Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Arguments against workers participation: workers participation is always not favoured by managers because of the following factors:
1. Inefficient workers: some managers discount worker participation on the ground that the workers are inefficient in taking decisions. Decision making in an intellectual job and workers are in general less intelligent when compared to the executives. In the eyes of employers and management workers are less educated incompetent and unintelligent and ineffective in taking decision. Thus it is not necessary for management to allow the workers to participate in decision making.
2. Participation is not possible in complicated issues: it is not always possible to extend participation in some complicated issues like financing marketing managerial functions such as planning organizing coordinating controlling. Today management has become highly professionalized activity demanding experienced experts for solving typical problems encountered by organizations. Decisions taken by professional's management people would be more effective than the decisions taken by the managers at the functional level and employees taken together. It is not rare to hire outside professionals consultants for solving some basic problems encountered by organizations than resorting to simple traditional worker participation.
3. Weak trade unions: in some countries trade unions are weak. US is not an exception to this. In US trade unions are dominated by political pressures and ideologies concentrating least on the welfare of the employees and organizations. Labour is highly unorganized and never works on equal footing posing a problem to participation. Effective worker participation requires strong labour union and welfare motivated ideology rather than weak union and politically motivated ideology.
These characteristics tend to create a group of individuals rather than a cohesive team. What concerns Hambrick (1994) is that a lack of information exchange, collaboration, and jo
Question 1: a) Critically discuss the issues behind the reality and rhetoric practice of HRM in modern organizations. b) Discuss the various drivers of retention you would
Objective performance measures: Objective performance measures are indications of job performance that can be verified by others and are usually quantitative. Objective criteri
Question 1: (a) Distinguish between monitoring and assessment. Support your answer by giving one example of each. (b) Write short notes on the two types of assessment.
Explain Crucial and value-adding knowledge The decision to invest in knowledge depends upon knowing what knowledge is relevant and crucial to the organisation and what knowledg
Difference between personnel management and human resource management
Most certainly. Transition and action processes are more influential for performance outcomes. For example, if a team is facing issues with product development time and quality, de
Question: (a) A new manager complains to you that she is unable to get her team to do what she tells them to do. Show how an understanding of both power and leadership might be
Depth interview: in this type of interview, would be examined extensively in core areas of knowledge and skills of the job. Experts in that particular field examine the candidates
Q. Training and Counselling? Training: if there is any confusion about what the job is and what is supposed to be done, proper training efforts cannot be identified. Whether
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd