case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Main sources of revenue of local authorities, Question 1: Local Governm...

Question 1: Local Government is generally seen as a system of getting various services run for the local community. What, in your view, are the other distinctive benefits t

What are the elements in the tort of negligence, What are the elements in t...

What are the elements in the tort of negligence? There should be two elements, in tort as: a. The breach of legal duty or injuria. b. Loss suffered through defendant damn

Define the term - bliss point, Define the term - bliss point A country...

Define the term - bliss point A country's bliss point is the outcome of monetary growth rates that gives that country its highest possible level of welfare. The bliss point fo

Presumed agency or from cohabitation, Presumed Agency or from Cohabitation ...

Presumed Agency or from Cohabitation Whether a woman who is living with a man is deemed that  be his agent for purposes of acquire necessaries to the family; marriage is not n

Lifting the veil of incorporation, Lifting the Veil of Incorporation: ...

Lifting the Veil of Incorporation: The legal rule that a registered company is at law a different person altogether from the subscribers to the memorandum of association and o

What are the functions and powers of the security council, What are the fun...

What are the functions and powers of the Security Council? The functions and powers of the Security Council, which are as follows: • To keep international peace and security

Recommendations for addressing phoenix activities, Recommendations for addr...

Recommendations for addressing phoenix activities Over the past two decades there have been a significant range of proposals for addressing phoenix activity. Most of these opt

Unsecured trade creditors, Unsecured trade creditors: It refers to a "...

Unsecured trade creditors: It refers to a "class" of members or of creditors. Obviously if two or more companies are involved or if one company has two classes of shares, eg.

Calls on contributories, Calls On Contributories:                     ...

Calls On Contributories:                                       Every person who is a member of the company at the commencement of winding up and every past member is in princi

Defining phoenix activity in legislation, Defining phoenix activity in legi...

Defining phoenix activity in legislation Some stakeholders noted that defining phoenix activity in legislation could be beneficial if the definition was appropriate and it was

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd