case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Describe in detail about the term - policy makers, Describe in detail abou...

Describe in detail about the - policy makers Elections are used to choose the policy makers, it is not the only mechanism. Since the authority to make decisions may be vested i

How evidence is used to prove a criminal offence, how evidence is used to p...

how evidence is used to prove a criminal offence: This question is asking you to consider the importance of evidence, how it is used and how reliable it may be in supporting

Explain the principles of tort law, QUESTION 1 With reference to the rel...

QUESTION 1 With reference to the relevant articles of the Mauritian Civil Code, explain the principles of tort law QUESTION 2 An employer should ensure the well being of a

Equity - subsidiary legislation, Equity: Moreover the word "equity" o...

Equity: Moreover the word "equity" ordinarily means "fairness" or "justice".  In fact as a source of England law there the phrase "doctrines of equity" denotes the body of Eng

Appeals - court-martial, Appeals - Court-Martial In fact in Section 11...

Appeals - Court-Martial In fact in Section 115 of the Armed Forces Act including a person who has been convicted through a court-martial to appeal to the High Court either aga

Implied powers rule, Implied powers rule: The courts would regard such...

Implied powers rule: The courts would regard such things as impliedly within the company's powers unless they are "expressly prohibited" by the memorandum. The range of transa

Goods - sales of goods, Goods - Sales of Goods Even if "goods" like in c...

Goods - Sales of Goods Even if "goods" like in common parlance has like the Act has given the word such technical meaning. Whether it provides like; "goods" consist of "all chat

Prospectus issue and statutory provisions, Prospectus Issue And Statutory P...

Prospectus Issue And Statutory Provisions: A company's shares are legally regarded as goods. Consequently, the common law rule known as "caveat emptor" applied to their sale.

Types of goods - sales of goods, Types oF Goods - Sales of Goods Furth...

Types oF Goods - Sales of Goods Further the Act classifies goods into: like; (i) Specific Goods Whether specific goods are "goods" like are acknowledged and agreed on

How can an employee invoke constructive dismissal, Question 1: "Constru...

Question 1: "Constructive Dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who necessarily takes the initiative in considering the contrac

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd