case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Case law - statutory provisions, CASE LAW:    The aforesaid statutory ...

CASE LAW:    The aforesaid statutory provisions for the protection of minorities have been supplemented by judicial intervention in a variety of cases which are generally expl

Shares issued at a premium, Shares Issued At A Premium: A company may ...

Shares Issued At A Premium: A company may at times issue its shares at a price above their nominal value, i.e at a premium. This may be necessitated by the fact that the compa

General Partner - Liability of Partners, General Partner - Liability of Par...

General Partner - Liability of Partners The General partner's liability extends for the whole of the debts to the partnership. Thus he is jointly with the other partners. Conv

What are usually accepted principles of corporate governance, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 (a) What are usually accepted principles of corporate governance. (b) What factors can lead to incrising corruption in the business environment? QUESTION 2

Spill over effects of monetary policy, Spill over Effects of Monetary Polic...

Spill over Effects of Monetary Policy There are three broad ways in which aggregate demand policies in one country can spillover to affect another country. These are the real i

What are the obligations of the employer, Question 1: Constructive dism...

Question 1: Constructive dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who takes the initiative in considering the contract as having be

Explain ihl prohibitions, Important to observe that IHL prohibitions It...

Important to observe that IHL prohibitions It is important to  observe that  IHL prohibitions should be identified and followed as  their violations/breach may be considered as

Problem question, how do i answer a problem question in law base on the law...

how do i answer a problem question in law base on the law of contract for final assesment

Classification of companies, Classification of Companies: Section 389 ...

Classification of Companies: Section 389 of the Companies Act provides that "no company there association or may partnership consisting of more than twenty persons shall be fo

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd