case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Take an action in court, A is a Malaysian contractor in the oil and gas bus...

A is a Malaysian contractor in the oil and gas business. B is a large British oil exploration company. By a written Contract, B appointed A in January 2008 to maintain B's offshore

Alternative dispute resolution, "The liability of third party neutrals has ...

"The liability of third party neutrals has been a topic of concern ever since the formalisation of dispute resolution in Australia.  Although there are no known cases in Australia

Terminate the contract of employment, QUESTION 1 In the exercise of its...

QUESTION 1 In the exercise of its disciplinary power an employer can terminate an employee's contract. Should an employer decide not to terminate the contract of employment, wh

Ethical issue, what ethical issue relate to nuclear energy industry

what ethical issue relate to nuclear energy industry

State article 8 of universal declaration of human rights, State Article 8 o...

State Article 8 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 8 - 'Everyone has a  right to  an  effective  remedy by  the  competent national tribunal for acts violating t

Statutory form, Statutory Form:                    Section 14 of the A...

Statutory Form:                    Section 14 of the Act provides that the form of the  Memorandum of Association of a company limited by shares shall be in accordance with th

Three main categories of international humanitarian laws, There are three m...

There are three main categories of international humanitarian laws: 1) The Hague conventions 2) The Geneva conventions 3) The additional protocols

Provision of fiduciary duties - company management, Provision of Fiduciary ...

Provision of Fiduciary Duties - company management: This provision is supplemented by Article 84 of Table A which provides that-  i. The director shall not vote in respect

Resolution for the variation - statutory provisions, Resolution for the var...

Resolution for the variation - Statutory provisions: Where any application is made pursuant to this provision, the variation shall not have effect unless and until it is confi

Reconstructions - mergers and winding up, Reconstructions, Mergers And Wind...

Reconstructions, Mergers And Winding Up: (a) Reconstructions, mergers and takeovers are not defined terms. A reconstruction may be an alternative of the structure of a group o

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd