case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Recognition of government, Recognition of government It relates to reco...

Recognition of government It relates to recognition of a government of a particular State as the legitimate representative of the people of that country. The recognition of gov

How was negligence the main cause, How was Negligence the main cause? ...

How was Negligence the main cause? Negligence was the major cause: A claim for damages can only succeed when there has been damage or loss to the claimant. Illustrations

Discussion board question, I have an order in and I want to know what the 8...

I have an order in and I want to know what the 829.2 means and the order is 12.00?

Determining the capital requirements for credit risk, Question: a) The...

Question: a) The first pillar of Basel II provides a range of options for determining the capital requirements for credit risk and operational risk to allow banks and supervi

Ratio decidendi, Ratio Decidendi Conversely "ratio decidendi" of a cas...

Ratio Decidendi Conversely "ratio decidendi" of a case consists of the material facts of such case and the decision made through the judge on the basis of those facts.  So hen

Prospectus issue, Prospectus Issue: Under a prospectus issue the compa...

Prospectus Issue: Under a prospectus issue the company sells the shares directly to the public rather than selling them through intermediaries.

Challenging an arbitral award, Challenging an Arbitral Award Conversel...

Challenging an Arbitral Award Conversely a party dissatisfied through an arbitral award any challenge that it in the High Court and the High Court might set it aside whether i

Glen signs a release, Glenda has taken a household insurance on her classic...

Glenda has taken a household insurance on her classic Queenslander home in North Queensland.  At the time of application, the insurer "URINSURED" asked various questions regarding

What is the meaning of remuneration, QUESTION 1 Explain the meaning of ...

QUESTION 1 Explain the meaning of ‘constructive dismissal' with reference to appropriate case law QUESTION 2 (a) What is the meaning of remuneration? (b) What type o

Advantages of alternative dispute resolution, Question 1: (a) Elaborat...

Question 1: (a) Elaborate on the sources of Law in Mauritius. (b) Explain what you understand by the following legal terms: (i) Obiter Dictum

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd