User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Compulsory change - change of name , Compulsory Change: Section 20(2) ...

Compulsory Change: Section 20(2) of the Act provides that within six months of registration with a particular name the registrar may direct a change in name if in his opinion

business environment , steeple analysis about setting up a buisines

steeple analysis about setting up a buisiness

What was the immunity from jurisdiction, WHAT WAS THE IMMUNITY FROM JURISD...

WHAT WAS THE IMMUNITY FROM JURISDICTION   States are recognized as having authority over people, things and events within their own territory and therefore may exercise jurisdict

Alien tort claims act, Alien Tort Claims Act Problem: You work ...

Alien Tort Claims Act Problem: You work at a New York law firm and have been invited by the partner you work for to attend a meeting with Mrs. Esther Kiobel and a dozen

Executions take place using a lethal injection, Most executions take place ...

Most executions take place using a lethal injection.  The company that manufactures the drug that is most used has now announced that it is choosing to no longer produce that drug.

Take an action in court, A is a Malaysian contractor in the oil and gas bus...

A is a Malaysian contractor in the oil and gas business. B is a large British oil exploration company. By a written Contract, B appointed A in January 2008 to maintain B's offshore

Casual appointments - company management, Casual Appointments:  Articl...

Casual Appointments:  Article 95 permits the board of directors to fill a vacancy in the board or to get an additional director to join the board for practical reasons provide

Differences between liquidators and receivers, Differences between Liquidat...

Differences between Liquidators and receivers: There are also significant differences: (a)a liquidator has numerous statutory powers. A receiver must rely on the powers given

Bidding process in specific circumstances, QUESTION 1 Section 39 of the...

QUESTION 1 Section 39 of the Public Procurement Act provides for cancellation of a bidding process in specific circumstances. State those circumstances and the implications of

Show the criminal conduct definition of phoenix activity, Q. Show the Crimi...

Q. Show the Criminal conduct definition of phoenix activity? Master Builders argued that the definition of phoenix activity should focus on the existing sections of corporation

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd