case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Determine the role of policy entrepreneurs, Determine the role of Policy en...

Determine the role of Policy entrepreneurs These couplings are made, Kingdon argues that policy "entrepreneurs" brokers or middlemen, known as Policy entrepreneurs, play a key

State article 2 of universal declaration of human rights, State Article 2 o...

State Article 2 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 2: 'Everyone is  entitled  to  the rights and freedoms set  forth in  this Declaration...' - This clause iden

Empowers directors - company management, Empowers directors - company manag...

Empowers directors - company management: In the case of companies which have adopted Table A, Article 107 empowers directors to appoint a managing director "for such period an

Invented case, a) Sometime in the mid 21st century the Jones-Markus experim...

a) Sometime in the mid 21st century the Jones-Markus experiment attempted to create a capuchin monkey with human intelligence. The experiment, however, outdid its intentions by se

Trading arrangements, Trading arrangements: From this statement, it ca...

Trading arrangements: From this statement, it can be inferred that, if a court held that a company acted in a particular instance as an agent of its holding company, the veil

Directors liability, Directors liability: This was fraudulent preferen...

Directors liability: This was fraudulent preference and the bank must repay the sums received. The directors' liability under their guarantee to the bank then revived. A paym

State the royal assent for the procedure of parliamentary, State the royal ...

State the royal assent for the procedure of parliamentary. The Royal Assent: It is specified when the Bill has passes by both Houses successfully and is usually simply fo

Meaning of oppression, MEANING OF "OPPRESSION":                    The...

MEANING OF "OPPRESSION":                    The Section does not define the word "oppression" or what constitutes "oppressive conduct".  However, the Cohen Committee's Report

Find out the elements of the tort, 1. Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court ar...

1. Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court are appointed for life. Unless they choose to retire, they have the right to remain in office and cannot be removed by congress or by the Pres

Show the criminal conduct definition of phoenix activity, Q. Show the Crimi...

Q. Show the Criminal conduct definition of phoenix activity? Master Builders argued that the definition of phoenix activity should focus on the existing sections of corporation

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd