Why the supreme court of canada should revisit this case

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM133294195

Assignment:

Pretend that you are a lawyer and have to make your opening statement in Defence of Reuben "Hurricane" Carter at the SCC INSTEAD of the Supreme Court of America, after he had been in jail for most of his life despite being innocent. State how and why the Supreme Court of Canada should revisit this case and let Carter go free based on his Charter rights and the evidence used to convict him. (1 pg., 12 point font) (Application).

Reference no: EM133294195

Questions Cloud

Concepts of actual notice and constructive notice : Compare and contrast the concepts of actual notice and constructive notice. Give an example of each.

Would you allow this testimony : A witness on the stand is going to offer this testimony: "Jessy told me that Joey told her that he saw a martian last night before he went to sleep.

Create a irrevocable trust for benefit of his three children : Bob creates a irrevocable trust for the benefit of his three children, Jorge, Maria, and Luis.

What is the plaintiff attempting to do : What are the elements of this cause of action and has the Plaintiff satisfied them? In allegation 5, what is the Plaintiff attempting to do?

Why the supreme court of canada should revisit this case : Why the Supreme Court of Canada should revisit this case and let Carter go free based on his Charter rights and the evidence used to convict him.

Discuss streetcar : Please choose two main points that you would like to discuss Streetcar, particularly when it comes to how women are discussed, how women are victimized.

Examine jurisdiction of the international court of justice : Distinguish between, and examine the scope of, contentious and advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

How would the new hires follow records management policy : How would you make the seminar interesting? How would it ensure that the new hires follow the records management policy?

Evaluating an aspect of climate policy or law : Discuss whether you agree or disagree with this statement, support your position by critically evaluating an aspect of climate policy or law.

User Account

All Pages