User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Explain the controversial mode of acquisition - accession, Explain the cont...

Explain the controversial mode of acquisition - accession The ontroversial mode of acquisition is accession . It involves the peaceful transfer of territory from one sovereig

Contributions of equity, Contributions of Equity Contributions of Equi...

Contributions of Equity Contributions of Equity as: Developed the so called maxims of equity and Provided additional remedies and Provided for the discovery of

The advisory council for occupational safety and health, QUESTION 1 Dis...

QUESTION 1 Discuss the functions of the following- (a) The Workfare Programme (b) The Advisory Council for Occupational Safety and Health (c) Health and Safety Officer

What are the functions of the commission for conciliation, Question 1: ...

Question 1: (a) Explain what you understand by the following legal terms under the Employment Relations Act - (i) Collective bargaining (ii) Collective agreement (iii

Law institutions and delegation of authority, Law institutions and delegati...

Law institutions and delegation of authority How time-consistency plays a significant role in policy process. The problems induced by the heterogeneity leading to the problem o

What is meant by ratio decidendi, Question: (a) Explian the various sta...

Question: (a) Explian the various stages that a Bill must go through before it becomes enforceable as a Law in Mauritius. (c) Mr. Vijay is the tenant of a house situated at

Standard of proof in criminal cases, Standard of proof in criminal cases: ...

Standard of proof in criminal cases: Whenever the standard of proof in criminal cases is away from any reasonable doubt.  Further in the event of any reasonable doubt the accu

Dishonour by non-acceptance, Dishonour by Non-Acceptance The drawee is...

Dishonour by Non-Acceptance The drawee is not prepared to meet the bill, such he will return it for the holder by means of a note to this effect, such the bill is then so said

Main advantages - mergers and winding up, Main advantages - mergers and win...

Main advantages - mergers and winding up: A scheme of arrangement under s.207 offers three main advantages: (a)     it can be used in circumstances to which s.210 and s.280

Rule in foss v harbottle, RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:  What has come to ...

RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:  What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harb

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd