case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Contract condition, 1. What is the difference between modifying a contract ...

1. What is the difference between modifying a contract under common law and modifying a contract under the UCC? 2. What is a "waiver" and what are its implications? 3. What i

State about the median voter theorem, State about the Median Voter Theorem ...

State about the Median Voter Theorem Percentage of vote necessary for a proposal to be adopted, remember Median Voter Theorem, will affect the difficult of adopting a proposal,

Compensation for loss of office - company management, Compensation for Loss...

Compensation for Loss of Office: (a) Section 192 makes it unlawful for a company to make a director any payment by way of compensation for loss of office, or  may as considera

Implied powers, Implied Powers:                                     Th...

Implied Powers:                                     The statement of Lord Cairns in 1875 in Ashbury Rail Co Ltd v Riche (22) to the effect that a contract beyond the objects o

Tort laws and the environment, Role of the Courts The role of the court...

Role of the Courts The role of the court system in Canada varies. Due to the numerous jurisdictions and different government levels involved, the courts are often asked to inte

How many types of immunities are there, There are various types of immunit...

There are various types of immunities, such as; The diplomatic immunity, Immunities of international organizations, Sovereign of state immunity and Acts of state doctr

Rights of co-guarantors, Rights of co-guarantors among themselves A guar...

Rights of co-guarantors among themselves A guarantor who that has paid more than his share below the guarantee is entitled such to contribution from his co-guarantors, although

Types of contract - law of contract, Types of Contract - Law of Contrac...

Types of Contract - Law of Contract However common law of US relating to the contract classifies contracts with the following categories as; Specialty Contra

Define the liability, The MV unfortunate was talking passengers to Lyme Cay...

The MV unfortunate was talking passengers to Lyme Cay when it receive a distress signal from a vessel nearby the master started to proceed towards the vessel but stop when he reali

What must the claimant show to succeed, What must the claimant show to succ...

What must the claimant show to succeed? The claimant should show the given issues, for a case to succeed: a. There was a duty of care. b. There was breach of such duty.

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd