case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Nature and categorization of law, NATURE AND CATEGORIZATION OF LAW: He...

NATURE AND CATEGORIZATION OF LAW: Here the term "law" has no consigned meaning.  It is utilized in a variety of senses.  Nonetheless different writers have bond to explain the

Beneficial service - binding contracts, Beneficial Service - Binding Contra...

Beneficial Service - Binding Contracts According to such, a contract relates service or apprenticeship is such binding on an infant - which mostly provided it is substantially

Online exam in Business Law, #questonline exam of business law about 20 qes...

#questonline exam of business law about 20 qestions ( T and F , MC, and short answers ) The exam will open just for two hours The exam will start half of hour from now >> can yo

Business law, Jerry contracted with Sally to purchase Sally’s Restaurant fo...

Jerry contracted with Sally to purchase Sally’s Restaurant for $50,000ion #Minimum 100 words accepted#

Commencement of business, Commencement of Business: Section III (1) pr...

Commencement of Business: Section III (1) provides that a public company which has issued a prospectus cannot commence business or exercise any borrowing powers unless:-

Standard of proof in criminal cases, Standard of proof in criminal cases: ...

Standard of proof in criminal cases: Whenever the standard of proof in criminal cases is away from any reasonable doubt.  Further in the event of any reasonable doubt the accu

Outline the role played by each of these institutions, QUESTION 1 In Ma...

QUESTION 1 In Mauritius, Industrial Relations are dealt with by a number of specialist institutions. Outline the role played by each of these institutions. QUESTION 2 "

Illustration of rules relating to consideration, Illustrtaion of Rules rela...

Illustrtaion of Rules relating to consideration Foakes v Beer (1884) Actually On the date 11th of August, 1875 Mrs Beer wrapped judgment next to Dr. Foakes for £2,077 1

Analyze the differences between a proposal and an invitation, Analyze the d...

Analyze the differences between a proposal and an invitation to treat and discuss the rules to determine the point of time on which an agreement is reached. Using the latest Malays

Lost by company personnel, In a business context, there are thousands of le...

In a business context, there are thousands of legal claims that happen frequently in a company's course of operations. Frequently, the management team must come to together to veri

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd