User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Third reading - reading, Third Reading: Now next is offers in Order 11...

Third Reading: Now next is offers in Order 112(1) which is on the adoption of a report on a Bill the Third Reading may regarding leave of Mr. Speaker be taken forthwith and wh

Describe journal in chronological order, For the transactions provided belo...

For the transactions provided below for the Braves Corporation during 2011, complete the following steps of the accounting cycle (round all answers and journal entries to the neare

Unincorporated associations, Unincorporated Associations:             ...

Unincorporated Associations:                 A group of people may come together in order to pursue or  promote a common purpose or activity but without going through the vari

Distinguish between dismissal and redundancy, Question 1: (a) Describe ...

Question 1: (a) Describe any five topics in employee relations from the following: Employee Engagement, Workplace Investigations, Employee Satisfaction, Performance Management,

Define good governance, QUESTION The vision of a modern and efficient Pu...

QUESTION The vision of a modern and efficient Public Service is to ensure good governance and achieve excellence in the delivery of public services (a) Define good governance

Qualifications of advocates, Qualifications of Advocates Conversely fo...

Qualifications of Advocates Conversely for qualify to admission as an advocate one must as; Be a US citizen or can say Possess a law degree from a recognized

Working of state jurisdiction, Working of State jurisdiction State juri...

Working of State jurisdiction State jurisdiction concerns essentially the extent of each State's right to regulate conduct or consequences of events. A state has the competence

Subsidiary legislation, SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION: Moreover this is subor...

SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION: Moreover this is subordinate or delegated indirect legislation. In fact section 2 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act specified subsidi

District magistrate''s court -civil appeals, District Magistrate's Court -C...

District Magistrate's Court -Civil Appeals Moreover in S.11 (1) of the Magistrate's Court Act gives that 'any person who is aggrieved through an order of a magistrate's court

Invitation to treat - law of contract, Invitation to Treat - Law of Contrac...

Invitation to Treat - Law of Contract Well this is a mere invitation through a party to another or others to make offers.  Another time the offeror become offeree and invitee

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd