User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

What are the features of the omc process, What are the features of the OMC ...

What are the features of the OMC process Participation is also seen as a central feature of the OMC process, especially if it is to be extended beyond 'top-down' to encompass '

Analyse the extent of the criminal liability, One night Mr Kokintou and Ms ...

One night Mr Kokintou and Ms Mangetou, entered into a housethrough a window which was negligently left open by the owner of the house.  Whilst Ms Mangetou was keeping guard at the

State the policies of convergence, State the policies of convergence Ex...

State the policies of convergence Explained here in the simplest case with assumption that there is full representation of voters; information is symmetric and single peaked pr

Describe in detail about the european monetary union, Describe in detail ab...

Describe in detail about the European Monetary Union The experimental lab for international policy coordination has been the European Union where monetary unification of member

Strong and weakness of acts of parliament, Strong and Weakness of Acts of P...

Strong and Weakness of Acts of Parliament: There an Act of Parliament may be said to possess the giving advantages: as; (i) Democratic in nature Now here it is democrati

Essay on Legal Change, Identify and explain any legal changes which had res...

Identify and explain any legal changes which had resulted from Economic changes, Changes in our moral values and Political changes

When is an employer not vicariously liable, When is an employer not vicario...

When is an employer not vicariously liable? An employer is not vicariously liable when: a. Worker is doing something in working hours as of a personal nature. b. She or h

List of members - meetings and resolutions, List of Members: S.130(6) ...

List of Members: S.130(6) provides that the directors shall cause a list showing the names and postal addresses of the members of the company, and the number of shares held th

Define a conflict of interest, Question  How does the RTL Code define ...

Question  How does the RTL Code define a 'conflict of interest'?  Give one example of how the RTL Code suggests a conflict of interest may arise.

Commercial Law, Silcraze City Council owns and operates a Gym. It charges $...

Silcraze City Council owns and operates a Gym. It charges $20 per month as membership fees. On the Gym Membership Card it is written that the Cardholder has the right to use all th

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd