User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

State article 3 of air and outer space law, State Article 3 of air and oute...

State Article 3 of air and outer space law Article 3 refers to the fact that the Convention would be applicable to the civil aircraft only and not to the state aircraft. Also,

Explain united nations general assembly, Explain United Nations General Ass...

Explain United Nations General Assembly A treaty may also be referred to as a Convention, Protocol, Agreement and Declaration. There are no legal reasons for using different na

Explain the second theory of international antitrust, Explain the second th...

Explain the second theory of international antitrust cooperation A second theory of international antitrust cooperation is a more limited multilateral approach under which only

The health and safety issues in the hospitality industry, QUESTION 1 (i...

QUESTION 1 (i) What are the principles applicable regarding the unjustified termination of a contract of employment (ii) What would be your views regarding the legal issues

State law concerning use of force, State law concerning use of force ...

State law concerning use of force The law concerning use of force is a contentious area in international law. In pre-modern times, the state territory was extended by occupyi

Quantifying phoenix activity, Many stakeholders emphasised that it would be...

Many stakeholders emphasised that it would be difficult to quantify phoenix activity as phoenix operators are very skilled at 'flying under the radar'. Impacts, beyond those listed

Objection to a variation of class rights, Objection to a variation of class...

Objection to a variation of class rights: The company proposed to reduce its share capital by repayment of the 5% 1 pound Cumulative Preference Shares (which were entitled to

Powers of arbitral tribunal, Powers of Arbitral Tribunal Powers of Arb...

Powers of Arbitral Tribunal Powers of Arbitral Tribunal are as Follow: For determine whether it has jurisdiction to entertain a dispute and For provide interim reme

an express term and an implied term, What is the difference between an exp...

What is the difference between an express term and an implied term? Provide me with an example of each.

Impact of phoenix activity on employ superannuation, Q. Impact of phoenix a...

Q. Impact of phoenix activity on employ superannuation? Employees experience a range of impacts other than lost wages, entitlements and superannuation from phoenix activity. Fi

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd