User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Discuss how the law deals with computer crime, Question 1: (a) A contra...

Question 1: (a) A contract is valid as soon as the parties agree on its terms. According to you, is this statement correct? Justify your answer with the relevant enactment/cas

Rules relating to an offer - law of contract, Rules Relating to an Offer - ...

Rules Relating to an Offer - Law of Contract However the case law relating to an offer has established the following rules: 1. Such offer may be oral plus written or may be

Code of ethics and audit standards, You are an audit manager in Ecco & Co, ...

You are an audit manager in Ecco & Co, a firm of Chartered Accountants. At the monthly audit managers' meeting, the following client situation was reviewed and discussed. Ecco &

Define the meaning of lobbyists, Define the meaning of Lobbyists Lobbyi...

Define the meaning of Lobbyists Lobbyists place a premium on information. While framing their arguments; they often turn to research and analysis that supports the case they ar

Explain the right of self determination, Explain the right of self determin...

Explain the right of self determination The right of self determination amounts to an exception in the sense that when fighting for self determination, the state can render as

The law making process of primary legislation in mauritius, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 Interpreting legislation is a very important function of the Court. However, Judges must only have recourse to the intention of parliament while interpreting legisla

Explain the term chain of custody, QUESTION Chain of custody in eviden...

QUESTION Chain of custody in evidence collection is a very important document when it comes to presenting a computer forensic case in the court of law i. Explain the term c

Service of notice - meetings and resolutions, Service of Notice: Secti...

Service of Notice: Section 134 (a) provides that, unless the articles of the company make other provision in that behalf, notice of the meeting of a company shall be served on

What is the meaning of redundancy, Question 1: (a) What do you meant by...

Question 1: (a) What do you meant by the term misconduct in employment law. How does the English definition of misconduct differ from the French definition of misconduct? (b

What must the claimant show to succeed, What must the claimant show to succ...

What must the claimant show to succeed? The claimant should show the given issues, for a case to succeed: a. There was a duty of care. b. There was breach of such duty.

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd