User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Holder or other holder in due course, Holder or Other Holder in Due Course ...

Holder or Other Holder in Due Course The holder of a bill of exchange who that does not come within the statutory definition of such a holder in due course holds that the bill

Calculate the facts in law, Mr. Hellerstein is a professor at Tahoe Law Sch...

Mr. Hellerstein is a professor at Tahoe Law School located in Tahoe California. He lives in Nevada and commutes to Tahoe Law School, which is only a 50-mile, commute one way.  Duri

Nature and categorization of law, NATURE AND CATEGORIZATION OF LAW: He...

NATURE AND CATEGORIZATION OF LAW: Here the term "law" has no consigned meaning.  It is utilized in a variety of senses.  Nonetheless different writers have bond to explain the

Define the nuclear law of international law, Nuclear law The importance...

Nuclear law The importance of international law relating to nuclear law lies in the fact that it regulates, conducts and prohibits the use of nuclear weapons. The United Nation

Corporation aggregate - types of corporations, Corporation Aggregate - ...

Corporation Aggregate - Types of Corporations However this is a legal entity formed through at least two people and whose membership at any one time legally concludes of a

Misfeasance - winding up, Misfeasance: Under s.324, misfeasance procee...

Misfeasance: Under s.324, misfeasance proceedings may be instituted against a director, promoter, manager, liquidator or "officer" (including an auditor) of a company in liqui

Determine the implications of the legislature, Determine the implications o...

Determine the implications of the legislature Policy outcomes are the result of legislative bargaining. So policy becomes a compromise between the executive and the legislature

Deferred debts - disclaimer of assets, Deferred Debts - Disclaimer of asset...

Deferred Debts - Disclaimer of assets: Deferred Debts: A debt owed to a member as member, i.e. an unpaid dividend, is a deferred debt paid only when ordinary debts have b

Distinguish between the concepts of originalism and dynamism, Question 1: ...

Question 1: Discuss the main problems faced by judges when interpreting a piece of legislation. Question 2: A necessary evil': Would you agree with this definition of d

Effect of voluntary winding up, Effect of Voluntary Winding Up: The ma...

Effect of Voluntary Winding Up: The main difference in legal consequences between a compulsory and voluntary winding up are: (a) A voluntary winding up commences on the day

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd