case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Plan the disciplinary interview, Question: You are the manager of a res...

Question: You are the manager of a restaurant and receive a letter from a customer complaining about the quality of service and the rudeness of one member of your staff. You ha

Appointment of directors, Appointment of Directors: In the absence of ...

Appointment of Directors: In the absence of other provisions in a company's articles, the directors of the company would be appointed in accordance with the following provisio

State in brief about the term - nash equilibrium, State in brief about the ...

State in brief about the term - Nash equilibrium For the foreign country its reaction function cuts its indifference curves where they are vertical. Both these reaction functio

Law society of england, Law Society of England However the Law Society...

Law Society of England However the Law Society of England is a body corporate constituted through the Law Society of England Act.  Therefore its objects or functions are, amon

What are the functions of the commission for conciliation, Question 1: ...

Question 1: (a) Explain what you understand by the following legal terms under the Employment Relations Act - (i) Collective bargaining (ii) Collective agreement (iii

Synopsis, Who would think a documentary about the collapse of a mammoth cor...

Who would think a documentary about the collapse of a mammoth corporation could play out like a drama with the emotional power of Greek tragedy? But that is the impact of enroll:th

State article 14 of air and outer space law, State Article 14 of air and ou...

State Article 14 of air and outer space law Article 14 refers to the fact that each contracting State should agree to take effective measures to prevent the spread by means of

Misfeasance - winding up, Misfeasance: Under s.324, misfeasance procee...

Misfeasance: Under s.324, misfeasance proceedings may be instituted against a director, promoter, manager, liquidator or "officer" (including an auditor) of a company in liqui

Describe the definition of a valid contract, Question 1 It is significant ...

Question 1 It is significant for any person to know law as ignorance of law is no excuse. Modern USA law has been derived from some sources. Describe the primary and secondary sou

Protect intellectual property , Officials defended China's efforts to stop ...

Officials defended China's efforts to stop rampant copying of movies and other goods, saying Thursday that 4,322 people had been convicted of product piracy last year and promising

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd