case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Characterisation of the legislation, Your task is to examine and analyse th...

Your task is to examine and analyse the article by Shae McCrystal The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and the Right to Strike. (2009) (December) Vol 23 Australian Journal of Labour Law

Exceptions to the doctrine of privity of contract, Exceptions to the doctri...

Exceptions to the doctrine of Privity of contract Further there are a number of exceptions to the privity of contract rule of which the subsequent may be stated: (a) Agenc

Define the term- international implications of enforcement, Define the term...

Define the term- international implications of enforcement Agencies cooperate over time, they converge towards common principles that might then serve as the foundation for the

When do property, QUESTION 1 (a) What are the ways in which a contract ...

QUESTION 1 (a) What are the ways in which a contract may be terminated? (b) Elaborate on two of them QUESTION 2 When do property, risk and title pass in a contract?

Recovery of possession of goods, Recovery of Possession of Goods Howev...

Recovery of Possession of Goods However below S.15 where two-thirds or more about the hire-purchase price has been paid the owner is such precluded from enforcing the rights a

Duties of the principal - agency law, Duties of the Principal - Agency Law ...

Duties of the Principal - Agency Law However the duties of the principal for the agent are like: Remuneration Whether to pay the agreed commission where it becomes du

What is a contract?, QUESTION The Web has made it extremely attractive ...

QUESTION The Web has made it extremely attractive to conduct commercial activities online. Companies such as Amazon.com and eBay are e-commerce powerhouses that sell all sorts

Non-accepting shareholders, Non-accepting shareholders: Acceptance on ...

Non-accepting shareholders: Acceptance on the required scale must be obtained within a maximum of four months from the date of the offer.  The position then is that: (a) at

Appeals - court-martial, Appeals - Court-Martial In fact in Section 11...

Appeals - Court-Martial In fact in Section 115 of the Armed Forces Act including a person who has been convicted through a court-martial to appeal to the High Court either aga

condition precedent, What is a condition precedent? Provide me with an exa...

What is a condition precedent? Provide me with an example.

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd