User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Business law , Explain whether Mike should be excused from not performing u...

Explain whether Mike should be excused from not performing under the contract with Jim: Facts Mike ran an excavation business whereby he was contracted by builders to use his exca

Duty of an auditor, Duty of an auditor: The duty of an auditor general...

Duty of an auditor: The duty of an auditor generally was very carefully considered by this court in RE: LONDON AND GENERAL BANK (1895) and I cannot usefully add anything to wh

What is the use of reprisal, What is the use of reprisal the use of rep...

What is the use of reprisal the use of reprisal should also be categorized under the heading of the lawful use of force. It is defined as a counter action taken by a state to p

Subrogation - void contracts, Subrogation - Void Contracts       Howeve...

Subrogation - Void Contracts       However in Re National Permanent Benefit Building Society would the court stated that where an infant obtains a loan for necessaries and real

Assets and liabilities of the company, Assets and liabilities of the compan...

Assets and liabilities of the company: Within 14 days of the making of the order for winding up a statement of affairs must be delivered to the liquidator (Official Receiver)

Articles of partnership - authority of partners, Articles of Partnership - ...

Articles of Partnership - Authority of Partners The relations of partners to one other are governed through the Articles of Partnership.  Like third parties are not allowed fo

Avoidance of floating charges, Avoidance of Floating Charges: Under s....

Avoidance of Floating Charges: Under s.314 liquidation automatically renders void any floating charge created within the period of 12 months before commencement of liquidation

What are the obligations of the employer, Question 1: Constructive dism...

Question 1: Constructive dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who takes the initiative in considering the contract as having be

Show the criminal conduct definition of phoenix activity, Q. Show the Crimi...

Q. Show the Criminal conduct definition of phoenix activity? Master Builders argued that the definition of phoenix activity should focus on the existing sections of corporation

#title., What is hire purchase?

What is hire purchase?

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd