Why was it not followed up

Assignment Help Econometrics

Reference no: EM131046929

Mattel, Inc. Originators of "Bill and Hold" Toy with Accounting

Story Mattel, Inc. of El Segundo, California designs, manufactures and markets various toy products worldwide. Mattel brands include: Barbie dolls and accessories, Hot Wheels, Matchbox, Nickelodeon, Harry Potter, Yu-Gi-Oh!, He-Man and Masters of the Universe, Fisher-Price, Sesame Street, Winnie the Pooh, Blue's Clues, Barney, and View-Master, as well as games and puzzles. Almost from its founding in 1945, Mattel was very successful, but the company began experiencing serious problems in the early 1970s. Mattel tried several accounting schemes to keep their growth high including a "bill and hold" program, understatement of inventory reserves, improper amortization of tooling costs, non-payment of royalties, and booking insurance recovery in the wrong period. (Knapp 2001) Here we will address the sales and accounts receivable "bill and hold" issues.

Mattel Invents the Term

In order to inflate the company's reported earnings, top executives established the "bill and hold" program. This was the first instance of the term "bill and hold" for the practice of billing customers for future sales, recording the sales immediately, and holding on to the inventory - bill and hold. The SEC gave several reasons why the subject sales should not have been recorded in 1991 (SEC 1981):

¦ The merchandise was not shipped.

¦ The merchandise was not physically segregated from Mattel's inventory.

¦ The customer could cancel the order without penalty.

¦ Mattel retained the risks of ownership.

¦ In many instances, the invoices were prepared without knowledge of the customer.

Covering Their Tracks

To support the bill and hold sales, Mattel prepared bogus sales orders, sales invoices, and bills of lading. The bills of lading were signed by the same employees as both themselves and a common carrier and were stamped "bill and hold" on the face. When the goods were actually sold much later, Mattel's inventory records were full of errors. To resolve the problem, Mattel reversed the sales booked, but this created negative sales for the next period. To fix that problem, Mattel booked a fictitious $11 million sale in their general ledger, but not their accounts receivable subsidiary ledger, creating an unreconciled difference. They reversed another $7 million of the remaining bill and hold sales in fiscal 1992. (SEC 1981)

The Audit of Sales

Mattel's auditors, Arthur Andersen, sent accounts receivable confirmations. The confirmations were returned with discrepancies in what the customers claimed and what Mattel booked. To resolve the discrepancies, the auditors obtained copies of bills of lading to determine whether goods had actually been shipped. Even though the bills of lading were stamped "bill and hold," the auditors never asked Mattel to explain the phrase. Furthermore, the bills of lading lacked required routing or delivery instructions. The employee signatures as themselves and common carriers did not get noticed. (SEC 1981) When the auditors looked at fiscal 1972 they found the $7 million reversing entry that caused that month's general ledger sales to be $7 million less than the sales figure in the corresponding sales invoice register. The staff auditor accepted the explanation of a Mattel employee that the offset to sales was due to "invoicing errors" uncovered by Mattel employees when comparing computer-prepared invoices to bills of lading. The Andersen senior reviewing the workpapers wrote the staff person, "Need a better explanation. This looks like a big problem," but the problem was investigated no further. (Knapp 2001) Had Arthur Anderson utilized analytical procedures to evaluate the overall reasonableness of Mattel's monthly sales, they should have discovered that monthly sales varied dramatically from 1970 to 1972. This was a result of errors introduced by the bill and hold scheme and the subsequent reversals.

Discussion Questions

¦ What alternative audit procedures could the Andersen auditors perform when (or if) they found the inconsistencies in conformations and bills of lading?

¦ Why do you think the staff auditor accepted the explanation of the $7 million discrepancy by the Mattel employee?

¦ Why was it not followed up?

Reference no: EM131046929

Questions Cloud

What is meant by map : What is meant by MAP?

Find the kernel : Let G be a group and let φ: S3 → G be a non-trivial homomorphism. Suppose φ is not injective. Find the kernel of φ. If φ is surjective, what is G

Which most likely would yield the most predictable evidence : Auditors try to identify predictable relationships when using analytical procedures. Relationships involving transactions from which of the following accounts most likely would yield the most predictable evidence?

Identify factors that may interfere with training goals : Identify three factors that may interfere with the accomplishing your training goals. You may include internal or external variables. You may also include some of your own personal obstacles that kept you from achieving your goal.

Why was it not followed up : In many instances, the invoices were prepared without knowledge of the customer.

Organizations such as events like graduations : The company will compete other businesses in the industry and will have the competitive advantage because where are going to extend the market to smaller organizations such as events like graduations.

Determine whether the amortization period is reasonable : In auditing intangible assets, an auditor most likely would review or recompute amortization and determine whether the amortization period is reasonable in support of management's financial statement assertion of:

A particular average loss and a general average loss : a. What is the difference between a particular average loss and a general average loss in ocean marine insurance?b. What conditions must be fulfilled to have a general average loss?

Question regarding the breach of contract : The businesses are being sued for breach of contract. Create a matrix that lists each business, and compare and contrast your personal liability exposure as an owner as a result of the lawsuit.

User Account

All Pages