case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Warranties - terms used in contract, Warranties - Terms used in Contract ...

Warranties - Terms used in Contract Conversely the following are the warranties implied by the Act like: (a) Quiet possession with (s.14 (b)). However this provision is int

Impose a duty on directors, Impose a duty on directors: A company is, ...

Impose a duty on directors: A company is, however, free to impose a duty on its directors to attend board meetings within a certain period of time and to prescribe the consequ

Issue of restraining order services , Sub: Filing Divorce and Issue of Rest...

Sub: Filing Divorce and Issue of Restraining order services Dear Kimberly Frederick Bumfree, Warm Greetings from Donald & Matthews Law firm, This letter is for your imme

Judicial elucidation of acts, Judicial elucidation of Acts: In fact th...

Judicial elucidation of Acts: In fact the other points to be noted in relation to judicial elucidation of Acts are as follows: like; (a)   There is no clause of an Act is t

How state succession deals with debts and loans, How state succession deals...

How state succession deals with debts and loans The issue relating to state succession deals with debts and loans. When a new state comes into existence, the question arises as

What are the state foreign policy, What are the state foreign policy Th...

What are the state foreign policy The states disregard the operational rule, that power must be counter balanced - they place their over security in jeopardy. "The balance of p

Liability of maker of a promissory, Liability of Maker of a Promissory ...

Liability of Maker of a Promissory Conversely S.89 provides such with the maker of a promissory notice through making it: like (a) Engages such he will pay it according to

Principle of floating charges, Principle of floating charges: The gene...

Principle of floating charges: The general purpose of the rule is to prevent an unsecured creditor of an insolvent company from getting advantage over other creditors by obtai

Explain causes of employee grievances, Question 1: (a) Distinguish betw...

Question 1: (a) Distinguish between Industrial Relations and Employee Relations? (b) Explain five causes of Employee Grievances with suitable examples. (c) What ar

The law making process of primary legislation in mauritius, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 Interpreting legislation is a very important function of the Court. However, Judges must only have recourse to the intention of parliament while interpreting legisla

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd