case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Penalty for improper appointment, PENALTY FOR IMPROPER APPOINTMENT:  ...

PENALTY FOR IMPROPER APPOINTMENT:           S.161 (4) provides that if any unqualified person is appointed as auditor, the person appointed, the company and every officer i

Issue of additional preference shares, Issue of additional preference share...

Issue of additional preference shares: In the Bristol Aeroplane Case it was said of the issue of additional preference shares that:                    "the existing prefere

Pooling of assets and liabilities, Q. Pooling of assets and liabilities? ...

Q. Pooling of assets and liabilities? In 2004 the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee proposed that assets and liabilities of companies be aggregated and creditors paid

Issuing shares at a discount - allotment of shares, Issuing shares at a dis...

Issuing shares at a discount: In Ooregum Gold Mining Co of India Ltd v Roper (45) the House of Lords held that it is illegal for a limited company to issue its shares at a dis

What is the common law, Question 1: (a) What is "The Common Law"? (...

Question 1: (a) What is "The Common Law"? (b) What are the virtues of the Common Law? Question 2: (a) Name the three facets of "the concept of justice". (b) E

State article 22 of international law, State Article 22 of international la...

State Article 22 of international law Article 22 declares the premises of the mission as inviolable and agents of receiving State are not to enter them without the consent of

Harm both companies'' reputations, Part of the client's contract clearly st...

Part of the client's contract clearly states that negative publicity will not be tolerated on any actions connected to the temp agency. You know that this situation can harm both c

Case of bussiness law and ethics, Betty and Veronica always fell in lo...

Betty and Veronica always fell in love with the same men. Veronica got very jealous of Betty for stealing Archie away from her and decided to start sending her anonymous

Avoidance of floating charges, Avoidance of Floating Charges: Under s....

Avoidance of Floating Charges: Under s.314 liquidation automatically renders void any floating charge created within the period of 12 months before commencement of liquidation

Partnership property, Partnership Property Partnership property compri...

Partnership Property Partnership property comprises all property originally brought in the partnership as well like acquired for the purposes of such the firm's businesses. Th

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd