case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Illustrate the case of environmental taxes, Illustrate the case of environm...

Illustrate the case of environmental taxes Consider the case of environmental taxes. There is clear evidence that International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) suffers from an

Publication, PUBLICATION: Whether in section 46(3) of the constitution...

PUBLICATION: Whether in section 46(3) of the constitution states that like, upon a Bill that has been passed through the National Assembly being presented to the President for

Statutory provisions, Statutory Provisions:  i) Definition of "Prospec...

Statutory Provisions:  i) Definition of "Prospectus" A prospectus is defined by S.2 as "any prospectus, notice, circular, advertisement or other invitation offering to the

Explain the sovereign of state immunity, Explain the sovereign of state imm...

Explain the sovereign of state immunity Immunity relates to the sovereign of state immunity and act of state doctrine. This is the most complicated immunity available and relat

What do you understand by the rule of law, Question 1: Should the Judic...

Question 1: Should the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council be maintained at the summit of the hierarchy of our judicial system? Critically discuss on the above. Ques

Right to prior repayment, Right to prior repayment: Therefore this was...

Right to prior repayment: Therefore this was not variation of class rights since the existing preference shareholders had the same number of shares (and votes at a class meeti

Contractual capacity of drunken persons, Contractual Capacity of Drunken Pe...

Contractual Capacity of Drunken Persons Whether a person purported to enter with a contract at a time at what time he was too drunk to understand then what he was doing and th

Case study, I don''t know how to make a maxim. And my case is

I don''t know how to make a maxim. And my case is

Choice of name - name clause, Choice of Name - Name Clause: However, i...

Choice of Name - Name Clause: However, it might be relevant to note that the registrar of English companies, pursuant to his powers under the corresponding section of the Engl

Court, why is it important for a lawyer to address the victim

why is it important for a lawyer to address the victim

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd