case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Explain the second theory of international antitrust, Explain the second th...

Explain the second theory of international antitrust cooperation A second theory of international antitrust cooperation is a more limited multilateral approach under which only

Analyse the major changes brought to industrial relations, Question 1: ...

Question 1: Critically analyse the major changes brought to Industrial Relations by the Employment Relations Act 2008? Question 2: Write short notes on the followings:

What are the main sources of european law, What are the main sources of Eur...

What are the main sources of European Law? There are three main sources of EU (European) law: a. Primary legislation: It is the Treaties of Rome and Paris that initial

Explain self determination, Explain Self determination Self determinat...

Explain Self determination Self determination is actually the foundation of United Nations (UN) Charter. It is defined as a right of people to determine and to choose their ow

District magistrate''s court -civil appeals, District Magistrate's Court -C...

District Magistrate's Court -Civil Appeals Moreover in S.11 (1) of the Magistrate's Court Act gives that 'any person who is aggrieved through an order of a magistrate's court

#title.32228-05, Hi do you have solutions for 32228-05 question on law

Hi do you have solutions for 32228-05 question on law

The day on which the worker becomes aware of the misconduct, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 a) What are the implied obligations of an employer and an employee under a contract of employment b) In what circumstances should an employer pay severance allowa

Representations regarding character or credit, Representations Regarding Ch...

Representations Regarding Character or Credit Since statements relating to a person's credit-worthiness will only be actionable whether made in pursuance of a contract that wa

Cs 652 - programming problem, Q. CS 652 - Programming problem? Without ...

Q. CS 652 - Programming problem? Without using the system() function to call any bash commands, write a python program that will implement a simple version of the diff command.

Explain universal jurisdiction of criminal jurisdiction, Explain Universal ...

Explain Universal jurisdiction of criminal jurisdiction It is concerned with the application of a State's criminal jurisdiction in respect of offences committed against the int

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd