case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Objection to a variation of class rights, Objection to a variation of class...

Objection to a variation of class rights: The company proposed to reduce its share capital by repayment of the 5% 1 pound Cumulative Preference Shares (which were entitled to

Judicial and legislative function of chief justice, Judicial and Legislativ...

Judicial and Legislative Function of Chief Justice Judicial Function However a judge of the High Court and the court of Appeal he participates in the adjudicatory proce

Non-accepting shareholders, Non-accepting shareholders: Acceptance on ...

Non-accepting shareholders: Acceptance on the required scale must be obtained within a maximum of four months from the date of the offer.  The position then is that: (a) at

Governing the questioning of witnesses in a court of law?, QUESTION 1 (...

QUESTION 1 (a) Compare and contrast the different rules and features governing the burden and standard of proof in both civil and criminal cases (b) The art of advocacy is n

Discuss the principles of the substantive law, Munsami was driving his car ...

Munsami was driving his car registration number CB 713 from Nausori to wards Suva. He was travelling at 80kmph on 50kmph zone. At koronivia a taxi driven by Ram Raji of Koronivia,

Hire-Purchase and Credit Sale - Sales of good, Hire-Purchase and Credit Sal...

Hire-Purchase and Credit Sale - Sales of good A Credit sale is a sale on credit. Whether A buyer of goods may be unable for pay the price in full on once and the seller may let

Article 8 - state responsibilty, Article 8 - State Responsibilty Articl...

Article 8 - State Responsibilty Article 8. Act of person or group of persons are presumed to be acting on the instructions of a state therefore even in such a situation the sta

Benefits associated with ethical behavior, Question 1: (a) According to...

Question 1: (a) According to Archie Carroll what are the four interrelated aspects of corporate social responsibility? Use examples from the Mauritian context to illustrate you

Definitions of phoenix activity, phoenix activity involves "the evasion of ...

phoenix activity involves "the evasion of tax and other liabilities, such as employee entitlements, through the deliberate, systematic and sometimes cyclic liquidation of related c

Relationship of partners inter se, Relationship of Partners Inter Se W...

Relationship of Partners Inter Se Whether various terms are in utilize to denote the different specification of partners.  Then the most central of these terms are like: (

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd