case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Safety and health officer in an organization, QUESTION 1 What are the d...

QUESTION 1 What are the duties of an Occupational, Safety and Health officer in an organization? QUESTION 2 Section 47 (1) of the Occupational, Safety and Health Act st

Publication of list of repeat offenders, Q. Publication of list of repeat o...

Q. Publication of list of repeat offenders ? As a part of the joint education campaign option, or separate to the education campaign, a ‘naming and shaming' approach could also

Determine the term miscoordination - policy formation, Determine the term m...

Determine the term miscoordination - Policy Formation A problem known as miscoordination in Policy Formation may also emerge and it may be either vertical or horizontal. Let us

What must the claimant show to succeed, What must the claimant show to succ...

What must the claimant show to succeed? The claimant should show the given issues, for a case to succeed: a. There was a duty of care. b. There was breach of such duty.

General crossing - crossing on a cheque, General Crossing - Crossing on a C...

General Crossing - Crossing on a Cheque Section S.76 (1) since such provides about whenever a cheque bears across its face an addition of described below: The words such

Reports and balance sheets, Reports and balance sheets: The reports an...

Reports and balance sheets: The reports and balance sheets for the years ending June 30, 1925, and, June 30, 1926, were signed by two directors.  The reports annexed to these

General rules on statute-barred debts, General rules on statute-barred debt...

General rules on statute-barred debts: A statute-barred debt should be rejected since it is not legally enforceable.  But in a members' voluntary winding up the liquidator may

Liability of maker of a promissory, Liability of Maker of a Promissory ...

Liability of Maker of a Promissory Conversely S.89 provides such with the maker of a promissory notice through making it: like (a) Engages such he will pay it according to

Distribution of surplus assets, Distribution of Surplus Assets: If the...

Distribution of Surplus Assets: If the debts are paid in full the liquidator should apply what remains in repayment of capital paid on shares and then distribute any residue t

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd