User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Contributions of equity, Contributions of Equity Contributions of Equi...

Contributions of Equity Contributions of Equity as: Developed the so called maxims of equity and Provided additional remedies and Provided for the discovery of

Concepts of negligence and remoteness of damage in tort law, Question 1: ...

Question 1: Explain the main elements that constitute a valid contract. Question 2: Describe the concepts of negligence and remoteness of damage in tort law. Questi

Describe the policy making realities, Describe the policy making realities ...

Describe the policy making realities Rational models simply do not describe policy making realities. As policy actors seldom evaluate very many alternatives for action or compa

C.i.f. contacts - import and export trade, C.I.F. Contacts - Import and Exp...

C.I.F. Contacts - Import and Export Trade Therefore a c.i.f. like cost, insurance else freight whether contract is a contract for the sale of goods for be performed through the

Domicile of dependence, Domicile of Dependence Moreover this is the do...

Domicile of Dependence Moreover this is the domicile a person acquires by virtue of legal dependency. Hence it is determined through the domicile of the other person. Howev

Strong and weakness of acts of parliament, Strong and Weakness of Acts of P...

Strong and Weakness of Acts of Parliament: There an Act of Parliament may be said to possess the giving advantages: as; (i) Democratic in nature Now here it is democrati

Nemo dat quod non habet - sales of goods, Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet - Goods ...

Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet - Goods Therefore another common law maxim such applies to sale of goods is like "nemo dat quod non habet": whether a person cannot give such he does

What are the features of the omc process, What are the features of the OMC ...

What are the features of the OMC process Participation is also seen as a central feature of the OMC process, especially if it is to be extended beyond 'top-down' to encompass '

Possible proceeding under the fair work act, As part of this project, exper...

As part of this project, expert input was provided by employment law specialists Herbert Geer. Herbert Geer raised the possibility that the FWO could recover amounts lost by indivi

Negligence - statutory provisions, NEGLIGENCE: It is still uncertain w...

NEGLIGENCE: It is still uncertain whether damage caused by negligence can be brought under the heading of "fraud" for the purpose of the exception of "fraud on the minority."

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd