User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Country strategy in harmonising national, Country Strategy in harmonising n...

Country Strategy in harmonising national It is proposed that the OMC should enhance the role of such Country Strategy in harmonising national and EC aid programmes. The OMC wi

Possessory lien, Possessory Lien Possessory Lien right of a party in p...

Possessory Lien Possessory Lien right of a party in possession about anothers goods to retain like the m as security about an obligation owned as in the owner.  Therefore the

Three main categories of international humanitarian laws, There are three m...

There are three main categories of international humanitarian laws: 1) The Hague conventions 2) The Geneva conventions 3) The additional protocols

Discuss the trial period in a contract of employment, Question 1: "Le C...

Question 1: "Le Coco" is a well known hotel located on the north coast of Mauritius. Mr. B, a client of "Le Coco" hotel, was injured after a short heated argument with another

Criminal law, Criminal Law: However criminal law has been defined as t...

Criminal Law: However criminal law has been defined as the law of crimes.  So a crime has been defined just like an act or omission or committed, omitted in violation of publi

What are parliamentary procedures for passing legislation, What are parliam...

What are parliamentary procedures for passing legislation? Parliamentary procedure for passing legislation: A statute can simply be part of law while this has passed the

Partnerships, Partnerships:                A partnership is defined by...

Partnerships:                A partnership is defined by s.3(1) of the Partnership Act   as "the relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with

Transfer of immovable property, Transfer of Immovable Property By S.54...

Transfer of Immovable Property By S.54 Property Act, 1882 as Note: This Act is applicable in the US requires that a transfer of immovable property worth over as 100 rupees mus

Contracts illegal at the common law, Contracts illegal at the common law ...

Contracts illegal at the common law However a contract which is prohibited through the common law is frequently described as being as "contrary to public policy" as i.e. the c

Describe about the policy agenda setting, Describe about the Policy Agenda ...

Describe about the Policy Agenda Setting Agenda setting under direct democracy. Agenda setting concerns to the rules on the grounds of which policy proposals come up for a vote

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd