case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Assets in the possession of creditors, ASSETS IN THE POSSESSION OF CREDITOR...

ASSETS IN THE POSSESSION OF CREDITORS:  If the creditor has seized assets in the course of executing a judgement for debt against the company and at the commencement of the wi

Fundamentals of public health law, Fundamentals of Public Health Law T...

Fundamentals of Public Health Law The Honorable Art Vandelay has been a member of the U.S. Congress for 10 years, representing the 12th District in South Caledonia. Through hi

Powerpoint presentation on ethics-sustainability and culture, I will provid...

I will provide a cases from the media that have ethical implications. Please prepare a ppt presentation that: a) describes the issue/story (Clearly identify which case you ar

Probabilities for various ratios, I am an executive being transferred from ...

I am an executive being transferred from my home city on the west coast to one in the Midwest. I know nothing about the city I'm moving to, but I have to buy a house there. Realtor

Provisions prevent capital going out of the company, Provisions Which Preve...

Provisions Which Prevent Capital Going Out Of The Company: In Trevor v Whitworth (1887) Lord Watson stated: "Paid-up capital may be diminished or lost in the course of the

Define the strategic voting and policy process, Define the Strategic Voting...

Define the Strategic Voting and Policy Process Now we take up an important issue with respect to policy process. In standard models, where a single vote is taken directly as re

Scheme at meeting - reconstructions, Scheme at meeting - reconstructions: ...

Scheme at meeting - reconstructions: Following approval of the scheme at meeting(s) application is made to the court for an order to approve and implement the scheme.  At this

Repugnance to justice and morality, Repugnance to Justice and Morality ...

Repugnance to Justice and Morality However the customary law will be applied only whether it is not repugnant to justice and morality.Even though the Act needs the phrase "and

Main advantages - mergers and winding up, Main advantages - mergers and win...

Main advantages - mergers and winding up: A scheme of arrangement under s.207 offers three main advantages: (a)     it can be used in circumstances to which s.210 and s.280

Case of bussiness law and ethics, Betty and Veronica always fell in lo...

Betty and Veronica always fell in love with the same men. Veronica got very jealous of Betty for stealing Archie away from her and decided to start sending her anonymous

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd