User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Bulky and technical bills, Bulky and technical Bills: In fact some Bil...

Bulky and technical Bills: In fact some Bills are so bulky and technical hence they are passed without sufficient debate it means Parliament lacks the time and knowledge to th

Group accounts, Group Accounts: S.150(1) provides that if, at the end ...

Group Accounts: S.150(1) provides that if, at the end of its financial year, a company has subsidiaries, then it must include in its annual accounts "group accounts" dealing w

Legitimacy in your ethical life, 1 With reference to the material discussed...

1 With reference to the material discussed in class n in the reading over the last few weeks, I would like you to continue a fours on the ethical things that we can all do in our e

Case of bussiness law and ethics, Betty and Veronica always fell in lo...

Betty and Veronica always fell in love with the same men. Veronica got very jealous of Betty for stealing Archie away from her and decided to start sending her anonymous

State article 16 of air and outer space law, State Article 16 of air and ou...

State Article 16 of air and outer space law Article 16 states that the appropriate authorities of each of the contracting States shall have the right, without unreasonable dela

State about the stages in the policy process, State about the Stages in the...

State about the Stages in the policy process Stages in the policy process are generally conceptualized within a broader environment governed by constitutional rules, political

Liability in tort, Liability in Tort A partner commits a tortious act ...

Liability in Tort A partner commits a tortious act so then the remaining partners are jointly and hence severally liable with him, thus provided they authorised such the act e

Restatement of the fundamental rule, Restatement of the fundamental rule: ...

Restatement of the fundamental rule: In Bray v Ford Lord Herschell stated that the aforesaid rule is not "founded upon principles of morality" but is based on the consideratio

Manage the currency risks using the futures contract, Question 1: (a) "...

Question 1: (a) "A tourist resort which does business in a single currency is not exposed to currency risk." Discuss (use example to support your answer). (b) Case: Hedging

Effect of rescission, Effect Of Rescission: Where a contract of allotm...

Effect Of Rescission: Where a contract of allotment is rescinded, the former shareholder will be entitled to his money back (normally with interest) and to a refund of any exp

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd