - statutory provisions, Derivative action: In Nurcom...

Derivative action: In Nurcombe v Nurcombe Lawton L J stated that a derivative action is a procedural device for enabling the court to do justice to a company controlled by mis

Speaker notes per slide, In light of some latest accounts coming into the c...

In light of some latest accounts coming into the company and working to promote its latest services, IDSS has also make a few trademarks to ensure and protects its innovative techn

Empirical claim, One of the critical tasks we have as empirical political s...

One of the critical tasks we have as empirical political scientists is to assess the validity of the comments people around us make about the socio-political world. For this assign

Election of chairman, ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN:           S.134(d) provide...

ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN:           S.134(d) provides that, unless the articles of a company contain a contrary provision, any member elected by the members present at a meeting m

Dissolution by the court, Dissolution by the Court Conversely Section 39...

Dissolution by the Court Conversely Section 39 of the Act prescribes the state of affairs that the court will decree the compulsory dissolution about a partnership. They are: li

Ways which affect the behaviour of the policy maker, Ways which affect the ...

Ways which affect the behaviour of the policy maker There may be at least three ways this uncertainty may affect the behaviour of the policy maker. a) He may chose mainly th

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd