case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Unincorporated associations, Unincorporated Associations:             ...

Unincorporated Associations:                 A group of people may come together in order to pursue or  promote a common purpose or activity but without going through the vari

Article 2 - state responsibility, Article 2 - State Responsibility Art...

Article 2 - State Responsibility Article 2 . This article lists down the elements of what constitute International wrongful act of a state. Means both wrongful acts and omissi

What are the three main features of security, QUESTION 1 (a) What are t...

QUESTION 1 (a) What are the three main features of security? Define the different types of security that banks normally take to secure credit facilities (b) The Borrower Pro

Define the term - inaction and crises, Define the term - Inaction and crise...

Define the term - Inaction and crises We know that the standard social planner does not show and delay or have tendency of inaction and adopts a policy as soon as it is proved

What is policy - enumerate the various sources of policy, Question 1: W...

Question 1: Why are some activities organized through private collective action, that is, the market whereas other activities are organized through public collective action?

Growth rate of the money supply in the domestic economy, Growth rate of the...

Growth rate of the money supply in the domestic economy On the horizontal axis is the growth rate of the money supply in the domestic economy, M. On the vertical axis is the gr

Define and explain the term code of ethics, Question 1: (a) What does ...

Question 1: (a) What does Professional Practice mean to you? Define your perception of good Professional Practices. (b) Discuss some of the difficulties and challenges fac

Estate planning , Estate Planning Case Study Rich and his wife, Ruby, ...

Estate Planning Case Study Rich and his wife, Ruby, heard that you are an expert in the field of Estate Planning as a result of the superior education you received at WPU.  The

Schemes of fraud, Schemes of fraud: Auditors must not be made liable f...

Schemes of fraud: Auditors must not be made liable for not tracking out ingenious and carefully laid schemes of fraud whenever there is nothing to arouse their suspicion, and

Explain the basic criticism of the stages framework, Explain the basic crit...

Explain the basic criticism of the stages framework The basic criticism of the stages framework is that it, in a formal sense, parallels the cognitive steps of the rational ap

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd