User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Determine the term - real income effects, Determine the term - Real Income ...

Determine the term - Real Income Effects This linkage between countries takes place through the current account of the balance of payments. It occurs when a change in one count

Group accounts, Group Accounts: S.150(1) provides that if, at the end ...

Group Accounts: S.150(1) provides that if, at the end of its financial year, a company has subsidiaries, then it must include in its annual accounts "group accounts" dealing w

Issue of restraining order services , Sub: Filing Divorce and Issue of Rest...

Sub: Filing Divorce and Issue of Restraining order services Dear Kimberly Frederick Bumfree, Warm Greetings from Donald & Matthews Law firm, This letter is for your imme

Function of the registered office, Function of the Registered Office: ...

Function of the Registered Office:                          Section 107(1) provides that a company shall, as from the day on which it begins to carry on business or as from th

Principles applicable regarding the unjustified termination, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 (i) What are the principles applicable regarding the unjustified termination of a contract of employment (ii) What would be your views regarding the legal issues

Administrative function of chief justice, Administrative Function of Chief ...

Administrative Function of Chief Justice Where, he is the principal administrative officer of the judiciary And where, he is the chairman of the Judicial Service Commi

Redemption of shares, Redemption of Shares: Section 60 (1) empowers a ...

Redemption of Shares: Section 60 (1) empowers a company limited by shares to issue preference shares that are, or may be at the option of the company are to be liable, to be r

How to explain the apparent lack of expressions, How to explain the apparen...

How to explain the apparent lack of expressions There are several ways to explain the apparent lack of expressions of the impacts. In fact, there are arguments that political

Cross agency actions - addressing phoenix activity, Q. Cross agency actions...

Q. Cross agency actions - addressing phoenix activity? the ASIC, ATO and FWO all have responsibilities in investigating and monitoring elements of phoenix activity. This means

When is an employer vicariously liable, When is an employer vicariously lia...

When is an employer vicariously liable? An employer is vicariously liable when: a. When Employer authorised. b. When unauthorised procedure utilized when executing an aut

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd