case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Ethics, Assignments should be submitted on or before the due date. Zero mar...

Assignments should be submitted on or before the due date. Zero mark will follow late submission of an assignment unless you have an acceptable reason approved by the instructor.

What is the procedure for setting up a company, Question a) What is a...

Question a) What is a company? b) The Companies Act 2001, there shall be a Registrar of Companies. What are the functions of the Registrar? c) What is the procedure fo

Law of business organization, Assignments submitted after the due date in t...

Assignments submitted after the due date in the absence of an extension will incur a marking penalty. An extension must be applied for in writing before the due date. Extension app

V, Topic: "Imagine yourself in a situation of being encouraged to inflate ...

Topic: "Imagine yourself in a situation of being encouraged to inflate your expense account. Do you think your choice would be most affected by your individual moral development o

Successive stages of a capital reorganisation, Successive stages of a capit...

Successive stages of a capital reorganisation: There was a sequence of general and class meetings to approve the successive stages of a capital re-organisation.  Out of 1,600

Case of bussiness law and ethics, Betty and Veronica always fell in lo...

Betty and Veronica always fell in love with the same men. Veronica got very jealous of Betty for stealing Archie away from her and decided to start sending her anonymous

State in brief about the monetary effects, State in brief aboput the Moneta...

State in brief aboput the Monetary Effects Besides real income effects there will also be monetary effects if nations seek to intervene in foreign exchange markets which govern

Effective collective bargaining, Question 1: (i) Explain clearly the d...

Question 1: (i) Explain clearly the difference between Individual Bargaining and Collective Bargaining highlighting with examples the contexts in which each of them applies.

Parol evidence rule, 1. How do mandatory terms limit freedom of contract? ...

1. How do mandatory terms limit freedom of contract? 2. How do contract interpretation issues arise? 3. What is the difference between subjective and objective intent?   4

Family and medical leave act, Family and Medical Leave Act: There is a...

Family and Medical Leave Act: There is a split among the federal circuit courts of appeal on whether or not public employees/officials may be considered "employers" and theref

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd