case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Non renewal- time lines, 1. Please list and explain the non renewal- time l...

1. Please list and explain the non renewal- time lines for teachers. 2. Are there any changes to this under new legislation relative to House Bill 153 and or House Bill 555? An

I need thesis, i need first proposal for a thesis on arbitrtion or construc...

i need first proposal for a thesis on arbitrtion or construction law which must be practical not theoritecal

What must the claimant show to succeed, What must the claimant show to succ...

What must the claimant show to succeed? The claimant should show the given issues, for a case to succeed: a. There was a duty of care. b. There was breach of such duty.

Law assignment, hello.. iahve one business law assignment can you please gi...

hello.. iahve one business law assignment can you please give me quote?

Procedure for registration of trade unions, Question 1: (a) The Employ...

Question 1: (a) The Employment Relations Act does not apply to all categories of workers. Describe. (b) What is the main procedure for registration of trade unions? Qu

Directors to perform the duties, Directors to perform the duties: Ther...

Directors to perform the duties: Therefore it cannot be that the auditors  are to be at the expense and trouble not merely of sending their report through the post but of deli

Compulsory liquidation - winding up, Compulsory liquidation - winding up: ...

Compulsory liquidation - winding up: There are a number of points of similarity: (a) in a compulsory (but not a voluntary) liquidation the directors have to submit a statemen

Personal rights invaded - statutory provisions, Personal rights invaded: ...

Personal rights invaded:                    A shareholder may sue to protect from invasion their own individual rights as members.  This is illustrated by Pender v Lushington

Manner of transfer of bills, Manner of Transfer of Bills One of the ch...

Manner of Transfer of Bills One of the characteristics of bills of exchange is such whereas  A gives B a bill accepted through X in settlement of his debt, since this same ins

Perpetual succession, Perpetual Succession:                      Accor...

Perpetual Succession:                      According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary, "perpetual" means, inter alia, "applicable, valid, for ever or for indefinite time " wh

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd