case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

What are the sources of labour laws, Question 1: (a) Discuss the pow...

Question 1: (a) Discuss the powers and duties of the employer under the Employment Rights Act 2008? (b) Discuss the powers and duties of the worker under the Employme

Analyse the extent of the criminal liability, One night Mr Kokintou and Ms ...

One night Mr Kokintou and Ms Mangetou, entered into a housethrough a window which was negligently left open by the owner of the house.  Whilst Ms Mangetou was keeping guard at the

What is the meaning of flexible exchange rates, What is the Flexible Exchan...

What is the Flexible Exchange Rates With a fully flexible exchange rate adjustment toward the long run equilibrium occurs via a change in relative prices. This effect is shown

Jurisdiction - court of appeal, Jurisdiction - Court of Appeal Howev...

Jurisdiction - Court of Appeal However S.64 (1) of the Constitution gives that the Court of Appeal 'shall have such jurisdiction and the powers in relative to appeals from t

Shares issued at a premium, Shares Issued At A Premium: A company may ...

Shares Issued At A Premium: A company may at times issue its shares at a price above their nominal value, i.e at a premium. This may be necessitated by the fact that the compa

Contents and form of accounts - accounts and audit, Contents and Form of Ac...

Contents and Form of Accounts - Accounts and audit: By s.149(1), every balance sheet shall give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company as at the end of it

Business law for commercial transactions, (These are short answer assignmen...

(These are short answer assignments; just a few paragraphs for each part is all that is required) Assignment 1: Discussion Questions In this assignment, you will research and appl

When is an employer vicariously liable, When is an employer vicariously lia...

When is an employer vicariously liable? An employer is vicariously liable when: a. When Employer authorised. b. When unauthorised procedure utilized when executing an aut

Discuss the role of policy maker, Discuss the role of policy maker A po...

Discuss the role of policy maker A policy maker, who focuses mainly on the possibility of remaining in the office, faces different set of incentives in choosing policy. He trie

What are the limitations on economic rights, Question 1: (a) What are t...

Question 1: (a) What are the considerations that apply for a computer contract? (b) How is Industrial Property protected in Mauritius? Question 2: Explain the princi

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd