case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Amount of compensation payable, Amount of compensation payable: In CLA...

Amount of compensation payable: In CLARK V URQUHART (44) the court explained that the amount of compensation payable under S.45 of the Act is calculated or measured in the sam

Write about constitutional validity of the drt act, Question1 Clayton's ca...

Question1 Clayton's case is considered to be one of the most essential legal decisions in banking laws that established the principle of the order of application of credits agains

Non renewal- time lines, 1. Please list and explain the non renewal- time l...

1. Please list and explain the non renewal- time lines for teachers. 2. Are there any changes to this under new legislation relative to House Bill 153 and or House Bill 555? An

Register of directors shareholdings, Register of Directors' Shareholdings: ...

Register of Directors' Shareholdings: Section 196(1) requires every company to keep a register showing the number, description and amount of any shares or debentures which are

Liability based definition of phoenix activity, Q. Liability based definiti...

Q. Liability based definition of phoenix activity? The definition used by Treasury, and used as a working definition for this project, focuses on the intent with which phoenix

Registered companies, Registered Companies: A registered company is fo...

Registered Companies: A registered company is formed by registration under the Companies Act. It is this type of company that people usually have in mind when they talk of "a

Members voluntary winding up, Members voluntary winding up: In a membe...

Members voluntary winding up: In a members' voluntary winding up the creditors play no part since the assumption is that their debts will be paid in full.  There is no committ

Explain the main elements that constitute a valid contract, Question 1: ...

Question 1: Explain the main elements that constitute a valid contract. Question 2: Explain the concepts of negligence and remoteness of damage in tort law. Questio

Necessaries - binding contracts, Necessaries - Binding Contracts Defin...

Necessaries - Binding Contracts Definition of 'Necessaries' cleared by S. 4(2) to the Sale of Goods Act like "goods appropriate for the condition in life of that infant or min

Need for research design, Need for research Design: a. It facilities ...

Need for research Design: a. It facilities the smooth sailing of the various research operations thereby making research as efficient as possible yielding maximal inf

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd