User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Explain international law on sir creek issue, Explain International law on ...

Explain International law on sir creek issue The issue concerning Sir Creek is of great importance for both India and Pakistan. The dispute does not concern the division betwee

Agency, John owns a 1951 Mercedes Sl that he wishes to sell. He instructs R...

John owns a 1951 Mercedes Sl that he wishes to sell. He instructs Ross to sell the car, and in return, will be paid £5,000 commission. Ross manages to find a buyer, Paul, Paul and

Law of agency - lawful rules, Law of Agency - Lawful Rules Though the ...

Law of Agency - Lawful Rules Though the law of agency prescribes the lawful rules to ascertaining as:           (a) How a person possibly will become an agent; and one is

Casual appointments - company management, Casual Appointments:  Articl...

Casual Appointments:  Article 95 permits the board of directors to fill a vacancy in the board or to get an additional director to join the board for practical reasons provide

Nemo dat quod non habet - sales of goods, Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet - Goods ...

Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet - Goods Therefore another common law maxim such applies to sale of goods is like "nemo dat quod non habet": whether a person cannot give such he does

Case briefing - instructions and guidelines, EXPLAINING THE PURPOSE OF THE ...

EXPLAINING THE PURPOSE OF THE CB ASSIGNMENTS An essential part of understanding the law is being able to read, digest, and synthesize legal cases (also referred to as case law o

Effect of voluntary winding up, Effect of Voluntary Winding Up: The ma...

Effect of Voluntary Winding Up: The main difference in legal consequences between a compulsory and voluntary winding up are: (a) A voluntary winding up commences on the day

Rights of co-guarantors, Rights of co-guarantors among themselves A guar...

Rights of co-guarantors among themselves A guarantor who that has paid more than his share below the guarantee is entitled such to contribution from his co-guarantors, although

Agency, Types of Agency

Types of Agency

Describe the main stages of money laundering, QUESTION 1 (a) Describe t...

QUESTION 1 (a) Describe the main stages of money laundering? (b) Is the current Mauritian Banking Act strong enough to protect depositors and maintain financial stability gi

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd