Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
AUDIT RISK
As we have seen many parties rely on the audit opinion to make decisions, and therefore it is now a well established fact that if the auditor gives an audit opinion that is wrong in some particular then they stand a chance of suffering some damage.
Audit risk therefore could be defined as the chance of damage to the audit firm as a result of giving an opinion that is wrong in some particular. Or put another way, it could be explained as the possibility that financial statements contain material mis-statements which had escaped detection by both an internal control on which the auditor has relied and on the auditor's own substantive tests and other work.
It could be looked at also as: the possibility that the auditor may be required to pay damages to the client or other persons as a consequence of:1. The financial statements containing a mis-statement;2. The complaining party suffering a loss as a direct consequence of relying on the financial statement and 3. Negligence by the auditor in not detecting any reporting on the mis-statement which can be demonstrated.
Damage to the audit firm or the auditor may be in the form of monetary damages paid to the complainant as compensation or simply damage to their reputation with a client or the business community.
All audits involve an element of risk such that however strong the audit evidence and however careful the auditor, there is always a possibility of an error or a fraud going undetected. It is generally known that the auditor who organises his office and staff in a competent manner and follows auditing standards and guidelines is unlikely to be found negligent and to pay damages as a consequence of fraud or error not being discovered by him.
Audit risk can be either normal or higher than normal.
Will I be able to download immediately once I purchase this assignment?
In June 2004, Feltex Carpets Limited raised NZ $254 million in an initial public offering. Twenty seven months later the company was in receivership, its share price having collaps
a) Would King & Queen be liable to EFL? Provide specific case references to support your answer.
Techniques of Obtaining Evidence ISA 500 mentions them as such: Inspection of documents or records, Inspection of tangible assets, Observation, Inq
factors that influence auditors judgement on sufficiency of audit evidence
Relevance - Sources of evidence The auditor obtains evidence either through compliance testing of the internal controls or through substantive tests of the information contain
Examination of Deeds Make Sure that the mortgage is in the name shown in the advance records; That there is a document of title to the property within mortgage and that
list and explain four factors that influence the auditor''s judgement regarding the sufficiency if the evidence obtain
Higher normal risk Several audit assignments involve high audit risk and usually in any client there will always be at least one high risk area. Indications that an audit has
AUDIT RISK As we have seen many parties rely on the audit opinion to make decisions, and therefore it is now a well established fact that if the auditor gives an audit opinion
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd