case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

What is the effect of smuggling and distribution of drugs, What is the effe...

What is the effect of smuggling and distribution of drugs International Criminal Law does not refer to the traditional crimes like murder and theft. A crime of an international

Tort law and employment law, Tort law and Employment law: Pat, a build...

Tort law and Employment law: Pat, a builder, is an employee of Tom's. One day on site the scaffolding that Pat is standing on collapses and he suffers personal injuries. The s

The essential requirements of a valid asset protection trust, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 Discuss the position in UK with respect to the Capital Maintenance Doctrine. QUESTION 2 (i) What are the essential requirements of a valid Asset Protection T

Examples of laws that were created to force ethical behavior, 1. Sometimes ...

1. Sometimes laws are created that are done for ethical reasons. For instance, it is wrong to pollute, so Congress passed the Environmental Protection Act, which punished those tha

Ethical issue, what ethical issue relate to nuclear energy industry

what ethical issue relate to nuclear energy industry

Dividends - alteration of capital, DIVIDENDS: As a commercial term, th...

DIVIDENDS: As a commercial term, the word "dividends" has a variable meaning which depends on the context in which it is used. For purposes of company law, it denotes the paym

How can consent be vitiated in relation to contracts, QUESTION 1 (a) Wh...

QUESTION 1 (a) What are the essential elements for a valid contract as stipulated by article 1108 of the Civil Code (CCM)? (b) How can consent be vitiated in relation to con

Statutory power - mergers and winding up, Statutory power - mergers and win...

Statutory power - mergers and winding up: It is usual to proceed under s.207 as there are technical difficulties over s.300 procedure.  The liquidator's powers to reach a comp

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd