User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

State the policies of convergence, State the policies of convergence Ex...

State the policies of convergence Explained here in the simplest case with assumption that there is full representation of voters; information is symmetric and single peaked pr

Define the reflect relative policy stance, Define the reflect relative poli...

Define the reflect relative policy stance We assume that contributions reflect relative policy stance, then the policy positions are perceived only noisily and we get only expe

Ultra vires- objects clause, The Doctrine of 'Ultra Vires':           ...

The Doctrine of 'Ultra Vires':                          The doctrine of ultra vires is a legal rule that was articulated by the House of Lords in the case of Ashbury Rail, Car

Declaration and payment, Declaration and Payment: There is no provisio...

Declaration and Payment: There is no provision in the Act dealing with payment of dividends. It is therefore governed by the provisions of the company's articles, failing whic

Unwritten sources , UNWRITTEN SOURCES OF ENGLAND LAW: However common l...

UNWRITTEN SOURCES OF ENGLAND LAW: However common law may be illustrated as that branch of the law of England that was developed through the English courts on the basis of the

Distinguish between economic development and economic growth, Question 1: ...

Question 1: a. Distinguish between Economic Development and economic growth. b. "Despite all their diversity, less developed countries are linked by a range of common problems"

Contracts of guarantee, Contracts of Guarantee However a contract of g...

Contracts of Guarantee However a contract of guarantee or suretyship is such a contract through one person to answer that for the debt, such default or miscarriage of another.

Requisites of acceptance - rules relating to acceptance, Requisites of Acce...

Requisites of Acceptance - Rules Relating To Acceptance Section number S.17 (2) provides like an acceptance is invalid unless since it complies with the following conditions:

Good faith - meetings and resolutions, Good Faith - meetings and resolution...

Good Faith - meetings and resolutions: The directors must act in good faith when calling a meeting,.  Thus, in Cannon v Tasks, the directors called the annual general meeting

Payment of underwriting commission - allotment of shares, Payment of Underw...

Payment of Underwriting Commission: A "commission" is defined by Osborn's Concise Law Dictionary as, inter alia "an agent's remuneration". Therefore purposes of company law, i

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd