case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Repugnance to justice and morality, Repugnance to Justice and Morality ...

Repugnance to Justice and Morality However the customary law will be applied only whether it is not repugnant to justice and morality.Even though the Act needs the phrase "and

Transfer or passing of property - sales of goods, Transfer or Passing of Pr...

Transfer or Passing of Property - Sales of Goods Perhaps assuming like the seller has a right to sell the goods, so it like necessary to determine the precise moment the trans

Oppression of minorities, OPPRESSION OF  MINORITIES:                  ...

OPPRESSION OF  MINORITIES:                    7.3.1 Section 211 of the Act provides that any member of a company who complains that the affairs of the company are being conduc

Theories of international antitrust coordination, Theories of international...

Theories of international antitrust coordination We have come across various policy coordinations and adjustments but still there are other spheres of affairs where direct poli

Definitions of phoenix activity, phoenix activity involves "the evasion of ...

phoenix activity involves "the evasion of tax and other liabilities, such as employee entitlements, through the deliberate, systematic and sometimes cyclic liquidation of related c

Explain salient features of the constitution of mauritius, QUESTION 1 T...

QUESTION 1 The proliferation of tribunals, enquiries and quasi-judicial bodies constitutes the risk of a new type of despotism in running public affairs. How do the courts ensu

Synopsis, Who would think a documentary about the collapse of a mammoth cor...

Who would think a documentary about the collapse of a mammoth corporation could play out like a drama with the emotional power of Greek tragedy? But that is the impact of enroll:th

Explain universal jurisdiction of criminal jurisdiction, Explain Universal ...

Explain Universal jurisdiction of criminal jurisdiction It is concerned with the application of a State's criminal jurisdiction in respect of offences committed against the int

Realization of auditors, Realization of Auditors: it is a mere truism ...

Realization of Auditors: it is a mere truism to say that the value of loans and securities depends on their realization.  We were told that a statement to that effect, is so u

Variation of class rights, Variation of class rights: It is only neces...

Variation of class rights: It is only necessary to follow the variation of class rights procedure (and a dissenting minority can only apply to the court for cancellation)  if

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd