User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Election of chairman, ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN:           S.134(d) provide...

ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN:           S.134(d) provides that, unless the articles of a company contain a contrary provision, any member elected by the members present at a meeting m

Define the term - agenda amendments, Define the term - agenda amendments ...

Define the term - agenda amendments The solution to the above lies in the rules of policy or agenda amendments and the real weapon in the hands of the voter is their ability t

Commencement of business, Commencement of Business: Section III (1) pr...

Commencement of Business: Section III (1) provides that a public company which has issued a prospectus cannot commence business or exercise any borrowing powers unless:-

Ratio decidendi, Ratio Decidendi Conversely "ratio decidendi" of a cas...

Ratio Decidendi Conversely "ratio decidendi" of a case consists of the material facts of such case and the decision made through the judge on the basis of those facts.  So hen

Tort law and employment law, Tort law and Employment law: Pat, a build...

Tort law and Employment law: Pat, a builder, is an employee of Tom's. One day on site the scaffolding that Pat is standing on collapses and he suffers personal injuries. The s

Personal rights invaded - statutory provisions, Personal rights invaded: ...

Personal rights invaded:                    A shareholder may sue to protect from invasion their own individual rights as members.  This is illustrated by Pender v Lushington

Determine about the mundell-fleming model, Determine about the Mundell-Flem...

Determine about the Mundell-Fleming model The basic two country Mundell-Fleming model assumes that both countries are small. It is this assumption that we modify and assume in

What are parliamentary procedures for passing legislation, What are parliam...

What are parliamentary procedures for passing legislation? Parliamentary procedure for passing legislation: A statute can simply be part of law while this has passed the

Strong and weakness of acts of parliament, Strong and Weakness of Acts of P...

Strong and Weakness of Acts of Parliament: There an Act of Parliament may be said to possess the giving advantages: as; (i) Democratic in nature Now here it is democrati

Suing and being sued, Suing and being Sued:            Because a compa...

Suing and being Sued:            Because a company is at law a different person altogether from its members it follows that a wrong to, or by, the company does not legally con

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd