case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Indicators of phoenix activity, Indicators of phoenix activity Stakehold...

Indicators of phoenix activity Stakeholders noted that there are a range of 'signals' or 'indicators' that phoenix activity may be about to occur. These generally occur before t

State the advantage of the information on the legislature, Advantage of the...

Advantage of the information on the legislature The main result was that voters take advantage of the information on the legislature - executive trade-offs in policy process. W

Committal stage - reading, Committal Stage: In this such order 103 off...

Committal Stage: In this such order 103 offers that a Bill having been read a second moment shall stand committed to a committee of the Whole House, unless the House commits t

Briefly outline the role of the state in employee relations, Question 1: ...

Question 1: (a) Briefly outline the role of the State in Employee Relations. (b) Write short notes on any three of the following: (i) The Ministry of Labour and Industrial

Purchase of shares - voidable contracts, Purchase of Shares - Voidable Cont...

Purchase of Shares - Voidable Contracts However an infant who applies to is allotted, a company's shares becomes a member to the company under S.28 (2) for the Companies Act f

Jurisdiction - high court, Jurisdiction - High Court Whether under Sec...

Jurisdiction - High Court Whether under Section 60 of the constitution states in which the High Court shall have 'unlimited original jurisdiction in civil and the criminal mat

Commercial Law, Silcraze City Council owns and operates a Gym. It charges $...

Silcraze City Council owns and operates a Gym. It charges $20 per month as membership fees. On the Gym Membership Card it is written that the Cardholder has the right to use all th

Consideration must move from the promise - law of contract, Consideration m...

Consideration must move from the promise - Law of Contract Conversely the rule that "consideration must move from the promisee" means such only a person who has personally giv

Case law relating to dividends, Case Law Relating To Dividends: The ab...

Case Law Relating To Dividends: The above provisions of Table A supplement the following common law rules: 1)      Losses in previous years need not be provided for. Furthe

General rules on statute-barred debts, General rules on statute-barred debt...

General rules on statute-barred debts: A statute-barred debt should be rejected since it is not legally enforceable.  But in a members' voluntary winding up the liquidator may

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd