case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Regulations regarding hazardous substances, REGULATIONS REGARDING HAZARDOUS...

REGULATIONS REGARDING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES A hazardous substance has the potential to harm. It may cause harm to human beings, other living creatures, plants, microorganisms, p

Explain the human rights of international laws, HUMAN RIGHTS   Human right...

HUMAN RIGHTS   Human rights are something which we frequently hear about, discuss, and have probably read a great deal on as well. Most political and social discussions revolve ar

How can consent be vitiated in relation to contracts, QUESTION 1 (a) Wh...

QUESTION 1 (a) What are the essential elements for a valid contract as stipulated by article 1108 of the Civil Code (CCM)? (b) How can consent be vitiated in relation to con

Significance of registration, Significance of Registration:           ...

Significance of Registration:           S.389 provides that "no company or association or may partnership consisting of more than twenty persons shall be formed... except it i

Summary of the international humanitarian laws, Summary of the internationa...

Summary of the international humanitarian laws The main objectives/summary of the international humanitarian laws can be divided into a few parts which are as follows: D

Important resolutions which have great impact of terrorism, Two very import...

Two very important resolutions which had a great impact on description of terrorism UNSC has also declared incitement as an offence. The interpretation of terrorism formulated

Personal rights invaded - statutory provisions, Personal rights invaded: ...

Personal rights invaded:                    A shareholder may sue to protect from invasion their own individual rights as members.  This is illustrated by Pender v Lushington

Describe the social conditions of multiple streams, Describe the Social con...

Describe the Social conditions of multiple streams Social conditions that are not defined as problems, and for which alternatives are never proposed, never become policy issues

What are the disadvantages of doctrine of judicial precedent, What are the ...

What are the disadvantages of doctrine of judicial precedent? Disadvantages of doctrine of judicial precedent: • Overtime here has been a huge number of cases, makes this ve

Common law rule - meetings and resolutions, Common law rule - meetings and ...

Common law rule - meetings and resolutions: The common law rule applies irrespective of whether the failure to give notice of the meeting was deliberate or unintentional.  How

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd