case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Proxies - meetings and resolutions, PROXIES - meetings and resolutions: ...

PROXIES - meetings and resolutions: By S.136(1), any member of a company entitled to attend and vote at a meeting of the company shall be entitled to appoint one more person (

Find the murderer, Your first big case is a multiple murder. As defense att...

Your first big case is a multiple murder. As defense attorney for SyKopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them

When do property, QUESTION 1 (a) What are the ways in which a contract ...

QUESTION 1 (a) What are the ways in which a contract may be terminated? (b) Elaborate on two of them QUESTION 2 When do property, risk and title pass in a contract?

Goods - sales of goods, Goods - Sales of Goods Even if "goods" like in c...

Goods - Sales of Goods Even if "goods" like in common parlance has like the Act has given the word such technical meaning. Whether it provides like; "goods" consist of "all chat

Forms of action, Forms of action: A minority of shareholders or an ind...

Forms of action: A minority of shareholders or an individual shareholder suing under one of the above exceptions may institute one of the following actions i) A personal ac

Taxtation law, Question 6 Indicate any amounts from these transactions tha...

Question 6 Indicate any amounts from these transactions that is assessable income for the 2016/17 tax year. (a) Frida is a resident taxpayer employed by Sharpe Office Supplies. Sh

State the term- gains from policy coordination, Gains from Policy Coordinat...

Gains from Policy Coordination The previous section has illustrated how large countries typically face positive or negative spill over effects associated with aggregate demand

Liquidators and receivers, Liquidators and Receivers: The distinction ...

Liquidators and Receivers: The distinction between liquidators and receivers must be kept clear: (a) a receiver is a representative of secured creditors appointed by them (

Determine the term - games nations play, Games nations play Game analog...

Games nations play Game analogy can be used to get the idea because the principal players, states reject any higher authority. Each state, take any player in a competitive game

Undischarged bankrupts, Undischarged Bankrupts: S.188 provides that if...

Undischarged Bankrupts: S.188 provides that if an undischarged bankrupt acts as director of any company without leave of the court he shall be liable to imprisonment for a ter

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd