case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Contract law problems, Case Study Cathy's septic tank at her house was ...

Case Study Cathy's septic tank at her house was old and it suddenly stopped  working.  On 9 June 2008 she called Dave, the owner of Septix Pty Ltd (-Septix?), to urgently give

What are the scope and limitations of administrative law, QUESTION 1 Wh...

QUESTION 1 What are the scope and limitations of administrative law? Is the demarcation clear? What are the criteria by which you would decide on which side of the line a case

Determine the areas of open method of coordination, Determine the areas of ...

Determine the areas of open method of coordination The EU has indicated its intention to employ the OMC, but so far there is little evidence of progress. These areas include E

Relationship between morality, Question 1: (a) Distinguish social acco...

Question 1: (a) Distinguish social accounting from conventional (financial) accounting. (b) Discuss the practical and moral reasons for organizations to engage in social a

Compensation for removal - company management, Compensation for Removal: ...

Compensation for Removal: Subsection (6) provides that nothing in s.185 shall be taken as depriving a removed director of compensation or damages payable to him in respect of

Advantages of negotiable instruments, Advantages of Negotiable Instruments ...

Advantages of Negotiable Instruments (i) A negotiable instrument provides a creditor regarding a better remedy, since once it has been issued like or accepted whether applicab

Agency, John owns a 1951 Mercedes Sl that he wishes to sell. He instructs R...

John owns a 1951 Mercedes Sl that he wishes to sell. He instructs Ross to sell the car, and in return, will be paid £5,000 commission. Ross manages to find a buyer, Paul, Paul and

Contracts illegal at the common law, Contracts illegal at the common law ...

Contracts illegal at the common law However a contract which is prohibited through the common law is frequently described as being as "contrary to public policy" as i.e. the c

"detriment" as consideration, "Detriment" as consideration  An example...

"Detriment" as consideration  An example of a 'detriment' that will legally suffice like the consideration for a promise is provided with the case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke

What are intellectual property rights?, Question 1 What are cybercrimes? M...

Question 1 What are cybercrimes? Mention in detail what are considered as cybercrimes Question 2 What are Intellectual Property Rights? Explain in detail Question 3 What

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd