User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Rules for purchase of own shares, Rules for Purchase of own shares: So...

Rules for Purchase of own shares: So now next despite the rule in Trevor V Whitworth a company may purchase or acquire its own shares in the following cases: a) Where it ac

Determine the implications of the legislature, Determine the implications o...

Determine the implications of the legislature Policy outcomes are the result of legislative bargaining. So policy becomes a compromise between the executive and the legislature

Contracts of indemnity, Contracts of Indemnity Indemnity is the undert...

Contracts of Indemnity Indemnity is the undertaking about primary responsibility to see like a certain act is performed there.If a particular contractual promise such constitu

Contingent and prospective liabilities of the company, Contingent and prosp...

Contingent and prospective liabilities of the company: A creditor who petitions on grounds of the company's insolvency may rely on any of the following situations to show (as

Leases - voidable contracts, Leases - Voidable Contracts However a lea...

Leases - Voidable Contracts However a lease granted to an infant is binding on him unless he repudiates it then within a reasonable time after attaining the age for eighteen.

What is zone refining, Q. What is Zone Refining? This method is used to...

Q. What is Zone Refining? This method is used to obtain metals of very high purity. The basic principle involved in this process is similar to fractional crystallisation. A sma

Classification of companies, Classification of Companies: Section 389 ...

Classification of Companies: Section 389 of the Companies Act provides that "no company there association or may partnership consisting of more than twenty persons shall be fo

Purchaser assert, a) Under these facts, what claim could Purchaser assert i...

a) Under these facts, what claim could Purchaser assert if she begin a lawsuit?  State the name of the claim only.   b)   What would Purchaser argue is her basis for such cla

What are the features of the omc process, What are the features of the OMC ...

What are the features of the OMC process Participation is also seen as a central feature of the OMC process, especially if it is to be extended beyond 'top-down' to encompass '

How can an employee invoke constructive dismissal, Question 1: "Constru...

Question 1: "Constructive Dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who necessarily takes the initiative in considering the contrac

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd