User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Explain about the codified systems, Explain about the codified systems. ...

Explain about the codified systems. Codified (civil law) systems: It is a rule based approach to law making and it is designed to give a comprehensive code of laws for th

Advantages - take-over bid, Advantages - Take-over bid: A non-acceptin...

Advantages - Take-over bid: A non-accepting shareholder who applies to the court to set aside the proposed compulsory acquisition of his shares under s.210 will fail unless he

Advise as conflict of interest, A is large property developer who is listed...

A is large property developer who is listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. B is a building contractor. A employed B in 2008 to build a large office complex comprising 3 towers

Trade unions - unincorporated associations, Trade Unions:             ...

Trade Unions:                   Trade Unions are registered under s.11 of the Trade Unions Act 1952 with the primary object of regulating the  relations between employees and

Remedies of the ultra vires lender, Remedies of the Ultra Vires Lender: ...

Remedies of the Ultra Vires Lender:                          In Sinclair v Brougham (26) the House of Lords explained that no action or suit lies at law or in equity to recove

Show the suggested actions to address phoenix activity, Q. Show the Suggest...

Q. Show the Suggested actions to address phoenix activity? There have been a range of options identified by previous works on phoenix activity, such as the Cole Inquiry and Tre

Mode of reduction - alteration of capital, Mode of Reduction: S.68 (1)...

Mode of Reduction: S.68 (1) expressly states that a company may reduce its capital "in any way". There is therefore no statutorily prescribed mode of reduction and the actual

Reduction of capital, Reduction of Capital:   4.1 The general rule ...

Reduction of Capital:   4.1 The general rule is that it is illegal for a company to reduce its capital. This is so because such a reduction would be tantamount to reducing

Explain international criminal court, Normal 0 false false ...

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

What are the important provisions of the statute of icj, What are  the imp...

What are  the important provisions of the Statute of ICJ Some of the important provisions of the Statute of ICJ are: Article 34 which states that only states and not the in

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd