case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Nemo dat quod non habet - sales of goods, Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet - Goods ...

Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet - Goods Therefore another common law maxim such applies to sale of goods is like "nemo dat quod non habet": whether a person cannot give such he does

Explain the human rights of international laws, HUMAN RIGHTS   Human right...

HUMAN RIGHTS   Human rights are something which we frequently hear about, discuss, and have probably read a great deal on as well. Most political and social discussions revolve ar

Dividends - alteration of capital, DIVIDENDS: As a commercial term, th...

DIVIDENDS: As a commercial term, the word "dividends" has a variable meaning which depends on the context in which it is used. For purposes of company law, it denotes the paym

Company secretary, Company Secretary:             4.19.1  Appointment ...

Company Secretary:             4.19.1  Appointment of the Secretary             By section 179, every company must have a secretary but a sole director cannot be a secretar

District magistrate''s court, District Magistrate's Court Establishm...

District Magistrate's Court Establishment Further District Magistrate's Courts are established to each district in England thgrough S.7(1) of the Magistrate's Courts Ac

Theory of contract law, Mary has just graduated from LIM College and is in ...

Mary has just graduated from LIM College and is in an interview with ABC Design Firm.  ABC employees several talented designers that work with ABC retail clients to design lines of

Order of application of assets, Order of application of assets: The or...

Order of application of assets: The order of application of assets is therefore as follows: (a) secured creditors who have fixed charges are entitled to be paid out of thei

Sale of goods act, 15 cases under sale of goods act within the year 2000- 2...

15 cases under sale of goods act within the year 2000- 2016?

safeguards interfere with law enforcement, The U.S. Constitution provides ...

The U.S. Constitution provides certain procedural safeguards to an accused, including protections from unreasonable searches and seizures, the right to an attorney and the right to

Meeting is unnecessary - meetings and resolutions, Meeting is Unnecessary -...

Meeting is Unnecessary - meetings and resolutions: The purpose of holding general meetings with all the formality which this entails is to give to each member the opportunity

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd