Boolean operations - class of recognizable languages, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations.

The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a given string is in either or both of any pair of recognizable languages. We can modify the construction for other Boolean operations simply by selecting the appropriate set of accepting states:

• Union: Let F′

= {(q, p) | q ∈ F1 or p ∈ F2}. Then L(A′ ) = L1 ∪ L2.

• Relative complement: Let F′ = F1 × (Q2 - F2). Then L(A′ ) = L1 -L2.

• Complement: Let L1 = Σ* and use the construction for relative complement.


Related Discussions:- Boolean operations - class of recognizable languages

Mapping reducibility, Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know...

Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?

Algorithm, What is the Best way to write algorithm and construct flow chart...

What is the Best way to write algorithm and construct flow chart? What is Computer? How to construct web page and Designe it?

Operations on strictly local languages, The class of Strictly Local Languag...

The class of Strictly Local Languages (in general) is closed under • intersection but is not closed under • union • complement • concatenation • Kleene- and positive

Vogel Approximation Method(VAM, how to write program Minimum Cost Calculat...

how to write program Minimum Cost Calculation - Vogel Approximation Method(VAM

Automaton for finite languages, We can then specify any language in the cla...

We can then specify any language in the class of languages by specifying a particular automaton in the class of automata. We do that by specifying values for the parameters of the

Kleene closure, So we have that every language that can be constructed from...

So we have that every language that can be constructed from SL languages using Boolean operations and concatenation (that is, every language in LTO) is recognizable but there are r

Class of local languages is not closed under union, Both L 1 and L 2 are ...

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

Decision problems of regular languages, We'll close our consideration of re...

We'll close our consideration of regular languages by looking at whether (certain) problems about regular languages are algorithmically decidable.

Finite automata, design an automata for strings having exactly four 1''s

design an automata for strings having exactly four 1''s

Grammer, write grammer to produce all mathematical expressions in c.

write grammer to produce all mathematical expressions in c.

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd