User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Relationship between banker and customer, Relationship between Banker and C...

Relationship between Banker and Customer Therefore the relationship between a banker and the customer is a debtor-creditor association that was articulated In the chief case o

Administrative function of chief justice, Administrative Function of Chief ...

Administrative Function of Chief Justice Where, he is the principal administrative officer of the judiciary And where, he is the chairman of the Judicial Service Commi

Investigation of companys affairs, Investigation of Company's Membership: ...

Investigation of Company's Membership: Section (1) empowers the registrar to appoint one or   more competent inspectors to investigate and report on the membership of any comp

Explain the term chain of custody, QUESTION Chain of custody in eviden...

QUESTION Chain of custody in evidence collection is a very important document when it comes to presenting a computer forensic case in the court of law i. Explain the term c

Committee of inspection - winding up, Committee of Inspection:        ...

Committee of Inspection:                                       A committee of inspection is appointed in a compulsory liquidation and in a creditors' voluntary liquidation. It

The law making process of primary legislation in mauritius, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 Interpreting legislation is a very important function of the Court. However, Judges must only have recourse to the intention of parliament while interpreting legisla

Explain the need for rules in interpreting statutes, Question 1: (a) I...

Question 1: (a) In the Mauritian Legal System, there is a hierarchy of courts. Describe the various courts. (b) State and critically examine the features of the 5 main sour

What do you understand by contract administration, QUESTION (a) Define ...

QUESTION (a) Define the term 'contract' and explain the basic elements which constitute a valid and legally enforceable contract under the English Law (b) What do you unders

Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions, Purpose of the rule: It ha...

Purpose of the rule: It has been stated by various English judges that without the rule in Foss v Harbottle (i)            There would be futile actions.  A court order

Criminal-justice system, Models for a criminal-justice system based on an e...

Models for a criminal-justice system based on an ethos of rehabilitation and reintegration ... have been regarded as idealistic but unworkable in the real world, except perhaps in

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd