User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Creation of a legally binding contract, Question 1: Define and explain ...

Question 1: Define and explain the essential conditions for the creation of a legally binding contract. You may attempt this question in French. Question 2: "Law is

State the international policy coordination, State the International Policy...

State the International Policy Coordination There may be two sources of interdependence between national economic policies, club goods and horizontal spill overs. The first has

State about the median voter theorem, State about the Median Voter Theorem ...

State about the Median Voter Theorem Percentage of vote necessary for a proposal to be adopted, remember Median Voter Theorem, will affect the difficult of adopting a proposal,

Theoretical foundations of international policy coordination, Theoretical f...

Theoretical foundations of international policy coordination Policy process more from a domestic perspective. If a country is small one can assume away any spillover effects th

Online exam in Business Law, #questonline exam of business law about 20 qes...

#questonline exam of business law about 20 qestions ( T and F , MC, and short answers ) The exam will open just for two hours The exam will start half of hour from now >> can yo

Ways which affect the behaviour of the policy maker, Ways which affect the ...

Ways which affect the behaviour of the policy maker There may be at least three ways this uncertainty may affect the behaviour of the policy maker. a) He may chose mainly th

Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions, Purpose of the rule: It ha...

Purpose of the rule: It has been stated by various English judges that without the rule in Foss v Harbottle (i)            There would be futile actions.  A court order

Requisites of acceptance - rules relating to acceptance, Requisites of Acce...

Requisites of Acceptance - Rules Relating To Acceptance Section number S.17 (2) provides like an acceptance is invalid unless since it complies with the following conditions:

Teleological approach to client representation- case, Bobby K is pursuing t...

Bobby K is pursuing the teleological approach to client representation, meaning that the result is all he's after - case closed! Not exactly a win-win but a "settlement" and closur

Winding-up, Winding-Up:    (a) A company is dissolved, i.e. ceases t...

Winding-Up:    (a) A company is dissolved, i.e. ceases to exist, when its name is removed from the register.  It is usually necessary, before it can be dissolved, to liquida

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd