Amazing work. I really appreciate the team work you do. Solution is provided always on time, i'm really happy with the service. All the task members are really polite and helps in sorting out every problem. Thanks

for the two tasks, I hope you don't have any query Please provide the solution of this assignment in paragraphs like the introduction, Literature review, Methodology Followed in Paper, Parameters Studied, and Results and Discussion. Also you have to add the Results and Discussion. All this include in the task 1( Its not mentioned in my requirement file but still please note it and provide this in the solution i forgot top tell one more point i hope your writer still not completed this assignment, Please include the scope of the study in the solution aS well . write in general only don't write in details. also needed Review of Literature i mean literature review. Also don't forget to write key words of the articles under abstract. I attached one of my colleague's assignment who got A. Please follow it in task 1. 26118725_1sample 1.docx 26118744_2sample.docx Thanks, Please provide the solution till given deadline.

Description Marks In text Citations For the ten citations, 2 mark each for correct in-text citations (10x2=20marks) References For the corresponding 10 References, 3 mark each for correct listing of references to confirm to the CCE- Harvard Referencing style. (10x3 = 30marks)

CRITICAL ANALYSIS (30 MARKS) OUTSTANDING EXCELLENT VERY GOOD GOOD SATISFACTORY FAIL MARKS DOES THE WORK SHOW AN UNDERSTANDING OF TECHNICAL CONTENTS OF THE PAPER? (MAX. 5 MARKS) COULD THE STUDENT CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PAPER AND RELATE THAT TO OTHER EARLIER WORKS CITED IN THE PAPER? (MAX. 5 MARKS) DID THE STUDENT ARGUE / EVALUATE THE METHODS / TECHNIQUES USED BY THE AUTHORS OF THE PAPER? (MAX. 10 MARKS) COULD THE STUDENT IDENTIFY ANY WEAKNESSES IN THE PAPER? (MAX. 5 MARKS) IS ANY SCOPE FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION IDENTIFIED BY THE STUDENT? (MAX. 5 MARKS)

* Please ? the option and assign the marks appropriately in the ‘Marks’ column. ABSTRACT (20 MARKS) OUTSTANDING (90-100) EXCELLENT (80-89) VERY GOOD (70-79) GOOD (60-69) SATISFACTORY (50-59) FAIL (<50%) MARKS ABSTRACT DEVELOPMENT (MAX.10 MARKS) WRITING QUALITY: LOGICAL AND FOCUSED (MAX. 5 MARKS) BASIC GRAMMAR, SPELLING AND OTHER CONVENTIONS. (MAX. 5 MARKS)

Marking scheme Component Description Weightage (%) 1 Knowledge and understanding of the topic 30% 2 Application and analysis of the topic (Module specific Skill) 35% 3 The structure in terms of logic and coherence 30% 4 The use of relevant work examples and/or examples gained from further reading 5% Total 100

S.No Type of Resource Citation (In-text) –CCE Harvard Style Reference List Entry 1. Journal Paper …………….. …………………….. 2. Book ………. …………………… 3. Website ……. ………………………… 4 Image in Book

CONTENT MAX MARKS In text Citations For the ten citations, 2 mark each for correct in-text citations 10x2 = 20 References For the corresponding 10 References, 3 mark each for correct listing of references to confirm to the CCE- Harvard Referencing style. 10x3 = 30 TOTAL 50

CONTENT MAX MARKS DOES THE WORK SHOW AN UNDERSTANDING OF TECHNICAL CONTENTS OF THE PAPER? 5 COULD THE STUDENT CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PAPER AND RELATE THAT TO OTHER EARLIER WORKS CITED IN THE PAPER? 5 DID THE STUDENT ARGUE / EVALUATE THE METHODS / TECHNIQUES USED BY THE AUTHORS OF THE PAPER? 10 COULD THE STUDENT IDENTIFY ANY WEAKNESSES IN THE PAPER? 5 IS ANY SCOPE FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION IDENTIFIED BY THE STUDENT? 5 TOTAL 30

write a critical analysis and an abstract based on the scientific information available in the paper. also, I attached the article paper for task 1 and For the task 2 area of the project is energy production and oil substitutes [CONTENT MAX MARKS ABSTRACT DEVELOPMENT 10 WRITING QUALITY, LOGICAL AND FOCUSED 5 BASIC GRAMMAR, SPELLING AND OTHER CONVENTIONS 5 TOTAL 20