Reference no: EM133296679
POSITION: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) should not be available for anyone under any circumstances, the law should revert to a blanket prohibition on assisted suicide.
COMPOUND QUESTIONS: Why should MAID not be available for anyone under any circumstances? How are autonomy, paternalism (focus on particular types), quality of life, sanctity of life, and wrongness of killing perspectives relevant and significant?
For chosen position:
DEVELOP SUPPORT: Which specific philosophical principles and theories
provide persuasive and meaningful support for your position, and how do they
support that position, i.e., which particular interpretations and applications of
those principles and theries, and why?
DRAW CONNECTIONS to REASONING of Judges: Which passages or
portions of the reasoning of the judges in the case(s) provide support for the
position you are arguing for, and how do they support that position, i.e., which
specific arguments of the judges are relevant to your arguments and why?
[Rodriguez v. Attorney General of B.C. and Carter v. Canada]
ADDRESS CRITICISMS and OBJECTIONS: What are meaningful and
impactful criticisms and objections to the position you are defending? How can
you best respond to those criticisms and objections in order to persuasively and
decisively defend your position?