User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Function and powers of chairman, Function and Powers of Chairman: In t...

Function and Powers of Chairman: In the case of National Dwellings Society v Sykes Chitty, J. stated: "It is the duty of the chairman, and his function, to preserve order,

Rule in foss v harbottle, RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:  What has come to ...

RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:  What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harb

Find the best arguments to oppose the objections, This is a felon in posses...

This is a felon in possession of a firearm case. The defendant and his wife were involved in an argument. The argument became heated enough that the wife called the police through

Trade and commerce, what is the importance of law enforcement and the legal...

what is the importance of law enforcement and the legal profession as service industries?

Explain the meaning of the term reverse logistics, Question 1: (a) What...

Question 1: (a) What do you understand by the term Logistics Management? (b) What are the three types of costing which come under storage? (c) Explain the role of Public

District magistrate''s court - civil jurisdiction, District Magistrate's Co...

District Magistrate's Court - Civil Jurisdiction Conversely the civil jurisdiction of the district magistrate's courts in claims not below customary law was changed through St

Personal property security act, You act for Fred who is the secured lending...

You act for Fred who is the secured lending manager of BigBank. He has a troublesome customer, Macs Tires Pty Ltd. This is a family run tire business with three directors. The prin

Requisites of acceptance - rules relating to acceptance, Requisites of Acce...

Requisites of Acceptance - Rules Relating To Acceptance Section number S.17 (2) provides like an acceptance is invalid unless since it complies with the following conditions:

Analyze the basic ethical values for business, Question: (a) Ethics i...

Question: (a) Ethics is the set of moral principles by which people conduct themselves personally, socially, or professionally. Critically analyze the basic ethical values

Allotment of shares and debentures - mergers and winding up, Allotment of s...

Allotment of shares and debentures - mergers and winding up: When the scheme is before the court for final approval a minority may object on any of the various grounds indicat

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd