Good quick response to any of my query. Looks good quality and the expert read the case and provided a proper response instead of rushing despite needed it after 5 hours of asking for help. Instructions were followed correctly, the assignment is prepared correctly too! Cool.

In-text citations and Reference list APA formatted Weighting 5% More than 5 errors. 4-5 errors. 2-3 errors. 1 error. No errors.

Research Weighting 20% No authoritative sources, no evidence of research or not relevant for the task. Very limited understanding. The research has not been linked to the main text. Less than 2 authoritative sources or sources are not relevant for the task. Limited understanding. Little evidence of meaningful integration of the research with the main text. 2-3 scholarly sources. Some sources lack relevance or authority but are still appropriate for the task. Adequate understanding. The research could be incorporated with the 3-4 scholarly sources. Sources are mostly well-chosen, authoritative and appropriate for the task. Good understanding. The research is integrated with the main text. 4-5 scholarly sources. Sources are well- chosen, authoritative and are appropriate for the task. Excellent understanding. The research is very well integrated with the main text.

Writing Weighting 5% No consideration for presentation. Muddled writing that is very difficult to follow. Numerous grammatical errors. Multiple spelling errors. Acceptable presentation. Long winded and some clear writing presentation. Some grammatical errors. Multiple spelling errors. Tidy presentation. Mostly clear writing but at times long winded. Writing style lacks consideration. Few issues around grammar. Less than 5 spelling errors. Professional presentation. Clear writing mainly to the point. Considered writing style. Excellent grammar with only minor oversights. Less than 3 spelling errors. Polished presentation. Clear and concise writing. Mature and appropriate writing style. Excellent grammar, correct in all aspects. No spelling errors.

Organisation/ logic Weighting 5% No flow. No argument. Poorly organised and difficult to read. Does not flow logically from one part to another. The argument is not clear. Generally well organised although the flow of the argument is not always logical. Argument is clear and mostly sound. Coherently organised and logical formation of sound argument. Exceptionally well structured. Logic is easy to follow. Arguments are sound and convincing.

Part 2. Identify theoretical approaches for team building and provide examples of a relevant team building approach in a selected context. Application of theory in developing a team building programme Weighting 25% Theoretical approaches to team building not evidenced Theoretical approaches to team building not adequate Adequate coverage of theoretical approaches to team building. Would be improved with more detail. Strong coverage of the theory behind team building approaches is evident. Thoughtful and comprehensive coverage. The inclusion of theory in the team building approach is insightful and multidimensional. Excellent selection of team building theory fitting superbly into the team building context.

Mar king schedule Criteria E (0-39) D (40-49) C (50-64) B (65-79) A (80-100) Part 1. Team building goals and plans Develop goals and team/group processes to achieve objectives and justify the approach with reference to business communication theories and models. Weighting 40% Plan omits important considerations Plan contains some good thinking but overall would be unrealistic. Some of the goals and activities described are inadequate or irrelevant. Adequate coverage of the main components required in a team building programme. Programme is generally realistic but would be improved with more detail. Team building programme shows a strong understanding of the components in a team building programme. Good insight is shown into the practicalities of applying theory in a work programme. Interesting selection of options. An excellent team building programme. Comprehensive coverage of planning needs. Detail and discussion go beyond expectation. Excellent selection of options