User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Pooling of assets and liabilities, Q. Pooling of assets and liabilities? ...

Q. Pooling of assets and liabilities? In 2004 the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee proposed that assets and liabilities of companies be aggregated and creditors paid

Equity - subsidiary legislation, Equity: Moreover the word "equity" o...

Equity: Moreover the word "equity" ordinarily means "fairness" or "justice".  In fact as a source of England law there the phrase "doctrines of equity" denotes the body of Eng

Discuss intellectual property rights protect, QUESTION Many governments ...

QUESTION Many governments around the world have sought to address the problems posed by materials on the Internet that are illegal under their offline laws, and those considered

Tort laws and the environment, Role of the Courts The role of the court...

Role of the Courts The role of the court system in Canada varies. Due to the numerous jurisdictions and different government levels involved, the courts are often asked to inte

Describe ways in which subsidiary legislation is controlled, Question 1: ...

Question 1: (a) Explain what is meant by Subsidiary Legislation and the reasons for using such a law. (b) Describe the ways in which Subsidiary Legislation is controlled.

Terminate the contract of employment, QUESTION 1 In the exercise of its...

QUESTION 1 In the exercise of its disciplinary power an employer can terminate an employee's contract. Should an employer decide not to terminate the contract of employment, wh

Delivery of good – sales of goods, Delivery of Good – Sales of Goods T...

Delivery of Good – Sales of Goods Therefore this is the voluntary transfer of possession from one person to other. Actually delivery usually takes any of the next forms, namel

Rule in turquands case, Rule in Turquands case: This statement can be ...

Rule in Turquands case: This statement can be reduced to two propositions which constitute what is compositely known as "the rule in Turquand's case", namely:; i. A person

Contract condition, 1. What is the difference between modifying a contract ...

1. What is the difference between modifying a contract under common law and modifying a contract under the UCC? 2. What is a "waiver" and what are its implications? 3. What i

What is the relation between business the law and ethics, Question 1: T...

Question 1: To what extent do you agree with the assertion that Governments are failing and that corporate power is on the rise? Question 2: (a) Critically determine th

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd