Boolean operations - class of recognizable languages, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations.

The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a given string is in either or both of any pair of recognizable languages. We can modify the construction for other Boolean operations simply by selecting the appropriate set of accepting states:

• Union: Let F′

= {(q, p) | q ∈ F1 or p ∈ F2}. Then L(A′ ) = L1 ∪ L2.

• Relative complement: Let F′ = F1 × (Q2 - F2). Then L(A′ ) = L1 -L2.

• Complement: Let L1 = Σ* and use the construction for relative complement.


Related Discussions:- Boolean operations - class of recognizable languages

NP complete, I want a proof for any NP complete problem

I want a proof for any NP complete problem

Mapping reducibility, (c) Can you say that B is decidable? (d) If you someh...

(c) Can you say that B is decidable? (d) If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?

Pojects idea, i want to do projects for theory of computation subject what ...

i want to do projects for theory of computation subject what topics should be best.

Prism algorithm, what exactly is this and how is it implemented and how to ...

what exactly is this and how is it implemented and how to prove its correctness, completeness...

Turing machine, Can v find the given number is palindrome or not using turi...

Can v find the given number is palindrome or not using turing machine

Ogdens lemma, proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand ...

proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand the meaning of distinguished position .

Possibility of recognizing the palindrome language, Computer has a single F...

Computer has a single FIFO queue of ?xed precision unsigned integers with the length of the queue unbounded. You can use access methods similar to those in the third model. In this

Complement - operations on languages, The fact that SL 2 is closed under i...

The fact that SL 2 is closed under intersection but not under union implies that it is not closed under complement since, by DeMorgan's Theorem L 1 ∩ L 2 = We know that

Local myhill graphs, Myhill graphs also generalize to the SLk case. The k-f...

Myhill graphs also generalize to the SLk case. The k-factors, however, cannot simply denote edges. Rather the string σ 1 σ 2 ....... σ k-1 σ k asserts, in essence, that if we hav

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd