User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Court access and power, American citizens can utilize their Courts only und...

American citizens can utilize their Courts only under certain conditions and circumstances. That is, there are both formal and informal "barriers" to access the legal system.

Intent to defraud the italian creditor, Intent to defraud the Italian credi...

Intent to defraud the Italian creditor: The company owed money to trade creditors and also had outstanding against it a large claim for breach of contract which it disputed (t

Explain how this power conferred on the fsc is exercised, QUESTION 1 Th...

QUESTION 1 The Financial Services Commission (FSC) is the licensing authority for businesses operating in the Global Business sector. By referring to the Global Business Catego

Discuss about the three streams, Discuss about the three streams There...

Discuss about the three streams There come times, however, when these three streams are joined. An event in the political stream, such as a change in administration, calls for

Define a conflict of interest, Question  How does the RTL Code define ...

Question  How does the RTL Code define a 'conflict of interest'?  Give one example of how the RTL Code suggests a conflict of interest may arise.

Who is liable to income tax?, QUESTION 1 Discuss the legal relationship...

QUESTION 1 Discuss the legal relationship between a bank and its customer with reference to the responsibilities of the parties towards each other QUESTION 2 (a) Examin

Differences members and creditors voluntary wind up, Differences members an...

Differences members and creditors voluntary wind up: main differences between a members' and a creditors' voluntary winding up are that : (a) in a creditors' voluntary win

Determine about the mundell-fleming model, Determine about the Mundell-Flem...

Determine about the Mundell-Fleming model The basic two country Mundell-Fleming model assumes that both countries are small. It is this assumption that we modify and assume in

Suing and being sued, Suing and being Sued:            Because a compa...

Suing and being Sued:            Because a company is at law a different person altogether from its members it follows that a wrong to, or by, the company does not legally con

Insanity and rejection - termination of an offer, Insanity and Rejection - ...

Insanity and Rejection - Termination of an Offer Insanity Furthermore the unsoundness of mind about either party before acceptance terminates the offer.  Hence the offe

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd