case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Warranties - terms of a contract, Warranties - Terms of a Contract How...

Warranties - Terms of a Contract However there is no precise legal definition of such "warranty" that in legal nomenclature, where is susceptible for a variety of interpretati

State the international policy coordination, State the International Policy...

State the International Policy Coordination There may be two sources of interdependence between national economic policies, club goods and horizontal spill overs. The first has

Explanatory statement - mergers and winding up, Explanatory statement - mer...

Explanatory statement - mergers and winding up: It is also necessary that the members or creditors who are to vote on the scheme should be able to understand its full effects.

The three regimes of law of the sea, The three regimes:- i. Right over ...

The three regimes:- i. Right over Territorial Waters: The right over territorial waters extends up to 12 nautical miles (NM) from the baseline of a coastal state. Territorial w

Explain the term- sustainability, Explain the term- Sustainability One ...

Explain the term- Sustainability One of the major problems identified for international policy coordination is whether the agreed outcome is sustainable. As can be seen from th

Briefly outline the role of the state in employee relations, Question 1: ...

Question 1: (a) Briefly outline the role of the State in Employee Relations. (b) Write short notes on any three of the following: (i) The Ministry of Labour and Industrial

Lifting the veil of incorporation, Lifting the Veil of Incorporation: ...

Lifting the Veil of Incorporation: The legal rule that a registered company is at law a different person altogether from the subscribers to the memorandum of association and o

Contract condition, 1. What is the difference between modifying a contract ...

1. What is the difference between modifying a contract under common law and modifying a contract under the UCC? 2. What is a "waiver" and what are its implications? 3. What i

Method for enactment of laws, Method for Enactment of Laws: Whether th...

Method for Enactment of Laws: Whether the procedure to be followed in Parliament in order to enact Law is governed through Constitution and Orders 94-125 of National Assembly

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd