case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Ddisadvantages - mergers and winding up, Ddisadvantages - mergers and windi...

Ddisadvantages - mergers and winding up: The disadvantages of s.280 are that cash may have to be provided to pay off creditors and dissenting members or alternatively the sale

Illustrate the case of environmental taxes, Illustrate the case of environm...

Illustrate the case of environmental taxes Consider the case of environmental taxes. There is clear evidence that International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) suffers from an

Restatement of the fundamental rule, Restatement of the fundamental rule: ...

Restatement of the fundamental rule: In Bray v Ford Lord Herschell stated that the aforesaid rule is not "founded upon principles of morality" but is based on the consideratio

Administrative law, QUESTION Miss Titch Herr, a newly appointed educati...

QUESTION Miss Titch Herr, a newly appointed education officer, starts her day at No Nonsense State Secondary School (NNSSS), an institution wholly subsidized from public funds

Company management, COMPANY MANAGEMENT: A company, being an artificial...

COMPANY MANAGEMENT: A company, being an artificial person, cannot manage its own affairs. It is therefore not surprising to find that the articles of every registered company

Constructive notice - registered office, Doctrine of "Constructive Notice":...

Doctrine of "Constructive Notice":  The doctrine of "constructive notice" is a rule of company law to the effect that a person transacting business with a company is taken to

Describe remedies available for a case of judicial review, Question 1: ...

Question 1: (a) What is meant by: (i) Ratio Decidendi (ii) Obiter Dicta (iii) Legal Doctrine (b) Distinguish between Criminal Law and Civil Law.

Representative action, Representative action: Where individual shareho...

Representative action: Where individual shareholders have suffered personal loss in addition to the injury to the company one shareholder may bring a representative action on

Misconduct in employment law, Question 1: " One of those general precep...

Question 1: " One of those general precepts of our law of contract is that covenants legally entered into cannot be revoked except by the mutual consent of the parties theret

Analyse ethical and legal issues , Fran is a 68 year old female patient wit...

Fran is a 68 year old female patient with a history of diabetes.  Fran separated from her husband, Derek, 3 years ago (although they are not divorced) and over the past few years t

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd