User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Guide - african customary law, Guide - African Customary Law Furth...

Guide - African Customary Law Further the courts are to be "guided" through African customary law.  Conversely this provision provides a judge discretion whenever to allow

Resolutions - meetings and resolutions, Resolutions: A meeting reaches...

Resolutions: A meeting reaches a decision by passing a resolution.  There are two kinds of resolution, ie. (a) an ordinary resolution which is carried by a simple majority

Trade unions - unincorporated associations, Trade Unions:             ...

Trade Unions:                   Trade Unions are registered under s.11 of the Trade Unions Act 1952 with the primary object of regulating the  relations between employees and

Compulsory liquidation - winding-up, Compulsory Liquidation :          ...

Compulsory Liquidation :                                       A petition is presented to the High Court under s.218 of the Companies Act.  The petition will specify one of the

Prospectus issue, Prospectus Issue: Under a prospectus issue the compa...

Prospectus Issue: Under a prospectus issue the company sells the shares directly to the public rather than selling them through intermediaries.

What is judicial review, QUESTION 1 (a) What are the various alternativ...

QUESTION 1 (a) What are the various alternatives that exist to settle a dispute besides going to court (b) What are their respective advantages and disadvantages QUESTIO

Explain two scenarios of restraint of trade clause, Explain two scenarios i...

Explain two scenarios in which a restraint of trade clause would typically be used.

Usual business at an annual general meeting, Usual business at an annual ge...

Usual business at an annual general meeting: The registrar is not bound to call or direct the calling of the meeting but, in the event of his refusing to do so, the aggrieved

Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions, Purpose of the rule: It ha...

Purpose of the rule: It has been stated by various English judges that without the rule in Foss v Harbottle (i)            There would be futile actions.  A court order

Advantages - take-over bid, Advantages - Take-over bid: A non-acceptin...

Advantages - Take-over bid: A non-accepting shareholder who applies to the court to set aside the proposed compulsory acquisition of his shares under s.210 will fail unless he

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd