case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Qualification shares, Qualification Shares: S.183(1) provides that it ...

Qualification Shares: S.183(1) provides that it shall be the duty of every director who is by the articles of the company required to hold a specified qualification, and who i

Write about constitutional validity of the drt act, Question 1 Describe th...

Question 1 Describe the term banking. What are the acceptable businesses for a banking company as per BR Act 1949 Question 2 When is a negotiable apparatus considered as dish

Describe the difference between liquidation and receivership, Question 1 ...

Question 1 The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co. Ltd has to be watched very carefully. The Courts can and often do draw aside the veil. Discuss. Question 2

Describe the term- higher national income and interest rate, Describe the t...

Describe the term- higher national income and interest rate This causes country B to adjust to point B with both a higher national income and interest rate. At this point the f

District magistrate''s court - territorial jurisdiction, District Magistrat...

District Magistrate's Court - Territorial Jurisdiction Further in Section 7(3) of the Act giving that 'a district magistrate's court shall have jurisdiction all through the di

Implied conditions and warranties - sales and goods, Implied Conditions and...

Implied Conditions and Warranties - Sales and Goods Whether section 8 of the Act implies that the next terms in every hire purchase agreement like: a) Right to sell: whethe

State article 6 of air and outer space law, State Article 6 of air and oute...

State Article 6 of air and outer space law Article 6 states that no scheduled international air service may be operated over or into the territory of a contracting State, excep

All spark-producing devices, Mrs. Rusholme occupied the firm of Saunders an...

Mrs. Rusholme occupied the firm of Saunders and Watts to refinish floors in assured rooms of a home owned by her and her husband in Red Deer, Alberta. She told Mr. Saunders that sh

What is the relation between business the law and ethics, Question 1: T...

Question 1: To what extent do you agree with the assertion that Governments are failing and that corporate power is on the rise? Question 2: (a) Critically determine th

Laws and regulations, Here, we have outlined the utility of National Buildi...

Here, we have outlined the utility of National Building Code. We have explained the main features of Factories Act. Some of the provisions of Electricity Act and Rules which are re

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd