case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Powers of arbitral tribunal, Powers of Arbitral Tribunal Powers of Arb...

Powers of Arbitral Tribunal Powers of Arbitral Tribunal are as Follow: For determine whether it has jurisdiction to entertain a dispute and For provide interim reme

Civil liabilities, Civil Liabilities: LIABILITY FOR FAILURE TO STATE A...

Civil Liabilities: LIABILITY FOR FAILURE TO STATE ANY MATTER OR REPORT At Common Law, a contract of allotment is not a contract Uberrimae Fidei. The company is therefore no

What is the neighbour rule, What is the neighbour rule? Duty of care:...

What is the neighbour rule? Duty of care: There is a duty of care by anyone to other where this can be reasonably foreseen which one’s action may injure another (negligen

Interpretation of constitution - high court, Interpretation of Constitution...

Interpretation of Constitution - High Court After then under Section 67(1) of the Constitution gives that whether any question as to the interpretation of the constitution ari

Explain ihl prohibitions, Important to observe that IHL prohibitions It...

Important to observe that IHL prohibitions It is important to  observe that  IHL prohibitions should be identified and followed as  their violations/breach may be considered as

Legal pyramid, Legal Pyramid: However the sources of England law menti...

Legal Pyramid: However the sources of England law mentioned above may be described through the aid of the following diagram or "legal pyramid"; NOTE: there as;

State the international policy coordination, State the International Policy...

State the International Policy Coordination There may be two sources of interdependence between national economic policies, club goods and horizontal spill overs. The first has

Explain what is meant by subsidiary legislation, Question 1: (a) Expla...

Question 1: (a) Explain what is meant by Subsidiary Legislation and the reasons for using such a Law. (b) Explain the ways in which Subsidiary Legislation is controlled.

Contract for work and materials, Contract for Work and Materials In Ro...

Contract for Work and Materials In Robinson v Graves a dispute arose over an agreement below such an artist had promised to make a portrait about 250 guineas. So query had to

Explain the main elements that constitute a valid contract, Question 1: ...

Question 1: Explain the main elements that constitute a valid contract. Question 2: Explain the concepts of negligence and remoteness of damage in tort law. Questio

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd