This Assessment item/ Answer(s) aims to achieve Learning Outcomes 1, 2 and 3
|
This assignment provides youwith the opportunity to use the content knowledge gained so far in the subject, and for us to assess your ability to: (a) discuss and analyse the statement given, and agree or disagree with it, and (b) explain the costs and benefits of the strategy.
|
In addition to the level achieved for a Distinction, the answer provides a sound justification for the conclusion (agree/ disagree) based on relevant research/ references. The response adds to the answer an economic analysis and provides consequences of the conclusion/ recommendation, and further brings in to the analysis/ discussion what the role of business/ government could be in the scenario that is discussed in the answer.
|
In addition to the level achieved for a Credit grade, the Assessment Item/ Answer adds a brief description of trade between Australia and China, provides a good justification for the conclusion which will be either agree/ disagree.
|
In addition to the level achieved for a Pass grade, the Assessment Item/ Answer should be able to recognise the correct economic theory and the associated diagram(s)/ model(s) for the analysis. The response will be able to explain the basics of the theory and of the construction of the diagram(s)/ model(s) and analyse the statement, and provide a justification for the conclusion which will be either agree/ disagree.
|
Provides in 'everyday language' a summary of the correct answer (without reference to diagrams) to the question asked. This summary includes a succinct description of the point from where the analysis commences, identification of the concept(s) behind the statement, a brief evaluation of the statement, and a justification for the answer.
|
The Assessment Item/ Answer(s) fail(s) to achieve the level required for a Pass: Fails to demonstrate knowledge of key principles & concepts. There is no evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Contains only a few ideas, but not presented in a manner that make sense. Lack of integrated arguments.
|
|
|
Accurate use of syntax, spelling and punctuation, correctly refers to an extensive variety of sources to support arguments, including prescribed texts and a broad range of additional readings; reference list of an extensive range of resources used, correctly formatted using APA style.
|
Accurate use of syntax, spelling and punctuation; succinct and effective use of vocabulary; correctly refers to a broad range of sources to support arguments, including prescribed text and a variety of further readings; reference lists includes a range of relevant resources used, correctly formatted using APA style.
|
Accurate use of syntax, vocabulary, spelling and punctuation; correctly refers to more than the minimum requirement of sources to support arguments, including prescribed texts and recommended readings; reference list formatted in APA style, with few or no errors.
|
Mostly accurate syntax, spelling and punctuation; correctly refers to minimum number of sources to support arguments, including prescribed texts; reference list used, formatted in APA style, with minor errors.
|
Incorrect and/ or inappropriate use of syntax, vocabulary, spelling and punctuation; in-text citation is inaccurate, inappropriate and/ or inadequate; reference list is omitted, incomplete and/ or contains numerous errors.
|