case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

International law is a law or not, Q. International law is a law or not? ...

Q. International law is a law or not? It is debatable whether international law is a law or not. Law is defined as rules established by a governing authority to institute and m

Determine in detail about the credibility factor, Determine in detail about...

Determine in detail about the credibility factor Let us consider, 'credibility' factor. The law, institutions and other created authorities lead to circumstances that can assur

Global competitiveness of firms, Question 1 Briefly explain: (i) Des...

Question 1 Briefly explain: (i) Describe Business ethics. (ii) Illustrate caveat emptor. (iii) Define corporate governance. (iv) What is whistle blowing? (v) D

Law and morality, Law and Morality: Since morality contain of prescrip...

Law and Morality: Since morality contain of prescriptions of the society and is not enforceable, hence rules of law are enforceable.  However wrongs in society are contraventi

Explain ensuring good corporate governance, QUESTION 1 What measures do...

QUESTION 1 What measures do you consider important in ensuring good corporate governance? Explain why QUESTION 2 Explain the nature of the relationship among a bank and

Managing director - company management, Managing Director: In Ellis v ...

Managing Director: In Ellis v Bailey and Company (East Africa) Limited (76) it was stated that "without specific authority in the articles directors may not appoint one of the

Distribution of surplus assets, Distribution of Surplus Assets: If the...

Distribution of Surplus Assets: If the debts are paid in full the liquidator should apply what remains in repayment of capital paid on shares and then distribute any residue t

Explain the principles of tort law, QUESTION 1 With reference to the rel...

QUESTION 1 With reference to the relevant articles of the Mauritian Civil Code, explain the principles of tort law QUESTION 2 An employer should ensure the well being of a

Penalty for improper appointment, PENALTY FOR IMPROPER APPOINTMENT:  ...

PENALTY FOR IMPROPER APPOINTMENT:           S.161 (4) provides that if any unqualified person is appointed as auditor, the person appointed, the company and every officer i

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd