Acceptance - element of contract, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:

Acceptance - Element of Contract

However this is the external manifestation about assent through the offeree.  Regarding to acceptance an agreement comes with existence between the parties. Further acceptance takes place on a very subjective moment whether the minds about the parties meet like i.e. as Consensus ad idem. Whether this is the moment at whereas an agreement comes with existence. Conversely this subjectivity must be like "externalised". Hence this is referred for as acceptance.

Moreover this offer and acceptance award rise to consensus, consequently agreement. Thus these two elements constitute such the foundation about every contractual relationship although cannot through themselves constitute a contract.

  • However the offeree must have been aware about and must have intended for accept the offer whether as he did what is such alleged to be the acceptance: as The Crown v. Clarke (Australian case and a persuasive precedent in the US).  The Clarke had made his statement to the police in such order to save himself from the unfounded charge of that murder.  Hence he had not prepared the statement in instruct to accept the offer such he had forgotten about at the material time.  Hence it is statement was not consequently an acceptance for the offer to pay the reward.
  • Next is the offeree's assent must be notify, to the offeror or made known as Household Fire Insurance C. Ltd. V. Grant.

Illustrating such the case of Felthouse v. Bindely whereas it was held in such the nephew's information to auctioneer which the horse had been sold could not comprise an acceptance of the plaintiff's offer for the reason that he as the plaintiff had not been told anything through the nephew.

Exception

However an uncommunicated receiving will be effective whether from the words of the offer that the offeror can be regarded as having waived such the right to be informed of the acceptance: as  Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. Whereas as Mrs. Carlill was with as having accepted the defendant company's offer but she had not told them since she would buy and required the carbolic smoke balls.


Related Discussions:- Acceptance - element of contract

Who is liable to income tax?, QUESTION 1 Discuss the legal relationship...

QUESTION 1 Discuss the legal relationship between a bank and its customer with reference to the responsibilities of the parties towards each other QUESTION 2 (a) Examin

Allotment of shares, ALLOTMENT OF SHARES: An allotment, legally, is th...

ALLOTMENT OF SHARES: An allotment, legally, is the company's acceptance of an offer to buy its shares. Thus we can say it is governed by the following rules of the common law

Advise as conflict of interest, A is large property developer who is listed...

A is large property developer who is listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. B is a building contractor. A employed B in 2008 to build a large office complex comprising 3 towers

Express and implied terms of contract, Express and Implied terms of contrac...

Express and Implied terms of contract Express terms However the terms of a contract are said to like "express terms" whether the parties themselves adverted to them on

Employer pay severance allowance to his employee, QUESTION 1 What are t...

QUESTION 1 What are the consequences of a unilateral modification of a contract of employment of indeterminate duration by an employer? QUESTION 2 (a) In what circumsta

Directors remuneration - company management, Directors' Remuneration: ...

Directors' Remuneration: For technical reasons the directors are not regarded as servants or employees of the company of that they are directors. Therefore  here they have no

Which was the first global treaty, Which was the first global treaty T...

Which was the first global treaty The IAEA was the first global treaty regulating and facilitating the trade of nuclear technology through its provisions. Within the framework

Difference between plain meaning and the liberal approaches, What is the d...

What is the difference between the plain meaning and the liberal approaches to the interpretation of contracts? Provide me with an example of each to show me you understand the dif

Qualifications of advocates, Qualifications of Advocates Conversely fo...

Qualifications of Advocates Conversely for qualify to admission as an advocate one must as; Be a US citizen or can say Possess a law degree from a recognized

"detriment" as consideration, "Detriment" as consideration  An example...

"Detriment" as consideration  An example of a 'detriment' that will legally suffice like the consideration for a promise is provided with the case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd