User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Possible proceeding under the fair work act, As part of this project, exper...

As part of this project, expert input was provided by employment law specialists Herbert Geer. Herbert Geer raised the possibility that the FWO could recover amounts lost by indivi

Media Law, online Law test, Due tomorrow December 14th, 20 multiple choice...

online Law test, Due tomorrow December 14th, 20 multiple choice questions and 4 essay questions. Topics, Obscenity, child porn; broadcasting indecency, citizens united, ipr & cop

Prohibition - name clause , Prohibition:  Section 18 of the Registrat...

Prohibition:  Section 18 of the Registration of Business Names Act provides that the registration of a company's business name under the Act shall not be construed as authoris

Ddisadvantages - mergers and winding up, Ddisadvantages - mergers and windi...

Ddisadvantages - mergers and winding up: The disadvantages of s.280 are that cash may have to be provided to pay off creditors and dissenting members or alternatively the sale

Theoretical foundations of international policy coordination, Theoretical f...

Theoretical foundations of international policy coordination Policy process more from a domestic perspective. If a country is small one can assume away any spillover effects th

Illustrate the maintenance phase of policy process, Illustrate the Maintena...

Illustrate the Maintenance Phase of policy process a) Develop a plan for active maintenance and review Who will ensure that policies are actively maintained and reviewed? H

Rules for partnership - partnership law, Rules for Partnership - Partnershi...

Rules for Partnership - Partnership Law Joint tenancy, as such tenancy in common then joint property or common property and may part ownership does not of itself produce a

Penalty for improper appointment, PENALTY FOR IMPROPER APPOINTMENT:  ...

PENALTY FOR IMPROPER APPOINTMENT:           S.161 (4) provides that if any unqualified person is appointed as auditor, the person appointed, the company and every officer i

What are the main areas of case law, What are the main areas of case law? ...

What are the main areas of case law? Case law: There are two main areas, as follows: • Common law: It is an amalgamation of past cases that are used to make decision

When was international atomic energy agency established, Explain Internatio...

Explain International Atomic Energy Agency The  NPT  also  creates  rights and  obligations on  the  members of  NPT  to  comply  with  the provisions of the treaty and to ensu

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd