case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

All spark-producing devices, Mrs. Rusholme occupied the firm of Saunders an...

Mrs. Rusholme occupied the firm of Saunders and Watts to refinish floors in assured rooms of a home owned by her and her husband in Red Deer, Alberta. She told Mr. Saunders that sh

Accuracy of the managers certificate, Accuracy of the managers certificate:...

Accuracy of the managers certificate: Was it the duty of the auditors to test the accuracy of the manager's certificate by a comparison of the figures in the books, and were t

Write short notes on the litteral rule, QUESTION (i) Write on the healt...

QUESTION (i) Write on the health and safety issues in the hospitality industry (ii) Describe the hierarchy of courts in Mauritius and explain what you understand by the doct

Prepare tax memo , Patriot, Inc (a C corporation) filed for Chapter 11 bank...

Patriot, Inc (a C corporation) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection during August, 2011 and has worked out a re-organization plan that was accepted by the Bankruptcy Court an

Recognition of government, Recognition of government It relates to reco...

Recognition of government It relates to recognition of a government of a particular State as the legitimate representative of the people of that country. The recognition of gov

Name based definition of phoenix activity, Q. Name based definition of phoe...

Q. Name based definition of phoenix activity? The approach taken in New Zealand has been to define phoenix activity in terms of the re-use of the name, or a name similar, to th

The impact of behaviour on the policy agenda, The impact of behaviour on th...

The impact of behaviour on the policy agenda To see the impact of behaviour, on the policy agenda and outcomes, which is generally not apparent, one way is to focus on the basi

Illegal partnerships - number of partners, Illegal Partnerships - Number of...

Illegal Partnerships - Number of Partners However a partnership will be illegal in the following state of affairs: like;; (a)   Whether it is formed for an illegal purpose

Change the law and move to comparative negligence, 1. Maryland is one of a ...

1. Maryland is one of a few states in which contributory negligence is a complete defense, barring the plaintiff from any recovery. What is contributory negligence? How does it com

Ethical decision making project, This activity brings together the ethical ...

This activity brings together the ethical issues, concepts, and statutes presented in your readings, lectures, and discussed in your chat sessions. You will select two (2) scenario

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd