User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Personal property security act, You act for Fred who is the secured lending...

You act for Fred who is the secured lending manager of BigBank. He has a troublesome customer, Macs Tires Pty Ltd. This is a family run tire business with three directors. The prin

Directors liability, Directors liability: This was fraudulent preferen...

Directors liability: This was fraudulent preference and the bank must repay the sums received. The directors' liability under their guarantee to the bank then revived. A paym

Capacity - sales of goods, Capacity - Sales of goods Through S.4 (1) p...

Capacity - Sales of goods Through S.4 (1) provides such capacity to buy and to sell is governed through the natural law concerning capacity for contract. Although where necess

Determine the schemes of michael mandelbaum, Determine the schemes of Micha...

Determine the schemes of Michael Mandelbaum Michael Mandelbaum has offered a two fold scheme, the inside-out and outside-in approach. According to inside-out approach, a natio

Explain ensuring good corporate governance, QUESTION 1 What measures do...

QUESTION 1 What measures do you consider important in ensuring good corporate governance? Explain why QUESTION 2 Explain the nature of the relationship among a bank and

Determine in detail about the credibility factor, Determine in detail about...

Determine in detail about the credibility factor Let us consider, 'credibility' factor. The law, institutions and other created authorities lead to circumstances that can assur

Defects in appointment - company management, Defects in Appointment: S...

Defects in Appointment: S.181 provides that a director's acts shall be valid despite any defect that may afterwards be discovered in his appointment or qualification. This pro

When is an employer not vicariously liable, When is an employer not vicario...

When is an employer not vicariously liable? An employer is not vicariously liable when: a. Worker is doing something in working hours as of a personal nature. b. She or h

What do you understand by collective bargaining, Question 1: (A) What...

Question 1: (A) What do you understand by Collective Bargaining? (B) What is collective bargaining from: (I) The economic point of view

Intent to defraud the italian creditor, Intent to defraud the Italian credi...

Intent to defraud the Italian creditor: The company owed money to trade creditors and also had outstanding against it a large claim for breach of contract which it disputed (t

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd