case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

What are the obligations of the employer, Question 1: Constructive dism...

Question 1: Constructive dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who takes the initiative in considering the contract as having be

How was negligence the main cause, How was Negligence the main cause? ...

How was Negligence the main cause? Negligence was the major cause: A claim for damages can only succeed when there has been damage or loss to the claimant. Illustrations

Explain the laws and rules of atlantic case, Explain the Laws and rules of ...

Explain the Laws and rules of atlantic case There are several laws and rules which were applicable to this situation: Paris Convention on Aerial Navigation of 1919 H

Find out the ethical issues of the organization, Select a manufacturing org...

Select a manufacturing organization and find out the ethical issues of the organization in the following areas: Production: Marketing & sales: Human Resources & employee relatio

Partnerships, Partnerships:                A partnership is defined by...

Partnerships:                A partnership is defined by s.3(1) of the Partnership Act   as "the relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with

Court-martial, Court-Martial Establishment Moreover Section 65 ...

Court-Martial Establishment Moreover Section 65 (1) of the Constitution empowers Parliament to establish court martial that shall have such jurisdiction and powers as m

What are the procedures that an employer needs to follow, QUESTION 1 Wi...

QUESTION 1 With the coming into force of the Employment Rights Act, how far has the freedom of the employer to unilaterally terminate contracts of employment been curtailed?

What is the meaning of potential harmonization, What is the meaning of pote...

What is the meaning of potential harmonization On reviewing the literature on coordination, convergence, and potential harmonization of antitrust laws, we discover several dif

Statutory provisions, STATUTORY PROVISIONS: Article 4 of Table A permi...

STATUTORY PROVISIONS: Article 4 of Table A permits a company to vary the rights attached to any class of shares if the proposed variation is consented to in writing by the hol

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd