User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

When is an employer not vicariously liable, When is an employer not vicario...

When is an employer not vicariously liable? An employer is not vicariously liable when: a. Worker is doing something in working hours as of a personal nature. b. She or h

Define the term multiple decision makers - strategic voting, Define the ter...

Define the term multiple decision makers - Strategic Voting The following lines, from Austen-Smiths' (1986) clarify the position quite succinently. He writes, 'so in elections

Accuracy of the managers certificate, Accuracy of the managers certificate:...

Accuracy of the managers certificate: Was it the duty of the auditors to test the accuracy of the manager's certificate by a comparison of the figures in the books, and were t

What are the functions of the commission for conciliation, Question 1: ...

Question 1: (a) Explain what you understand by the following legal terms under the Employment Relations Act - (i) Collective bargaining (ii) Collective agreement (iii

What do you understand by the rule of law, Question 1: Should the Judic...

Question 1: Should the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council be maintained at the summit of the hierarchy of our judicial system? Critically discuss on the above. Ques

Proposal and invitation, Analyze the differences between a proposal and an ...

Analyze the differences between a proposal and an invitation to treat and discuss the rules to determine the point of time on which an agreement is reached. Using the latest Malays

Necessaries - binding contracts, Necessaries - Binding Contracts Defin...

Necessaries - Binding Contracts Definition of 'Necessaries' cleared by S. 4(2) to the Sale of Goods Act like "goods appropriate for the condition in life of that infant or min

Civil liabilities, Civil Liabilities: LIABILITY FOR FAILURE TO STATE A...

Civil Liabilities: LIABILITY FOR FAILURE TO STATE ANY MATTER OR REPORT At Common Law, a contract of allotment is not a contract Uberrimae Fidei. The company is therefore no

Guide - african customary law, Guide - African Customary Law Furth...

Guide - African Customary Law Further the courts are to be "guided" through African customary law.  Conversely this provision provides a judge discretion whenever to allow

How to explain the apparent lack of expressions, How to explain the apparen...

How to explain the apparent lack of expressions There are several ways to explain the apparent lack of expressions of the impacts. In fact, there are arguments that political

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd