Reference no: EM131290716 , Length: word count:2000
This CTP is to be written per APA style and remember to cite! Refer to Purdue Owl website or the Student writing Center for questions. The purpose of this rubric is to provide you feedback on your Critical Thinking papers and to give you suggestions for improvement.
PART TWO
APPLICATION
Apply the ethical principle of a major ethical theory to reach a resolution of the central ethical issue. Apply two different theories.(1st theory: Consequential -Mandatory, Act utilitarianism, as well as, a 2nd theory: virtue ethics, natural law, natural rights, deontology (Kant) or contractarianism). You can choose the second theory, but it has to be Non-Consequential. Reminder: Egoism may NOT be used!
A brief statement and explanation of the theory/theorist's history, frame/type and what that means, and main principle should be included before applying it. When you apply the principle, you should weigh each option you identified in your analysis according to the principle's "main idea." You are strongly advised to use the "Steps in Applying" the theories presented in the chapters on consequentialist and non-consequentialist theories. Be as detailed as you can in your discussion of each option.
DECISION-MAKING :
Choose the option that you think is the wisest, most ethical option and justify your decision. This should not be an unsupported opinion. Using your analysis and application, as well as consideration of any other relevant rules, laws, or new researched evidence from the case, then select and defend (explain why) the option you think is most morally right/permissible.Remember that the theory helps guide the best decision! *Include in this section either a deductive (classical syllogism) or inductive argument. (refer to ch. 4 in your textbook).
EVALUATION :
Effective reasoning involves being able to consider other perspectives. This section should help develop that skill. So, identify at least two objections to your conclusion or arguments against the option that you selected as being morally right or ethically permissible. What might someone who disagrees with you say as a rebuttal? How would you defend against those arguments? (Similar to a debate.)
REFLECTION :
Reflect/self-evaluate your own thought process. What did you learn about the way you think by having gone through a systematic approach to the case study? What could you do to improve? How might you use this process to make decisions in your own life?
Note: Reflection should NOT be a "conclusion" like in a paper for an English class where you just restate all of your previous opinions. Rather, you should be thinking about your own thinking (metacognition)! Refer to your TEXTBOOK for various questions to answer in this section.
FORMAT, LENGTH. & COMPOSITION :
One goal of these papers is to improve your writing, so part of the score depends on composition. Organize your thoughts carefully, explain them clearly, and proofread for errors in grammar and composition. Each paper must be formatted according to APA standards! Any outside sources must be properly cited.The entire critical thinking paper must be at least 2,000 words long.
|
Develop a proposal for each of the given approaches
: Develop a proposal for each of these approaches: insourcing, outsourcing, and a combination of the two. Present the pros and cons or benefit analysis for each of the 3 proposals.
|
|
Calculate the net swap payment, indicating which party pays
: If the stock index is at 1,275.89 on the first payment date, calculate the net swap payment, indicating which party pays it.
|
|
What would you recommend charles do now
: 1. What would be the benefits of raising the $3 million through a private placement? What would be the benefits of raising the money through a venture capitalist? 2. Of these two approaches, which would be best for Charles? Why? 3. What would you r..
|
|
Develop an overall work breakdown structure for system
: Develop an overall work breakdown structure (WBS) for the 7 system development life cycle (SDLC) phases: Preliminary Analysis, System Analysis or Requirements Definition and System Design.
|
|
Write a paper about the critical thinking
: A brief statement and explanation of the theory/theorist's history, frame/type and what that means, and main principle should be included before applying it. When you apply the principle, you should weigh each option you identified in your analys..
|
|
Appeal for a venture capitalist
: Would a commercial banker be willing to lend money to the Abramses? How much? On what do you base your answer? Would this venture have any appeal for a venture capitalist? Why or why not? If you were advising the Abramses, how would you recommend the..
|
|
How the two types of swaptions are like interest rate option
: Explain how a bank could use a swaption to hedge the possibility that it will enter into a pay floating, receive-fixed swap at a later date ? Explain how a forward swap is like a swaption and how it is different .
|
|
Do you think the united states
: In your own words. Do you think the United States is more or less likely to face another housing crisis similar to the one experienced in 2008? Explain. (At least 250 words)
|
|
How the bank would use a swap to achieve this objective
: It would like to use a swap to synthetically alter the payments on the loan it holds. The rate it could obtain on a plain vanilla swap is 7.25 percent. Explain how the bank would use a swap to achieve this objective.
|