case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Write about constitutional validity of the drt act, Question 1 Describe th...

Question 1 Describe the term banking. What are the acceptable businesses for a banking company as per BR Act 1949 Question 2 When is a negotiable apparatus considered as dish

Completion of the agreement, Completion of the Agreement However the h...

Completion of the Agreement However the hirer may give written notice about intention to complete the purchase through paying the owner on a specified day like the balance due

Problem question in law, how do i answer a problem question in law about th...

how do i answer a problem question in law about the law of contract

Contractual capacity of persons of unsound mind, Contractual Capacity of Pe...

Contractual Capacity of Persons of Unsound Mind Furthermore a contract entered into through a person of unsound mind is voidable on his option whether it is proved that the ot

Regulations regarding experiments on animals, REGULATIONS REGARDING EXPERIM...

REGULATIONS REGARDING EXPERIMENTS ON ANIMALS : You may be aware that experiments on animals are performed in the laboratories of educational and research institutions. You should k

Agency by ratification, Agency by Ratification So then Agency by ratif...

Agency by Ratification So then Agency by ratification can only arise whether: The agent purported for act to a principal and one is The alleged principal was in exi

What are the limitations imposed on banks by the banking act, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 (a) Under which circumstances can banking information on customers be disclosed and at the same time not breaching the confidentiality clause of the Banking Act (

Statutory form, Statutory Form:                    Section 14 of the A...

Statutory Form:                    Section 14 of the Act provides that the form of the  Memorandum of Association of a company limited by shares shall be in accordance with th

Standard of proof in civil cases, Standard of proof in civil cases: Th...

Standard of proof in civil cases: Therefore the standard of proof in civil cases is on a preponderance of probabilities or on a balance of probabilities.  So it must be more p

Make-or-buy decisions, Make-or-Buy Decisions  Make or buy decision is a...

Make-or-Buy Decisions  Make or buy decision is a strategic decision that any organisation has to make, between producing an item internally and buying it externally.  With t

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd