case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Types of goods - sales of goods, Types oF Goods - Sales of Goods Furth...

Types oF Goods - Sales of Goods Further the Act classifies goods into: like; (i) Specific Goods Whether specific goods are "goods" like are acknowledged and agreed on

Who is liable to income tax?, QUESTION 1 Discuss the legal relationship...

QUESTION 1 Discuss the legal relationship between a bank and its customer with reference to the responsibilities of the parties towards each other QUESTION 2 (a) Examin

Give five differences between law and ethics, QUESTION (a) In scientifi...

QUESTION (a) In scientific ethics, list four fundamental principles of scientific research? (b) Give five differences between law and ethics (c) When does a ‘Conflict of

Provisions of the employment relations act, Francis is the newly elected ...

Francis is the newly elected chairperson of Boat House Services Union (BHSU) which represents 70% of workers at Boat House Services Ltd. BHSU is registered and holds a registra

Non-payment of cheques, Non-Payment of Cheques A banker's authority ab...

Non-Payment of Cheques A banker's authority about pay a cheque that will be determined or that terminated through: like; (a) Countermand of payment, below s.75 (a). the Act

Explain about the tort of negligence, Explain about the tort of negligence....

Explain about the tort of negligence. A form of civil wrong where a contract doesn’t exist among the two parties and this is not a crime where punishment is the major goal to t

Rules for purchase of own shares, Rules for Purchase of own shares: So...

Rules for Purchase of own shares: So now next despite the rule in Trevor V Whitworth a company may purchase or acquire its own shares in the following cases: a) Where it ac

Effective collective bargaining, Question 1: (i) Explain clearly the d...

Question 1: (i) Explain clearly the difference between Individual Bargaining and Collective Bargaining highlighting with examples the contexts in which each of them applies.

International law relating to air and outer space, International law relati...

International law relating to air and outer space International law relating to air and outer space is an extensive and important area. It regulates at global level and its si

Contracts of guarantee, Contracts of Guarantee However a contract of g...

Contracts of Guarantee However a contract of guarantee or suretyship is such a contract through one person to answer that for the debt, such default or miscarriage of another.

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd