case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

How evidence is used to prove a criminal offence, how evidence is used to p...

how evidence is used to prove a criminal offence: This question is asking you to consider the importance of evidence, how it is used and how reliable it may be in supporting

Complaints made against the auditors, Complaints made against the auditors:...

Complaints made against the auditors: These are the most simple principles that such have to be applied to cases of this description. I protest, however, against the notion

Employer pay severance allowance to his employee, QUESTION 1 What are t...

QUESTION 1 What are the consequences of a unilateral modification of a contract of employment of indeterminate duration by an employer? QUESTION 2 (a) In what circumsta

Policies which reduce energy supplies, 1. Indicate whether the following st...

1. Indicate whether the following statements are true or false and briefly explain your answer. a. Actions by government to increase spending and by the central bank to increase

The provisions of the law relating to a lost bill of exchang, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 (a) By referring to the features documentary credits, explain how such an instrument can enhance and facilitate business activities (b) Discuss the applicability

Theory of contract law, Mary has just graduated from LIM College and is in ...

Mary has just graduated from LIM College and is in an interview with ABC Design Firm.  ABC employees several talented designers that work with ABC retail clients to design lines of

Obligations of the employer and the employee, Question 1: Constructive ...

Question 1: Constructive dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who necessarily takes the initiative in considering the contract

Classification of companies, Classification of Companies: Section 389 ...

Classification of Companies: Section 389 of the Companies Act provides that "no company there association or may partnership consisting of more than twenty persons shall be fo

Describe the term banking, Question1 Describe the term banking and what ar...

Question1 Describe the term banking and what are the permitted businesses for a banking company as per BR Act 1949 Question2 When is a negotiable instrument considered as

Loans to directors, Loans to Directors: Section 191(1) renders unlawfu...

Loans to Directors: Section 191(1) renders unlawful any loan made by a company to a director of the company or its holding company. It is also unlawful for the company to guar

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd