User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Discuss alternative dispute resolution, QUESTION 1 Nowadays, many peopl...

QUESTION 1 Nowadays, many people are opting for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a means to settle commercial disputes due to its advantages. Discuss QUESTION 2

Consideration must move from the promise - law of contract, Consideration m...

Consideration must move from the promise - Law of Contract Conversely the rule that "consideration must move from the promisee" means such only a person who has personally giv

Liquidators powers, Liquidators' Powers:                              ...

Liquidators' Powers:                                       The liquidator (in any type of liquidation) has numerous statutory powers but in the exercise of some of them he mus

Information in agenda setting, Information in Agenda Setting What infor...

Information in Agenda Setting What information, how and when reaches to voters to proposal, is also a detrimental factor in policy process. The degree to which information is c

Define the strategic voting and policy process, Define the Strategic Voting...

Define the Strategic Voting and Policy Process Now we take up an important issue with respect to policy process. In standard models, where a single vote is taken directly as re

The role of expectation of winning the election, The role of expectation of...

The role of expectation of winning the election The role of expectation, of possibility of winning the election and of policy convergence on choice of agenda. In standard mode

Important resolutions which have great impact of terrorism, Two very import...

Two very important resolutions which had a great impact on description of terrorism UNSC has also declared incitement as an offence. The interpretation of terrorism formulated

Function of the court, Function of the Court: In Scottish Insurance Co...

Function of the Court: In Scottish Insurance Corporation Ltd v. Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co. Lord Simmons stated: "But important though its task is to see that the procedure by

Representative action, Representative action: Where individual shareho...

Representative action: Where individual shareholders have suffered personal loss in addition to the injury to the company one shareholder may bring a representative action on

Wbp, what is wbp? and its danger and benefits ? components of wbp?

what is wbp? and its danger and benefits ? components of wbp?

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd