User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Hirer requires information from the owner, Hirer Requires Information from ...

Hirer Requires Information from the Owner Conversely the hirer requires some information from the owner whether he should send him a written request so and then like pay to hi

Transfer of immovable property, Transfer of Immovable Property By S.54...

Transfer of Immovable Property By S.54 Property Act, 1882 as Note: This Act is applicable in the US requires that a transfer of immovable property worth over as 100 rupees mus

Article 33 - pacific settlement of disputes, Article 33 - Pacific settlemen...

Article 33 - Pacific settlement of disputes Article 33 the meaning of Negotiation is the same as in domestic law. It is a preferred mode and third party intervention is not nee

Disclaimer of assets, DISCLAIMER OF ASSETS: The liquidator has a statu...

DISCLAIMER OF ASSETS: The liquidator has a statutory right of disclaimer of assets: s.135.  The rules are: (a)     he must obtain leave of the court; (b)     the right o

Advantages of stare decisis - aptitude for growth, Advantages of Stare Deci...

Advantages of Stare Decisis - Aptitude for growth However process of 'distinguishing' cases facilitates the growth of detailed legal principles to deal by different factua

Hire-purchase and sale, Hire-Purchase and Sale The hire-purchase trans...

Hire-Purchase and Sale The hire-purchase transaction is such not a sale since, according to the definition like: (i)There is no seller or buyer. Such like the parties are the

Remedies of the buyer - sales of goods, Remedies of the Buyer - Sales of Go...

Remedies of the Buyer - Sales of Goods (a)Damages for non-delivery Section number 51 (1) provides that whether the seller wrongfully neglects or refuses to deliver the go

Parol evidence rule, 1. How do mandatory terms limit freedom of contract? ...

1. How do mandatory terms limit freedom of contract? 2. How do contract interpretation issues arise? 3. What is the difference between subjective and objective intent?   4

Describe the evolution of health and safety legislation, Question 1: Mr...

Question 1: Mr Ben is the director of ABC Ltd. He wishes to know whether he has any responsibility under the OSHA regarding the presence of the following in his enterprise:

Illustrate the maintenance phase of policy process, Illustrate the Maintena...

Illustrate the Maintenance Phase of policy process a) Develop a plan for active maintenance and review Who will ensure that policies are actively maintained and reviewed? H

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd