case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Partnership property, Partnership Property Partnership property compri...

Partnership Property Partnership property comprises all property originally brought in the partnership as well like acquired for the purposes of such the firm's businesses. Th

Account for the importance of policy evaluation, QUESTION 1 Explain cle...

QUESTION 1 Explain clearly how Public Policy making constitutes a major function of Government QUESTION 2 Account for the role of Public opinion in the identification o

What do you understand by business ethics, QUESTION 1 (1) What do you u...

QUESTION 1 (1) What do you understand by business ethics? (2) How can an ethical climate be improved in an organization? QUESTION 2 Explain the importance of stakeho

Name the legislations passed regarding state succession, There are certain ...

There are certain legislations passed regarding state succession. For example, The continuance of legal Proceedings Act 1950; The Pakistan Currency Act 1950; The Pakistan

What is the meaning of flexible exchange rates, What is the Flexible Exchan...

What is the Flexible Exchange Rates With a fully flexible exchange rate adjustment toward the long run equilibrium occurs via a change in relative prices. This effect is shown

Discussion board question, I have an order in and I want to know what the 8...

I have an order in and I want to know what the 829.2 means and the order is 12.00?

What is policy clustering, What is Policy Clustering Adoption of polici...

What is Policy Clustering Adoption of policies is motivated by the observation that nation-states, or some other jurisdictional unit, choose similar institutions within a fairl

Publication of list of repeat offenders, Q. Publication of list of repeat o...

Q. Publication of list of repeat offenders ? As a part of the joint education campaign option, or separate to the education campaign, a ‘naming and shaming' approach could also

Jurisdiction over your company, a) Determine which forum(s) Purchaser could...

a) Determine which forum(s) Purchaser could file her lawsuit in.   Personal Jurisdiction, b)  If Purchaser were to file in CA, could she formed specific jurisdiction over you

Ostensible authority - authority of partners, Ostensible Authority - Author...

Ostensible Authority - Authority of Partners A difference is something drawn among the genuine and ostensible authority about a partner. Whether it is actual or express author

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd