case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

State preamble of the united nations charter, State Preamble of the United ...

State Preamble of the United Nations Charter 'We the Peoples of the United Nations determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war...and to reaffirm faith in fu

Explain the difference between liquidation and receivership, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 The principle of law set out in Salomon v Salomon & Co. Ltd is not always applied. Discuss when the judiciary or statutory provisions will not take into account of

Duties of an advocate, Duties of an Advocate First is, Duty to th...

Duties of an Advocate First is, Duty to the Court Whether as an officer of court an advocate is bound to assist in administration of the justice.  Thus he must adv

Explain causes of employee grievances, Question 1: (a) Distinguish betw...

Question 1: (a) Distinguish between Industrial Relations and Employee Relations? (b) Explain five causes of Employee Grievances with suitable examples. (c) What ar

Special courts, Special Courts However in addition to the courts dealt...

Special Courts However in addition to the courts dealt into paragraphs as 2.1 - 2.7 above, there exist in England a number of other institutions that are called "courts" or "t

State article 15 of air and outer space law, State Article 15 of air and ou...

State Article 15 of air and outer space law Article  15  states  that  any  charges  that  may  be  imposed  or  permitted  to  be  imposed  by  a contracting State for the use

Discuss the role of agend setting in policy process, Discuss the Role of ag...

Discuss the Role of agend setting in policy process In policy process, agenda setting plays a vital role. It helps determine what policies are chosen. When there are many compe

Unsecured trade creditors, Unsecured trade creditors: It refers to a "...

Unsecured trade creditors: It refers to a "class" of members or of creditors. Obviously if two or more companies are involved or if one company has two classes of shares, eg.

Secured creditors - winding up, SECURED CREDITORS: A secured creditor ...

SECURED CREDITORS: A secured creditor may: (a) realize his security and prove as an unsecured creditor for the balance (if any) of his debt; (b)value the security and prov

Compulsory winding up, Compulsory winding up: At the hearing other cre...

Compulsory winding up: At the hearing other creditors of the company may oppose the petition.  If so, the court is likely to decide in favour of those to whom the larger amoun

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd