User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Market failures in the financial services industry, Question: State whe...

Question: State whether the following statements are TRUE, FALSE or UNCERTAIN. Briefly (two or three paragraphs) give reasons for your answer. (a) There are no market fail

Business ethics and public relations, Select an existing business that is d...

Select an existing business that is dealing with, or has recently dealt with, a negative public relations situation involving business ethics. You may also use your own company. Co

What are the limitations imposed on banks by the banking act, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 (a) Under which circumstances can banking information on customers be disclosed and at the same time not breaching the confidentiality clause of the Banking Act (

Partnership agreement - voidable contracts, Partnership Agreement - Voidabl...

Partnership Agreement - Voidable Contracts Conversely an infant is bound at common law through a partnership agreement although he is free to repudiate it at all time during i

General principles of calls on contributories, General principles of Calls ...

General principles of Calls on contributories: If it is necessary to make calls on contributories the liquidator draws up a list "A" of contributories who were members at th

Ratification of corporate acts, Ratification of Corporate Acts: A numb...

Ratification of Corporate Acts: A number of English cases which are regarded as instances of lifting the veil are those relating to informal ratification by the members of act

Arbitration is overriding condition in business contracts, QUESTION 1 A...

QUESTION 1 Arbitration is an overriding condition in all business contracts. Without a clause for arbitration business relationship is bound to suffer. Critically examine this

What is a contract, QUESTION (i) Briefly explain the following in relat...

QUESTION (i) Briefly explain the following in relation to the legal structure of Mauritius- Legislative branch Executive branch Judiciary branch Local Government

Global competitiveness of firms, Question 1 Briefly explain: (i) Des...

Question 1 Briefly explain: (i) Describe Business ethics. (ii) Illustrate caveat emptor. (iii) Define corporate governance. (iv) What is whistle blowing? (v) D

Benefits of non-accepting shareholders, Benefits of non-accepting sharehold...

Benefits of non-accepting shareholders: The minority whose shares are acquired compulsory under s.210 are entitled to all the benefits included in the original offer and accep

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd