Reference no: EM133549195

Case Scenario: A popular chain restaurant called Sunday Roasters decided to build a new location and had two options for construction sites, one more expensive than the other. The cheaper site abutted a waterway, which the company knew would likely become contaminated during construction. The restaurant also learned that the vibrations and noise from the machinery could disturb the wildlife, potentially affecting the fragile ecosystem for years to come. The more expensive construction site posed no threat to the local wildlife or waterways. Refer to Scenario 4.1. Julia lives in the town where Sunday Roasters has just built their new location near a fragile waterway. Julia and some of her neighbors are upset by this decision and have called for their fellow citizens to boycott the restaurant.

Question: Why should the company take their opinions into consideration? Julie and her neighbors have social responsibilities toward the company. Julia and her neighbors are stakeholders of the company. The company believes in planned obsolescence. The company is committed to consumerism.