case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

How evidence is used to prove a criminal offence, how evidence is used to p...

how evidence is used to prove a criminal offence: This question is asking you to consider the importance of evidence, how it is used and how reliable it may be in supporting

Change the law and move to comparative negligence, 1. Maryland is one of a ...

1. Maryland is one of a few states in which contributory negligence is a complete defense, barring the plaintiff from any recovery. What is contributory negligence? How does it com

Amount of compensation payable, Amount of compensation payable: In CLA...

Amount of compensation payable: In CLARK V URQUHART (44) the court explained that the amount of compensation payable under S.45 of the Act is calculated or measured in the sam

Nature of a company, Nature of a Company: There is no precise legal de...

Nature of a Company: There is no precise legal definition of "a company". This is due to historical reasons which are too lengthy to be narrated in this text. Suffice it to sa

Fraudulent trading, Fraudulent Trading: Under s.323, if the court find...

Fraudulent Trading: Under s.323, if the court finds that the business of a company in liquidation has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors or for any fraudulent pu

What is the stability of the emu banking sector, What is the Stability of t...

What is the Stability of the EMU banking sector Low currency risk, external balance and the stability of the EMU banking sector and financial markets are club goods whose benef

Analyse the link between csr and competitiveness, Question 1 "CSR can play...

Question 1 "CSR can play a key role in contributing to sustainable development while enhancing Europe's innovative potential and competitiveness" Critically analyse the link be

Requisites of acceptance - rules relating to acceptance, Requisites of Acce...

Requisites of Acceptance - Rules Relating To Acceptance Section number S.17 (2) provides like an acceptance is invalid unless since it complies with the following conditions:

Discuss the trial period in a contract of employment, Question 1: "Le C...

Question 1: "Le Coco" is a well known hotel located on the north coast of Mauritius. Mr. B, a client of "Le Coco" hotel, was injured after a short heated argument with another

Take an action in court, A is a Malaysian contractor in the oil and gas bus...

A is a Malaysian contractor in the oil and gas business. B is a large British oil exploration company. By a written Contract, B appointed A in January 2008 to maintain B's offshore

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd