User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Fraudulent concealment of a book, Fraudulent concealment of a book: He...

Fraudulent concealment of a book: Hence it is nothing to him where dividends are properly or improperly declared, and provided he discharges his own duty to the shareholders.

What is the meaning of redundancy, Question 1: (a) What do you meant by...

Question 1: (a) What do you meant by the term misconduct in employment law. How does the English definition of misconduct differ from the French definition of misconduct? (b

Explain the limitations to the economic rights, Question 1: (a) Expliqu...

Question 1: (a) Expliquez les conditions qui doivent être réunis pour la formation d'un contrat. (b) Expliquez les differentes modes selon lesquels un contrat peut prendre

Gist of lord buckleys statement, Gist of Lord Buckleys statement: The ...

Gist of Lord Buckleys statement: The gist of Lord Buckley's statement, above, may be summarised as follows: The judges will not regard a transaction undertaken by a company as

State article 2 of international law, State article 2 of International law ...

State article 2 of International law Article 2 states that there is no right of a State under international law to diplomatic relations; these exist by mutual consent. However

Termination of partnership, Termination of Partnership The Articles of P...

Termination of Partnership The Articles of Partnership will contain like a rule or be the regulations with regard for the termination of the partnership. Almost in the absence o

What is a contract, QUESTION (i) Briefly explain the following in relat...

QUESTION (i) Briefly explain the following in relation to the legal structure of Mauritius- Legislative branch Executive branch Judiciary branch Local Government

Article 1 - state responsibility, Article 1 - State Responsibility The ...

Article 1 - State Responsibility The laws on state responsibility are derived from state practices and various other customs and practices. However the main text on the law of

Define the term - authoritative government decision, Define the term - auth...

Define the term - authoritative government decision We can sum up by way of saying that the intent to implement a policy is not the same thing as a real policy. Failure to impl

Find out the elements of the tort, 1. Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court ar...

1. Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court are appointed for life. Unless they choose to retire, they have the right to remain in office and cannot be removed by congress or by the Pres

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd