case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Sales of goods, when can implied condition can be treated as warrantee?

when can implied condition can be treated as warrantee?

Contracts illegal at the common law, Contracts illegal at the common law ...

Contracts illegal at the common law However a contract which is prohibited through the common law is frequently described as being as "contrary to public policy" as i.e. the c

Employement Contract, I have a contract for employment, its is for a CTO po...

I have a contract for employment, its is for a CTO position, giving me equity stake in the company, I do not agree with the offer and I have a counter offer, I need a experts opini

When was international criminal court for rwanda established, When was Inte...

When was International Criminal Court for Rwanda established Moreover, in early 1990s the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY) was established under UNSC Resol

Theobald , Theobald: Conversely there such I take to be the duty of th...

Theobald: Conversely there such I take to be the duty of the auditor; then he must be honest.... i.e. like he must not certify that what he does not believe to be true, reason

Analyze information security and cybercrime law issues, (A Safe Assign note...

(A Safe Assign note : All work submitted will be checked for plagiarism using an automated tool developed by Blackboard. Work will be checked against a variety of sources including

Rules of delivery of goods - sales of good, Rules of Delivery of Goods - Sa...

Rules of Delivery of Goods - Sales of Good So the rule regarding with delivery are like; (a)  The goods should be in a deliverable state and one is (b) Otherwise unless l

Dismiss a worker for misconduct, Question 1: What are the procedures t...

Question 1: What are the procedures that an employer should follow before he will dismiss a worker for misconduct? Question 2: Section 39 of the Labour Act provides fo

Differences members and creditors voluntary wind up, Differences members an...

Differences members and creditors voluntary wind up: main differences between a members' and a creditors' voluntary winding up are that : (a) in a creditors' voluntary win

Empowers directors - company management, Empowers directors - company manag...

Empowers directors - company management: In the case of companies which have adopted Table A, Article 107 empowers directors to appoint a managing director "for such period an

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd