User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Concept of authority - agency law, Concept of Authority - Agency Law W...

Concept of Authority - Agency Law Whether this is the oral or written permission conferred on a person through another to do a particular thin.  Thus it is a factual concept a

Explain the criminal jurisdiction, Explain The criminal jurisdiction Th...

Explain The criminal jurisdiction The criminal jurisdiction is exercised on the basis of the following: 1. Nationality 2. Territory 3. Universal jurisdiction and 4. Specifi

Acceptance - negotiable instruments, Acceptance - Negotiable Instruments ...

Acceptance - Negotiable Instruments Meaning The word "acceptance" such used in relation to bills of exchange like has a special meaning also. Acceptance of a bill of ex

Jurisdiction - high court, Jurisdiction - High Court Whether under Sec...

Jurisdiction - High Court Whether under Section 60 of the constitution states in which the High Court shall have 'unlimited original jurisdiction in civil and the criminal mat

Payment of underwriting commission - allotment of shares, Payment of Underw...

Payment of Underwriting Commission: A "commission" is defined by Osborn's Concise Law Dictionary as, inter alia "an agent's remuneration". Therefore purposes of company law, i

Skills of legal writing, You are a Graduate Legal Officer employed in the C...

You are a Graduate Legal Officer employed in the Constitutional Policy Unit of the Australian Attorney-General's Department. Until this point, your supervisor, Rodger Dodger, has p

Invented case, a) Sometime in the mid 21st century the Jones-Markus experim...

a) Sometime in the mid 21st century the Jones-Markus experiment attempted to create a capuchin monkey with human intelligence. The experiment, however, outdid its intentions by se

Principle of floating charges, Principle of floating charges: The gene...

Principle of floating charges: The general purpose of the rule is to prevent an unsecured creditor of an insolvent company from getting advantage over other creditors by obtai

Rule in foss v harbottle, RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:  What has come to ...

RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:  What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harb

Representative action, Representative action: Where individual shareho...

Representative action: Where individual shareholders have suffered personal loss in addition to the injury to the company one shareholder may bring a representative action on

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd