User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

The impact of behaviour on the policy agenda, The impact of behaviour on th...

The impact of behaviour on the policy agenda To see the impact of behaviour, on the policy agenda and outcomes, which is generally not apparent, one way is to focus on the basi

Determine the term - games nations play, Games nations play Game analog...

Games nations play Game analogy can be used to get the idea because the principal players, states reject any higher authority. Each state, take any player in a competitive game

Ex-ship contracts - import and export trade, Ex-Ship Contracts - Import and...

Ex-Ship Contracts - Import and Export Trade Therefore whether goods are sold ex ship, such the duties of the seller are-like; (i) To deliver the goods to the buyer from suc

Analyse and discuss to minority shareholders, "Within a company there are m...

"Within a company there are many areas of potential disagreement among members. As the range of potential disagreement is very broad, so also is the scope for exploitation and abus

Adequacy of consideration - law of contract, Adequacy of consideration - La...

Adequacy of consideration - Law of Contract Well provided that consideration is sufficient, or actual it necessitate not be adequate.  Hence the court will not compare the val

Fraudulent preference - liquidator, Fraudulent preference - liquidator: ...

Fraudulent preference - liquidator: When a transaction is void as a fraudulent preference any charge created is void and any cash paid or property transferred by the company

What is meant by ratio decidendi, Question: (a) Explian the various sta...

Question: (a) Explian the various stages that a Bill must go through before it becomes enforceable as a Law in Mauritius. (c) Mr. Vijay is the tenant of a house situated at

Fair work ombudsman options, Q. Fair Work Ombudsman options? The follow...

Q. Fair Work Ombudsman options? The following are a range of potential options for the FWO to mitigate phoenix activity. These options recognise that the FWO does not currently

Teleological approach to client representation- case, Bobby K is pursuing t...

Bobby K is pursuing the teleological approach to client representation, meaning that the result is all he's after - case closed! Not exactly a win-win but a "settlement" and closur

Explain causation, Explain the Causation, Remoteness and Contributory Negli...

Explain the Causation, Remoteness and Contributory Negligence in short. Causation: When the accident was going to occur anyway then causation is not proved, which is a third

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd