case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Define the conceptual strength of stages model, Define the Conceptual stren...

Define the Conceptual strength of stages model The stages model has a number of conceptual strengths. First, it emphasizes a process of policy making that cuts across and bridg

Business entity, Sole proprietorship, partnership and company

Sole proprietorship, partnership and company

Illustration of rules relating to consideration, Illustrtaion of Rules rela...

Illustrtaion of Rules relating to consideration Foakes v Beer (1884) Actually On the date 11th of August, 1875 Mrs Beer wrapped judgment next to Dr. Foakes for £2,077 1

Practical consequences of incorporation, Practical Consequences of Incorpor...

Practical Consequences of Incorporation: In the course of delivering his judgment in Salomon's case Lord Halsbury stated that "once the company is incorporated, it must be tre

The reports - matters and reports, The Reports: i) An auditor's report...

The Reports: i) An auditor's report showing:                    a) Profits or losses in each of the last FIVE years.                    b) Rate of dividend during the la

Compulsory liquidation - winding-up, Compulsory Liquidation :          ...

Compulsory Liquidation :                                       A petition is presented to the High Court under s.218 of the Companies Act.  The petition will specify one of the

What is diplomatic immunity, What is Diplomatic immunity Diplomatic imm...

What is Diplomatic immunity Diplomatic immunity relates to the protection of the representatives of another state to ensure that they perform their international political func

Negotiation and joint consultation committee, Problem: (a) Show the dif...

Problem: (a) Show the difference between negotiation and Joint consultation Committee. (b) What is the difference between a procedural and a substantive agreement? (c) De

What are the main areas of case law, What are the main areas of case law? ...

What are the main areas of case law? Case law: There are two main areas, as follows: • Common law: It is an amalgamation of past cases that are used to make decision

Analyse the major changes brought to industrial relations, Question 1: ...

Question 1: Critically analyse the major changes brought to Industrial Relations by the Employment Relations Act 2008? Question 2: Write short notes on the followings:

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd