case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

#title., What is hire purchase?

What is hire purchase?

Describe five major types of employee rights, QUESTION 1 What are the i...

QUESTION 1 What are the individual and situational factors that influence ethical decision making in the workplace QUESTION 2 (a) How is unemployment socially distribut

Liability of incoming partners and death of a partner, Liability of Incomin...

Liability of Incoming Partners and Death of a Partner Liability of Incoming Partners However Unless a new partner makes a individual agreement to the effect such he wil

Rules for purchase of own shares, Rules for Purchase of own shares: So...

Rules for Purchase of own shares: So now next despite the rule in Trevor V Whitworth a company may purchase or acquire its own shares in the following cases: a) Where it ac

Issue of restraining order services , Sub: Filing Divorce and Issue of Rest...

Sub: Filing Divorce and Issue of Restraining order services Dear Kimberly Frederick Bumfree, Warm Greetings from Donald & Matthews Law firm, This letter is for your imme

Classification of companies, Classification of Companies: Section 389 ...

Classification of Companies: Section 389 of the Companies Act provides that "no company there association or may partnership consisting of more than twenty persons shall be fo

State the theories of self-enforcing, Theories of self-enforcing or implici...

Theories of self-enforcing or implicit contracts These theories relate to the problem of limits to which legal compulsion can be employed (due to information or transaction cos

Explain globalization and its relevance for business ethics, Question 1: ...

Question 1: (a) Explain the term Corporate Social Responsibility. Critically examine the moral responsibility of corporations towards their stakeholders. (b) Discuss the stre

Cross agency actions - addressing phoenix activity, Q. Cross agency actions...

Q. Cross agency actions - addressing phoenix activity? the ASIC, ATO and FWO all have responsibilities in investigating and monitoring elements of phoenix activity. This means

Usual procedure - shares of the minority, Usual procedure - shares of the m...

Usual procedure - shares of the minority: Hence the usual procedure is: (a)     first to dispose of possible objections by creditors by paying their debts or providing secu

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd