case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Qualified acceptance, Qualified Acceptance It might be as the drawee is ...

Qualified Acceptance It might be as the drawee is prepared for accept the bill since only subject to some adjustment. Any type of acceptance which varies the effect of such a bi

Law assignment, hello.. iahve one business law assignment can you please gi...

hello.. iahve one business law assignment can you please give me quote?

Dismiss a worker for misconduct, Question 1: What are the procedures t...

Question 1: What are the procedures that an employer should follow before he will dismiss a worker for misconduct? Question 2: Section 39 of the Labour Act provides fo

Acceptance - law of contract, Acceptance - Law of Contract Converse...

Acceptance - Law of Contract Conversely an offer made to the general public can be established through anybody who fulfil that performs then the conditions stated therein.

Derivative action - statutory provisions, Derivative action: In Nurcom...

Derivative action: In Nurcombe v Nurcombe Lawton L J stated that a derivative action is a procedural device for enabling the court to do justice to a company controlled by mis

Question if business law, I am  Lauren Garcia, I have an order my assignmen...

I am  Lauren Garcia, I have an order my assignment, please answer me back here Describe what parts of business law are involved in the following scenario. What issues are invo

State article 2 of universal declaration of human rights, State Article 2 o...

State Article 2 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 2: 'Everyone is  entitled  to  the rights and freedoms set  forth in  this Declaration...' - This clause iden

Standard of proof in criminal cases, Standard of proof in criminal cases: ...

Standard of proof in criminal cases: Whenever the standard of proof in criminal cases is away from any reasonable doubt.  Further in the event of any reasonable doubt the accu

The restrictions imposed on locally incorporated banks, QUESTION (a) Th...

QUESTION (a) The new Guideline on Corporate Governance relates to the processes and structures that should be put in place in order to direct and manage the business and affair

Statutory task force on phoenix activity, Q. Statutory task force on phoeni...

Q. Statutory task force on phoenix activity? A long term option could be the establishment of a statutory task force on phoenix activity. This could be supported by all the rel

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd