case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Liability - company secretary, Liability:             The secretary is...

Liability:             The secretary is an officer of the company and thus he owes fiduciary duties to the company which are similar to those of a director, eg. he must act in

Pawan, Decode the Code Problem Description Smugglers are becoming very smar...

Decode the Code Problem Description Smugglers are becoming very smart day by day. Now they have developed a new technique of sending their messages from one smuggler to another. In

Secured creditors - winding up, SECURED CREDITORS: A secured creditor ...

SECURED CREDITORS: A secured creditor may: (a) realize his security and prove as an unsecured creditor for the balance (if any) of his debt; (b)value the security and prov

Important points - contractual capacity of drunken persons, Important point...

Important points - Contractual Capacity of Drunken Persons Here the following points should be notice for as: Ratification Well a drunken man who enters into

Administrative function of chief justice, Administrative Function of Chief ...

Administrative Function of Chief Justice Where, he is the principal administrative officer of the judiciary And where, he is the chairman of the Judicial Service Commi

Define a conflict of interest, Question  How does the RTL Code define ...

Question  How does the RTL Code define a 'conflict of interest'?  Give one example of how the RTL Code suggests a conflict of interest may arise.

What is the principal-agent paradigm, What is the principal-agent paradigm ...

What is the principal-agent paradigm Controversies on the decisions of many state governors and other ministers can be cited as examples. Such behaviour reflects their willing

Illustrate the example for policy convergence, Illustrate the example for P...

Illustrate the example for Policy Convergence Suppose there are two candidates, with known positions, policy proposal p A and policy proposal p B , representing policy offers

Parol evidence rule, 1. How do mandatory terms limit freedom of contract? ...

1. How do mandatory terms limit freedom of contract? 2. How do contract interpretation issues arise? 3. What is the difference between subjective and objective intent?   4

AUDITING, EXPLAIN THE KNGSTON COTTON MILL CASE

EXPLAIN THE KNGSTON COTTON MILL CASE

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd