User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Disadvantages of stare decisis , Disadvantages of Stare Decisis Over...

Disadvantages of Stare Decisis Over-subtlety or Artificiality However a judge is forced, but it were follow an earlier case that, his conscience may preclude him from

Determine in detail about the credibility factor, Determine in detail about...

Determine in detail about the credibility factor Let us consider, 'credibility' factor. The law, institutions and other created authorities lead to circumstances that can assur

Interpersonal relationships in comprehensive awareness , Interpersonal Rela...

Interpersonal Relationships Entrepreneurs are more concerned with people's accomplishments than with their feelings. They generally avoid becoming personally involved and

Business Law and Ethics, A Black Firefighter alleges that each time he is t...

A Black Firefighter alleges that each time he is transferred from one fire station to another, he must take his bed with him, on orders of the fire chief. The chief defends on the

What are the limitations on economic rights, Question 1: (a) What are t...

Question 1: (a) What are the considerations that apply for a computer contract? (b) How is Industrial Property protected in Mauritius? Question 2: Explain the princi

Illustrate the economic and social council of united nations, Illustrate th...

Illustrate the Economic and Social Council of United Nations. UN Economic and Social Council: The Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) functions as the central forum for

Lanuzzi v. Phillip Morris_IRAC, Mrs. Lanuzzi began smoking in 1951 when she...

Mrs. Lanuzzi began smoking in 1951 when she was fifteen. She smoked two packs a day until her death from lung cancer in 1984. She had tried several times, unsuccessfully, to quit.

Extraordinary universal meetings, Extraordinary Universal Meetings: S....

Extraordinary Universal Meetings: S.132(1) provides for the convening of "extraordinary" general meeting but does not define it.  Neither is the word "extraordinary" defined i

District magistrate''s court - criminal jurisdiction, District Magistrate's...

District Magistrate's Court - Criminal Jurisdiction However Statute Law like as Miscellaneous Amendments Act 1983 amended the criminal jurisdiction of district magistrate's co

Calls on contributories, Calls On Contributories:                     ...

Calls On Contributories:                                       Every person who is a member of the company at the commencement of winding up and every past member is in princi

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd