case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Main advantages - mergers and winding up, Main advantages - mergers and win...

Main advantages - mergers and winding up: A scheme of arrangement under s.207 offers three main advantages: (a)     it can be used in circumstances to which s.210 and s.280

Voluntary liquidation - shares of the minority , Voluntary liquidation - sh...

Voluntary liquidation - shares of the minority: A company in (or about to go into) members' voluntary liquidation may by special resolution authorize the liquidator to sell th

Explain the term chain of custody, QUESTION Chain of custody in eviden...

QUESTION Chain of custody in evidence collection is a very important document when it comes to presenting a computer forensic case in the court of law i. Explain the term c

What are the main sources of european law, What are the main sources of Eur...

What are the main sources of European Law? There are three main sources of EU (European) law: a. Primary legislation: It is the Treaties of Rome and Paris that initial

Pre-incorporation contracts, Pre-incorporation Contracts:             ...

Pre-incorporation Contracts:                             A pre-incorporated contract is an agreement which is entered into, usually by a promoter or promoters, on behalf of a

Ethical and professional requirements, It has been said that "auditors cann...

It has been said that "auditors cannot legitimately serve the 'user' public because they are hired and fired by the management of the company being audited. If management does not

Third reading - reading, Third Reading: Now next is offers in Order 11...

Third Reading: Now next is offers in Order 112(1) which is on the adoption of a report on a Bill the Third Reading may regarding leave of Mr. Speaker be taken forthwith and wh

Recommendations for addressing phoenix activities, Recommendations for addr...

Recommendations for addressing phoenix activities Over the past two decades there have been a significant range of proposals for addressing phoenix activity. Most of these opt

What are the obligations of the employer, Question 1: Constructive dism...

Question 1: Constructive dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who takes the initiative in considering the contract as having be

Proceedings at meetings - meetings and resolutions, Proceedings at Meetings...

Proceedings at Meetings: (a)Each item of business comprised in the notice should be taken separately, discussed and put to the vote.  Members may propose ammendments to the re

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd