case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Types of agents - agency law, Types of Agents - Agency Law Although br...

Types of Agents - Agency Law Although broadly agents are either special or might be general depending on the scope of authority.  Subsequently an agent engaged to carry a task

Application of the unwritten sources, APPLICATION OF THE UNWRITTEN SOURCES ...

APPLICATION OF THE UNWRITTEN SOURCES OF ENGLAND LAW: Conversely it is a rule of England Law that unwritten laws are to be applied subject to the provisions' that any applicabl

Fitness for purpose - sales of goods, Fitness for Purpose - Sales of Goods ...

Fitness for Purpose - Sales of Goods However that goods such are bought for a particular purpose that are reasonably fit about that purpose:(S.16 (a))like Whether this conditi

What is diplomatic immunity, What is Diplomatic immunity Diplomatic imm...

What is Diplomatic immunity Diplomatic immunity relates to the protection of the representatives of another state to ensure that they perform their international political func

Article 8 - state responsibilty, Article 8 - State Responsibilty Articl...

Article 8 - State Responsibilty Article 8. Act of person or group of persons are presumed to be acting on the instructions of a state therefore even in such a situation the sta

Ratio decidendi, Ratio Decidendi Conversely "ratio decidendi" of a cas...

Ratio Decidendi Conversely "ratio decidendi" of a case consists of the material facts of such case and the decision made through the judge on the basis of those facts.  So hen

Case, Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold ...

Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of thes

Rules for partnership - partnership law, Rules for Partnership - Partnershi...

Rules for Partnership - Partnership Law Joint tenancy, as such tenancy in common then joint property or common property and may part ownership does not of itself produce a

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd