case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Lifting the veil of incorporation, Lifting the Veil of Incorporation: ...

Lifting the Veil of Incorporation: The legal rule that a registered company is at law a different person altogether from the subscribers to the memorandum of association and o

Redemption of shares, Redemption of Shares: Section 60 (1) empowers a ...

Redemption of Shares: Section 60 (1) empowers a company limited by shares to issue preference shares that are, or may be at the option of the company are to be liable, to be r

Rules of delivery of goods - sales of good, Rules of Delivery of Goods - Sa...

Rules of Delivery of Goods - Sales of Good So the rule regarding with delivery are like; (a)  The goods should be in a deliverable state and one is (b) Otherwise unless l

Advantages - take-over bid, Advantages - Take-over bid: A non-acceptin...

Advantages - Take-over bid: A non-accepting shareholder who applies to the court to set aside the proposed compulsory acquisition of his shares under s.210 will fail unless he

Right to sell - terms used in contract, Right to sell - Terms used in Contr...

Right to sell - Terms used in Contract With S.14 (a) provides that there is an implied condition such seller has a right for sell the goods and, like in the case of an agreeme

Directorship - company management, Directorship - company management: ...

Directorship - company management: A directorship is not a professional job with a legally prescribed qualification. In the circumstances, anybody (even a six-months-old baby)

Obligations of the employer and the employee, Question 1: Constructive ...

Question 1: Constructive dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who necessarily takes the initiative in considering the contract

Civil law, Civil Law: Further civil law is affected with violations of...

Civil Law: Further civil law is affected with violations of private rights in their corporate or individual capacity egg breach of contract, negligence, defamation, nuisance,

Explain the role of ethics in entrepreneurship, 1. Explain the role of ‘Eth...

1. Explain the role of ‘Ethics' in Entrepreneurship. 2. What do you understand by ‘Public Limited Company'? 3. Difference between ‘Intrapreneur' & ‘Intrepreneur'. 4. What is ‘Copyr

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd