Referencing 5% Provided a comprehensive reference list and accurately referenced all sources using the correct referencing style. References used are relevant, m irront and frnm a nnrnnriato litarnti Ira% Used correct referencing style accurately. References used are relevant. current. and from appropriate literature sources. Used correct referencing style generally accurately. References used are relevant. current. and from appropriate literature cni irroc Used correct referencing style but with frequent errors. Some references not relevant. Used incorrect referencing style or made a large numbe referencing errors. Paforamrcc not radani

Presentation 5% Excellent presentation style is in accordance with guidelines. Layout and formatting is clear and easy to read. Adheres to word limit. Presentation style is in accordance with guidelines including adherence to word limit. Good layout and formatting. Presentation style is in accordance with guidelines including adherence to word limit. Some effort has been made to address layout and formatting. Presentation style is in accordance with guidelines including adherence to word limit. Layout and formatting satisfactory. Presentation style is accordance with guidelines including adherence to word Iii Layout and formattin unsatisfactory.

Communication 10% Content is communicated clearly and concisely in a professional academic way. Objective and authentic writing style. Evidence of critical discussion, linkage and integration of information. Assignment is easy to read with logical flow of content. Clear communication technical terms explained where necessary. Objective and well developed writing style which enhances readability of the assignment's content. Technical terms explained where necessary. Evidence of development of objective writing style. Assignment flows. Technical terms not consistently used or explained. Writing may be descriptive and/or relies on generalisations. Does not demonstrate a logical flow of ideas. Frequent errors in grammar, writing styl and/or spelling which not allow the assignr to flow.

Research 15% Precise, refined critical discussion that demonstrates integration of research and information. Originality of thought and creativity in the development and interpretation of ideas. Clearly expressed, critical discussion that demonstrates good integration of research and information. Originality of thought evident in the interpretation of ideas. Clarity of ideas, originality, creativity and soundness. Evidence of critical thinking, linkage and integration of ideas. Evidence of engagement in the research and integration however not always clear and/or not original or creative. Work does not demonstrate engagement in the research or clarity of ideas.

Synthesises content — 10% Comprehensive and accurate review informed by in-depth exploration of the relevant theories of practice development in relation to Person Centred Care. Demonstrates relevance and integration of the CIP principle Provides a thorough review of the relevant theories of practice development in relation to Person Centred Care. Provides insight into the CIP principle. Demonstrates an understanding of the relevant theories of practice development in relation to Person Centred Care. CIP principle addressed and relevant connections apparent. Some understanding of the relevant theories of practice development in relation to Person Centred Care. CIP principle inconsistently addressed and/or not adequately addressed. No evidence of understanding of the relevant theories of practice developmen CIP principles not addressed.

Relevance of content information — 30% Insightful, thoughtful and accurate exploration of the clinical and professional implications of Person Centred Care. Provides an accurate and thorough exploration of the clinical and professional implications of Person Centred Care. Demonstrates good understanding of the application of Person Centred Care in a clinical context. Describes the impact of Person Centred Care in the clinical context. Does not address the impact of Person Centred Care in the clinical context.

Percentage High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Meets aims of assignment 30% Demonstrates the ability to comprehensively investigate Person Centred Care and to explore its relevance to practice development. Assignment shows deep understanding of the key concepts. Demonstrates the ability to investigate Person Centred Care and to explore its relevance to practice development. Assignment shows good of the key concepts. Demonstrates a good overall understanding of Person Centred Care and its relevance to practice development. Understanding of Person Centred Care is general but sound and relates to practice development. Does not demonstral an understanding of Person Centred Care its relevance to praci development.

Tools for practice development assignment please use only practice development reference minimum 20 Assessment Criteria Meets aims of assignment — 30% Relevance of content information — 30% Synthesises content — 10% Communicates clearly and uses appropriate academic language — 10% Appropriately uses supporting literature and research — 10% Adheres to school requirements with regard to presentation, referencing and word limit.- 10%