User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Group accounts, Group Accounts: S.150(1) provides that if, at the end ...

Group Accounts: S.150(1) provides that if, at the end of its financial year, a company has subsidiaries, then it must include in its annual accounts "group accounts" dealing w

Publication of name, Publication of Name:                             ...

Publication of Name:                             Section 109(1) requires every company (except one exempted under s.21): (a)     To paint or affix its name in a conspicuous

Determine the levels of policy perspective, Determine the levels of Policy ...

Determine the levels of Policy perspective Policy perspective, analysis can be made on three levels, state-system level, the nation-state level and the decision making level. T

Sdfsdfsdf, xcgbcbfghfgh

xcgbcbfghfgh

Liquidators powers, Liquidators' Powers:                              ...

Liquidators' Powers:                                       The liquidator (in any type of liquidation) has numerous statutory powers but in the exercise of some of them he mus

Governing the questioning of witnesses in a court of law?, QUESTION 1 (...

QUESTION 1 (a) Compare and contrast the different rules and features governing the burden and standard of proof in both civil and criminal cases (b) The art of advocacy is n

Advise as conflict of interest, A is large property developer who is listed...

A is large property developer who is listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. B is a building contractor. A employed B in 2008 to build a large office complex comprising 3 towers

Pooling of assets and liabilities, Q. Pooling of assets and liabilities? ...

Q. Pooling of assets and liabilities? In 2004 the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee proposed that assets and liabilities of companies be aggregated and creditors paid

Diffrence between phoenix activity and honest behaviour, Q. Diffrence betw...

Q. Diffrence between phoenix activity and  honest behaviour? There are circumstances where a business has been managed responsibly and fails, and after a period of time, its di

Intention - element of contract, Intention - Element of Contract Moreo...

Intention - Element of Contract Moreover to an agreement to constitute a contract then the parties thereto must have intended it for have legal consequences.  Subsequently an

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd