User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Benefits of non-accepting shareholders, Benefits of non-accepting sharehold...

Benefits of non-accepting shareholders: The minority whose shares are acquired compulsory under s.210 are entitled to all the benefits included in the original offer and accep

Duties of an advocate, Duties of an Advocate First is, Duty to th...

Duties of an Advocate First is, Duty to the Court Whether as an officer of court an advocate is bound to assist in administration of the justice.  Thus he must adv

Determine the complexities of the policy process, Determine the Complexitie...

Determine the Complexities of the policy process Complexity of the policy process, affects the form of delegation of powers to the agents by the principal. When there are a lar

Examine the features of the main sources of law in mauritius, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 Arbitration has proved itself to be a valuable scheme in alternative dispute resolution of conflicts. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Arbitration as a su

Advantages of subsidiary legislation, ADVANTAGES: Therefore some of th...

ADVANTAGES: Therefore some of the advantages or strong point of delegated legislation are:as; (a)   Compensation of lost Parliamentary time Conversely parliamentarians a

What do you understand by collective bargaining, Question 1: (A) What...

Question 1: (A) What do you understand by Collective Bargaining? (B) What is collective bargaining from: (I) The economic point of view

Use of shares of the minority, Use of shares of the minority: X, Y and...

Use of shares of the minority: X, Y and Z held 4,500, 4,500 and 1,000 one pound shares respectively, of Company B.  They were the only shareholders and  X and Y were the direc

Declaration of solvency, DECLARATION OF SOLVENCY:                     ...

DECLARATION OF SOLVENCY:                                       A voluntary winding up is a members' voluntary winding up only if the directors make and deliver to the regist

What is udhr, What is UDHR UDHR is therefore, considered as a source of...

What is UDHR UDHR is therefore, considered as a source of international law relating to human rights. Apart from UNGA-responsible for issuing resolutions, the decisions of the

When is an employer not vicariously liable, When is an employer not vicario...

When is an employer not vicariously liable? An employer is not vicariously liable when: a. Worker is doing something in working hours as of a personal nature. b. She or h

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd