User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

The international court of justice, The International Court of Justice ...

The International Court of Justice The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued a legal opinion on the legality of nuclear weapons, which says that the threat or use of forc

How many types of immunities are there, There are various types of immunit...

There are various types of immunities, such as; The diplomatic immunity, Immunities of international organizations, Sovereign of state immunity and Acts of state doctr

Effect of registration, Effect of Registration: S.16(2) of the Act pro...

Effect of Registration: S.16(2) of the Act provides that "from the date of incorporation mentioned in the certificate of incorporation the subscribers to the memorandum of a

Unwritten sources , UNWRITTEN SOURCES OF ENGLAND LAW: However common l...

UNWRITTEN SOURCES OF ENGLAND LAW: However common law may be illustrated as that branch of the law of England that was developed through the English courts on the basis of the

Case, Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold ...

Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of thes

Write briefly on two types of ppp, Question 1: Public Private Partnersh...

Question 1: Public Private Partnership (PPP) means investment through private sector participation by a contractual arrangement between a procuring entity and a private sector

Law of employment, Unique Vespa Couriers Pty Ltd ('UVC') is a courier compa...

Unique Vespa Couriers Pty Ltd ('UVC') is a courier company operating in the Melbourne metropolitan area.  Where most courier companies used bicycle couriers, UVC used vespas.  They

Dishonour by non-acceptance, Dishonour by Non-Acceptance The drawee is...

Dishonour by Non-Acceptance The drawee is not prepared to meet the bill, such he will return it for the holder by means of a note to this effect, such the bill is then so said

Assignment of share in partnership, Assignment of Share in Partnership ...

Assignment of Share in Partnership Whereas as has been stated, never new partner may be bring in without the consent of all other partners as well like accordingly no partner

Resolution for the variation - statutory provisions, Resolution for the var...

Resolution for the variation - Statutory provisions: Where any application is made pursuant to this provision, the variation shall not have effect unless and until it is confi

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd